ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04173494Updated Nov 1, 2023Results posted

A Study of Momelotinib Versus Danazol in Symptomatic and Anemic Myelofibrosis Participants (MOMENTUM)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Momelotinib and Placebo to match danazol in Primary Myelofibrosis, Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis and Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, sponsored by Sierra Oncology LLC - a GSK company. Completed at 167 sites in 22 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-01.

Sponsored by Sierra Oncology LLC - a GSK company (part of GlaxoSmithKline) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
195
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

MOMENTUM is a randomized, double-blind, active control Phase 3 trial intended to confirm the differentiated clinical benefits of the investigational drug momelotinib (MMB) versus danazol (DAN) in symptomatic and anemic participants who have previously received an approved Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). The purpose of this clinical study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of MMB to DAN in treating and reducing: 1) disease related symptoms, 2) the need for blood transfusions and 3) splenomegaly, in adults with primary MF, post-polycythemia vera MF or post-essential thrombocythemia MF. The study is planned in countries including, but not limited to: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom (UK) and United States (US).

Participants must be symptomatic with a Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) version (v) 4.0 Total Symptom Score of >= 10 at screening, and be anemic with hemoglobin (Hgb) \< 10 gram/deciliter (g/dL). For participants with ongoing JAKi therapy at screening, JAKi therapy must be tapered over a period of at least 1 week, followed by a 2-week non-treatment washout interval prior to randomization.

Participants will be randomized 2:1 to orally self-administer blinded treatment: MMB plus placebo or DAN plus placebo. Participants randomized to receive MMB who complete the randomized treatment period to the end of Week 24 may continue to receive MMB in the open-label extended treatment period to the end of Week 204 (a total period of treatment of approximately 4 years) if the participants tolerates and continues to benefit from MMB.

Participants randomized to receive DAN may cross-over to MMB open-label treatment in the following circumstances: at the end of Week 24 if they complete the randomized treatment period; or at the end of Week 24 if they discontinue treatment with DAN but continue study assessments and do not receive prohibited medications including alternative active anti-MF therapy; or at any time during the randomized treatment period if they meet the protocol-defined criteria for radiographically confirmed symptomatic splenic progression. Participants randomized to receive DAN who are receiving clinical benefit at the end of Week 24 may choose to continue DAN therapy up to Week 48. The comparator treatment, DAN, is an approved medication in the US and in some other countries and is recommended by national guidelines as a treatment for anemia in MF.

Read the detailed description

MOMENTUM Contact Email: GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Myelofibrosis
  • Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis
  • Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis

Keywords

  • Myelofibrosis
  • JAK inhibitor
  • Danazol
  • Momelotinib
  • Functional Iron deficiency
  • Activin receptor type 1
  • Anemia
  • Transfusion
  • Hepcidin
  • Myeloproliferative Disorders
  • Bone Marrow Diseases
  • Hematologic Diseases
03

In context

Primary Myelofibrosis

625 studies on the registry are indexed under Primary Myelofibrosis; 124 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 195 is above the median of 43 across 489 interventional studies indexed under Primary Myelofibrosis.

Browse Primary Myelofibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Sierra Oncology LLC - a GSK company is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (63%) have results posted.

First submitted before Sierra Oncology LLC became part of GlaxoSmithKline.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >= 18 years.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of PMF in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 criteria, or Post- polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia (PV/ET) MF in accordance with the International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT criteria).
  • Symptomatic, defined as a TSS of >= 10 units assessed by a single MFSAF v4.0 assessment during Screening prior to Baseline period (Day BL1).
  • Anemic, defined as a \< 10 g/dL in Screening/Baseline period.
  • Previously treated with an approved JAK inhibitor for PMF or Post-PV/ET MF for >= 90 days, or >= 28 days if JAK inhibitor therapy is complicated by RBC transfusion requirement of >= 4 units in 8 weeks, or Grade 3/4 AEs of thrombocytopenia, anemia, or hematoma.
  • Baseline splenomegaly, defined as having a palpable spleen at >= 5 centimeter (cm), below the left costal margin, or with volume >= 450 cubic centimeter (cm\^3) on imaging (ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or computed tomography [CT] are acceptable), assessed during Screening at any point prior to Randomization.
  • High risk, intermediate-2, or intermediate-1 risk MF as defined by Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS), or DIPSS-plus.
  • No stem cell transplant planned.
  • Acceptable laboratory assessments:

    1. (ANC) >= 0.75 × 10\^9/Liter (L).
    2. count (PLT) >= 25 × 10\^9/L (without requirement for platelet transfusion).
    3. Peripheral blast count \< 10%.
    4. / glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (AST/SGOT) and alanine aminotransferase/ serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) \<= 3 × Upper Limit Normal () (\<= 5 × ULN if liver is involved by extramedullary hematopoiesis as judged by the investigator or if related to iron chelator therapy that was started within the prior 60 days).
    5. Calculated (CCr) >= 30 milliliter per minute (mL/min) according to Cockcroft-Gault.
    6. Direct \<= 2.0 × ULN.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of the following treatments within the time periods noted:

    1. Prior momelotinib treatment at any time.
    2. Approved JAK inhibitor therapy (eg, fedratinib or ruxolitinib) within 1 week prior to the first day of Baseline.
    3. Active anti-MF therapy within 1 week prior to the first day of Baseline.
    4. Potent Cytochrome P450 3A4 () inducers within 1 week prior to Randomization.
    5. agent (including investigational JAK inhibitors) within 4 weeks prior to Randomization.
    6. Erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) within 4 weeks prior to Randomization.
    7. Danazol within 3 months prior to Randomization.
    8. Splenic irradiation within 3 months prior to Randomization.
    9. Current treatment with simvastatin, atorvastatin, lovastatin or rosuvastatin.
  • History of prostate cancer, with the exception of localized prostate cancer that has been treated surgically or by radiotherapy with curative intent and presumed cured.
  • Prostate specific antigen (PSA) > 4 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL).
  • Unsuitable for spleen volume measurements due to prior splenectomy or unwilling or unable to undergo an MRI scan or CT scan for spleen volume measurement per protocol requirements.
  • Any of the following (criteria a - k):

    1. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to: active uncontrolled infection (participants receiving outpatient antibacterial and/or antiviral treatments for infection that is under control or as infection prophylaxis may be included in the trial).
    2. Significant active or chronic bleeding event >= Grade 2 per (CTCAE) v5.0, within 4 weeks prior to Randomization.
    3. Unstable angina pectoris within 6 months prior to Randomization.
    4. Symptomatic congestive heart failure within 6 months prior to Randomization.
    5. Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia within 6 months prior to Randomization.
    6. Corrected Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) interval > 500 millisecond (msec), unless attributed to bundle branch block.
    7. Current progressive thrombosis despite treatment.
    8. History of porphyria.
    9. score >= 10.
    10. Psychiatric illness, social situation, or any other condition that would limit compliance with trial requirements or may interfere with the interpretation of study results, as judged by investigator or sponsor.
    11. Inability or unwillingness to comply with the protocol restrictions on MF therapy and other medications prior to and during study treatment.
  • Participants with a prior or concurrent , whose natural history or treatment has a significant potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen.
  • Known anemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, or or hereditary hemolytic anemia, or gastrointestinal bleeding or thalassemia.
  • Known positive status for human immunodeficiency viruses ().
  • Chronic active or acute viral hepatitis A, B, or C infection, or or C carrier (testing required for hepatitis B and C).
  • Unresolved non-hematologic toxicities from prior therapies that are > Grade 1 per CTCAE v5.0.
  • Presence of peripheral neuropathy >= Grade 2 per CTCAE v5.0.
  • Women who are already pregnant or lactating. Additional inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(18)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
195 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Momelotinib

    Participants will receive momelotinib plus placebo to match danazol

    Drug: Momelotinib · Drug: Placebo to match danazol

  • Active comparator
    Danazol

    Participants will receive danazol plus placebo to match momelotinib

    Drug: Danazol · Drug: Placebo to match momelotinib

Interventions

  • Momelotinib tablets will be self-administered orally once daily

    Also known as: MMB, GS-0387, CYT387

  • DrugPlacebo to match danazol

    Danazol placebo capsules will be self-administered orally twice daily

  • Danazol capsules will be self-administered orally twice daily

    Also known as: Danocrine

  • DrugPlacebo to match momelotinib

    Momelotinib placebo tablets will be self-administered orally once daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24

    Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) TSS version (v) 4.0 response rate was defined as percentage of participants with a \>= 50 percent (%) reduction from Baseline in mean MFSAF TSS over consecutive 28-day period immediately before end of Week 24. TSS response rate was measured using MFSAF v4.0. MFSAF v4.0 comprises 7 domains representing 7 most relevant symptoms of myelofibrosis (MF) identified through existing participant and clinician-based evidence: fatigue,night sweats,pruritus,abdominal discomfort,pain under left ribs,early satietyand bone pain. Participants scored each symptom domain using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0(absent) to 10(worst imaginable). The MFSAF TSS was calculated as sum of scores of 7 domains for a possible range of scores of 0 to 70, with a higher TSS corresponding to more severe symptoms. A reduction from Baseline corresponded to a lessening of MF symptoms. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Independence (TI) at Week 24

    TI status was defined as not receiving red blood cell (RBC) or whole blood transfusion for \>=12 weeks, with no hemoglobin (Hgb) level \< 8 grams per deciliter (g/dL) during the same interval. Percentage of participants with TI have been presented.

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Splenic Response Rate (SRR) of >=25% at Week 24

    Splenic response rate (SRR) is defined as the percentage of participants who have reduction in spleen volume of \>=25% from Baseline at the end of Week 24. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  3. Change From Baseline in MFSAF TSS at Week 24

    TSS was measured using the MFSAF v4.0. The MFSAF v4.0 comprises 7 domains representing the 7 most relevant symptoms of MF identified through existing participant and clinician-based evidence: fatigue, night sweats, pruritus, abdominal discomfort, pain under the left ribs, early satiety, and bone pain. Participants scored each symptom domain using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The MFSAF TSS was calculated as the sum of scores of the 7 domains for a possible range of scores of 0 to 70, with a higher TSS corresponding to more severe symptoms. A reduction from Baseline corresponded to a lessening of MF symptoms. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  4. Splenic Response Rate (SRR) of >= 35% at Week 24

    Splenic response rate (SRR) is defined as the percentage of participants who have reduction in spleen volume of \>=35 % from Baseline at the end of Week 24. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  5. Percentage of Participants With Zero RBC Units Transfused Over 24-Weeks

    Percentage of participants with zero RBC units transfused over 24-weeks were reported.

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

  6. Percentage of Participants With <=4 RBC Units Transfused Over 24-weeks

    Percentage of participants with \<=4 RBC units transfused over 24-weeks were reported.

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

  7. Duration of MFSAF TSS Response

    Duration of MFSAF TSS response is defined as the number of days from the start of the initial 28-day period in which a participant had a \>= 50% reduction from Baseline TSS to the first day of the 7-day assessment that determines the mean TSS for the 28-day period during which the participants TSS equals or exceeds their Baseline value.

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 151 weeks

  8. Duration of TI Response

    Duration of TI is defined as the number of days from (a) the first day of a 12-week period that satisfies the 12-week TI status definition, to (b) the first RBC transfusion or Hgb level \< 8 g/dL (except in the case of clinically overt bleeding).

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 151 weeks

  9. Mean Cumulative Number of Whole Blood Units Transfused Over 24 Weeks

    Cumulative transfusion risk was calculated as the estimated mean cumulative number of whole blood units transfused during the study.

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

  10. Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependence (TD) Status at Week 24

    TD status at Week 24 is defined as requirement of \>=4 RBC units in an 8-week period immediately prior to the end of Week 24.

    Time frame: Week 24

  11. Percentage of Participants With a Hemoglobin Response

    Hemoglobin responses are defined as increases of \>= 1, \>= 1.5, or \>= 2 g/dL from Baseline in Hgb, as measured over a (rolling) period of at least 12 consecutive weeks falling entirely before the end of Week 24. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date. Data has been reported for percentage of participants who had \>= 1, \>= 1.5, or \>= 2 g/dL increase from Baseline in hemoglobin.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  12. Number of Baseline TD Participants With TI Status at Week 24

    Participants were defined as having TD if they met both of the following requirements in the 8 weeks immediately before the end of Week 24: \>= 4 red blood cell or whole blood units were transfused (except in the case of clinically overt bleeding), each in response to a hemoglobin assessment of \<= 9.5 g/dL; and there were \>= 2 hemoglobin assessments with \>= 28 days between the earliest and latest hemoglobin assessments. TI status was defined as not requiring red blood cell transfusion (except in the case of clinically overt bleeding) for \>= 12 weeks immediately prior to the end of Week 24, with hemoglobin levels \>= 8 g/dL.

    Time frame: Week 24

  13. Duration of TI in Baseline TD Participants

    Duration of TI is defined as the number of days from (a) the first day of a 12-week period that satisfies the 12-week TI status definition, to (b) the first RBC transfusion or Hgb level \< 8 g/dL (except in the case of clinically overt bleeding).

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 151 weeks

  14. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs)- up to Week 24

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a trial participant administered an investigational product(s), a comparator product, or an approved drug regardless of the causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is an AE that Results in death, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any important medical events as per medical or scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not Serious were considered as Non-Serious adverse events.

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

  15. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs)- From Week 24 to a Maximum of 151 Weeks

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a trial participant administered an investigational product(s), a comparator product, or an approved drug regardless of the causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is an AE that Results in death, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any important medical events as per medical or scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not Serious were considered as Non-Serious adverse events.

    Time frame: From Week 24 to a maximum of 151 weeks

  16. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival is defined as the interval from the first study drug dosing date (or randomization date for participants who did not receive treatment) to death from any cause.

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 151 weeks

  17. Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)

    LFS is defined as the interval from first study drug dosing date (or randomization date for participants who did not receive treatment) to any evidence of leukemic transformation and/or death (from any cause).

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 151 weeks

  18. Change From Baseline in Disease-related Fatigue as Assessed by MFSAF TSS v4.0 at Week 24

    The MFSAF v4.0 comprises 7 domains representing the 7 most relevant symptoms of MF identified through existing participant- and clinician-based evidence: fatigue, night sweats, pruritus, abdominal discomfort, pain under the left ribs, early satiety, and bone pain. Participants scored each symptom domain using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). Data has been reported for Disease-related Fatigue domain measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), higher score indicates worst outcome. An increase in score from Baseline indicated a worsening of fatigue and a decrease in score from Baseline indicated an improvement in fatigue. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  19. Change From Baseline in Cancer-related Fatigue as Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at Week 24

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is comprised of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, cognitive), eight single item symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea), as well as sub-scales assessing global health/quality of life and financial impact. Most items use a 4-point Likert scale from "not at all" to "very much" and a one-week recall period with the exception of the final two items which use a 7 point scale response from "very poor" to "excellent". Scores were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better functioning/quality of life. An increase in scores from Baseline indicated an improved functioning/quality of life, and a decrease in scores from Baseline indicated a worsened functioning/quality of life. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  20. Change From Baseline in Physical Function Score as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10b at Week 24

    PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10b consists of 14 questions; each with a 5-point response. PROMIS short form assesses self-reported capability of a participant rather than actual performance of physical activities. This includes functioning of one's upper extremities (dexterity), lower extremities (walking or mobility), and central regions (neck, back) as well as instrumental activities of daily living, such as running errands. Participants scored each response on a scale from 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty, or not at all). Total possible range of scores was 14 to 70, with higher scores corresponding to a greater physical function ability. An increase in score from Baseline indicated an improvement in physical function ability and a decrease in score from Baseline indicated a reduction in physical function ability. Baseline was last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date. Change from Baseline was defined as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

07

Results

Posted Dec 22, 2022

Participant flow

This study evaluated the activity of Momelotinib (MMB) versus Danazol (DAN) in Symptomatic, Anemic participants. This study consists of Randomized Double-blind (DB) Treatment Period (TP) and Open-label extended Treatment Period.

Randomized DB TP (Up to Week 24)
Participant flow — Randomized DB TP (Up to Week 24)
MilestoneMMB 200 mg Once Daily (QD) + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Started13065
Completed9438
Not completed3627
Withdrew: Adverse event1611
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject65
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy63
Withdrew: Death43
Withdrew: Leukemic transformation22
Withdrew: Disease progression12
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Physician decision01
Open-Label Extended TP(Weeks 24 to 151)
Participant flow — Open-Label Extended TP(Weeks 24 to 151)
MilestoneMMB 200 mg Once Daily (QD) + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Started9341
Completed00
Not completed9341
Withdrew: Adverse event111
Withdrew: Death63
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy62
Withdrew: Physician decision43
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject43
Withdrew: Leukemic transformation01
Withdrew: Disease progression11
Withdrew: Continuing in mmb extension study6127

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24

Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) TSS version (v) 4.0 response rate was defined as percentage of participants with a \>= 50 percent (%) reduction from Baseline in mean MFSAF TSS over consecutive 28-day period immediately before end of Week 24. TSS response rate was measured using MFSAF v4.0. MFSAF v4.0 comprises 7 domains representing 7 most relevant symptoms of myelofibrosis (MF) identified through existing participant and clinician-based evidence: fatigue,night sweats,pruritus,abdominal discomfort,pain under left ribs,early satietyand bone pain. Participants scored each symptom domain using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0(absent) to 10(worst imaginable). The MFSAF TSS was calculated as sum of scores of 7 domains for a possible range of scores of 0 to 70, with a higher TSS corresponding to more severe symptoms. A reduction from Baseline corresponded to a lessening of MF symptoms. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24
Percentage of participantsMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 2424.62 (17.49 to 32.94)9.23 (3.46 to 19.02)
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0095 · Stratified cochran-mantel-haenszel: 15.67 · 95% CI 5.54 to 25.81
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Transfusion Independence (TI) at Week 24

TI status was defined as not receiving red blood cell (RBC) or whole blood transfusion for \>=12 weeks, with no hemoglobin (Hgb) level \< 8 grams per deciliter (g/dL) during the same interval. Percentage of participants with TI have been presented.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Independence (TI) at Week 24
Percentage of ParticipantsMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Independence (TI) at Week 2430.0 (22.28 to 38.66)20.00 (11.10 to 31.77)
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0116 · Non-inferiority difference: 13.58 · 95% CI 1.86 to 25.30Non-inferiority difference, defined as p(MMB) - (0.8) \*p(DAN) where p(MMB) is percentage of participants with TI status in MMB arm and p(DAN) is percentage of participants with TI status in DAN arm.
SecondarySplenic Response Rate (SRR) of >=25% at Week 24

Splenic response rate (SRR) is defined as the percentage of participants who have reduction in spleen volume of \>=25% from Baseline at the end of Week 24. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Splenic Response Rate (SRR) of >=25% at Week 24
Percentage of ParticipantsMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Splenic Response Rate (SRR) of >=25% at Week 2439.23 (30.79 to 48.18)6.15 (1.70 to 15.01)
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 · Stratified cochran-mantel-haenszel: 33.05 · 95% CI 22.59 to 43.51
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MFSAF TSS at Week 24

TSS was measured using the MFSAF v4.0. The MFSAF v4.0 comprises 7 domains representing the 7 most relevant symptoms of MF identified through existing participant and clinician-based evidence: fatigue, night sweats, pruritus, abdominal discomfort, pain under the left ribs, early satiety, and bone pain. Participants scored each symptom domain using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The MFSAF TSS was calculated as the sum of scores of the 7 domains for a possible range of scores of 0 to 70, with a higher TSS corresponding to more severe symptoms. A reduction from Baseline corresponded to a lessening of MF symptoms. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in MFSAF TSS at Week 24
Scores on a scaleMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Change From Baseline in MFSAF TSS at Week 24-9.36 ± 1.08-3.13 ± 1.62
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) · p = 0.0014 · Least squares mean difference: -6.22 · 95% CI -10.0 to -2.43
SecondarySplenic Response Rate (SRR) of >= 35% at Week 24

Splenic response rate (SRR) is defined as the percentage of participants who have reduction in spleen volume of \>=35 % from Baseline at the end of Week 24. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Splenic Response Rate (SRR) of >= 35% at Week 24
Percentage of ParticipantsMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Splenic Response Rate (SRR) of >= 35% at Week 2422.31 (15.48 to 30.44)3.08 (0.37 to 10.68)
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0011 · Stratified cochran-mantel-haenszel: 18.18 · 95% CI 9.77 to 26.59
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Zero RBC Units Transfused Over 24-Weeks

Percentage of participants with zero RBC units transfused over 24-weeks were reported.

Time frame:
Up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Zero RBC Units Transfused Over 24-Weeks
Percentage of participantsMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Percentage of Participants With Zero RBC Units Transfused Over 24-Weeks35.38 (27.20 to 44.25)16.92 (8.76 to 28.27)
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0012 · Stratified cochran-mantel-haenszel: 17.20 · 95% CI 7.99 to 26.40
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With <=4 RBC Units Transfused Over 24-weeks

Percentage of participants with \<=4 RBC units transfused over 24-weeks were reported.

Time frame:
Up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With <=4 RBC Units Transfused Over 24-weeks
Percentage of participantsMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Percentage of Participants With <=4 RBC Units Transfused Over 24-weeks55.38 (46.42 to 64.10)44.62 (32.27 to 57.47)
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1133 · Stratified cochran-mantel-haenszel: 10.62 · 95% CI -2.40 to 23.64
SecondaryDuration of MFSAF TSS Response

Duration of MFSAF TSS response is defined as the number of days from the start of the initial 28-day period in which a participant had a \>= 50% reduction from Baseline TSS to the first day of the 7-day assessment that determines the mean TSS for the 28-day period during which the participants TSS equals or exceeds their Baseline value.

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 151 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Days
Duration of MFSAF TSS Response
DaysMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Duration of MFSAF TSS Response286.00 (286.00 to 286.00)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryDuration of TI Response

Duration of TI is defined as the number of days from (a) the first day of a 12-week period that satisfies the 12-week TI status definition, to (b) the first RBC transfusion or Hgb level \< 8 g/dL (except in the case of clinically overt bleeding).

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 151 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Days
Duration of TI Response
DaysMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Duration of TI ResponseNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryMean Cumulative Number of Whole Blood Units Transfused Over 24 Weeks

Cumulative transfusion risk was calculated as the estimated mean cumulative number of whole blood units transfused during the study.

Time frame:
Up to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Whole blood units
Mean Cumulative Number of Whole Blood Units Transfused Over 24 Weeks
Whole blood unitsMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Mean Cumulative Number of Whole Blood Units Transfused Over 24 Weeks6.55 ± 8.41310.86 ± 13.203
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Anderson & Gill proportional means model · p = 0.0006 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.556 · 95% CI 0.397 to 0.778
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependence (TD) Status at Week 24

TD status at Week 24 is defined as requirement of \>=4 RBC units in an 8-week period immediately prior to the end of Week 24.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependence (TD) Status at Week 24
Percentage of participantsMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependence (TD) Status at Week 2415.38 (9.66 to 22.76)24.62 (14.77 to 36.87)
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1602 · Stratified cmh: -8.26 · 95% CI -20.18 to 3.66
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Hemoglobin Response

Hemoglobin responses are defined as increases of \>= 1, \>= 1.5, or \>= 2 g/dL from Baseline in Hgb, as measured over a (rolling) period of at least 12 consecutive weeks falling entirely before the end of Week 24. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date. Data has been reported for percentage of participants who had \>= 1, \>= 1.5, or \>= 2 g/dL increase from Baseline in hemoglobin.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Hemoglobin Response
Percentage of participantsMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
>=1g/dL Increase53.08 (44.13 to 61.88)33.85 (22.57 to 46.65)
>=1.5g/dL Increase40.00 (31.51 to 48.95)23.08 (13.53 to 35.19)
>=2g/dL Increase29.23 (21.59 to 37.85)20.00 (11.10 to 31.77)
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0124 · Stratified cmh: 19.00 · 95% CI 4.68 to 33.32\>=1g/dL Increase in Hemoglobin response
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0282 · Stratified cmh: 15.68 · 95% CI 2.47 to 28.90\>=1.5g/dL Increase in Hemoglobin response
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2844 · Stratified cmh: 6.97 · 95% CI -5.41 to 19.35\>=2g/dL Increase in Hemoglobin response
SecondaryNumber of Baseline TD Participants With TI Status at Week 24

Participants were defined as having TD if they met both of the following requirements in the 8 weeks immediately before the end of Week 24: \>= 4 red blood cell or whole blood units were transfused (except in the case of clinically overt bleeding), each in response to a hemoglobin assessment of \<= 9.5 g/dL; and there were \>= 2 hemoglobin assessments with \>= 28 days between the earliest and latest hemoglobin assessments. TI status was defined as not requiring red blood cell transfusion (except in the case of clinically overt bleeding) for \>= 12 weeks immediately prior to the end of Week 24, with hemoglobin levels \>= 8 g/dL.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Baseline TD Participants With TI Status at Week 24
ParticipantsMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Number of Baseline TD Participants With TI Status at Week 2493
SecondaryDuration of TI in Baseline TD Participants

Duration of TI is defined as the number of days from (a) the first day of a 12-week period that satisfies the 12-week TI status definition, to (b) the first RBC transfusion or Hgb level \< 8 g/dL (except in the case of clinically overt bleeding).

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 151 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Days
Duration of TI in Baseline TD Participants
DaysMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Duration of TI in Baseline TD ParticipantsNA (224.0 to NA)NA (196.0 to NA)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs)- up to Week 24

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a trial participant administered an investigational product(s), a comparator product, or an approved drug regardless of the causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is an AE that Results in death, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any important medical events as per medical or scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not Serious were considered as Non-Serious adverse events.

Time frame:
Up to Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs)- up to Week 24
ParticipantsMMB 200 mg QD + Placebo- Randomized Double-Blind Treatment PeriodDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo- Randomized Double-Blind Treatment Period
Any non-SAEs10855
Any SAEs4526
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs)- From Week 24 to a Maximum of 151 Weeks

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a trial participant administered an investigational product(s), a comparator product, or an approved drug regardless of the causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is an AE that Results in death, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any important medical events as per medical or scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not Serious were considered as Non-Serious adverse events.

Time frame:
From Week 24 to a maximum of 151 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs)- From Week 24 to a Maximum of 151 Weeks
ParticipantsMMB 200 mg QD- Open-Label Extended Treatment PeriodDAN 300 mg BID to MMB 200 mg QD- Open-Label Extended Treatment Period
Any non-SAEs5728
Any SAEs3012
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the interval from the first study drug dosing date (or randomization date for participants who did not receive treatment) to death from any cause.

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 151 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Days
Overall Survival (OS)
DaysMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Overall Survival (OS)624.0 (333.0 to NA)NA (309.00 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.6879 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.890 · 95% CI 0.504 to 1.572
SecondaryLeukemia-free Survival (LFS)

LFS is defined as the interval from first study drug dosing date (or randomization date for participants who did not receive treatment) to any evidence of leukemic transformation and/or death (from any cause).

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 151 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Days
Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)
DaysMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)624.0 (325.0 to NA)NA (284.0 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.4320 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.804 · 95% CI 0.466 to 1.386
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Disease-related Fatigue as Assessed by MFSAF TSS v4.0 at Week 24

The MFSAF v4.0 comprises 7 domains representing the 7 most relevant symptoms of MF identified through existing participant- and clinician-based evidence: fatigue, night sweats, pruritus, abdominal discomfort, pain under the left ribs, early satiety, and bone pain. Participants scored each symptom domain using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). Data has been reported for Disease-related Fatigue domain measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), higher score indicates worst outcome. An increase in score from Baseline indicated a worsening of fatigue and a decrease in score from Baseline indicated an improvement in fatigue. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Disease-related Fatigue as Assessed by MFSAF TSS v4.0 at Week 24
Scores on a scaleMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Change From Baseline in Disease-related Fatigue as Assessed by MFSAF TSS v4.0 at Week 24-1.53 ± 0.20-0.82 ± 0.31
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.0513 · Least squares mean difference: -0.71 · 95% CI -1.42 to 0.00
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cancer-related Fatigue as Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at Week 24

The EORTC QLQ-C30 is comprised of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, cognitive), eight single item symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnea), as well as sub-scales assessing global health/quality of life and financial impact. Most items use a 4-point Likert scale from "not at all" to "very much" and a one-week recall period with the exception of the final two items which use a 7 point scale response from "very poor" to "excellent". Scores were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better functioning/quality of life. An increase in scores from Baseline indicated an improved functioning/quality of life, and a decrease in scores from Baseline indicated a worsened functioning/quality of life. Baseline was the last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Cancer-related Fatigue as Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at Week 24
Scores on a scaleMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Change From Baseline in Cancer-related Fatigue as Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at Week 24-14.34 ± 2.35-3.52 ± 3.65
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.0113 · Least squares mean difference: -10.82 · 95% CI -19.15 to -2.48
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physical Function Score as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10b at Week 24

PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10b consists of 14 questions; each with a 5-point response. PROMIS short form assesses self-reported capability of a participant rather than actual performance of physical activities. This includes functioning of one's upper extremities (dexterity), lower extremities (walking or mobility), and central regions (neck, back) as well as instrumental activities of daily living, such as running errands. Participants scored each response on a scale from 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty, or not at all). Total possible range of scores was 14 to 70, with higher scores corresponding to a greater physical function ability. An increase in score from Baseline indicated an improvement in physical function ability and a decrease in score from Baseline indicated a reduction in physical function ability. Baseline was last assessment done before or on the day of first dose date. Change from Baseline was defined as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Score as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10b at Week 24
Scores on a scaleMMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Score as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10b at Week 241.19 ± 0.77-0.11 ± 1.21
Statistical analysis
  • MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo vs DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.3570 · Least squares mean difference: 1.31 · 95% CI -1.49 to 4.11

Adverse events

Collected over All-cause mortality, Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-SAEs were collected up to Week 24 for Randomized Double-Blind Treatment Period and From Week 24 to a maximum of 151 weeks for the Open-Label Extended Treatment Period. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
MMB 200 mg QD + Placebo- Randomized Double-Blind Treatment Period25/130 (19.2%)45/130 (34.6%)108/130 (83.1%)
DAN 300 mg BID + Placebo- Randomized Double-Blind Treatment Period16/65 (24.6%)26/65 (40%)55/65 (84.6%)
MMB 200 mg QD- Open-Label Extended Treatment Period23/93 (24.7%)30/93 (32.3%)57/93 (61.3%)
DAN 300 mg BID to MMB 200 mg QD- Open-Label Extended Treatment Period8/41 (19.5%)12/41 (29.3%)28/41 (68.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 123
Most frequent serious events
EventMMB 200 mg QD + Placebo- Randomized Double-Blind Treatment PeriodDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo- Randomized Double-Blind Treatment PeriodMMB 200 mg QD- Open-Label Extended Treatment PeriodDAN 300 mg BID to MMB 200 mg QD- Open-Label Extended Treatment Period
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/1306/651/931/41
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders4/1303/652/932/41
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders5/1303/651/931/41
COVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestations3/1300/654/930/41
Splenic infarctionBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1302/651/930/41
General physical health deteriorationGeneral disorders2/1302/651/930/41
Transformation to acute myeloid leukaemiaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)3/1302/650/931/41
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/1300/650/931/41
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/1300/651/931/41
Sudden deathGeneral disorders1/1300/650/931/41
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventMMB 200 mg QD + Placebo- Randomized Double-Blind Treatment PeriodDAN 300 mg BID + Placebo- Randomized Double-Blind Treatment PeriodMMB 200 mg QD- Open-Label Extended Treatment PeriodDAN 300 mg BID to MMB 200 mg QD- Open-Label Extended Treatment Period
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders29/1306/6516/935/41
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders28/1307/6513/937/41
Weight decreasedInvestigations14/1303/659/937/41
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders21/1306/658/930/41
Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations10/13010/657/934/41
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders9/13010/657/930/41
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders9/1309/653/931/41
AstheniaGeneral disorders17/1306/6512/930/41
PyrexiaGeneral disorders11/1305/6512/933/41
HypertensionVascular disorders6/1306/653/935/41

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics were measured in the Intention-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set, which included all randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)MMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + PlaceboTotal
Mean69.85 ± 8.2471.46 ± 6.9970.38 ± 7.86
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + PlaceboTotal
Female512172
Male7944123
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino5611
Not Hispanic or Latino11554169
Unknown or Not Reported10515
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MMB 200 mg QD + PlaceboDAN 300 mg BID + PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian12618
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American224
White10750157
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported9716
08

Study locations

167 sites
  • Mayo Clinic Hospital - Phoenix
    Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
  • Irvine Center for Clinical Research
    Irvine, California 92614, United States
  • Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Los Angeles, California 91011, United States
  • American Institute of Research - Whittier
    Whittier, California 90603, United States
  • University of Colorado Hospital Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Georgetown University Medical Center
    Washington, District of Columbia 20057, United States
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Northwest Oncology & Hematology - Rolling Meadows
    Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center - Presbyterian Hospital
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic - Richard E. Jacobs Health Center
    Avon, Ohio 44011, United States
  • Gabrail Cancer Center
    Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Allegheny Health Network
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Canberra Region Cancer Centre
    Garran, Australian Capital Territory 2605, Australia
  • Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital
    Waratah, New South Wales 2298, Australia
  • Flinders Medical Centre
    Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia
  • The Alfred Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
  • Perth Radiological Clinic - Magnetic Resonance Centre
    Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia
  • Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
    Innsbruck, Tyrol 6020, Austria
  • Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen
    Linz, Upper Austria 4020, Austria
  • Medizinische Universität Wien
    Wien, Vienna 1090, Austria
  • Oberösterreichische Gesundheitsholding GmbH
    Steyr, 4400, Austria
  • Hôpital Erasme
    Bruxelles, Brussels 1070, Belgium
  • Grand Hôpital de Charleroi - Notre Dame
    Charleroi, Hainaut 6000, Belgium
  • Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende - Campus Sint-Jan
    Brugge, West-Vlaanderen 8000, Belgium
  • Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg
    Antwerpen, 2060, Belgium
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège
    Liège, B-4000, Belgium
  • University Multiprofile Hospital For Active Treatment Dr. Georgi Stranski EAD
    Pleven, 5800, Bulgaria
  • University Hospital St. Ivan Rilski
    Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
  • University Multiprofile Hospital For Active Treatment Aleksandrovska
    Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
  • National Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Haematologic Diseases
    Sofia, 1756, Bulgaria
  • Saint Paul's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre - Halifax Infirmary
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 1V7, Canada
  • McMaster University Medical Center
    Hamilton, Ontario L8V 5C2, Canada
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
  • Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
    Montréal, Quebec H3H 2R9, Canada
  • Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
    Québec, G1J 1Z4, Canada
  • Fakultni Nemocnice Brno
    Brno, Jihormoravsky Kraj 625 00, Czechia
  • Herlev Hospital
    Herlev, Hovedstaden 2730, Denmark
  • Aalborg Universitetshospital - Syd
    Aalborg, Nordjylland 9000, Denmark
  • Sjællands Universitetshospital - Roskilde
    Roskilde, Sjælland 4000, Denmark
  • Odense Universitetshospital
    Odense, Syddanmark 5000, Denmark
  • Hôpital Haut-Lévêque
    Pessac, Aquitaine 33604, France
  • Hospital Center University Of Caen Normandie
    Caen, Basse-Normandie 14033, France
  • Hôpital Claude Huriez
    Lille, Hauts-de-France 59037, France
  • Hôpital Saint-Louis
    Paris, Ile-de-France 75010, France
  • Hôpital Saint-Antoine
    Paris, Ile-de-France 75571, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Limoges
    Limoges, Limousin 87042, France
  • Centre Hospitalier De Lens
    Lens, Nord Pas-Des-Calais 62307, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Le Mans
    Le Mans, Pays De La Loire 72037, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie - Site Sud
    Amiens, Picardie 80054, France
  • Hôpital l'Archet
    Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 06200, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
    Pierre-Bénite, Rhone-Alps 69495, France
  • Centre Hosptitalier Universitaire Angers
    Angers, 49 933, France
  • Hôpital Saint-Vincent De Paul - Lille
    Lille, 59000, France
  • Hôpital De La Conception
    Marseille, 13385, France
  • Hôpital Emile Muller
    Mulhouse, 68100, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes - Hôtel Dieu
    Nantes, 44000, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers
    Poitiers, 86021, France
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen
    Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen 52074, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Essen
    Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen 45147, Germany
  • Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden
    Minden, Nordrhein-Westfalen 32429, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Halle
    Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt 06120, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
    Dresden, Sachsen 01307, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
    Leipzig, Sachsen 04103, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Jena
    Jena, Thuringen 07747, Germany
  • Uniklinik Köln
    Köln, 50937, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck
    Lübeck, 23538, Germany
  • Kliniken Ostalb - Stauferklinikum Schwäbisch Gmünd
    Mutlangen, 73557, Germany
  • Pécsi Tudományegyetem Klinikai Központ
    Pécs, Baranya 7624, Hungary
  • Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Központ
    Debrecen, Hajdu-Bihar 4032, Hungary
  • Szent Borbála Kórház
    Tatabánya, Komárom-Esztergom 2800, Hungary
  • Dél-pesti Centrumkórház - Országos Hematológiai és Infektológiai Intézet - Szent László Telephely
    Budapest, Pest 1097, Hungary
  • Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Oktató Kórház
    Kaposvár, Somogy 7400, Hungary
  • Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Kórházak És Egyetemi Oktatókórház
    Nyíregyháza, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg 4400, Hungary
  • Markusovszky Egyetemi Oktatókórház Szombathely
    Szombathely, Vas 9700, Hungary
  • Semmelweis Egyetem
    Budapest, 1083, Hungary
  • Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház
    Győr, 9023, Hungary
  • Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center
    Be'er Ya'aqov, Central District 7030000, Israel
  • Bnai Zion Medical Center
    Haifa, Haifa District 31048, Israel
  • Hadassah University Hospital Ein Kerem
    Jerusalem, Jerusalem District, Israel
  • Rambam Health Care Campus
    Haifa, 3109601, Israel
  • Carmel Medical Center
    Haifa, 3436212, Israel
  • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
    Jerusalem, 9103102, Israel
  • Meir Medical Center
    Kfar Saba, 4428164, Israel
  • Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
    Nahariya, Israel
  • Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital
    Petah tikva, 4941492, Israel
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
    Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Careggi
    Firenze, Florence 50134, Italy
  • Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
    San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia 71013, Italy
  • Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori
    Meldola, Forli-Cesena 47014, Italy
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Monza - Ospedale San Gerardo
    Monza, Monza E Brianza 20900, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord
    Pesaro, Pesaro E Urbino 61121, Italy
  • IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Basilicata
    Rionero In Vulture, Potenza 85028, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
    Torino, Turin 10126, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano di Torino
    Torino, Turin 10128, Italy

Showing the first 100 of 167 sites across 22 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gerds A, Verstovsek S, Vannucchi A, Al-Ali HK, Lavie D, Kuykendall A, Grosicki S, Iurlo A, Goh YT, Lazaroiu M, Egyed M, Fox ML, McLornan D, Perkins A, Yoon SS, Gupta V, Kiladjian JJ, Donahue R, Kawashima J, Mesa R. MPN-483 Thrombocytopenic Myelofibrosis (MF) Patients Previously Treated With a JAK Inhibitor in a Phase 3 Randomized Study of Momelotinib (MMB) versus Danazol (DAN) [MOMENTUM]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Oct;22 Suppl 2:S340. doi: 10.1016/S2152-2650(22)01464-1. PubMed 36164014 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2020 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 21 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2022, 1 year after primary completion.

Of 22 phase 3 interventional studies under Primary Myelofibrosis, half reached primary completion within 39 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 68. This study's 21 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 20, 2019
First posted
Nov 22, 2019
StartActual
Feb 7, 2020
Primary completionActual
Dec 3, 2021
CompletionActual
Dec 29, 2022
Results first posted
Dec 22, 2022
Last update
Nov 1, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04173494
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 22, 2019
Start date
Feb 7, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 3, 2021
Completion
Dec 29, 2022
Results posted
Dec 22, 2022
Last update
Nov 1, 2023

Study contacts

Srdan Verstovsek, M.D., Ph.D.
principal investigator · Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Ruben Mesa
principal investigator · UT Health San Antonio Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Momelotinib

Start the discussion