ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03949387Updated Dec 24, 2024

Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling for Managing Mobility Disability in People with Multiple Sclerosis

An interventional study of FES Cycling Exercise and Passive Leg Cycling in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by University of Ottawa. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-24.

Sponsored by University of Ottawa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mobility impairment is one of the most common, poorly managed, and life altering consequences of MS. Current therapies for managing MS do not prevent the long-term accumulation of mobility impairment, highlighting the need for alternative strategies that prevent or slow progressive mobility disability. The proposed trial will test the efficacy and lasting effects of functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling as an exercise-based rehabilitation strategy for managing mobility impairment and associated consequences in MS.

Read the detailed description

The study is an assessor-blinded RCT for examining the efficacy and lasting effects of 24 weeks of supervised FES cycling exercise compared to passive leg cycling on mobility and secondary outcomes in people with MS with mobility impairment. Participants who meet the eligibility criteria will undergo the informed consent process and baseline assessment. Participants will then be randomized to either the FES or passive leg cycling program. Following baseline assessment, participants will complete a 24-week leg cycling program, with a mid-point assessment at 12 weeks. At 24 weeks, participants will undergo a post-intervention assessment. Following a 12-week follow-up period, participants will undergo a final assessment. Each participant will be involved in the study for approximately 10 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • exercise
  • multiple sclerosis
  • mobility
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,524 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 668 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 50 across 2,386 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Ottawa is the lead sponsor of 125 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
  • relapse free in the past 30 days
  • stable course of disease-modifying therapies over the past 6 months
  • ability to communicate in English
  • willing to come to the University of Ottawa to complete testing and training sessions
  • EDSS score 5.0 - 7.0
  • asymptomatic based on a physical activity pre-participation screening tool

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of any contraindication to FES including epilepsy, a pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, unstable fracture, or pregnancy
  • diagnosis of other neurological condition(s)
  • participation in FES cycling exercise or other mobility-based exercise rehabilitation program within the past 6 months
  • current use of dalfampridine within the past month
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FES Cycling Exercise

    FES cycling will involve systematic, transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the leg muscles to produce leg-cycling movement. The intensity and duration of training will be prescribed based on guidelines for aerobic exercise training for persons with MS and from the American College of Sports Medicine, and will progressively increase across 24 weeks. Participants will be encouraged to actively cycle at a minimum cadence of \~40-50 rpm, at 40-60% VO2peak for between 10-50 minutes. The intensity of stimulation will be adjusted per leg muscle group based on sensory tolerance with the goal of maintaining pedaling action and target heart rate over the entire session. At each session, we will record the distance traveled, energy expended, power output, resistance, heart rate and rating of perceived exertion (RPE).

    Other: FES Cycling Exercise

  • Placebo comparator
    Passive Leg Cycling

    Passive leg cycling will involve movement of the participant's legs by the cycle ergometer motor without electrical stimulation. The duration of training will follow the same schedule as the FES cycling condition and the same data will be recorded at each session. The passive cycling condition will include the same exposure with the training facility, the exercise equipment (i.e. RT300 cycles), and the research staff (i.e. social contact and attention) as with the FES cycling condition.

    Other: Passive Leg Cycling

Interventions

  • OtherFES Cycling Exercise

    FES cycling will use self-adhering surface electrodes (Pals Platinum, Fallbrook, CA) placed over the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteal muscle groups to deliver stimulation to the leg muscles.

  • OtherPassive Leg Cycling

    Passive leg cycling will not involve electrical stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Walking Speed

    Walking speed will be assessed using the timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) test. Participants will walk as quickly and safely as possible across a 25-foot distance (2 trials; average reported in m/s).

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Walking Endurance

    Walking endurance will be assessed using the 2-minute walk (2MW) test. Participants will walk as fast and as far as possible in an accessible hallway (1 trial, distance traveled recorded in meters).

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  2. Change in Agility

    Agility will be assessed using the Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test. Participants will rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and return to a seated position (2 trials, time recorded in seconds for both trials)

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  3. Change in Patient-rated Mobility Impairment

    Patient-rated impact of MS on walking will be captured using the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12). The MSWS-12 is a 12-item questionnaire that assesses the impact of MS on daily functioning with scores ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater walking impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  4. Change in Cognitive Performance: Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) battery

    The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) battery involves three cognitive tasks: the oral version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), the California Verbal Learning Test II (CVLT-II), and the revised Brief Visualspatial Memory Test (BVMT-R). The SDMT is a timed thinking task that involves associating numbers with symbols. Participants will be asked to provide as many correct numbers as possible in 90 seconds. The CVLT-II is a test of verbal memory and involves recalling a list of words read aloud by an examiner. The participant will be read a list of 16 words and asked to recall as many words as possible. The BVMT is a test of visual memory which involves recalling and manually drawing a series of 6 abstract designs as accurately as possible. The SDMT is performed once, while there are five trials of the CVLT-II and three trials of the BVMT in the BICAMS battery. Higher scores on all three tests indicate better cognitive function.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  5. Change in Cognitive Performance: Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)

    The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) involves single numerical digits being presented to a participant every 3 seconds. The participant must add each new digit to the one immediately preceding it. There are 61 numbers presented in total and the total number of correct responses is recorded. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  6. Change in Fatigue Impact

    Fatigue impact will be assessed using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). The MFIS is a 21-item questionnaire with three subscales (physical, cognitive, and psychosocial), that assess the impact of fatigue on daily functioning over the past 4 weeks. Total MFIS scores are calculated by summing responses for all 21 items, with higher scores indicating greater impact of fatigue. Subscales are calculated based on a subset of items. Scores range from 0-36, 0-40, and 0-8 for physical, cognitive, and psychosocial subscales, respectively, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  7. Change in Fatigue Severity

    Fatigue severity will be assessed by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). The FSS is a nine-item questionnaire that assesses perceived fatigue over the past 7 days. Total FSS scores are calculated as a mean of the nine items. Scores on the FSS range from 1-7, where higher scores indicate more severe fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  8. Change in Pain

    Pain will be assessed using the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). The MPQ is a 15-item questionnaire which assesses levels of pain experienced by the participants during a 4-week period. The overall score is calculated by summing responses from each item and can range from 0-45, where higher scores indicate greater severity of pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  9. Change in Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression

    Symptoms of anxiety and depression will be assessed using the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS has two subscales (i.e., anxiety and depression) which each contain 7-items, of which a subset are reserve-scored, and then summed into total scores that range from 0-21. Higher scores on each subscale indicate more frequent symptoms of anxiety and depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  10. Change in Health-related Quality of Life

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29). The MSIS-29 is a measure of physical and psychological health-related QOL. The physical subscale contains 20 items and the psychological subscale contains nine items. Scores from the physical and psychological subscales are computed to range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a greater physical and psychological impact of MS on daily activities.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  11. Change in Activities of Daily Living

    Participation in activities of daily living will be assessed using the abbreviated Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI). The LLDFI contains 15-items within three subscales: basic lower extremity function, advanced lower extremity function, and upper extremity function. Each subscale contains 5-items and scores range from 5-25. A composite score is generated by summing all three subscale scores, and ranges from 15-75, with higher scores indicating fewer functional limitations.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness

    Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed as peak oxygen consumption based on an incremental exercise test on a recumbent stepper.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  2. Change in Muscular Fitness

    Muscular fitness will be assessed bilaterally as peak torque of the knee extensors/flexors and ankle dorsiflexors/plantarflexors using a Biodex System 4 dynamometer. Peak torque will be obtained by having the participant perform three maximal isometric contractions with each muscle group for 5 seconds, with a 15-second rest between each attempt.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

  3. Change in Body Composition

    Body composition will be assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data will include percent body fat, fat mass, lean mass, bone mineral density, and bone mineral content.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  4. Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Measures

    Optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be used to capture retinal nerve fibre layer thicknesses.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (mid-point), 24 weeks (immediately post intervention), and 36 weeks (12 weeks follow-up)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Ottawa
    Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Edwards T, Motl RW, Pilutti LA. Cardiorespiratory demand of acute voluntary cycling with functional electrical stimulation in individuals with multiple sclerosis with severe mobility impairment. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 Jan;43(1):71-76. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0397. Epub 2017 Sep 7. PubMed 28881147 ↗
  • Pilutti LA, Motl RW, Edwards TA, Wilund KR. Rationale and design of a randomized controlled clinical trial of functional electrical stimulation cycling in persons with severe multiple sclerosis. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 May 15;3:147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.05.005. eCollection 2016 Aug 15. PubMed 29736463 ↗
  • Edwards T, Motl RW, Sebastiao E, Pilutti LA. Pilot randomized controlled trial of functional electrical stimulation cycling exercise in people with multiple sclerosis with mobility disability. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Nov;26:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 8. PubMed 30243234 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03949387
Collaborators
The Ottawa Hospital, Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
Responsible party
Lara Pilutti (Associate Professor, University of Ottawa) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 14, 2019
Start date
Oct 16, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 28, 2024
Completion
Oct 28, 2024
Last update
Dec 24, 2024

Study contacts

Lara Pilutti, PhD
principal investigator · University of Ottawa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion