An interventional study of Reading and Anxiety Management in Reading Disability and Anxiety, sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-07.
Sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Despite decades of research on reading disabilities, little is known about improving reading in the middle grades (i.e., grades 3-6) and advancements have been hindered by the narrow focus on reading problems alone without acknowledgement of non-academic factors shown to affect learning (e.g., child self-regulation). This proposal employs a highly innovative approach aimed at improving intervention outcomes through the integration of evidence-based practices for addressing reading, as well as self-regulation/socioemotional skills, difficulties known to occur in a substantial percentage of struggling readers and to negatively influence academic performance. This project represents translational research that directly informs the practice community (schools, clinicians, teachers, parents), by identifying novel instructional practices that can be aggregated to more effectively influence student outcomes and reduce disparities in academic and socioemotional domains.
While considerable knowledge has been accumulated on improving reading for students with reading disabilities in the primary grades, reading interventions conducted with middle-grades (i.e., grades 3-6) have been rare and have typically evidenced low impacts, even when more intensive interventions are provided for increasingly longer durations. One hindrance to extant interventions has been the narrow focus on reading problems without addressing non-academic (e.g., self-regulation, socioemotional) factors known to also affect learning. Thus, investigations of the efficacy derived from integrating additional components into standard reading skills interventions are necessary. Anxiety represents a particularly salient target for such an approach, as it is among the most commonly reported mental health issues of childhood, and significant associations have been found between anxiety and academic outcomes. Further, an overwhelming number of children who are struggling to read or who fail to respond to reading interventions report elevated anxiety. The purpose of this proposal is to evaluate an integrated program designed for middle-grade readers and comprised of evidence-based practices for the treatment of anxiety and reading difficulties. A pilot study of this program, conducted with 36 students randomized to treatment and control conditions, demonstrated its feasibility and positive effects on anxiety outcomes. The RCT will extend this work by comparing the combined reading and anxiety intervention with a reading-only condition and a control condition. Struggling readers will be included in this study and will receive two years of intervention. The study will assess efficacy of the interventions at reducing anxiety and improving reading at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up (Aim 1). This project significantly enhances extant research on interventions for struggling reading by examining mechanisms of action associated with augmented outcomes among students who receive the combined intervention (Aim 2), and by determining potential moderators of intervention effects (Aim 3). In all, between 300 and 350 ethnically diverse students will be recruited. A multi-informant (student, parent, teacher), multi-method (e.g., survey, standardized test, experiential sampling) assessment will be used. Relevance of this project lies in the determination of whether the inclusion of anxiety management skills enhances existing intervention outcomes for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades (concurrently/longitudinally). Examination of contextual and mitigating factors are further relevant for understanding the complex etiology of response to intervention among struggling readers. This project represents translational research that directly informs the practice community (e.g., clinicians, teachers) by identifying novel instructional practices that can be aggregated to more effectively influence student outcomes. By providing socioemotional skills training with a reading intervention using a school-based delivery model, this work has the potential of reducing disparities in mental health outcomes by reaching students of diverse backgrounds (e.g., ethnicity, SES) who would be otherwise less likely to receive such services.
NOTE: The Covid-19 pandemic emerged mid-project and altered several of our plans for this project, as well as led to a mid-project extension. Specifically, this was designed as a 2-cohort, multi-year intervention study. While Cohort 1 completed all planned milestones and activities, for Cohort 2 the intervention was ongoing when the pandemic closed all schools. A third Cohort was then added when schools reopened, but students in Cohort 3 only received 1 year of the intended 2-year intervention.
124 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyslexia; 27 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 542 is above the median of 76 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Dyslexia.
Browse Dyslexia studies →Boston University Charles River Campus is the lead sponsor of 154 studies on the registry; 30 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (57%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Reading · Other: Attention Control (math practice)
Other: Reading · Behavioral: Anxiety Management
Other: Classroom Business as Usual
Small group reading instruction
small group anxiety management skills instruction
Classroom Business as Usual
Attention Control (math practice)
Test of Word Reading Efficiency
Measures "ability to pronounce printed words and phonemically regular nonwords accurately and fluently"
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3; In cohort 2, same time frames, except it was not administered at post-intervention Y1
Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children
39-item scale of anxiety comprised of four subscales: Physical Symptoms, Harm Avoidance, Social Anxiety, and Separation/Panic. Response options range from 0-3. A total score is comprised of all subscales added together. The total score can range from 0-117. The range of the subscales are as follows: Physical Symptoms (0-36), Harm Avoidance (0-27), Social Anxiety (0-27), Separation/Panic (0-27). Higher scores indicate more anxiety. There are child, parent, teacher versions of this scale.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3
Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Test Battery-III
Two subtests: Letter-Word Identification and Word Attack. Scores are reported as standard scores in a range of 0-200+ or percentile ranks in a range of 0.1 to 99.9. The higher the score the greater the achievement level of the student.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3; In cohort 2, same time frames, except it was not administered at post-intervention Y1
Children's Test Anxiety Scale
30-item scale with a 4-point Likert Scale (1-4). Scale ranges from 30-120 with higher scores indicating greater test anxiety.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3
Reading Anxiety Scale
6-item scale adapted from the Wigfield and Meece (1988) Math Anxiety Scale. Designed to assess worries and stressed feelings about reading instruction and reading tests. Participants responded to each item with a 5-point Likert Scale from Never to Always. Higher scores indicate greater levels of reading anxiety.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3
Attention
child attention scale, Effortful Control-Persistence/Low Distractibility subscale, Strength and Weaknesses of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, (SWAN) parent/teacher reported attention
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, Change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3; In cohort 2, same time frames, except it was not administered at post-intervention Y1
Test of Silent Word Reading Efficiency and Comprehension
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3
Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills
Oral Reading Fluency
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3; In cohort 2, same time frames, except it was not administered at post-intervention Y1
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Self-report measure of anxiety in the past month. 21-item scale with a 4-point Likert scale. from 0-3. Items summed together. Scale range from 0-63. Score of 0-21= low anxiety. Score of 22-35 = moderate anxiety. Score of 36 and above = potentially concerning levels of anxiety. Administered to parents. Administered to intervention teachers in cohorot 2.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3
Beck Youth Inventories (BYI)
Self-report measure comprised of five inventories, which measure depression, anxiety, anger, disruptive behavior, and self-concept. Each inventory has 20-items which are scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3). Higher scores indicate greater amounts of concept (i.e., depression, anxiety, anger, disruptive behavior, and self-concept) being measured.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3; In cohort 2, BYI depression subscale was not administered at post-intervention Y1
Stress management skills evaluation
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3
Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale (CHAOS Survey)
15-items with a 4-point Likert Scale (1-4) measuring the home environment. Completed by parent/caregiver. Total score is created by summing the responses to the items. Range is 15-60. Higher scores indicate more chaotic home environments.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3
Reading Comprehension
Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement-III (KTEA-3)
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3; In cohort 2, same time frames, except it was not administered at post-intervention Y1
Fluency/Comprehension
Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3; In cohort 2, same time frames, except it was not administered at post-intervention Y1
Verbal Knowledge/Matrices
Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 1, change from baseline to post-intervention year 2, change from year 1 to year 2, change from year 2 to year 3; In cohort 2, same time frames, except it was not administered at post-intervention Y1
Math Calculation
Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Test Battery-III Calculation
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 2
Essential Word Knowledge
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention year 2
Reading Comprehension
Gates-MacGinitie Reading Comprehension
Time frame: Change from post-intervention year 1 to post-intervention year 2; In cohort 2, same time frames, except it was not administered at post-intervention Y1
Home Literacy Questions
A total of 7 questions (e.g., how many children's books are in your home; how many times per a week have you read with your child while schools have been closed?) examine home literacy prior to COVID19 and during COVID19.
Time frame: Cohort 2 Only- administered at post-intervention Y1
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Boston University Charles River Campus