ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04161183Updated Oct 5, 2022

Extracoporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) for the Treatment of Detrusor Underactivity/ Underactive Bladder (DU/UAB)

An interventional study of Extracoporeal shock wave therapy and Placebo in Detrusor, Underactive and Detrusor Underactivity, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-05.

Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESWT for the treatment of patients with DU/UAB

Read the detailed description

The prevalence of detrusor underactivity/ underactive bladder (DU/UAB) increased with age, which is 9-28% in young men (\<50 years), and is up to 48% in the elderly men (>70 years) with non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. In women aged >70 years, the prevalence of DU ranged from 12% to 45%. Currently, there is a lack of effective pharmacological or surgical treatment of DU/UAB. Previously we demonstrated that extracoporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) was able to mediate a partial recovery in the contractility of cryoinjury induced DU/UAB model in rats. Wang et al. reported the therapeutic effect of ESWT in the streptozotocin induced diabetic underactive bladder rat model with significantly improved voiding function, enhanced detrusor contractility, increased muscle actin expression and muscle proportion of the bladder wall, and recovery of neuronal integrity and innervations. Taken together, these findings suggest that a potential clinical benefit of ESWT treatment for patients with DU/UAB.

A total of 60 patients with DU/UAB will be enrolled to receive ESWT once a week for 6 weeks or placebo treatment. Patients with DU/UAB symptoms with post void residual (PVR) ≥ 100 mL and proven of DU/UAB without bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) by urodynamic study. Patients should not have uncontrolled acute urinary tract infection, and should not have treated with an investigational device, drug, or procedure for UAB within the last 3 months. Retreatment with ESWT at 3 months if patient reports ineffective will be allowed.

Primary end-point is the change of PVR volume (mL) from baseline to 1 month after treatment. Secondary endpoints include daily frequency, nocturia and FBC as record in 3-day voiding diary, Qmax, Pdet@Qmax, voided volume, PVR and global response assessment (GRA). One visit is required at baseline screening (before first treatment), treatment 1 (V1), treatment 2 (V2), treatment 3 (V3), treatment 4 (V4), treatment 5 (V5), treatment 6 (V6) and 1 month post V6 treatment (V7, primary end-point), and 3 months post V6 treatment (V8). Urine samples will be collected at each time-point for NGF and cytokines tests. Cystoscopy bladder biopsy will be performed at baseline and at 3 months post treatment, optional.

02

Conditions studied

  • Detrusor, Underactive
  • Detrusor Underactivity

Keywords

  • shock wave
  • detrusor underactivity
  • underactive bladder
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Underactive

31 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Underactive; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 66 across 21 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Underactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Underactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,096 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult male or female, at least 20 years of age.
  2. History of UAB (defined as bothersome chronic incomplete bladder emptying) for at least 3 months documented in the medical record with recurring UAB symptoms.
  3. No UAB symptom relief (unresponsiveness) with previous used medications and/or other treatments.
  4. Voiding difficulty (complains of difficulty emptying the bladder).
  5. UAB consistent with diabetes, MS, Parkinson's disease, or aging idiopathic.
  6. Post void residual ≥ 100 mL.
  7. Bladder capacity > 200 mL and \< 800 mL.
  8. Pressure flow Urodynamic testing demonstrating impaired detrusor contractility or areflexia without evidence of BOO, with maximum detrusor pressure Pdet at Qmax (Pdet@Qmax) of \< 20 cmH2O and Maximum flow rate (Qmax) \< 15 mL/sec for female, and BCI \< 100 and BOOI \< 40 for male.
  9. Total UAB Questionnaire Score ≥ 3.
  10. Females of agree to use reliable for the entire study duration.
  11. Willing and capable of understanding and complying with all requirements of the protocol, including proper completion of the voiding diaries and self-administered questionnaires.
  12. Free of active urinary tract infection.
  13. Free of bladder outlet obstruction on enrollment.
  14. Patient or his/her legally acceptable representative has signed the written form.
  15. Subject on clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) should have been on CIC for at least 1 month and should be able to void spontaneously and not be completely dependent on CIC.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patients who is pregnant, lactating, plans to become pregnant, or with without .
  2. Simultaneously participating in another drug or device study or use of any investigational drug(s) or therapeutic device(s) within 3 months preceding enrollment
  3. Has been treated with an investigational device, drug, or procedure for UAB within the last 3 months.
  4. History of cancer in pelvic organs, ureters, or kidneys or any cancer that has undergone treatment within the past 12 months.
  5. Medical condition or disorder that may limit or that may cause protocol deviations (e.g. unable to perform self-evaluations/accurately report medical history, and/or urinary symptoms).
  6. History of spinal cord injury affecting urinary function.
  7. Patients with uncontrolled acute urinary tract infection. An active urinary tract infection as evidenced by positive urine culture at the time of baseline assessment. If a UTI is confirmed in the baseline sample (e.g., positive urine culture containing > 100,000 cfu/mL in midstream urine), the run-in period should be stopped. After successful treatment of the UTI, the patient can be rescreened and if eligible enroll in the study. If the patient has asymptomatic bacteriuria (i.e., a positive urine culture without clinical signs and symptoms of a UTI), the patient should not be excluded.
  8. Currently taking medication(s) that may affect urination, including prescription drugs (i.e. anticholinergics, tricyclic antidepressants, bethanechol), over the counter drugs, dietary and/or herbal supplements, adrenergic antagonists. Alpha adrenergic blockers are allowed to use in a stable condition (longer than 1 month and keeping use during the study period).
  9. Pelvic organ prolapses beyond the introitus (e.g., cystocele, rectocele).
  10. Prior mesh surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic prolapse.
  11. Any other condition which per investigators' judgement, may affect the patient's safety (e.g. significant cardiovascular disease, asthma or other breathing disorders).
  12. Patients with bladder outlet obstruction on enrollment.
  13. Patients with any to be urethral catheterization during diagnostic test or treatment or follow-up period.
  14. Patients have laboratory abnormalities at screening including:

    > 3 x AST > 3 x upper limit of normal range Serum creatinine level > 2 x upper limit of normal range.

  15. Patients with any other serious disease considered by the investigator not in the condition to enter the trial.
  16. Patients with cortisone treatment 6 week before first LESW therapy.

Other single item of Lab examination also can be retested per Investigator's discretion if abnormality. Patient will be rescreened and randomized into the study once confirmed eligible.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo treatment (shock wave probe w/o energy)

    Device: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Extracoporeal shock wave therapy

    Extracoporeal shock wave therapy (shock wave probe w/ energy)

    Device: Extracoporeal shock wave therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceExtracoporeal shock wave therapy

    Probe be transcutaneous applied to the region of bladder dome, right upper lateral wall, right lower lateral wall, left upper lateral wall, and left lower lateral wall with 2500 shocks, frequency of 4 pulses per second and maximum total energy flow density 0.25 millijoule/mm2 once a week for 6 weeks

  • DevicePlacebo

    Probe be transcutaneous applied to the region of bladder dome, right upper lateral wall, right lower lateral wall, left upper lateral wall, and left lower lateral wall with 2500 shocks, frequency of 4 pulses per second but no energy once a week for 6 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Net changes of the mean post void residual (PVR) volume (mL) from baseline to 1 month after the last treatment day

    Net changes of the PVR from baseline to 1 month after the last treatment day (higher PVR volumes represent a worse outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Net changes of the functional bladder capacity (FBC) as assessed by the maximum urine volume (milliliters) as recorded in 3-day voiding diary

    Net changes of the functional bladder capacity (FBC) from baseline to 1 month after the last treatment day (higher FBC volumes represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  2. Net changes of the Global response assessment (GRA)

    Global response assessment (GRA) of therapeutic result by the patient (categorized from -3 to +3, indicating markedly worse to markedly improved) at 1 month after the last treatment day

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  3. Net changes of the maximum flow rate

    Net changes of the maximum flow rate from baseline to 1 month after the last treatment day (higher maximum flow rate represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  4. Net changes of the voided volume

    Net changes of the voided volume from baseline to 1 month after the last treatment day (higher voided volumes represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  5. Net changes of the Pdet@Qmax

    Net changes of the Pdet@Qmax from baseline to 1 month after the last treatment day

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  6. Net changes of the postvoid residual volume

    Net changes of the postvoid residual volume from baseline to 1 month after the last treatment day (lower postvoid residual volume represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  7. Changes of the Underactive Bladder Questionnaire (UAB-Q) score

    Changes of the UAB-Q score from baseline to 1 month after the last treatment day (lower UAB-Q score represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  8. Changes of urinary nerve growth factor and cytokines level

    Changes of the urinary nerve growth factor and cytokines level from baseline to 1 month after the last treatment day

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine
    Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. No abstract available. PubMed 11857671 ↗
  • Miyazato M, Yoshimura N, Chancellor MB. The other bladder syndrome: underactive bladder. Rev Urol. 2013;15(1):11-22. PubMed 23671401 ↗
  • Chuang YC, Plata M, Lamb LE, Chancellor MB. Underactive Bladder in Older Adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2015 Nov;31(4):523-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jul 26. PubMed 26476113 ↗
  • Osman NI, Chapple CR, Abrams P, Dmochowski R, Haab F, Nitti V, Koelbl H, van Kerrebroeck P, Wein AJ. Detrusor underactivity and the underactive bladder: a new clinical entity? A review of current terminology, definitions, epidemiology, aetiology, and diagnosis. Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):389-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.015. Epub 2013 Oct 26. PubMed 24184024 ↗
  • Brierly RD, Hindley RG, McLarty E, Harding DM, Thomas PJ. A prospective controlled quantitative study of ultrastructural changes in the underactive detrusor. J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1374-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000055781.07630.aa. PubMed 12629365 ↗
  • Elbadawi A, Yalla SV, Resnick NM. Structural basis of geriatric voiding dysfunction. II. Aging detrusor: normal versus impaired contractility. J Urol. 1993 Nov;150(5 Pt 2):1657-67. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35867-6. PubMed 8411454 ↗
  • Jiang YH, Kuo HC. Urothelial Barrier Deficits, Suburothelial Inflammation and Altered Sensory Protein Expression in Detrusor Underactivity. J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.071. Epub 2016 Jul 17. PubMed 27436428 ↗
  • Cho KJ, Koh JS, Choi J, Kim JC. Changes in Adenosine Triphosphate and Nitric Oxide in the Urothelium of Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Detrusor Underactivity. J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1392-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.080. Epub 2017 Jun 24. PubMed 28655527 ↗
  • Andersson KE. Detrusor underactivity/underactive bladder: new research initiatives needed. J Urol. 2010 Nov;184(5):1829-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.048. Epub 2010 Sep 17. No abstract available. PubMed 20846686 ↗
  • Osman NI, Esperto F, Chapple CR. Detrusor Underactivity and the Underactive Bladder: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Eur Urol. 2018 Nov;74(5):633-643. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.037. Epub 2018 Aug 20. PubMed 30139634 ↗
  • Wang HJ, Cheng JH, Chuang YC. Potential applications of low-energy shock waves in functional urology. Int J Urol. 2017 Aug;24(8):573-581. doi: 10.1111/iju.13403. Epub 2017 Jul 11. PubMed 28697536 ↗
  • Chuang YC, Tyagi P, Wang HJ, Huang CC, Lin CC, Chancellor MB. Urodynamic and molecular characteristics of detrusor underactivity in a rat cryoinjury model and effects of low energy shock wave therapy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Feb;37(2):708-715. doi: 10.1002/nau.23381. Epub 2017 Aug 2. PubMed 28767169 ↗
  • Chuang YC, Tyagi P, Luo HL, Lee WC, Wang HJ, Huang CC, Chancellor MB. Long-term functional change of cryoinjury-induced detrusor underactivity and effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in a rat model. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Apr;51(4):617-626. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02095-4. Epub 2019 Feb 22. PubMed 30796726 ↗
  • Wang HS, Oh BS, Wang B, Ruan Y, Zhou J, Banie L, Lee YC, Tamaddon A, Zhou T, Wang G, Lin G, Lue TF. Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy ameliorates diabetic underactive bladder in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. BJU Int. 2018 Sep;122(3):490-500. doi: 10.1111/bju.14216. Epub 2018 Apr 20. PubMed 29603534 ↗
  • Zissler A, Steinbacher P, Zimmermann R, Pittner S, Stoiber W, Bathke AC, Sanger AM. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Accelerates Regeneration After Acute Skeletal Muscle Injury. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):676-684. doi: 10.1177/0363546516668622. Epub 2016 Oct 13. PubMed 27729321 ↗
  • Wang B, Zhou J, Banie L, Reed-Maldonado AB, Ning H, Lu Z, Ruan Y, Zhou T, Wang HS, Oh BS, Wang G, Qi SL, Lin G, Lue TF. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy promotes myogenesis through PERK/ATF4 pathway. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Feb;37(2):699-707. doi: 10.1002/nau.23380. Epub 2017 Aug 1. PubMed 28763567 ↗
  • Uren AD, Cotterill N, Harding C, Hillary C, Chapple C, Klaver M, Bongaerts D, Hakimi Z, Abrams P. Qualitative Exploration of the Patient Experience of Underactive Bladder. Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):402-407. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.045. Epub 2017 Apr 8. PubMed 28400168 ↗
  • Zimmermann R, Cumpanas A, Miclea F, Janetschek G. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome in males: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.043. Epub 2009 Mar 25. Erratum In: Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):e140. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.02.011. PubMed 19372000 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2019 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 25 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 10, 2019
First posted
Nov 13, 2019
StartActual
Oct 15, 2019
Primary completionActual
Dec 1, 2021
CompletionActual
Aug 10, 2022
Last update
Oct 5, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04161183
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 13, 2019
Start date
Oct 15, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2021
Completion
Aug 10, 2022
Last update
Oct 5, 2022

Study contacts

Tsang-Tang Hsieh, MD
study chair · Institutional Review Board Chang Gung Medical Foundation

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion