ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04107766Updated Apr 17, 2026Results posted

NOLA (NeuWave Observational Liver Ablation) Registry

An observational study in Cancer of the Liver, Liver Cancer and Neoplasms, Liver, sponsored by Ethicon, Inc.. Terminated at 28 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-17.

Sponsored by Ethicon, Inc. (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Observational

Why this study was terminated
Change in Company Strategy
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
1,254
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, observational registry that follows patients for a total of 5 years from the date of the first liver ablation procedure with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, observational registry that follows patients for a total of 5 years from the date of the first liver ablation procedure with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System. The data gathered from participating sites will be available to be analyzed to develop ablation parameter guidance for ablation approaches under varying patient liver tissue conditions and liver lesions.

This is an "umbrella registry," which was included as an optional component in other NEUWAVE studies; hence, data from consenting patients who are or will be enrolled in other NEUWAVE soft tissue liver lesion ablation studies will be included in this registry. All other patients will be enrolled and followed prospectively, enrolled retrospectively with prospective, longitudinal follow up, or enrolled retrospectively with all retrospective follow up.

Enrollment for this study will include up to 1,500 patients throughout the world who underwent or are scheduled to undergo microwave ablation of one or more soft tissue liver lesions using the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System or the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System with Ablation Confirmation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer of the Liver
  • Liver Cancer
  • Neoplasms, Liver

Browse trials for

03

In context

Liver Neoplasms

1,345 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Neoplasms; 335 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,254 is above the median of 200 across 342 observational studies indexed under Liver Neoplasms.

Browse Liver Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Ethicon, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 66 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with at least one soft-tissue liver lesion ablated with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System or NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System with Ablation Confirmation.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients who underwent or are scheduled to undergo a microwave ablation of one or more liver lesions with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System per the device's Instructions for Use (IFU).
  2. Patients with signed (or waiver approved by IRB/EC) who are willing to comply with the assessment schedule, and willing to have data included in the database.
  3. Patients greater than or equal to 22 years old at the time of informed consent (or waiver approved by IRB/EC).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a of less than 1 year, in the opinion of the treating physician.
  2. Use of microwave ablation purely as a transection tool, rather than focused liver lesion ablation.
  3. Patient is currently participating, or planning to participate, in another NeuWave/Ethicon-funded clinical trial or registry studying microwave ablation in the liver. Note: roll-over patients from previous NeuWave trials are permitted.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
1,254 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Population

    Patients with at least one soft-tissue liver lesion ablated with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System or NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System with Ablation Confirmation.

    Device: Microwave Ablation

Interventions

  • DeviceMicrowave Ablation

    Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will undergo microwave ablation (MWA) with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System with or without Ablation Confirmation of at least one soft-tissue liver lesion, in accordance with the study site's standard-of-care (SOC) practices.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical Success

    Technical Success is defined as ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion(s) plus an ablative margin), as defined by the performing physician who will make the assessment using CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray, immediately following the procedure.

    Time frame: Immediately post-ablation (Day 0)

  2. Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technique Efficacy

    Technique efficacy is defined as ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion(s) plus an ablative margin), as defined by the performing physician who will make the assessment using CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray at Visit 3 (between 7 days and less than 3 months post-ablation).

    Time frame: Between 7 days and less than 3 months post-ablation

  3. Target Lesion Recurrence Rate

    Target lesion recurrence (local recurrence) was evaluated at every visit after ablation of the target lesion(s) and assessed by CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray.

    Time frame: Assessed at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months, 42 months, 48 months, 54 months, and 60 months post-ablation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    Overall survival was evaluated at every visit after ablation of the target lesion(s)

    Time frame: Assessed at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months, 42 months, 48 months, 54 months, and 60 months post-ablation.

07

Results

Posted Apr 17, 2026
Limitations and caveats
The study planned to enroll up to 1500 patients, but was terminated early as the result of a business decision that was not safety related. At the time of early termination, 1254 patients had been enrolled, and 1203 patients had been treated.

Participant flow

1254 participants enrolled in the study. 1 participant withdrew from the study, 1 participant discontinued, and 49 of these participants were later screen failures as they did not meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria. 1203 participants were treated with the NeuWave microwave ablation device.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePopulation
Started1203
Completed83
Not completed1120
Withdrew: Study stopped by sponsor750
Withdrew: Adverse event3
Withdrew: Death213
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up53
Withdrew: Physician decision9
Withdrew: Site closed by sponsor12
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject18
Withdrew: Other62

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical Success

Technical Success is defined as ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion(s) plus an ablative margin), as defined by the performing physician who will make the assessment using CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray, immediately following the procedure.

Time frame:
Immediately post-ablation (Day 0)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical Success
ParticipantsPopulation
Yes1174
No24
PrimaryNumber of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technique Efficacy

Technique efficacy is defined as ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion(s) plus an ablative margin), as defined by the performing physician who will make the assessment using CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray at Visit 3 (between 7 days and less than 3 months post-ablation).

Time frame:
Between 7 days and less than 3 months post-ablation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technique Efficacy
ParticipantsPopulation
Yes1000
No53
PrimaryTarget Lesion Recurrence Rate

Target lesion recurrence (local recurrence) was evaluated at every visit after ablation of the target lesion(s) and assessed by CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray.

Time frame:
Assessed at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months, 42 months, 48 months, 54 months, and 60 months post-ablation.
Reported as:
Number · Percent Probability
Target Lesion Recurrence Rate
Percent ProbabilityPopulation
At 6 month follow up4.69 (3.51 to 6.25)
At 12 month follow up10.05 (8.24 to 12.23)
At 18 month follow up14.36 (12.12 to 16.98)
At 24 month follow up17.14 (14.63 to 20.04)
At 30 month follow up19.94 (17.09 to 23.19)
At 36 month follow up21.44 (18.39 to 24.92)
At 42 month follow up25.52 (21.73 to 29.84)
At 48 month follow up27.42 (23.22 to 32.20)
At 54 month follow up29.72 (24.72 to 35.47)
At 60 month follow up31.57 (26.71 to 38.38)
SecondaryOverall Survival

Overall survival was evaluated at every visit after ablation of the target lesion(s)

Time frame:
Assessed at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months, 42 months, 48 months, 54 months, and 60 months post-ablation.
Reported as:
Number · Percent Probability
Overall Survival
Percent ProbabilityPopulation
At 6 month follow up98.27 (97.34 to 98.88)
At 12 month follow up95.12 (93.66 to 96.25)
At 18 month follow up89.96 (87.91 to 91.69)
At 24 month follow up84.66 (82.14 to 86.84)
At 30 month follow up81.42 (78.65 to 83.87)
At 36 month follow up77.77 (74.69 to 80.53)
At 42 month follow up74.86 (71.44 to 77.94)
At 48 month follow up71.50 (67.51 to 75.09)
At 54 month follow up68.14 (63.25 to 72.52)
At 60 month follow up68.14 (63.25 to 72.52)

Adverse events

Collected over 5 years following the initial ablation procedure.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Population213/1,203 (17.7%)488/1,203 (40.6%)398/1,203 (33.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 436
Most frequent serious events
EventPopulation
Death of unknown causeGeneral disorders51/1203
PyrexiaGeneral disorders36/1203
Hepatic encephalopathyNervous system disorders31/1203
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders27/1203
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders27/1203
PneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders23/1203
Malignant neoplasm progressionNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)20/1203
SepsisInfections and infestations18/1203
PneumoniaInfections and infestations17/1203
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders17/1203
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPopulation
Procedural painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications107/1203
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders99/1203
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders53/1203
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders50/1203
PyrexiaGeneral disorders31/1203
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders30/1203
Wound secretionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications28/1203

Baseline characteristics

1203 participants underwent NEUWAVE microwave ablation, with or without Ablation Confirmation software, of at least one soft-tissue liver lesion in accordance with the study site's standard-of-care.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Population
Mean64.4 ± 10.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Population
Female376
Male827
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Population
Hispanic or Latino76
Not Hispanic or Latino929
Unknown or Not Reported198
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Population
American Indian or Alaska Native3
Asian238
Black or African American34
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander2
White751
Multiple2
Not Reported141
Other32
Number of Target Lesions per Participant
Number of Target Lesions per Participant(Participants)Population
1 Lesion970
2 Lesions158
3 Lesions55
4 Lesions12
5 or More Lesions8
08

Study locations

28 sites
  • Loma Linda University Medical Center
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Sutter Institute for Medical Research
    Sacramento, California 95816, United States
  • Olive View UCLA
    Sylmar, California 91342, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Sarasota Memorial Hospital
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • ICAHN School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Virginia
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
  • University of Washington Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • University of Wisconsin At Madison
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
  • Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    Shanghai, 200120, China
  • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
    Paris, 75015, France
  • Tenon Hospital
    Paris, 75020, France
  • University Hospital Regensburg
    Regensburg, 93053, Germany
  • VUMC Amsterdam
    Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Goningen
    Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands
  • Radboud UMC
    Nijmegen, 6525 GA, Netherlands
  • Singapore General Hospital
    Singapore, 168582, Singapore
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital
    Singapore, 308433, Singapore
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH)
    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13620, South Korea
  • St. James's University Hospital
    Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
  • The Royal Marsden Hospital
    London, SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
    Norwich, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Johnson \& Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

Data sharing details ↗ · yoda.yale.edu

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04107766
Lead sponsor
Ethicon, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 27, 2019
Start date
Jan 15, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 18, 2025
Completion
Jun 18, 2025
Results posted
Apr 17, 2026
Last update
Apr 17, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion