ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05485142Updated Aug 29, 2023

The Treatment Efficacy of Prolotherapy in Bladder Voiding Dysfunction

An interventional study of prolotherapy in Overactive Bladder and Underactive Bladder, sponsored by Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-29.

Sponsored by Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 3 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2019, registered Jul 2022).
  • Started May 2019; still recruiting 7 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Voiding dysfunction including overactive bladder, underactive bladder, and neuropathic bladder. Voiding dysfunction has a great impact on life quality, especially in the elderly society. The current medication for overactive bladder has limited efficacy and the patient easily to dropout the medication because of its side-effects. The underactive bladder is a new entity of voiding dysfunction, its optimal is still unknown. Sacral neuromodulation(SNM) and posterior tibial nerve stimulation(PTNS) have been applied for both overactive bladder and underactive bladder treatment and the results is promising, but the equipment of SNM or PTNS is not available in most places. Prolotherapy using glucose local injection causing inflammatory reaction to stimulate cytokine and growth factors release. Investigators combined the concepts of posterior tibial nerve stimulation and prolotherapy to treat voiding dysfunction. Investigators anticipate it maybe a new promising treatment for voiding dysfunction.

Read the detailed description

Inclusion criteria:1. Adults over 20 years-old. 2. The patient who meets the diagnostic criteria of overactive bladder or underactive bladder. 3. The patient who capable to complete 3-days voiding diary and the questionnaire. Exclusion criteria: 1. The patient has severe stress urinary incontinence, severe pelvic organ prolapse, acute urinary tract infection, urolithiasis, or urinary tract malignancy. 2. The patient who has active skin disease on legs or not suitable for leg local injection. 3. Pregnant women. Method: 40 overactive bladder patients and 40 underactive bladder patients. The patients will receive 5% glucose 10ml local injection peripheral to posterior tibial nerve near ankle under ultrasound guidance once a week for 4 weeks, then the patients will be followed up once-a-month for 3 months. OverActive Bladder Symptom Score(OABSS), Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom score(CLSS) questionnaire, 3-days voiding diary, and urine nerve growth factor are used for assessment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder
  • Underactive Bladder

Keywords

  • neural prolotherapy
  • detrusor underactivity
  • overactive bladder
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

858 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 70 across 649 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults over 20 years-old.
  2. The patient who meets the diagnostic criteria of overactive bladder or underactive bladder.
  3. The patient who capable to complete 3-days voiding diary and the questionnaire.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe stress urinary incontinence or severe pelvic organ prolapse.
  2. Acute urinary tract infection.
  3. Active hematuria, urolithiasis, or neoplasm of urinary tract.
  4. Acute skin lesion over the ankle injection site or the patient who could not tolerate ankle injection.
  5. Pregnant women.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    overactive bladder

    Overactive bladder

    Procedure: prolotherapy

  • Experimental
    Underactive bladder

    Underactive bladder

    Procedure: prolotherapy

Interventions

  • Procedureprolotherapy

    5% glucose 10ml local injection peripheral to posterior tibial nerve near ankle under ultrasound guidance once a week for 4 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overactive Bladder Symptom Score

    The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.

    Time frame: Week 0

  2. Overactive Bladder Symptom Score

    The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.

    Time frame: Week1

  3. Overactive Bladder Symptom Score

    The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.

    Time frame: Week2

  4. Overactive Bladder Symptom Score

    The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.

    Time frame: Week3

  5. Overactive Bladder Symptom Score

    The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.

    Time frame: Week4

  6. Overactive Bladder Symptom Score

    The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.

    Time frame: Week8

  7. Overactive Bladder Symptom Score

    The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.

    Time frame: Week12

  8. Overactive Bladder Symptom Score

    The improvement of overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), OABSS ranged from 0 to 15, the higher score means more severity of overactive bladder.

    Time frame: Week16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cystometric bladder capacity

    Cystometric bladder capacity: the volume of water instilled into bladder while performing cystometry examination.

    Time frame: Week0

  2. Cystometric bladder capacity

    Cystometric bladder capacity: the volume of water instilled into bladder while performing cystometry examination.

    Time frame: Week4

  3. Cystometric bladder capacity

    Cystometric bladder capacity: the volume of water instilled into bladder while performing cystometry examination.

    Time frame: Week16

Other outcomes

  1. The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)

    The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems. Ranged from 1 to 6. The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.

    Time frame: Week 0

  2. The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition

    The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems. Ranged from 1 to 6. The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.

    Time frame: Week1

  3. The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition

    The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems. Ranged from 1 to 6. The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.

    Time frame: Week2

  4. The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition

    The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems. Ranged from 1 to 6. The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.

    Time frame: Week3

  5. The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition

    The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems. Ranged from 1 to 6. The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.

    Time frame: Week4

  6. The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition

    The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems.

    Time frame: Week8

  7. The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition

    The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems. Ranged from 1 to 6. The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.

    Time frame: Week12

  8. The improvement of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition

    The PPBC measures the patients' perception of their urinary (bladder) problems. Range from 1 to 6. The core 1 means no bother from bladder condition, higher score means more bother form bladder condition.

    Time frame: Week16

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fowler CJ, Griffiths D, de Groat WC. The neural control of micturition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jun;9(6):453-66. doi: 10.1038/nrn2401. PubMed 18490916 ↗
  • Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, Vasavada SP; American Urological Association; Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.087. Epub 2015 Jan 23. PubMed 25623739 ↗
  • Kaptchuk TJ. Acupuncture: theory, efficacy, and practice. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Mar 5;136(5):374-83. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00010. PubMed 11874310 ↗
  • Abraham TS, Chen ML, Ma SX. TRPV1 expression in acupuncture points: response to electroacupuncture stimulation. J Chem Neuroanat. 2011 Apr;41(3):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 20. PubMed 21256210 ↗
  • Chen HC, Chen MY, Hsieh CL, Wu SY, Hsu HC, Lin YW. TRPV1 is a Responding Channel for Acupuncture Manipulation in Mice Peripheral and Central Nerve System. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;49(5):1813-1824. doi: 10.1159/000493627. Epub 2018 Sep 19. PubMed 30231245 ↗
  • Zhang T, Yu J, Huang Z, Wang G, Zhang R. Electroacupuncture improves neurogenic bladder dysfunction through activation of NGF/TrkA signaling in a rat model. J Cell Biochem. 2019 Jun;120(6):9900-9905. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28272. Epub 2018 Dec 28. PubMed 30592331 ↗
  • Zhao Y, Zhou J, Mo Q, Wang Y, Yu J, Liu Z. Acupuncture for adults with overactive bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(8):e9838. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009838. PubMed 29465566 ↗
  • MacDiarmid SA, Peters KM, Shobeiri SA, Wooldridge LS, Rovner ES, Leong FC, Siegel SW, Tate SB, Feagins BA. Long-term durability of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of overactive bladder. J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.160. PubMed 19913821 ↗
  • Sakura S, Chan VW, Ciriales R, Drasner K. The addition of 7.5% glucose does not alter the neurotoxicity of 5% lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1995 Jan;82(1):236-40. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199501000-00028. PubMed 7832306 ↗
  • Tsui BC, Kropelin B, Ganapathy S, Finucane B. Dextrose 5% in water: fluid medium for maintaining electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves during stimulating catheter placement. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1562-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00736.x. PubMed 16223407 ↗
  • Tsui BCH, Kropelin B. The electrophysiological effect of dextrose 5% in water on single-shot peripheral nerve stimulation. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1837-1839. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153020.84780.A5. PubMed 15920223 ↗
  • Wu YT, Ho TY, Chou YC, Ke MJ, Li TY, Tsai CK, Chen LC. Six-month Efficacy of Perineural Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Aug;92(8):1179-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.025. PubMed 28778254 ↗
  • Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Perez-Marrero RA, Khan AU, Wooldridge LS, Davis GL, Macdiarmid SA. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus Sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036. Epub 2010 Feb 20. PubMed 20171677 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05485142
Lead sponsor
Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital
Responsible party
Jing-Dung, SHEN (Senior Urologist, Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 3, 2022
Start date
May 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 29, 2023

Study contacts

Jing-dung Shen, MD
Contact
jdwhydo@gmail.com
+886958878129
Jing-dung Shen
principal investigator · Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion