An interventional study of PAC catheter and critical care ultrasound examination in Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult and Ventricular Dysfunction, Right, sponsored by Kang Yan. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-03.
Sponsored by Kang Yan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
We hypothesize that combined critical care ultrasound and PAC monitoring-oriented therapy protocol (CUP protocol), would improve prognosis of patients of ARDS with right ventricular dysfunction.
Therefore, the overall goal of the study is: 1) To build the combined critical care ultrasound and PAC monitoring-oriented therapy protocol (CUP Protocol)in detail for patients of ARDS with RV dysfunction. Advantage of CUP protocol is that it directly aims at key parameters that we need for the prevention and treatment of such patients; we could improve the mechanical ventilation protocol, unequal pulmonary lesions, hemodynamics management and reduce pulmonary artery pressure according to these parameters, so that to improve the prognosis of the patients.2) To verify the value of CUP Protocol in ARDS with ACP.
ARDS is a hot topic due to its high morbidity and mortality. Severe ACP is independent predictor of mortality of ARDS and mortality of patients of ARDS with ACP is up to 48% to 60%. Therefore, prevention and treatment of ACP is key of improvement of mortality of ARDS patients. The occurrence of ACP is closely related to elevated RV afterload, which is due to pulmonary vascular spasm (caused by hypoxia and hypercapnia) and effect of cardiopulmonary interaction (due to inadequate mechanical ventilation), as well as the factors such as inadequate fluid treatment and other inadequate treatments. Therefore, ARDS with right ventricular dysfunction is hard to treat and easy to aggravate.
Critical care ultrasound could show pathophysiologic changes of lung and ventricular interaction and direct etiological treatment and pulmonary artery catheter could perform continuous and accurate monitoring. Therefore, Critical care ultrasound and PAC have their own advantages respectively and is complementary to each other theoretically. Experts opinions recommend echocardiography is mandatory and PAC could be considered in ventilated ARDS patients. However, there is no acknowledged therapeutic protocol, and no one know how to combine these two monitor tools, including specific application protocol, integration of parameters and the decision tree.
We had demonstrated the feasibility of combined monitoring protocol oriented delicate fluid management and mechanical ventilation, and the value of kidney protection under systemic treatment of optimized monitoring through the kidney contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. At the same time, we preliminary built the systemic diagnostic and treatment decision tree and provided the way and entry point of our study.
We hypothesize that combined critical care ultrasound and PAC monitoring-oriented therapy protocol (CUP protocol), would improve prognosis of patients of ARDS with right ventricular dysfunction.
Therefore, the overall goal of the study is: 1) To build the combined critical care ultrasound and PAC monitoring-oriented therapy protocol (CUP Protocol)in detail for patients of ARDS with RV dysfunction. Advantage of CUP protocol is that it directly aims at key parameters that we need for the prevention and treatment of such patients; we could improve the mechanical ventilation protocol, unequal pulmonary lesions, hemodynamics management and reduce pulmonary artery pressure according to these parameters, so that to improve the prognosis of the patients.2) To verify the value of CUP Protocol in ARDS with ACP.
1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 236 is above the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →Kang Yan is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients in control group received usual care that was decided by attending.
Patients in study group who had been placed the PAC were performed critical care ultrasound(CCUS) to monitor the pathophysiological changes of the lung and the hemodynamics immediately.
Device: PAC catheter and critical care ultrasound examination
Patients in study group were placed the PAC and performed critical care ultrasound(CCUS) to monitor the pathophysiological changes of the lung and the hemodynamics immediately
28-day mortality
28-day mortality after enrollment
Time frame: 28 days after enrollment
the length of ICU stay
the length of ICU stay after enrollment
Time frame: 0-360 days
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Respiratory Distress Syndrome→
Kang Yan