CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04100096Updated Jul 18, 2024Results posted

A Trial of Brexpiprazole in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder

A Phase 2 interventional study of Brexpiprazole and Placebo in Borderline Personality Disorder, sponsored by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.. Completed at 77 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-18.

Sponsored by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
332
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There are currently no pharmacological treatments approved to treat borderline personality disorder (BPD). This trial will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole for the treatment of participants diagnosed with BPD to provide a pharmacological treatment for BPD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Borderline Personality Disorder
03

In context

Personality Disorders

336 studies on the registry are indexed under Personality Disorders; 48 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 332 is above the median of 75 across 229 interventional studies indexed under Personality Disorders.

Browse Personality Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 289 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 104 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 69 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female participants, ages 18 to 65, inclusive, at the time of informed consent
  • Participants with a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of BPD confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD) at screening.
  • At screening and Day 0, participants must have a total score ≥ 12 on the Zanarini Rating Scale for BPD (ZAN-BPD) scale.
  • Participants who, in the investigator's judgment, require treatment with a medication for BPD.
  • Participants willing to discontinue all prohibited medications to meet protocol-required washouts prior to and during the trial period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sexually active males or females of childbearing potential who do not agree to practice 2 different methods of birth control or remain abstinent during the trial and for 30 days after the last dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP). Consensual sexual activity that cannot biologically result in pregnancy may not be participant to required birth control methods, following discussion with the medical monitor. Male participants must also agree not to donate sperm from trial screening through 30 days after the last dose of IMP.
  • Women who are breastfeeding and/or who have a positive pregnancy test result prior to receiving IMP.
  • Participants with a concurrent DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Also, participants with a concurrent diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, delirium, dementia, amnesia, eating disorder, antisocial personality disorder, or other cognitive disorders.
  • Participants with a current diagnosis of substance or alcohol use disorder within 90 days prior to screening visit.
  • Participants who fulfill the following criteria related to suicide and/or suicidal ideation are excluded:

    • Participants who have a significant risk of committing violent acts, serious self-harm, or suicide based on history or routine psychiatric status examination, or those who are homicidal or considered to be a high risk to others, or participants with a response of "yes" on the Columbia-suicide severity rating scale (C-SSRS) Suicidal Ideation Item 5, OR
    • Participants with a response of "yes" on the C-SSRS Suicidal Behavior Items, OR
    • Participants who have had 3 suicide attempts, OR,
    • Participants who have had 3 or more hospitalizations due to suicidal behavior.
  • Participants who received brexpiprazole in any prior clinical trial or participants who have taken or are taking commercially available brexpiprazole (Rexulti®).
  • Participants who are currently either inpatient or partially hospitalized.
  • Participants who participated in a clinical trial within 90 days prior to screening or who participated in more than 2 clinical trials within a year prior to screening.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
332 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day

    Participants received brexpiprazole, 2-3 milligrams per day (mg/day) tablets, orally, up to Week 12 during the treatment phase.

    Drug: Brexpiprazole

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants received brexpiprazole-matching placebo tablets, orally, up to Week 12 during the treatment phase.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugBrexpiprazole

    Tablet

    Also known as: Rexulti®

  • OtherPlacebo

    Tablet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD) Total Score

    The ZAN-BPD is a clinician-administered scale designed to assess severity of disease symptoms in participants with BPD based on clinician rating on 9 criteria. Each of the 9 criteria for BPD was rated on a 5-point anchored rating scale of 0 to 4. These scores were clustered into 4 sector scores (akin to domains) and a total score. The 4 sector scores added up to provide the overall total score for the ZAN-BPD, which ranged from 0 to 36. A higher score represented a higher severity of disease symptoms. Mixed model repeated measures = MMRM, antidepressant therapy = ADT.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 10

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score

    The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S. CGI-S is an observer-rated scale with a total score range of 0 to 7 where a higher score represented a worse outcome. The response choices were 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 10

  2. Change From Baseline in the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

    PGI-S is a 7-point single-item self-report scale for the participant to rate the severity of symptoms of BPD ranging from 0 to 7 where 1 denoted no symptoms and 7 denoted very severe.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12

  3. Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scale Score

    A 7-point single-item self-report scale depicting a participant's rating of overall change in their condition since starting trial medication. Participants answered the question: "Since starting study medication, how much have their symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder changed?" with a score ranging from 1 to 7 where 1 denoted very much improved and 7 denoted very much worse.

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8,10 and 12

  4. Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score

    Participant's condition was assessed using CGI-I scale. CGI-I is an observer-rated scale with a total score of 0 to 7 and a higher score represents a worse outcome. The score included the following response choices: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered an IMP and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is defined as an AE that started after start of study treatment.

    Time frame: From Baseline (Day 0) to 21 days after last dose (Up to Week 15)

  6. Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values

    Laboratory parameters included hematology(Hem), serum chemistry(Che) and urinalysis(Uri). Criterion:Che-Alkaline Phosphatase (Units/liter \[U/L\]):≥3 x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L):≥3 x ULN,Bilirubin (mg/deciliter\[dL\]):≥2.0,Cholesterol(Cho);Cho,fasting(mg/dl):≥240,Creatine Kinase(U/L):≥3 x ULN, Creatinine(mg/dL):≥2.0,Glucose (Glu);Glu,fasting(mg/dL):100,High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cho (mg/dL):Male (M) \< 40or Female (F) \<50, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cho(mg/dL):≥160,Prolactin (nanograms/milliliter \[ng/mL\]):\>1 x ULN,Triglyceride (mg/dL):≥150,Urate(mg/dL): M ≥10.5 or F ≥8.5,Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL):≥30,Hem-Eosinophils (Eosi) (10\^9 L):≥10%,Hematocrit (%): M ≤37% and ≥3 percentage (per) point decrease from baseline or F≤32% and ≥3per point decrease from baseline, Hemaglobin(gram per deciliter \[g/dL\]):M ≤11.5 or F ≤9.5,Leukocytes(10\^9/L):≤2.8 x10\^3/uL,≤16.0 x10\^3/uL,Platelets(10\^9/L):≤75 x10\^3/ uL,≥700 x10\^3/uL,Uri-Glu,urine; Protein,urine:Increase of ≥2U.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Week 12

  7. Number of Participants With Potential Clinical Relevant Laboratory Test Values - Prolactin

    New onset (\> 1 x upper limit of normal {ULN}, \> 2 x ULN, 3 X ULN) prolactin means a participant who attains a categorical change during treatment phase but not at baseline. Only those categories with at least one participant with event are reported.

    Time frame: Week 12

  8. Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

    Vital Signs included orthostatic hypotension, heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (bp), and weight. Potential clinical relevance criterion: Orthostatic Hypotension:\>= 20 millimeters of mercury (mmhg) decrease in systolic bp and \>= 25 beats per minute (bpm) increase in HR from supine to standing; HR Standing (bpm):\< 50 and decrease \>= 15,\> 120 and increase \>= 15; HR Supine (bpm): \< 50 and decrease \>= 15,\>120 and increase \>= 15; Systolic BP Standing (mmhg):\< 90 and decrease \>=20,\> 180 and increase \>= 20; Systolic BP Supine (mmhg):\< 90 and decrease \>= 20, \>180 and increase \>= 20; Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg): \< 50 and decrease \>= 15,\> 105 and increase \>= 15; Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg):\< 50 and decrease \>= 15, \> 105 and increase \>= 15; Weight (kilograms\[kg\]): Decrease or increase \>= 7%. Only those categories with at least one participant with event are reported.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to Week 12

  9. Change From Baseline in Body Weight

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

  10. Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference

    Time frame: Baseline (Screening: Day -21 to Day -1), Week 12

  11. Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

    BMI is defined as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

  12. Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

    ECG parameters analyzed included rhythm, conduction and ST/T morphology. Potential clinical relevance criterion: Rhythm- Supraventricular Premature Beat: not present at baseline and present post baseline, Ventricular Premature Beat: not present at baseline and present post baseline, Conduction- Right Bundle Branch Block: not present at baseline and present post baseline, ST/T Morphology- Symmetrical (Sym) T-Wave Inversion: not present at baseline and present post baseline. Only those categories with at least one participant with event are reported.

    Time frame: Week 12

  13. Change From Baseline in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score

    The SAS consisted of a list of 10 symptoms of Parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia). Each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of zero representing the absence of symptoms and a score of 4 representing a severe condition. The SAS total score was the sum of the scores for all 10 items and ranged from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicated worst outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 6 and 12

  14. Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score

    AIMS assessment consisted of 10 items describing symptoms of dyskinesia (muscles of facial expression, lips and perioral area, jaw, tongue, upper extremities, lower extremities, neck/shoulders/hips, overall movement severity, incapacitation, participant awareness). Facial and oral movements (items 1 through 4), extremity movements (items 5 and 6), and trunk movements (item 7) were observed unobtrusively while participant was at rest (e.g., in waiting room), and study physician would make global judgments on participant's dyskinesia's (items 8 through 10). Each item was rated on 5-point scale of severity from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) and assessment of problems with teeth or dentures (yes = 1, no = 0) and if the participant normally wears dentures (yes = 1, no = 0). Total score ranged from 0 to 42. Higher scores indicated worst outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 6 and 12

  15. Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS): Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia Score

    The BARS consisted of 4 items related to akathisia: objective observation of akathisia by the investigator, subjective feelings of restlessness by the participant, subjective distress due to akathisia, and global clinical assessment of akathisia. The global clinical evaluation was made on a 6-point scale, with zero representing absence of symptoms and a score of 5 representing severe akathisia.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 6 and 12

  16. Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and Suicidal Ideation As Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

    Suicidality was monitored using the C-SSRS. Suicidality was defined as at least one occurrence of suicidal ideation (including wish to be dead, non-specific suicidal thought, suicidal ideation-no intent, ideation with intent, no plan, ideation with plan/intent) or at least one occurrence of suicidal behavior (actual attempt, non-suicidal self-injurious behavior, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, preparatory acts/behavior, suicidal behavior) for the assessment period.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

07

Results

Posted Jul 18, 2024

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled in the study at 62 study centers in the United States, Spain, and Ukraine from 17 October 2019 to 27 Jun 2021.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Started159165
Safety population157165
Full analysis set (fas) for enriched participants112111
Completed112127
Not completed4738
Withdrew: Adverse event197
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1311
Withdrew: Non-compliance with study drug13
Withdrew: Protocol deviation11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by participant1315

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD) Total Score

The ZAN-BPD is a clinician-administered scale designed to assess severity of disease symptoms in participants with BPD based on clinician rating on 9 criteria. Each of the 9 criteria for BPD was rated on a 5-point anchored rating scale of 0 to 4. These scores were clustered into 4 sector scores (akin to domains) and a total score. The 4 sector scores added up to provide the overall total score for the ZAN-BPD, which ranged from 0 to 36. A higher score represented a higher severity of disease symptoms. Mixed model repeated measures = MMRM, antidepressant therapy = ADT.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 10
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD) Total Score
score on a scaleBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD) Total Score-7.27 ± 0.80-6.25 ± 0.76
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.2430 (Comparison was carried out using MMRM, with study center (pooled), treatment group (TG), visit, ADT status, and TG by visit interaction (BVI), gender BVI, age BVI as factors and baseline BVI as covariate. An unstructured covariance was used.) · Least square (ls) mean difference: -1.02 · 95% CI -2.75 to 0.70
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score

The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S. CGI-S is an observer-rated scale with a total score range of 0 to 7 where a higher score represented a worse outcome. The response choices were 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 10
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score
score on a scaleBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score-1.13 ± 0.14-1.09 ± 0.14
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.7759 (Comparison was carried out using MMRM, with study center (pooled), TG, visit, ADT status, and TG BVI, gender BVI, age BVI as factors and baseline BVI as covariate. An unstructured covariance was used.) · Ls mean difference: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.35 to 0.27
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

PGI-S is a 7-point single-item self-report scale for the participant to rate the severity of symptoms of BPD ranging from 0 to 7 where 1 denoted no symptoms and 7 denoted very severe.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
score on a scaleBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Change from Baseline at Week 2-0.33 ± 0.12-0.27 ± 0.12
Change from Baseline at Week 4-0.60 ± 0.15-0.35 ± 0.14
Change from Baseline at Week 6-0.91 ± 0.15-0.72 ± 0.14
Change from Baseline at Week 8-0.99 ± 0.14-0.69 ± 0.14
Change from Baseline at Week 10-0.90 ± 0.15-0.79 ± 0.14
Change from Baseline at Week 12-1.00 ± 0.16-0.86 ± 0.15
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.6585 (Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.) · Ls mean difference: -0.06 · 95% CI -0.32 to 0.20Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.1181 (Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.) · Ls mean difference: -0.25 · 95% CI -0.57 to 0.06Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.2431 (Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.) · Ls mean difference: -0.19 · 95% CI -0.51 to 0.13Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.0638 (Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.) · Ls mean difference: -0.30 · 95% CI -0.61 to 0.02Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.5050 (Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.) · Ls mean difference: -0.11 · 95% CI -0.44 to 0.22Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.4277 (Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.) · Ls mean difference: -0.14 · 95% CI -0.48 to 0.21Derived from an MMRM with fixed effects of treatment, (pooled) trial site, visit, ADT status (with/without background ADT), treatment BVI, gender BVI, covariates of baseline BVI and age BVI.
SecondaryPatient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scale Score

A 7-point single-item self-report scale depicting a participant's rating of overall change in their condition since starting trial medication. Participants answered the question: "Since starting study medication, how much have their symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder changed?" with a score ranging from 1 to 7 where 1 denoted very much improved and 7 denoted very much worse.

Time frame:
Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8,10 and 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scale Score
score on a scaleBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Week 23.38 ± 0.893.30 ± 0.93
Week 43.23 ± 1.263.25 ± 1.22
Week 62.94 ± 1.143.15 ± 1.11
Week 82.94 ± 1.103.11 ± 1.12
Week 102.89 ± 1.262.97 ± 1.20
Week 122.88 ± 1.192.96 ± 1.14
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6225 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.06 · 95% CI -0.18 to 0.30Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9145 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.02 · 95% CI -0.35 to 0.31Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1535 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.22 · 95% CI -0.52 to 0.08Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1922 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.20 · 95% CI -0.50 to 0.10Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6488 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.08 · 95% CI -0.40 to 0.25Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5992 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.08 · 95% CI -0.40 to 0.23Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
SecondaryClinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score

Participant's condition was assessed using CGI-I scale. CGI-I is an observer-rated scale with a total score of 0 to 7 and a higher score represents a worse outcome. The score included the following response choices: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.

Time frame:
Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score
score on a scaleBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Week 22.99 ± 0.962.99 ± 0.97
Week 42.89 ± 1.043.00 ± 1.20
Week 62.62 ± 1.052.77 ± 1.21
Week 82.39 ± 1.062.79 ± 1.26
Week 102.45 ± 1.182.61 ± 1.20
Week 122.37 ± 1.192.65 ± 1.17
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6579 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.05 · 95% CI -0.29 to 0.19Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3728 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.14 · 95% CI -0.43 to 0.16Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1684 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.21 · 95% CI -0.50 to 0.09Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0046 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.44 · 95% CI -0.74 to -0.13Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2087 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.20 · 95% CI -0.51 to 0.11Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0389 (Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.33 · 95% CI -0.64 to -0.02Comparison between TGs was carried out using the CMH Row Mean Score Differ Test controlling for trial site.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered an IMP and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE is defined as an AE that started after start of study treatment.

Time frame:
From Baseline (Day 0) to 21 days after last dose (Up to Week 15)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)9579
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values

Laboratory parameters included hematology(Hem), serum chemistry(Che) and urinalysis(Uri). Criterion:Che-Alkaline Phosphatase (Units/liter \[U/L\]):≥3 x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L):≥3 x ULN,Bilirubin (mg/deciliter\[dL\]):≥2.0,Cholesterol(Cho);Cho,fasting(mg/dl):≥240,Creatine Kinase(U/L):≥3 x ULN, Creatinine(mg/dL):≥2.0,Glucose (Glu);Glu,fasting(mg/dL):100,High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cho (mg/dL):Male (M) \< 40or Female (F) \<50, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cho(mg/dL):≥160,Prolactin (nanograms/milliliter \[ng/mL\]):\>1 x ULN,Triglyceride (mg/dL):≥150,Urate(mg/dL): M ≥10.5 or F ≥8.5,Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL):≥30,Hem-Eosinophils (Eosi) (10\^9 L):≥10%,Hematocrit (%): M ≤37% and ≥3 percentage (per) point decrease from baseline or F≤32% and ≥3per point decrease from baseline, Hemaglobin(gram per deciliter \[g/dL\]):M ≤11.5 or F ≤9.5,Leukocytes(10\^9/L):≤2.8 x10\^3/uL,≤16.0 x10\^3/uL,Platelets(10\^9/L):≤75 x10\^3/ uL,≥700 x10\^3/uL,Uri-Glu,urine; Protein,urine:Increase of ≥2U.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug up to Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Test Values
ParticipantsBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Che: Alkaline Phosphatase, High10
Che: Aspartate Aminotransferase, High10
Che: Bilirubin, High02
Che: Cho, High24
Che: Cho Fasting, High137
Che: Creatine Kinase, High43
Che: Creatinine, High10
Che: Glu Fasting, High2930
Che: HDL Cho, Fasting, Low4642
Che: Low LDL Cho, High34
Che: LDL Cholesterol, Fasting, High118
Che: Prolactin, High417
Che: Triglyceride, Fasting, High3525
Che: Urate, High10
Che: Urea Nitrogen, High20
Hem: Eosi/Leukocytes Ratio, High42
Hem: Hematocrit, Low24
Hem: Hemoglobin, Low22
Hematology: Leukocytes, Low01
Hem: Leukocytes, High20
Hem: Platelets, Low02
Uri: Glu, Urine, High01
Uri: Protein, Urine, High10
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Potential Clinical Relevant Laboratory Test Values - Prolactin

New onset (\> 1 x upper limit of normal {ULN}, \> 2 x ULN, 3 X ULN) prolactin means a participant who attains a categorical change during treatment phase but not at baseline. Only those categories with at least one participant with event are reported.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Potential Clinical Relevant Laboratory Test Values - Prolactin
ParticipantsBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Prolactin: >1 x ULN374
Prolactin: >2 x ULN11
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Vital Signs included orthostatic hypotension, heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (bp), and weight. Potential clinical relevance criterion: Orthostatic Hypotension:\>= 20 millimeters of mercury (mmhg) decrease in systolic bp and \>= 25 beats per minute (bpm) increase in HR from supine to standing; HR Standing (bpm):\< 50 and decrease \>= 15,\> 120 and increase \>= 15; HR Supine (bpm): \< 50 and decrease \>= 15,\>120 and increase \>= 15; Systolic BP Standing (mmhg):\< 90 and decrease \>=20,\> 180 and increase \>= 20; Systolic BP Supine (mmhg):\< 90 and decrease \>= 20, \>180 and increase \>= 20; Diastolic BP Standing (mmHg): \< 50 and decrease \>= 15,\> 105 and increase \>= 15; Diastolic BP Supine (mmHg):\< 50 and decrease \>= 15, \> 105 and increase \>= 15; Weight (kilograms\[kg\]): Decrease or increase \>= 7%. Only those categories with at least one participant with event are reported.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug up to Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in Vital Signs
ParticipantsBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Orthostatic Hypotension: Low01
Heart Rate Standing, High20
Heart Rate Supine, Low11
Systolic Blood Pressure Standing, Low11
Systolic Blood Pressure Supine, Low10
Weight, Increase53
Weight, Decrease2512
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Reported as:
Mean · kilogram (kg)
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
kilogram (kg)Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Baseline (Day 0)78.60 ± 22.1578.85 ± 22.33
Change From Baseline at Week 20.27 ± 1.150.09 ± 1.62
Change From Baseline at Week 41.05 ± 1.92-0.05 ± 2.02
Change From Baseline at Week 61.39 ± 2.250.20 ± 2.21
Change From Baseline at Week 81.55 ± 2.75-0.03 ± 2.41
Change From Baseline at Week 102.09 ± 2.960.37 ± 2.72
Change From Baseline at Week 121.74 ± 3.090.30 ± 2.75
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2720 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.18 · 95% CI -0.14 to 0.50
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 1.09 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.56
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons) · Mean difference (final values): 1.18 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.73
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 1.57 · 95% CI 0.92 to 2.21
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 1.72 · 95% CI 0.99 to 2.45
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0002 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 1.44 · 95% CI 0.68 to 2.19
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Waist Circumference
Time frame:
Baseline (Screening: Day -21 to Day -1), Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · centimeter
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference
centimeterBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Baseline (Screening: Day -21 to Day -1)89.74 ± 17.5490.01 ± 17.25
Change from Baseline at Week 121.07 ± 5.23-0.32 ± 5.76
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0620 · Mean difference (final values): 1.31 · 95% CI -0.07 to 2.68ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

BMI is defined as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Reported as:
Mean · kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2)
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2)Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Baseline (Day 0)27.35 ± 7.4928.52 ± 7.69
Change From Baseline at Week 20.09 ± 0.420.05 ± 0.62
Change From Baseline at Week 40.38 ± 0.68-0.00 ± 0.75
Change From Baseline at Week 60.50 ± 0.810.09 ± 0.83
Change From Baseline at Week 80.57 ± 1.010.00 ± 0.89
Change From Baseline at Week 100.76 ± 1.100.15 ± 1.00
Change From Baseline at Week 120.64 ± 1.170.13 ± 1.01
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.4613 · Mean difference (final values): 0.05 · 95% CI -0.08 to 0.17ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.38 · 95% CI 0.21 to 0.55
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0001 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.41 · 95% CI 0.21 to 0.61
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.56 · 95% CI 0.33 to 0.80
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.61 · 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0004 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.52 · 95% CI 0.23 to 0.80
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

ECG parameters analyzed included rhythm, conduction and ST/T morphology. Potential clinical relevance criterion: Rhythm- Supraventricular Premature Beat: not present at baseline and present post baseline, Ventricular Premature Beat: not present at baseline and present post baseline, Conduction- Right Bundle Branch Block: not present at baseline and present post baseline, ST/T Morphology- Symmetrical (Sym) T-Wave Inversion: not present at baseline and present post baseline. Only those categories with at least one participant with event are reported.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
ParticipantsBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Rhythm: Supraventricular Premature Beat01
Rhythm: Ventricular Premature Beat10
Conduction: Right Bundle Branch Block10
ST/T Morphology: Symmetrical T-Wave Inversion01
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score

The SAS consisted of a list of 10 symptoms of Parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia). Each item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a score of zero representing the absence of symptoms and a score of 4 representing a severe condition. The SAS total score was the sum of the scores for all 10 items and ranged from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicated worst outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0), Week 6 and 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score
score on a scaleBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Baseline (Day 0)0.18 ± 0.650.24 ± 0.92
Change from Baseline at Week 60.04 ± 0.76-0.08 ± 0.55
Change from Baseline at Week 120.04 ± 0.88-0.05 ± 0.63
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1687 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.10 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.25
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1874 (Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.12 · 95% CI -0.06 to 0.29
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score

AIMS assessment consisted of 10 items describing symptoms of dyskinesia (muscles of facial expression, lips and perioral area, jaw, tongue, upper extremities, lower extremities, neck/shoulders/hips, overall movement severity, incapacitation, participant awareness). Facial and oral movements (items 1 through 4), extremity movements (items 5 and 6), and trunk movements (item 7) were observed unobtrusively while participant was at rest (e.g., in waiting room), and study physician would make global judgments on participant's dyskinesia's (items 8 through 10). Each item was rated on 5-point scale of severity from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) and assessment of problems with teeth or dentures (yes = 1, no = 0) and if the participant normally wears dentures (yes = 1, no = 0). Total score ranged from 0 to 42. Higher scores indicated worst outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 6 and 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) Total Score
score on a scaleBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Baseline (Day 0)0.03 ± 0.200.04 ± 0.42
Change from Baseline at Week 6-0.02 ± 0.250.09 ± 0.87
Change from Baseline at Week 12-0.02 ± 0.270.07 ± 0.73
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0974 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons) · Mean difference (final values): -0.12 · 95% CI -0.25 to 0.02
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3910 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons) · Mean difference (final values): -0.06 · 95% CI -0.20 to 0.08
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS): Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia Score

The BARS consisted of 4 items related to akathisia: objective observation of akathisia by the investigator, subjective feelings of restlessness by the participant, subjective distress due to akathisia, and global clinical assessment of akathisia. The global clinical evaluation was made on a 6-point scale, with zero representing absence of symptoms and a score of 5 representing severe akathisia.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 6 and 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS): Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia Score
score on a scaleBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Baseline (Day 0)0.08 ± 0.270.12 ± 0.40
Change from Baseline at Week 60.15 ± 0.59-0.04 ± 0.37
Change from Baseline at Week 120.06 ± 0.53-0.05 ± 0.33
Statistical analysis
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0063 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.15 · 9% CI 0.04 to 0.26
  • Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0670 (ANCOVA model, with treatment as main effect and baseline value as covariate, is used for change from baseline of case comparisons.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.09 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.19
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and Suicidal Ideation As Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

Suicidality was monitored using the C-SSRS. Suicidality was defined as at least one occurrence of suicidal ideation (including wish to be dead, non-specific suicidal thought, suicidal ideation-no intent, ideation with intent, no plan, ideation with plan/intent) or at least one occurrence of suicidal behavior (actual attempt, non-suicidal self-injurious behavior, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, preparatory acts/behavior, suicidal behavior) for the assessment period.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and Suicidal Ideation As Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
ParticipantsBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Suicidal Behavior4229
Suicidal Ideation7870

Adverse events

Collected over From Baseline (Day 0) to 21 days after last dose (up to Week 15). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Brexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per Day0/157 (0%)5/157 (3.2%)69/157 (43.9%)
Placebo0/165 (0%)2/165 (1.2%)45/165 (27.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
Suicide AttemptPsychiatric disorders2/1570/165
Cerebrovascular AccidentNervous system disorders1/1570/165
Major DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/1570/165
Panic AttackPsychiatric disorders1/1570/165
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders0/1571/165
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/1571/165
DissociationPsychiatric disorders0/1571/165
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBrexpiprazole 2-3 Milligrams Per DayPlacebo
AkathisiaNervous system disorders22/1572/165
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders15/15710/165
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders13/1579/165
FatigueGeneral disorders12/1576/165
HeadacheNervous system disorders8/15712/165
Weight IncreasedInvestigations10/1574/165
RestlessnessPsychiatric disorders10/1572/165
Increased AppetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders8/1574/165
SomnolenceNervous system disorders8/1575/165

Baseline characteristics

Randomized population included all participants who were randomized to receive brexpiprazole or matching placebo in the treatment phase.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Brexpiprazole 2 to 3 Milligrams Per DayPlaceboTotal
Mean32.0 ± 10.631.0 ± 10.931.5 ± 10.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Brexpiprazole 2 to 3 Milligrams Per DayPlaceboTotal
Female129137266
Male302858
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Brexpiprazole 2 to 3 Milligrams Per DayPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native303
Asian729
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander112
Black or African American192241
White123131254
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported6915
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Brexpiprazole 2 to 3 Milligrams Per DayPlaceboTotal
Ethnicity — Hispanic or Latino313364
Ethnicity — Not Hispanic or Latino127131258
Ethnicity — Unknown101
Ethnicity — Other011
08

Study locations

77 sites
  • Pillar Clinical Research
    Bentonville, Arkansas 72712, United States
  • CI Trials
    Bellflower, California 90706, United States
  • Care Access Research Beverly Hills
    Beverly Hills, California 90212, United States
  • OM Research LLC
    Lancaster, California 93534, United States
  • CalNeuro Research Group
    Los Angeles, California 90024, United States
  • Excell Research
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • PCSD - Feighner Research
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • SF-Care Inc.
    San Rafael, California 94901, United States
  • CI Trials
    Santa Ana, California 92705, United States
  • Viking Clinical Research
    Temecula, California 90706, United States
  • Pacific Clinical Research Management Group
    Upland, California 91786, United States
  • Mountain View Clinical Research, Inc.
    Denver, Colorado 80209, United States
  • University of Connecticut
    Farmington, Connecticut 06030, United States
  • Institute of Living Hartford Hospital
    Hartford, Connecticut 06106, United States
  • Comprehensive Psychiatric Care
    Norwich, Connecticut 06360, United States
  • Mindful Behavioral Health
    Boca Raton, Florida 33431, United States
  • CNS Clinical Research of Coral Springs
    Coral Springs, Florida 33067, United States
  • Gulfcoast Clinical Research Center
    Fort Myers, Florida 33912, United States
  • Sarkis Clinical Trials
    Gainesville, Florida 32607, United States
  • New Life Medical Research Center
    Hialeah, Florida 33012, United States
  • Galiz Research
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions Inc.
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • Innovative Clinical Research, Inc
    Lauderhill, Florida 33319, United States
  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions dba CNS Healthcare
    Orlando, Florida 32801, United States
  • APG Research
    Orlando, Florida 32803, United States
  • Institute for Advanced Medical Research
    Alpharetta, Georgia 30022, United States
  • iResearch Atlanta
    Decatur, Georgia 30030, United States
  • The University of Chicago Hospitals
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • AMR Conventions Research
    Naperville, Illinois 60563, United States
  • Neuroscience Research Institute Inc.
    Winfield, Illinois 60190, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • McLean Hospital
    Belmont, Massachusetts 02478, United States
  • Copley Clinical
    Boston, Massachusetts 02116, United States
  • Adams Clinical
    Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, United States
  • Rochester Center for Behavioral Medicine
    Rochester Hills, Michigan 48307, United States
  • Advanced Clinical Research Center, LLC
    Bridgeton, Missouri 63044, United States
  • Psychiatric Care and Research Center
    O'Fallon, Missouri 63368, United States
  • St. Charles Psychiatric Associates dba Midwest Research Group
    Saint Charles, Missouri 63304, United States
  • Arch Clinical Trials LLC
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63118, United States
  • PsychCare Consultants Research
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63128, United States
  • Hassman Research Institute, LLC
    Berlin, New Jersey 08009, United States
  • Center for Emotional Fitness
    Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002, United States
  • Integrative Clinical Trials
    Brooklyn, New York 11229, United States
  • SPRI Clinical Trials LLC
    Brooklyn, New York 11235, United States
  • Bioscience Research, LLC
    Mount Kisco, New York 10549, United States
  • Manhattan Behavioral Medicine PLLC
    New York, New York 10036, United States
  • The Medical Research Network, LLC
    New York, New York 10128, United States
  • Finger Lakes Clinical Research
    Rochester, New York 14618, United States
  • New Hope Clinical Research
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28211, United States
  • MindPath Care Centers
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States
  • Quest Therapeutics of Avon Lake
    Avon Lake, Ohio 44012, United States
  • Lindner Center of Hope
    Mason, Ohio 45040, United States
  • North Star Medical Research LLC
    Middleburg Heights, Ohio 44130, United States
  • Sooner Clinical Research
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, United States
  • Paradigm Research Professionals
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118, United States
  • Carolina Clinical Trials Inc.
    Charleston, South Carolina 29407, United States
  • Relaro Medical Trials, LLC
    Dallas, Texas 75243, United States
  • Earle Research
    Houston, Texas 77058, United States
  • Red Oak Psychiatric Associates
    Houston, Texas 77090, United States
  • Pillar Clinical Research
    Richardson, Texas 75080, United States
  • The University of Texas Heath Science Center at San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Grayline Research Center
    Wichita Falls, Texas 76309, United States
  • Psychiatric Behavioral Solutions
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84105, United States
  • Cedar Psychiatry
    Springville, Utah 84663, United States
  • Woodstock Research Center
    Woodstock, Vermont 05091, United States
  • Eastside Therapeutic Resource Inc dba Core Clinical Research
    Everett, Washington 98201, United States
  • Hospital Parc Taul Parc Tauli 1
    Sabadell, Barcelona 08208, Spain
  • Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques - IMIM
    Barcelona, 08003, Spain
  • Consultoria i Projectes Sanitaris S.L. Clinic: Hestia Palau
    Barcelona, 08025, Spain
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Carrer de Sant Quint
    Barcelona, 08041, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
    Madrid, 28031, Spain
  • Hospital Provincial de Zamora
    Zamora, 49021, Spain
  • Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of NAMS of Ukraine
    Kharkiv, 61068, Ukraine
  • Kyiv railway clinical hospital 1
    Kyiv, 1030, Ukraine
  • Odessa Regional Medical Centre of Mental Health
    Odessa, 65006, Ukraine
  • Communal Enterprise-Regional Institution of Mental Psychiatric Care of the Poltava Regional Council
    Poltava, 36013, Ukraine
  • Vinnitsa National Medical University
    Vinnytsia, 21005, Ukraine
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Stoffers-Winterling JM, Storebo OJ, Pereira Ribeiro J, Kongerslev MT, Vollm BA, Mattivi JT, Faltinsen E, Todorovac A, Jorgensen MS, Callesen HE, Sales CP, Schaug JP, Simonsen E, Lieb K. Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD012956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012956.pub2. PubMed 36375174 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 7, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jun 21, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results of this study will be shared with researchers to achieve aims pre-specified in a methodologically sound research proposal. Small studies with less than 25 participants are excluded from data sharing.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04100096
Lead sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 24, 2019
Start date
Oct 17, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 27, 2021
Completion
Jun 27, 2021
Results posted
Jul 18, 2024
Last update
Jul 18, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion