ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03984500SCTawareUpdated Dec 21, 2022

A Program to Increase Sickle Cell Trait Knowledge Among Parent of Young Children Identified in Newborn Screening

An interventional study of Education in Sickle Cell Trait, sponsored by Susan Creary. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-21.

Sponsored by Susan Creary · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a study for parents of young children with Sickle Cell Trait (SCT) identified by newborn screening who are referred and present for in person SCT education at the Institution.

The study will determine the feasibility of implementing a SCT education program (SCTaware) that is appropriate for all parents, including those with low base knowledge and low health literacy and then test if results in high and sustained SCT knowledge.

Read the detailed description

This is a single center, observational study to develop an education program for parents of young children diagnosed with Sickle Cell Trait. This will be accomplish by evaluating the current Ohio education in-person program, and assessing, through a set of questionnaires, how much participants are understanding about this diagnosis.

During phase I of the study, participants will be video-taped, and a set of questionnaires will be answer before and after education is given. This data will then be analyzed by the SCT Team in order to develop the Program.

During phase II of the study, population with the same criteria as phase I will be enrolled, however they will receive the revised "SCTaware" education. Pre and post education questionnaires will also be answered. In addition, participants during this phase will receive follow-up calls at 1 and 6 months to complete additional surveys.

In addition, the investigators will be using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to explore if parents experience decisional conflict about whether or not to obtain SCT testing and if SCTaware reduces this conflict

02

Conditions studied

  • Sickle Cell Trait

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sickle Cell Trait
  • Education
03

In context

Sickle Cell Trait

43 studies on the registry are indexed under Sickle Cell Trait; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 74 is above the median of 63 across 22 interventional studies indexed under Sickle Cell Trait.

Browse Sickle Cell Trait studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Susan Creary as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult biological parents of children \<3 years old with S-trait identified by NBS who present for SCT education at NCH.
  2. English proficiency will be required

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Parents who self-report that they do not have functional verbal English (report that they are not proficient) or if they request an interpreter for the education session.
  2. Parents who have previously attended an education session about an abnormal hemoglobinopathy trait
  3. Parents who self-report that they have a child with SCD
  4. Parents who self-report that they have SCD.
  5. Parents who report that they or their partner is currently pregnant
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Education

    During phase 1 of this study parents who attend in person education sessions will be recruited to have their standard sessions video-taped, timed, and reviewed by the SCTaware Team. Subjects will complete before and after education questionnaires that will then be reviewed to see how much participants learned about SCT, how education was not clear and/or appropriate (too much medical jargon). The SCTaware education will then be created based on review of these videos and participants' survey responses. For phase 2 of the study, the same recruitment strategy will be utilized. Participants will receive SCTaware and complete before and after questionnaires for evaluation. Participants in this phase will also complete follow-up questionnaires at 1 and 6 months.

    Other: Education

Interventions

  • OtherEducation

    SCTaware education (Phase II) will be compared to Ohio's current in-person SCT education (Phase I).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of implementing of a Sickle Cell Trait education Program: The time required to train a sickle cell trait educator and to deliver the revised sickle cell trait education will be measured

    The time required to train a sickle cell trait educator and to deliver the revised sickle cell trait education will be measured. The program will be feasible if the time to train the educator and deliver the education can be completed within the context of the current sickle cell trait education program in Ohio.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Parental Sickle Cell Trait Knowledge

    Parental Sickle Cell Trait Knowledge will be measured before the education, immediately after the education, and 6 months after the education is provided using the 8-question Sickle Cell Trait Knowledge Assessment Measure. Parents that score 75% correct on this measure or higher will be considered to have high knowledge. The proportion of those parents who have high knowledge prior to the education will be compared to the percentage of parents that have high knowledge 6-months after receiving the education.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Parents who receive on-site Sickle Cell Trait testing

    On-site sickle cell trait testing will be available for all parents and will be ordered for all parents who accept this testing. The percentage of enrolled parents that accept and obtain on-site testing will be measured by the number of parents who accept this testing divided by the total number of parents who receive the education.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Decisional Conflict Scale

    Parents will complete the 16 item validated decisional conflict scale survey before and after education to measure if parents' confidence or difficulty in making the decision whether or not to be tested for sickle cell trait improved with sickle cell trait education. These results are reported as a total score, with 5 sub-scores (uncertainty, informed, values clarity, support, and effective decision sub-scores). The total score and the sub-scores range from 0-100, with a score of 0 indicating no conflict/uncertainty and a score of 100 indicating extreme conflict/uncertainty.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Parental Anxiety

    Parents will complete the state trait anxiety short from survey before and after receiving sickle cell trait education to measure if the education reduces parents' state anxiety about having a child with sickle cell trait.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Sickle Cell Trait Testing Cost

    Parents will complete the sickle cell trait needs assessment survey that includes an item that asks participants if the cost of sickle cell testing impacted their decision whether or not to be tested for sickle cell trait.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Abrams MA, Zajo KN, Beeman CM, O'Brien SH, Chan PK, Shen Y, McCorkle B, Johnson L, Chisolm D, Barnard-Kirk T, Mahan JD, Christian-Rancy M, Creary SE. A Health Literate Approach to Address Health Disparities: a Virtual Program for Parents of Children with Sickle Cell Trait. J Commun Healthc. 2022;15(2):112-120. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2022.2026056. Epub 2022 Jan 19. PubMed 36275941 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 21, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03984500
Lead sponsor
Susan Creary
Responsible party
Susan Creary (Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 13, 2019
Start date
Jun 18, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2022
Completion
Jun 1, 2022
Last update
Dec 21, 2022

Study contacts

Susan Creary, MD
principal investigator · Nationwide Children's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion