ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04131660VONIVOOUpdated Apr 15, 2026

Efficacy of Volume Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure at Risk of Obstructive Apneas or Obesity Hypoventilation

An interventional study of AVAPS-AE mode during NIV and S/T mode during NIV in Acute Respiratory Failure, Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure and Respiratory Acidosis, sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-15.

Primary conditionAcidosis, RespiratoryRegistry: Respiratory InsufficiencyReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Respiratory Insufficiency — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Acidosis, Respiratory
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Acidosis, Respiratory, a narrower term within Respiratory Insufficiency.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Difficulty in enrolling new patients
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares a volume targeted pressure support non-invasive ventilation with an automatic PEP regulation (AVAPS-AE mode) to a pressure support non-invasive ventilation (S/T mode) in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with acidosis. This study focuses on patients at risk of obstructive apneas or obesity-hypoventilation syndrom (BMI≥30 kg/m²). Half of participants (33 patients) will receive non invasive ventilation with AVAPS-AE mode, the other half will receive non-invasive ventilation with S/T mode.

Read the detailed description

So far, in respiratory intensive care units, the usual treatment of patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with acidosis is non-invasive ventilation set with a pressure support mode (S/T or VS/AI mode depending on the ventilator manufacturer).

AVAPS-AE mode is a volume targeted pressure support mode with an automatic PEP. With the forced oscillations method, the ventilator is able to detect the obstruction and the resistances of upper airways.

It allows the ventilator to change its pressure settings to keep the targeted volume and avoid apneas and hypoventilation.

That is why in patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m², at risk of obesity hypoventilation syndrom or obstructive apneas, this ventilation mode may be interesting.

AVAPS-AE has been evaluated in the home ventilation showing it is as efficient as S/T mode in controlling PaCO2.

However it has never been compared to S/T mode in acute respiratory failure care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Failure
  • Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
  • Respiratory Acidosis
  • Obesity
  • Hypoventilation Syndrome
  • Apnea, Obstructive

Keywords

  • non-invasive ventilation
  • respiratory failure
  • obese
  • obesity
  • Hypoventilation Syndrome
  • apnea
  • hypercapnic
  • acidosis
  • AVAPS-AE
  • VONIVOO
03

In context

Acidosis, Respiratory Reclassified

22 studies on the registry are indexed under Acidosis, Respiratory; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 18 across 16 interventional studies indexed under Acidosis, Respiratory.

Browse Acidosis, Respiratory studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Rouen is the lead sponsor of 418 studies on the registry; 106 are open to participants now.

Compared within Acidosis, Respiratory, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Respiratory Insufficiency. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient of age
  • Patient benefitting of social security
  • Informed patient who signed the information note and the research enlighted consent form
  • Admission in respiratory intensive care unit for an acid-hypercapnic exacerbation (defined by pH≤ 7,35)
  • ≥ 30kg/m2
  • PaCO2 > 6.5 kPa on blood gases at ICU admission

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed with a spirometry (VEMS/CVF \< 70%)
  • Pregnant women, or breast-feeding women
  • Patient with a judiciary or administrative liberty deprivation
  • Patients under guardianship
  • to NIV
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AVAPS-AE mode

    A volume targeted pressure support ventilation mode

    Device: AVAPS-AE mode during NIV

  • Active comparator
    S/T mode

    A pressure support ventilation mode

    Device: S/T mode during NIV

Interventions

  • DeviceAVAPS-AE mode during NIV

    NIV will be setup in AVAPS-AE mode, with a Trilogy ventilation device (Respironics, Murrysville, PA). The range of positive expiratory pressure will be set between 4 and 14 cmH2O. The range of inspiratory pressure support will be set between 14 and 24 cmH2. The target tidal volume will be set to achieve 8 to 10 mL/kg of ideal body weight (Size (m) \* Size (m) \* 23).

  • DeviceS/T mode during NIV

    NIV will be setup in ST mode, with a Trilogy ventilation device (Respironics, Murrysville, PA). The physician will decide the level of positive expiratory pressure and of pressure support.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Resolution of hypercapnia

    Time between admission and resolution of hypercapnia (≤ 6.5 kPa)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of persistent apneic events on NIV (/h) during the first night

    Comparison of persistent apneic events on NIV (/h) during the first night (determined with a respiratory polygraph) between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (determined with an oxymeter)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Comparison of patient-ventilator asynchronisms during NIV (/h)

    Comparison of patient-ventilator asynchronisms during NIV (/h) between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (determined with ventilator datas and a respiratory polygraph)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Comparison of time during NIV with a oxygen saturation below 90%

    Comparison of time during NIV with a oxygen saturation below 90% between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (determined with an oxymeter)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Comparison of NIV confort

    Comparison of NIV confort between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (NIV confort determined by a visual scale: 0: very comfortable to 10:not comfortable at all)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Comparison of length of stay

    Comparison of length of stay between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU Rouen
    Rouen, 76031, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be avaible by Email request to Dr. Patout Maxime

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: Within 2 years of study publication

Access criteria: Researchers in the field of acute/chronic respiratory failure.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04131660
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 18, 2019
Start date
Dec 4, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021
Completion
Jun 30, 2021
Last update
Apr 15, 2026

Study contacts

Antoine Cuvelier, MD, PhD
study director · UH Rouen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion