ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04179981Updated Jun 5, 2026

Impact of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Older Veterans With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Comorbid Obstructive Sleep Apnea (Overlap Syndrome)

An interventional study of Positive airway pressure and Conservative care (control arm) in Sleep Apnea Syndrome, Obstructive Sleep Apnea and COPD, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-05.

Primary conditionSleep Apnea, ObstructiveRegistry: Sleep Apnea SyndromesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sleep Apnea Syndromes — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, a narrower term within Sleep Apnea Syndromes.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2020; still recruiting 5 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
668
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are highly prevalent chronic respiratory diseases in the Veteran population. OSA co-occurring with COPD, known as Overlap Syndrome (OVS), is a complex chronic medical condition associated with grave consequences. OVS is highly prevalent in Veterans. Veterans with OVS may be at increased risk for cognitive deficits, poor sleep quality as well as a reduced quality of life (QoL). The overall objective is to study the effects of positive airway pressure therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with OVS.

Read the detailed description

There are no studies regarding the impact of PAP therapy on sleep disturbance, cognitive function and quality of life in patients with OVS. The investigators' rationale is that in patients with moderate-severe OVS, PAP therapy will effectively alleviate sleepiness, sleep disturbances and cognitive deficits, and, thereby, improve QoL. 'PAP' includes either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or noninvasive positive airway pressure ventilation (NIPPV).

Objectives:

Specifically, the investigators will study the effectiveness of PAP therapy vs. conservative care in reducing daytime sleepiness and in improving sleep quality and QoL in older Veterans with OVS.

The investigators will also explore whether CPAP is non-inferior to noninvasive positive airway pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in reducing daytime sleepiness, sleep disturbances and neurocognitive dysfunction, and in improving QoL in older Veterans with OVS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Apnea Syndrome
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • COPD
  • Overlap Syndrome
  • Quality of Life
  • Neurocognitive Function
  • Sleepiness
  • Elderly
  • Positive Airway Pressure

Keywords

  • Apnea
  • Sleep Apnea Syndromes
  • Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Respiration Disorders
  • Respiratory Tract Diseases
  • Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory
  • positive airway pressure
  • cognitive function
  • quality of life
  • sleepiness
03

In context

Sleep Apnea, Obstructive Reclassified

2,240 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; 475 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 668 is above the median of 52 across 1,472 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive.

Browse Sleep Apnea, Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,771 studies on the registry; 392 are open to participants now.

Of its 213 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 185 (87%) have results posted.

Compared within Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sleep Apnea Syndromes. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • OSA with moderate-to-severe disease, AHI 20 per hour by in-lab polysomnography with concomitant moderate-severe based on pulmonary function tests (PFTS) and with past significant history (>10 pack-years) of smoking
  • Male or female gender
  • Age greater than or equal to 60 years
  • Stable treatment regimen for COPD

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or prior treatment with PAP or oral appliance
  • Central sleep apnea defined as central apnea index >5 per hour and comprising 50% of AHI
  • Known primary neuromuscular diseases
  • Disorders that may impact cognitive function including:

    • neurodegenerative disorders
    • traumatic brain injury
  • untreated PTSD and/or history of learning disability
  • Medicines that may cause or alter sleepiness: sedative hypnotics, or stimulants as these may alter the results
  • Patient is actively suicidal due to depression, unstable mental health condition
  • Epworth sleepiness score >16 (severe sleepiness) or a near-miss or prior automobile accident due to sleepiness within the past 12 months
  • Narcolepsy is the primary sleep disorder, with requirement of stimulant medications
  • Employed as a commercial driver or operating heavy machinery
  • On long-term oxygen therapy prior to start of study, more than 12 hr/day
  • Patients is unable to use either a nasal or face mask (e.g., facial trauma, claustrophobia)
  • Consumption of >3 alcoholic beverages per day or current use of some illicit drugs, as these may contribute to cognitive deficits
  • Patients who cannot give
  • Patients receiving hospice care
  • Pregnant women due to unknown risks
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
668 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Conservative care (control arm)

    Eligible OVS patients will receive conservative care/usual care with education about sleep apnea and sleep hygiene via handouts and video instructions. This is the control arm.

    Other: Conservative care (control arm)

  • Active comparator
    PAP therapy arm

    PAP Therapy will be provided to eligible patients with OVS. This is the active therapy arm.

    Device: Positive airway pressure

Interventions

  • DevicePositive airway pressure

    Positive airway pressure therapy. OVS patients randomized to PAP therapy arm will be titrated to optimal PAP therapy per standard protocol and assigned to use PAP therapy.

  • OtherConservative care (control arm)

    Eligible OVS patients will receive conservative care/usual care with education about sleep apnea and sleep hygiene via handouts and video instructions. This is the control arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neurocognitive function Trails A and Trails B

    Trails A and Trails B test will be administered to evaluate attention and psychomotor function. This score is adjusted for age, race, gender, and years of education. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  2. Neurocognitive function PASAT

    PASAT (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test) will be administered to evaluate vigilance and executive function. The PASAT is recorded as the total number of correct responses (from 0-60), or the percent of correct responses out of 60 (from 0-100), where a higher value is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  3. Neurocognitive function Stroop color-word interference

    Stroop color-word interference test will be administered to evaluate executive function. This score is adjusted for age, and years of education. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  4. Neurocognitive function DIGIT

    DIGIT test will be administered to evaluate short-term and working memory. This score is adjusted for age. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  5. Neurocognitive function WASI

    Abbreviated Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) will be administered to evaluate verbal comprehension and working memory. This score is adjusted for age. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  6. Neurocognitive function WMS

    Wechsler Memory test (WMS) will be administered to measure Verbal comprehension, and working and visual memory. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15, where a higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  7. Neurocognitive function PVT

    Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) will be administered to measure Alertness and vigilance, in terms of number of lapses and reaction time. The performance score ranges from 0-100, where a higher value is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  8. Neurocognitive function HVLT-R

    Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) will be administered to evaluate Verbal learning and memory. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15, where a higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  9. Sleepiness ESS

    Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) score will be measured. This score is on a scale of 0-24, where a higher value indicates greater degree of sleepiness.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  10. Sleep quality PSQI

    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a detailed assessment of subject sleep quality over the most recent month by considering seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score to assess sleep quality on a scale of "poor" to "good".

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  11. Quality of life SF-36v2

    QoL will be assessed using the survey SF-36v2 Health survey. Thirty-five of the SF-36v2 items are used to measure eight domains of health-related quality of life. These are on a scale of 0-100, where higher values indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  12. Quality of life FOSQ

    Disease specific QoL will be assessed using the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire FOSQ/(FOSQ). There are 5 subscale domains of the FOSQ (General Productivity, Social Outcome, Activity Level, Vigilance, and Intimate Relationships and Sexual Activity). There all range from 0-20, where a higher value is a better outcome. The total FOSQ is the sum of these subscale domains and ranges from 0-100, where a higher value is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  13. Quality of life SGRQ

    Disease specific QoL will be assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The SGRQ has three subscale domains (Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts), which range from 0-100, where a higher value indicates a worse outcome. The total SGRQ is the average of these subscale domains and is on a scale of 0-100, where a higher value is a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hours of nightly positive airway pressure (PAP) use

    Collection of PAP adherence data from the smart card of the PAP machine or from online data.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  2. Patient preferance for type of PAP (PAP arm)

    A visual analog scale to determine preference to CPAP vs NIPPV therapy. A scores will range from -10 to +10, where a higher score is better.

    Time frame: at 3 and 6 months

  3. Fatigue severity

    Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS): FSS measures how fatigue affects motivation, exercise, physical functioning, carrying out duties, interfering with work, family, or social life. Where a higher value is a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 and 6 months

  4. Sleep-dependent memory

    In a subgroup of patients, the investigators will perform Word-pair test and PVT before and after sleep period, this is an exploratory measure.

    Time frame: At baseline and at 3 months

  5. Blood CO2 or bicarbonate level

    Test is being done to evaluate for presence or absence of hypercapnia

    Time frame: At baseline and at 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04179981
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 27, 2019
Start date
Dec 1, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 5, 2026

Study contacts

Ruchi Rastogi, MS
Contact
ruchi.rastogi@va.gov
(313) 576-4464
Susmita Chowdhuri, MD MS
principal investigator · John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion