ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07883616Updated Oct 20, 2026

Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block vs Retrolaminar Block for Pain in Lumbar Spine Surgeries

An interventional study of Morphine and Bupivacaine in Postoperative Pain After Spinal Surgery, sponsored by Zagazig University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by Zagazig University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2025, registered Oct 2026).
  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Updated Oct 20, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective randomized double-blind study aims to compare the efficacy of modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (mTLIP) block versus Retrolaminar block for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing elective two-level lumbar spine surgeries. The primary outcome is total morphine consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours.

Read the detailed description

Pain after lumbar spine surgery arises from disruption of paraspinal muscles, ligaments, and bony structures, with innervation from dorsal rami of spinal nerves. Opioids remain the cornerstone of postoperative analgesia but carry adverse effects. The mTLIP block targets the fascial plane between longissimus and iliocostalis muscles, while the Retrolaminar block deposits local anesthetic on the posterior surface of the vertebral lamina. Both target the dorsal rami. This study will compare both techniques regarding opioid consumption, pain scores, time to first rescue analgesia, block performance metrics, side effects, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain After Spinal Surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Zagazig University is the lead sponsor of 457 studies on the registry; 77 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 21 and 65 years
  • ASA physical status I or II
  • BMI \< 30 kg/m²
  • Scheduled for elective two-level lumbar spine surgery (discectomy/decompression)
  • Expected duration of surgery less than 3 hours
  • Patient's acceptance and written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infection at block site
  • Known allergy to used drugs
  • Coagulation disorder
  • History of psychiatric illness
  • Pre-existing neurological deficits
  • Presence of any metastasis
  • Previous lumbar spine surgeries
  • Patients on previous opioid therapy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (mTLIP) Block

    Preoperative ultrasound-guided mTLIP block at L3 level with 20 mL injectate (Bupivacaine 0.25% 15 mL + dexamethasone 8 mg + magnesium sulphate 300 mg per side), followed by standardized general anesthesia.

    Drug: Morphine · Drug: Bupivacaine · Drug: Dexamethasone · Drug: Magnesium Sulphate · Procedure: Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block

  • Active comparator
    Retrolaminar Block

    Preoperative ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block at L3 level with the same 20 mL injectate composition per side, followed by standardized general anesthesia.

    Drug: Morphine · Drug: Bupivacaine · Drug: Dexamethasone · Drug: Magnesium Sulphate · Procedure: Retrolaminar Block

Interventions

  • Rescue analgesic administered intravenously at a dose of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg every 2-4 hours as needed for breakthrough pain (NRS \> 3), with a maximum dose of 10 mg per administration.

    Also known as: Morphine Sulfate

  • Local anesthetic used in the block solution (0.25%, 15 mL per side).

    Also known as: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

  • Adjuvant added to the block solution (8 mg per side) to prolong analgesia.

    Also known as: Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate

  • Adjuvant added to the block solution (300 mg of 10% per side) to prolong analgesia.

    Also known as: Magnesium Sulfate

  • ProcedureModified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block

    Ultrasound-guided injection between the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles at the L3 level.

    Also known as: mTLIP Block

  • ProcedureRetrolaminar Block

    Ultrasound-guided injection on the posterior surface of the vertebral lamina at the L3 level, deep to the erector spinae muscles.

    Also known as: RLB

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total morphine consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively

    Cumulative morphine dose (mg) administered as rescue analgesia during the first 24 postoperative hours

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    Pain intensity assessed using a 10-point Numerical Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable)

    Time frame: At 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively

  2. Time to first rescue analgesia

    Time from local anesthetic injection until the patient first requests additional pain-relieving medication (NRS \> 3)

    Time frame: First 24 hours postoperatively

  3. Block performance time

    Time required to perform the block procedure

    Time frame: During block procedure

  4. Onset of sensory block

    Time from local anesthetic injection until loss of sensation in the desired dermatomes

    Time frame: Within 20-30 minutes after injection

  5. Opioid-related side effects

    Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) assessed by PONV impact scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), sedation, and respiratory depression

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  6. Patient satisfaction score

    Patient satisfaction assessed using a 4-point scale (4 = excellent, 3 = good, 2 = fair, 1 = poor)

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  7. Incidence of chronic pain

    Chronic pain will be assessed at 3 months postoperatively via a structured follow-up (telephone interview or outpatient clinic visit). Patients will be asked whether they experience persistent or recurrent pain at or around the surgical site lasting more than 3 months after surgery. Responses will be recorded as "Yes" or "No," and the proportion of patients answering "Yes" will be reported as the incidence of chronic pain, according to the IASP definition (pain persisting or recurring for more than 3 months).

    Time frame: 3 to 6 months postoperatively

  8. Time of ambulation

    Time to first mobilization after surgery

    Time frame: First 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Zagazig University Hospitals, Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management Department
    Zagazig, Sharqia Province 44519, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Klimek M, Ubben JF, Ammann J, Borner U, Klein J, Verbrugge SJ. Pain in neurosurgically treated patients: a prospective observational study. J Neurosurg. 2006 Mar;104(3):350-9. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.3.350. PubMed 16572646 ↗
  • Patel TD, McNicholas MN, Paschell PA, Arnold PM, Lee CT. Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (TLIP) block verses other paraspinal fascial plane blocks and local infiltration for enhanced pain control after spine surgery: a systematic review. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02500-1. PubMed 38539065 ↗
  • Kamel AAF, Fahmy AM, Medhat MM, Ali Elmesallamy WAE, Salem DAE. Retrolaminar block for opioid-free anaesthesia and enhanced recovery after posterior lumbar discectomy: A randomised controlled study. Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Mar;68(3):261-266. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_773_23. Epub 2024 Feb 22. PubMed 38476544 ↗
  • Pfeiffer G, Oppitz N, Schone S, Richter-Heine I, Hohne M, Koltermann C. [Analgesia of the axilla using a paravertebral catheter in the lamina technique]. Anaesthesist. 2006 Apr;55(4):423-7. doi: 10.1007/s00101-005-0969-0. German. PubMed 16404582 ↗
  • Ahiskalioglu A, Yayik AM, Doymus O, Selvitopi K, Ahiskalioglu EO, Calikoglu C, Alici HA, Karaca O. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for postoperative analgesia after spinal surgery: a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2018 May;65(5):603-604. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1051-0. Epub 2018 Jan 9. No abstract available. PubMed 29318534 ↗
  • Hand WR, Taylor JM, Harvey NR, Epperson TI, Gunselman RJ, Bolin ED, Whiteley J. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block: a pilot study in volunteers. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1196-200. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0431-y. Epub 2015 Jul 7. PubMed 26149600 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy and ethical restrictions.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07883616
Lead sponsor
Zagazig University
Responsible party
mohamed shehta mohamed ali salem (Principal Investigator, Zagazig University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Study contacts

Mohamed Shehta Mohamed Ali
Contact
m.shehta025@medicine.zu.edu.eg
+2001014634299
Mohamed Shehta Mohamed Ali, M.B.B.CH
principal investigator · Zagazig University
Tarek Gaafar, Prof
study chair · Zagazig University
Sanaa Eltohamy, Prof
study chair · Zagazig University
Khadeja Elhossieny, Assist Prof
study chair · Zagazig University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion