ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT04172935Updated Dec 11, 2019

Productivity Study of Presbyopia Improvement in Textile Workers

An interventional study of Presbyopic Glasses/ Intervention Group in Presbyopia, sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-11.

Sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2019, 6 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
136
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To establish, using a randomized, controlled design, the impact of near vision correction on the productivity of presbyopic textile workers in China, as measured by the change of monthly income.

Read the detailed description

Sustainable development is considered to be a major development strategy to meet rapid economic and social development in China. China is one of the biggest manufacturing hubs in the world. With the rapid development of economy, the health of manufacturing workers is closely related to productivity. In some low-income developing countries, studies have focused on improving the health of manufacturing workers to improve productivity .Most of the studies focused on improving the nutritional intake of workers has a significant effect on improving work efficiency and productivity .

As the global aging is becoming an critical issue for both health and economics, the health of the working population over the age of 45 is of greater concern in low - and middle-income developing countries. China has a workforce of 980 million people (aged 15 to 60). Urban workers and blue-collar workers account for nearly 310 million. With the aging population increased, presbyopia is becoming more and more serious, and it also affects the labor group that needs to work in close proximity. Studies have proved that refractive correction for tea pickers with old vision can effectively improve the yield of tea pickers and increase personal income.Because Guangdong area textile industry is developed, textile worker population is large. Most front-line textile workers need to work in close proximity for a long time, and the problem of aging productivity is increasingly obvious. At present, no relevant studies have explored whether presbyopia affects the work efficiency of textile workers who work in close proximity.

In this study, a randomized controlled clinical study will be conducted on front-line textile workers with presbyopia to explore whether refractive correction can improve labor income and relieve symptoms of visual fatigue for textile workers aged 40 years or above who work in the front-line.

02

Conditions studied

  • Presbyopia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Presbyopia
  • textile worker
03

In context

Presbyopia

336 studies on the registry are indexed under Presbyopia; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 136 is above the median of 61 across 276 interventional studies indexed under Presbyopia.

Browse Presbyopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Employee of E-square for 6 months;
  • Aged >= 40 years;
  • Quantifiable near visual task workers;
  • Habitual near visual acuity of >= 0.8M (\<=6/12) at 40cm in both eyes, correctable to \<=0.5M (>=6/7.5);
  • Near correction spherical equivalent refractive error >= +0.50D or astigmatism \<-1.00D;
  • Asthenopia symptoms reported ( Asthenopia questionnaire score >= 16) Ability to give

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ocular surgery done in the past 3 months;
  • Eye disease detected on baseline eye exam
  • Current ownership of near correction capable of improving near visual acuity to \<= 0.8M (>= 6/12) in either eye
  • Unlikely to complete follow-up due to unsatisfactory work performance, plans to move out of the area, etc.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
136 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Presbyopic Glasses/ Intervention Group

    Immediate provision of a free pair of spherical presbyopic glasses to correct the worker's vision for optimal working distance as measured before intervention.

    Device: Presbyopic Glasses/ Intervention Group

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Will be deferred to receive spectacles as above, after the 4 weeks evaluation period.

Interventions

  • DevicePresbyopic Glasses/ Intervention Group

    Immediate provision of a free pair of spherical presbyopic glasses to correct the worker's vision for optimal picking distance, astigmatism is corrected.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The rate of income change of textile workers

    The rate of income change over baseline.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. The quality of vision function

    Secondary outcome will be the quality of vision function in both groups.National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25 ) questionnaire will be used to measure the quality of vision function.For the NEI-VFQ-25, a composite score (25 items) and near activities sub score (two items) were created on 0-100 scales.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Percentage of glasses wear in intervention group, as well as the purchase and use of glasses in control group.

    Independent compliance observation of wear of the study spectacles in the intervention group, self-reported purchase and use of glasses in the control group will be recorded.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gaoming, Foshan, Guangdong
    Foshan, Guangdong 510000, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04172935
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 21, 2019
Start date
Dec 13, 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 21, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2049 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 11, 2019

Study contacts

Yuting LI, Master
Contact
liyuting@gzzoc.com
+86-020-87334687
Qianyun Chen, Master
Contact
chenqianyun@gzzoc.com
+86-020-66610720
Yangfa Zeng, Master
study director · Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion