CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04155450Updated Dec 20, 2021

Effects of Extension Biased External Limb Loading in Addition to McKenzie Extension Protocol in Lumbar Derangement Syndrome

An interventional study of Extension Biased External Limb Loading Exercises and McKenzie Extension Exercise Protocol in Sciatica, Low Back Pain and Low Back Pain, Mechanical, sponsored by Foundation University Islamabad. Completed at 2 sites in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-20.

Sponsored by Foundation University Islamabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Low back pain is one of the most common problem affecting one's daily living activities.

McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnostic Therapy (MDT) is an appealing modality of treatment. McKenzie classified the lumbar back pain into three categories i.e. lumbar postural syndrome, lumbar dysfunction syndrome and lumbar derangement syndrome.

Progressive extension bias limb loading exercises at lumbar region emphasizes on lumbar extensor musculature. The purpose of the current study is to determine the effects of extension biased lumbar limb loading exercises along with McKenzie extension protocols in the management of patients with lumbar derangement syndrome, which will also be a cost effective management option. It will also add to the existing pool of knowledge in the fields of conservative low back pain treatment, physical therapy, orthopedic manual therapy and musculoskeletal medicine.

Read the detailed description

Low back pain is one of the most common problem affecting one's daily living activities.

Back pain results from multifactorial etiology with anatomical, psychological, physiological and social consequences and it is often classified as acute, sub-acute and chronic according to pain duration. Upto 71% of people with acute low back pain in primary care report persistent symptoms and therefore there is requirement for effective treatments in those who have not recovered after acute phase. Therapeutic exercises, manual therapy, functional training, modalities, traction, endurance training of back extensors, Kinesio-taping, trigger point therapy, deep friction massage are some of the procedures being safely and effectively applied by physical therapists to combat back discomfort or disorder.

McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnostic Therapy (MDT) approach was developed by Robin McKenzie who was a physical therapist from New Zealand back in 1950s. MDT is an appealing modality of treatment focusing on five areas of benefit-including reliable assessment, early prognosis, self-treatment, better outcomes and prevention of recurrence. The evaluation also determine who will get benefit from treatment and who will require another treatment protocols. McKenzie classified the lumbar back pain into three categories i.e. lumbar postural syndrome, lumbar dysfunction syndrome and lumbar derangement syndrome based on symptomatic or mechanical responses observed during repeated lumbar end range movements. The McKenzie Institute Lumbar Spine Assessment will be used to classify the patients into different syndromes and to choose the desired one fulfilling the inclusion criteria of study.

When normal tissues are deformed over a prolonged period it ends with postural syndrome like slouched posture and the postural syndrome may lead to dysfunction or derangement syndromes. Deformation of structures and tissues that causes pain at end ranges of available motion is characterized as dysfunction syndrome. Derangement syndrome is related to displacement of intervertebral disc with or without involvement of radiating pattern of pain along with back pain and fluctuations in symptoms or pain with directional movements can be observed due to force changes on affected intervertebral disc.

Centralizing and Peripherilizing are two important concepts with a strong association towards derangement syndrome. Centralizing reveals that movements or loading moves the most distal pain proximally while Peripherilizing shows movements or loading moves the pain more distally. McKenzie lumbar extension exercises results in reduction, abolition or centralization of symptoms. In Lumbar derangement syndromes following MDT classification system, a subgroup in which symptoms improve with lumbar extension is labeled as posterior derangement syndrome whereas the subgroup in which symptoms improve with lumbar flexion is labeled as anterior derangement syndrome. Work of many researchers, like Peterson, Machado and Paatelma, provided the strongest evidence regarding the validity of McKenzie method of treatment.

Progressive limb loading exercises at lumbar region fall under two categories, one group emphasis on abdominal musculature and the second group emphasize on lumbar extensor musculature. Patient begins from quadruped position and progress towards prone position initiating with low intensity training and progressing towards greater intensity along with spinal compression in case of lumbar extensors. Progression towards prone position at the end range of motion requires greater control of neutral spine thus providing excellent stabilization of lumbar extensors.

A randomized controlled trial on McKenzie treatment approach in people with chronic low back pain conducted by M.H Halliday et al. provide preliminary evidence that treatment effects of McKenzie Exercises are greater when the core principles are followed with significant reduction in pain and disability of 15.2 [95% CI 7.6 to 22.7] and 11.7 [95% CI 5.4 to18.0]. Srivastav et al. conducted a study at mechanical low back pain with significant improvement having p\<0.05 at NPRS \& MODI after application of lumbar stabilization exercises along with conventional physical therapy.

An international survey conducted in 15 different countries in 2019 regarding McKenzie classification system involving 64.8% lumbar, 29.6% cervical, 5.6% thoracic spine of 750 patients fulfilling MDT criteria revealed 0.1% postural syndrome, 1.7% dysfunction syndrome, 75.4% derangement and 22.8% other. In derangement syndrome 82.5% were extension biased thus Derangement is the most commonly encountered pain syndrome and extension is so far the most common directional preference.

With the help of this study the investigators can determine the effects of extension biased lumbar limb loading exercises along with McKenzie extension protocols in the management of patients with lumbar derangement syndrome, which will also be a cost effective management option. It will add to the existing pool of knowledge in the fields of conservative spinal management, physical therapy, orthopedic manual therapy and musculoskeletal medicine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sciatica
  • Low Back Pain
  • Low Back Pain, Mechanical

Keywords

  • exercise
  • manipulation, spinal
  • rehabilitation
  • therapy, manual
  • manual therapy
03

In context

Sciatica

139 studies on the registry are indexed under Sciatica; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 66 across 111 interventional studies indexed under Sciatica.

Browse Sciatica studies →

Lead sponsor

Foundation University Islamabad is the lead sponsor of 238 studies on the registry; 128 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients of age 30 to 50 years
  • Patients of both Gender i.e. Male \& Female
  • Lumbar Derangement Syndrome
  • Centralization or Peripheralization phenomenon
  • Constant or Intermittent pain worsening on repeated movements
  • Somatic, radicular or combination of both patterns of pain
  • Positive Radicular signs \& symptoms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lumbar Postural syndrome
  • Lumbar Dysfunction syndrome
  • Post laminectomy/discectomy
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Osteoporosis/Fractures
  • Cauda equine syndrome
  • Recent history of spinal trauma or surgery
  • Lumbar myelopathy
  • Patients with known metabolic diseases
  • Participants having less than 20% ODI scoring
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    McKenzie Extension with External Limb Loading Protocol

    Moist Heat Pack for 10 mins McKenzie Extension Exercise Protocol Static: 1. Lying Prone 2. Lying prone in extension 3. Sustained extension 4. Posture correction Dynamic: 5. Extension in lying 6. Extension in lying with clinician overpressure 7. Extension mobilization 8. Extension in standing Limb loading for basic stabilization progression of the lumbar extensors. Begin in the quadruped position and progress the intensity by 1. Flexing one upper extremity 2. Extending one lower extremity with a leg slide 3. Extending one lower extremity by lifting it off the mat 4. Flexing one upper extremity while extending contralateral lower extremity and then alternate to opposite extremities. Progress to prone position: 5. Extending one lower extremity 6. Extending both lower extremity

    Other: Extension Biased External Limb Loading Exercises · Other: McKenzie Extension Exercise Protocol · Other: Moist Heat

  • Active comparator
    McKenzie Extension Group

    Moist Heat Pack for 10 mins McKenzie Extension Protocol Sequence Static: 1. Lying Prone 2. Lying prone in extension 3. Sustained extension 4. Posture correction Dynamic: 5. Extension in lying 6. Extension in lying with clinician overpressure 7. Extension mobilization 8. Extension in standing

    Other: McKenzie Extension Exercise Protocol · Other: Moist Heat

Interventions

  • OtherExtension Biased External Limb Loading Exercises

    Begin in the quadruped position and progress the intensity by 1. Flexing one upper extremity 2. Extending one lower extremity with a leg slide 3. Extending one lower extremity by lifting it off the mat 4. Flexing one upper extremity while extending contralateral lower extremity and then alternate to opposite extremities. Progress to prone position: 5. Extending one lower extremity 6. Extending both lower extremity

    Also known as: Core stability exercises

  • OtherMcKenzie Extension Exercise Protocol

    Static: 1. Lying Prone 2. Lying prone in extension 3. Sustained extension 4. Posture correction Dynamic: 5. Extension in lying 6. Extension in lying with clinician overpressure 7. Extension mobilization 8. Extension in standing

  • OtherMoist Heat

    Moist Heating for 10 minutes at lumbar spine in prone position using moist heat packs, heated via hydro-collator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index

    Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) assess symptoms and severity of low back pain in terms of disablement and the degree to which back pain impacts functional activities. Questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how one's back or leg pain is affecting his/her ability to manage in everyday life. It has good person and item reliability with an excellent test retest reliability (ICC= 0.97) and floor effect of 29.9% and ceiling effect of 3.9%. ODI will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session. Lower score shows better outcome.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. Fall Risk Test

    Biodex Balance System has a fall risk screening test and conditioning protocol based on well-established science and technology. Screening include analytical balance testing by identifying a potential problem and establishes Z-Score on the basis of mean values. Fall risk will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session. Lower score shows better outcome.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  3. Postural Stability Index PSI will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session.

    Postural stability screening test will be used to determine the postural stability index of the participants.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  4. Range of Motion

    Lumbar ROM including Forward bending, Backward bending, Right side bending and Left side bending will be measured using Inclinometers. ROM will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session. Greater range shows better outcome.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  5. Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance

    Clinical Test of Sensory Integration of Balance (CTSIB) will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  6. Balance Error Scoring System

    Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  7. STarT Back Screening Tool

    The Keele STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) (9-item version) is a brief validated tool, designed to screen primary care patients with low back pain for prognostic indicators that are relevant to initial decision making. STarT will be assessed at the base line and at the end of 2 weeks session.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Foundation University Islamabad
    Islamabad, Federal 46000, Pakistan
  • Shafi International Hospital
    Islamabad, Federal 46000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04155450
Lead sponsor
Foundation University Islamabad
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 7, 2019
Start date
Nov 1, 2019
Primary completion
May 1, 2020
Completion
May 1, 2020
Last update
Dec 20, 2021

Study contacts

Shoaib Kayani, DPT, MS-OMPT*
principal investigator · Foundation University Islamabad
Muhammad Osama, DPT, MSOMPT, CHPE, ACMEd, PhD*
study director · Foundation University Islamabad

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion