ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04059445FURC-II-REGENUpdated Nov 30, 2023

Mandibular Furcation II Regeneration

A Phase 4 interventional study of Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + collagen membrane (Straumann Jason Membrane) and Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + enamel matrix proteins (Straumann Emdogain) in Furcation Defects and Periodontal Diseases, sponsored by University of Oslo. Terminated at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-30.

Sponsored by University of Oslo · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Recruitment problem
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Teeth with furcation grade II defects will be treated with open flap debridement and regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate combined with either enamel matrix proteins or a collagen membrane.

02

Conditions studied

  • Furcation Defects
  • Periodontal Diseases
03

In context

Furcation Defects

42 studies on the registry are indexed under Furcation Defects; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 27 across 38 interventional studies indexed under Furcation Defects.

Browse Furcation Defects studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Oslo is the lead sponsor of 177 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject must be ≥ 20 years
  • Subject must have periodontal disease as determined by the World Workshop 2017 criteria
  • Subjects must be undergoing periodontal treatment or follow-up and present 1 or more pair of bilateral mandibular molars affected by furcation involvement grade II with PPD >4 mm, and the furcation fornix must be below a tangential line from the distal to mesial interproximal crestal bone level
  • Competent to give consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The following must not be present at the time of enrolment;

  • Previous radiotherapy to the jaws, current use of chemotherapy, systemic long-term treatment
  • Present or past use of bisphosphonate treatment
  • Pregnant or nursing subjects
  • Patients classified as > class 2 according to the ASA () physical status classification
  • Previous surgical therapy of included furcation defects
  • Inability to comprehend and respond to the quality of life questionnaire
  • Dental restorations or prosthesis involving the furcation area
  • Root fractures or suspected infractions
  • Caries lesions in the furcation area
  • No systemic antibiotic treatment within 3 months prior to intervention
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Regenerative therapy w/BCP and collagen membrane

    In this arm, treatment of furcation grade II defects includes open flap debridement and regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and collagen membrane.

    Device: Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + collagen membrane (Straumann Jason Membrane) · Drug: Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + enamel matrix proteins (Straumann Emdogain)

  • Active comparator
    Regenerative therapy w/BCP and enamel matrix proteins

    In this arm, treatment of furcation grade II defects includes open flap debridement and regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and enamel matrix proteins.

    Device: Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + collagen membrane (Straumann Jason Membrane) · Drug: Biphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + enamel matrix proteins (Straumann Emdogain)

Interventions

  • DeviceBiphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + collagen membrane (Straumann Jason Membrane)

    Regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate + collagen membrane.

  • DrugBiphasic calcium phosphate (Straumann Bone Ceramic) + enamel matrix proteins (Straumann Emdogain)

    Drug page: Enamel matrix proteins

    Regenerative therapy with biphasic calcium phosphate + enamel matrix proteins.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of furcation grade level

    Proportion of sites demonstrating improvement in furcation grade level as measured with Nabers probe

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment

  2. Change of furcation grade level

    Proportion of sites demonstrating improvement in furcation grade level as measured with Nabers probe

    Time frame: 24 months after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in patient-reported quality of life (QoL)

    To assess QoL changes related to mouth and teeth prior to therapy to after therapy by the use of "The Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP)" instrument. Each question is assessed by a 5-point scale; (1) never affected, (2) less than once a month, (3) once or twice a month, (4) once or twice a week; and (5) every or nearly every day. The higher number represents more severe impact on quality of life; e.g. worse outcome. Each item will be dichotomised yielding the categories (A) affected; including scale categories (2)-(5), and (B) unaffected, including category (1).

    Time frame: Preoperatively compared to 24 months after treatment

  2. Changes in patient-reported quality of life (QoL)

    To assess QoL changes related to mouth and teeth prior to therapy to after therapy by the use of "The Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP)" instrument. Each question is assessed by a 5-point scale; (1) never affected, (2) less than once a month, (3) once or twice a month, (4) once or twice a week; and (5) every or nearly every day. The higher number represents more severe impact on quality of life; e.g. worse outcome. Each item will be dichotomised yielding the categories (A) affected; including scale categories (2)-(5), and (B) unaffected, including category (1).

    Time frame: Preoperatively compared to 12 months after treatment

  3. Changes in defect morphology assessed by CBCT

    Cone beam computed tomography will be acquired at baseline, 2 weeks postoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. This outcome measures quantitative morphologic changes in the furcation defects at 24 months

    Time frame: 24 months after treatment

  4. Changes in CAL

    Changes in clinical attachment level will be measured with a probe in mm

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment

  5. Changes in CAL

    Changes in clinical attachment level will be measured with a probe in mm

    Time frame: 24 months after treatment

  6. Changes in PPD

    Changes in pocket probing depth will be measured with a probe in mm

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment

  7. Changes in PPD

    Changes in pocket probing depth will be measured with a probe in mm

    Time frame: 24 months after treatment

  8. Radiographic changes

    Standardized intraoral bitewing radiographs will be obtained and compared to baseline radiographs

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment

  9. Radiographic changes

    Standardized intraoral bitewing radiographs will be obtained and compared to baseline radiographs

    Time frame: 24 months after treatment

  10. Pain following surgery

    Pain sensation for one week posteoperatively will be recorded on a visual analog scale scale from 0-10. 0 is equivalent to no pain, whereas 10 is the highest pain imagineable.

    Time frame: Daily for 1 week postoperatively

  11. Caries assessment

    Caries in furcation defect assessed with an explorer will be recorded as (Y/N)

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Caries assessment

    Caries in furcation defect assessed with an explorer will be recorded as (Y/N)

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo
    Oslo, 0455, Norway
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 30, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04059445
Lead sponsor
University of Oslo
Responsible party
Anders Verket (Associate Professor, University of Oslo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 16, 2019
Start date
Oct 15, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 27, 2023
Completion
Nov 27, 2023
Last update
Nov 30, 2023

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Enamel matrix proteins

Start the discussion