ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06664788Updated Nov 3, 2026

A Study of ETHIZIA Versus SURGICEL Original in Controlling Soft Tissue Bleeding During Open Surgery

An interventional study of ETHIZIA and SURGICEL Original in Hemostasis and Hemostatic Techniques, sponsored by Ethicon, Inc.. Completed at 7 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Ethicon, Inc. (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 3, 2026Now CompletedNow Active, not recruiting+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ETHIZIA to control minimal, mild, or moderate soft tissue bleeding during open surgery when compared to SURGICEL Original in the percentage of cases achieving hemostasis at 3 minutes after product application, and without re-bleeding up to 10 minutes after application.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemostasis
  • Hemostatic Techniques
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ethicon, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 66 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Pre-operative

  • Participant is scheduled to undergo an elective open, abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, thoracic (non-cardiac) or extremity surgical procedure
  • Participant is willing and able to give written for the clinical investigation participation

Intra-operative

  • Participant in whom the Investigator can identify and visualize a target bleeding site for which any applicable conventional means for hemostasis (e.g., suture, ligature, or cautery) are ineffective or impractical
  • Target Bleeding Site is identified to originate from soft tissue, defined as organ bed, loose areolar tissue, fat, lymphatic tissue/lymph node beds, and muscle
  • The choice is made to use a hemostatic agent to stop the bleeding, and there is the ability to apply pressure on the surface of the hemostatic agent to achieve hemostasis
  • Participant has a Target Bleeding Site with a SBSS score of 1, 2, or 3 (e.g., reflecting minimal, mild, or moderate bleeding severities)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Pre-operative

  • Participant is scheduled for another planned surgery within the follow-up period and the subsequent surgery would jeopardize the ETHIZIA or SURGICEL Original application
  • Participant is taking multiple antithrombotic therapies in therapeutic dosage up to the time of surgery, but allowing exclusive use of acetylsalicylic acid
  • Participant has an active or suspected infection at the bleeding site
  • Participant is pregnant, planning on becoming pregnant, or actively breastfeeding during the 28-day follow-up period

Intra-operative

  • Target bleeding site is identified to originate from parenchymal organ tissue, cardiovascular (anastomotic or cardiovascular repair sites) tissue, or is in proximity to a foramina in bone, or areas of bony confine
  • Target bleeding site is from a large defect in an artery or vein that requires vascular reconstruction with maintenance of vessel patency
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ETHIZIA

    ETHIZIA will be applied at bleeding sites that meet the inclusion criteria in participants undergoing open surgery to control soft tissue bleeding. Participants will be followed up for 28 days after surgery.

    Device: ETHIZIA

  • Active comparator
    SURGICEL Original

    SURGICEL Original will be applied at bleeding sites that meet the inclusion criteria in participants undergoing open surgery to control soft tissue bleeding. Participants will be followed-up for 28 days after surgery.

    Device: SURGICEL Original

Interventions

  • DeviceETHIZIA

    ETHIZIA patch will be applied to bleeding site intraoperatively.

  • DeviceSURGICEL Original

    SURGICEL Original will be applied to bleeding site intraoperatively.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Cases Achieving Hemostasis at Three Minutes Following Product Application And With No Rebleeding Up to 10 Minutes Following Application at The Target Bleeding Site

    Cases achieving hemostasis at 3 minutes following product application \& with no rebleeding up to 10 minutes following application at the target bleeding site (first bleeding site treated) will be determined by Surface Bleeding Severity Scale (SBSS). SBSS provides a clinically validated score for assessment of bleeding at the target site, and consists of 6 scores (0 = none, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, not immediately life-threatening, 5 = extreme, immediately life-threatening). A grade of 0 (None/Dry) on the SBSS is considered as achieving hemostasis.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (up to 10 minutes)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Hemostasis at Target Bleeding Site

    Time to achieve hemostasis for target bleeding site up to 10 minutes will be evaluated and presented using Kaplan-Meier estimated distribution.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (up to 10 minutes)

  2. Percentage of Bleeding Sites Achieving Hemostasis at Three Minutes Following Product Application And With No Rebleeding Up to 10 Minutes Following Application at All Treated Bleeding Sites

    Percentage of bleeding sites achieving hemostasis at 3 minutes following product application \& with no rebleeding up to 10 minutes following application at all bleeding sites (additional bleeding sites treated including target bleeding site) will be determined by SBSS. SBSS provides a clinically validated score for assessment of bleeding at the target site, and consists of 6 scores (0 = none, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, not immediately life-threatening, 5 = extreme, immediately life-threatening).

    Time frame: Intraoperative (up to 10 minutes)

  3. Time to Hemostasis for All Treated Bleeding Sites

    Time to achieve hemostasis for all treated bleeding sites for up to 10 minutes will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (up to 10 minutes)

  4. Median Time to Hemostasis at Target Bleeding Site

    Median time to hemostasis at target bleeding site will be reported.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  5. Median Time to Hemostasis for All Treated Bleeding Sites

    Median time to hemostasis for all treated bleeding sites will be reported for both groups.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  6. Treatment Failure for Target Bleeding Site Treated and for All Treated Bleeding Sites

    Treatment failure is defined as no hemostasis at 10 minutes or received rescue therapy prior to 10 minutes from the application of the study product.

    Time frame: Intraoperative (up to 10 minutes)

  7. Sustained Hemostasis at All Treated Bleeding Sites

    Sustained hemostasis at all treated bleeding sites will be reported. Sustained hemostasis is defined as achieving hemostasis at 3 minutes with no rebleeding up to Day 28.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  8. Proportion of Bleeding Sites with Rebleeding After 10 Minutes

    Proportion of bleeding sites with rebleeding after 10 minutes and prior to initiation of final fascia closure will be reported. Summaries will be presented for target bleeding site and for all treated bleeding sites.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  9. Percentage of Bleeding Sites Achieving Hemostasis with ETHIZIA or SURGICEL Original

    Percentage of bleeding sites achieving hemostasis with ETHIZIA or SURGICEL Original will be reported. Summaries will be presented for target bleeding site and for all treated bleeding sites.

    Time frame: At 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480, 540, and 600 seconds

  10. Proportion of Bleeding Sites Requiring More Than One Application of ETHIZIA or SURGICEL Original to Achieve Hemostasis

    Proportion of bleeding sites requiring more than one application of randomized product in order to achieve hemostasis will be reported. Summaries will be presented for target bleeding site and for all treated bleeding sites.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  11. Proportion of Bleeding Sites that Require a Second Surgical Maneuver to Achieve Hemostasis

    Proportion of bleeding sites that require a second surgical maneuver (for example, adjunct product, electrocautery, etcetera) as a rescue therapy to achieve hemostasis following treatment will be reported. Summaries will be presented for target bleeding site and for all treated bleeding sites.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Keck Hospital of USC
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Washington University Barnes Jewish Hospital
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Capital Health Medical Center - Hopewell
    Pennington, New Jersey 08534, United States
  • New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medical Ctr
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • UT Health East Texas EMS Air 1
    Tyler, Texas 75701, United States
  • Intermountain Medical Center
    Murray, Utah 84107, United States
  • UMC Radboud
    Nijmegen, 6500HB, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of Johnson \& Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Data sharing details ↗ · innovativemedicine.jnj.com

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Recruiting→Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Sep 25, 2026 · changed Nov 3, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 28, 2026→Sep 3, 2026 (actual)
Nov 3, 2026
Study completion
Sep 28, 2026→Oct 7, 2026 (actual)
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Sep 28, 2026→Sep 3, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Sep 28, 2026→Oct 7, 2026 (now actual)
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Sep 25, 2026
    Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    + 3 other changes: verification date, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06664788
Lead sponsor
Ethicon, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 30, 2024
Start date
Apr 16, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 3, 2026
Completion
Oct 7, 2026
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Ethicon Inc. Clinical Trial
study director · Ethicon, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion