ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03944876BASICUpdated Nov 19, 2024

Botulinum Toxin Type A Blockade of the Sphenopalatine Ganglion in Treatment-refractory Chronic Cluster Headache

A Phase 3 interventional study of Botulinum toxin type A and placebo in Cluster Headache, sponsored by Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Recruiting at 5 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-19.

Sponsored by Norwegian University of Science and Technology · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2019; still recruiting 7 years later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
112
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cluster headache is a primary headache condition characterized by clusters of one-sided, high-intensity pain attacks. The headache may be episodic or chronic. Treatment options are limited and their effects unsatisfactory. An important nerve pathway involved in the pain attacks has a switching station at the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) located in the depth of the facial bones. SPG is a known therapy target for cluster headache. The area can be identified on CT images, but is difficult to access due to its location. Thus, the Multiguide navigation system has been developed to enable precise delivery of the drugs that target SPG activity. In Trondheim, two phase 1 / Phase 2 study have been carried out using botulinum toxin A (Botox®) against SPG in patient with chronic cluster headache and chronic migraine. The results indicate that such a treatment strategy is safe and beneficial. The current study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blinded study to investigate whether precise single-injection of botulinum toxin A reduces the frequency of attacks in chronic cluster headache .

02

Conditions studied

  • Cluster Headache

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Botulinum Toxin Type A
  • Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block
  • Autonomic Nerve Block
  • Injections
03

In context

Cluster Headache

123 studies on the registry are indexed under Cluster Headache; 26 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 112 is above the median of 42 across 90 interventional studies indexed under Cluster Headache.

Browse Cluster Headache studies →

Lead sponsor

Norwegian University of Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 495 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Informed and written consent.
  2. Male or female, 18-85 years of age
  3. Headache attacks fulfilling the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) III criteria for chronic cluster headache (CCH) 3.1.2.
  4. Dominant headache laterality with ≥ 80% of cluster headache attacks on one side.
  5. Subject reports an average of ≥ 4 cluster attacks/week on the side of their dominant headache laterality in the 3 months prior to inclusion and in the baseline period.
  6. The condition is pharmacologically defined as suboptimal effect or intolerable side effects or for verapamil or lithium or suboccipital injection.
  7. Subject agrees to maintain current preventive headache medication regimens (no change in type, frequency, or dose) during the whole study period.
  8. Subject is able to differentiate concomitant headaches from cluster headache.
  9. In case of women of (WOCBP) they have to be using highly effective in a period of 4 weeks after injection.
  10. Ability to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has had a change in type, dosage or dose frequency of preventive headache medications ≥ two weeks prior to baseline/screening or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer.
  2. Subject currently treated with occipital nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation or other implantable device, that have changed parameters in the last month, or are unable to keep parameters stable throughout the study.
  3. Current or previous treatment with implanted medical devices targeting the SPG
  4. Subject has had a change in type, dosage or dose frequency of preventive headache medications during the baseline period, eg. prior to IMP administration.
  5. Non-responder to both oxygen and triptan.
  6. Participation in a clinical study of a new chemical entity or a prescription medicine within 2 months before study drug administration or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer.
  7. Subject is currently participating or has participated in the last 3 months in another clinical study in which the subject has, is, or will be exposed to an or non-investigational drug or device.
  8. Allergy or reactions to marcaine, lidocaine, xylocaine, adrenaline, any botulinum toxin or similar substances.
  9. Abuse of drugs or alcohol.
  10. Use of opioids for ≥10 days per month.
  11. Treatment with pharmacological substances that may interact with BTA (aminoglycosids, spectinomycin, neuromuscular blockers, both depolarizing agents (such as succinylcholine) or non-depolarizing (tubocurarine derivates), lincosamides, polymyxins, quinidine, magnesium sulfate or anticholinestases.).
  12. that do not adhere to the requirements for HEC, as noted in inclusion criteria 9 and outlined in section 3.3.
  13. Pregnancy or breastfeeding in the study period
  14. Subject has undergone facial surgery in the area of the pterygopalatine fossa or zygomaticomaxillary buttress ipsilateral to the planned injection site that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may lead to an inability to properly conduct the procedure.
  15. Facial anomaly or trauma which renders the procedure difficult.2
  16. Subject currently has an active oral or dental abscess or a local infection at the site of injection based on present symptoms.
  17. Subject has been diagnosed with any major infectious processes such as osteomyelitis, or primary or secondary involving the face that have been active or required treatment in the past 6 months.
  18. Patients exhibiting a high degree of comorbidity and/or frailty associated with reduced or high likelihood of hospitalization, at the discretion of the investigator.
  19. Patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders with psychotic or other symptoms making compliance with the study protocol difficult, at the discretion of the investigator.
  20. Patient with active infectious disease or infections that warrants special infection control measures, such as , tuberculosis, or chronic or C infection.
  21. Patient with disorders that are known for Botox® treatment, especially neuromuscular disorders such as motorneuron disorders and myasthenic syndromes
  22. Subject has had previous radiofrequency ablation, balloon compression, gamma knife, or chemical denervation (e.g. glycerol treatments) of the ipsilateral trigeminal ganglion or any branch of the trigeminal nerve.
  23. Subject has had previous radiofrequency ablation (including non-lesional pulsed radiofrequency), balloon compression, gamma knife, or chemical denervation (e.g. glycerol treatments) of the ipsilateral SPG.
  24. Subject has had blocks of short-acting anaesthetics of the ipsilateral SPG in the last 3 months.
  25. Subject has undergone onabotulinumtoxinA injections of the head and/or neck in the last 3 months.
  26. Subject is anticipated to require any excluded medication, device, or procedure during the study.
  27. Subject has a history of bleeding disorders and in the opinion of the Investigator, may lead to an inability to properly conduct the procedure.
  28. Subject has a history of coagulopathy.
  29. Subject is unable to stop antithrombotic medication, eg. anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet therapy, before procedure.
  30. The subject has been diagnosed with another trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia or trigeminal neuralgia.
  31. The patient cannot participate or successfully complete the study, in the opinion of their healthcare provider or the investigator, for any of the following reasons:

    • mentally or legally incapacitated or unable to give consent for any reason.
    • in custody due to an administrative or a legal decision, under tutelage, or being admitted to a sanatorium or social institution.
  32. The patient is a study centre employee who is directly involved in the study or the relative of such an employee.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
112 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Botox injections towards SPG

    Botulinum Toxin type A injections

    Drug: Botulinum toxin type A

  • Placebo comparator
    Controls

    placebo injections

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Botulinum toxin 25 Allergan units in 0.5 ml Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9 % Braun. One injection in the headache side of the face, targeted at the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG)

    Also known as: botox

  • Drugplacebo

    0.5 ml Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 0.9% Braun. One injection in the headache side of the face, targeted at the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG)

    Also known as: Sodium Chloride

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in change from baseline week 5-8 in mean number of cluster headache attacks per week at weeks 5-8 post-intervention in the treatment group versus the placebo group

    Change from baseline to weeks 5-8 post-intervention in number of cluster headache attacks per week in the active group versus the placebo group. The number of cluster headache attacks is collected in a headache diary.

    Time frame: week 5 through week 8 in the post-injection period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) in the active group versus the placebo group

    All adverse events and serious adverse events occurring in the 3 months follow up are registered in an electronic case report form (CRF). Frequency of AE and SAE are compared between the placebo group and the treatment group

    Time frame: week 1 through week 12 in the post-injection period

  2. Difference in change from baseline week 5-8 in mean number of cluster headache attacks per week during weeks 9-12 post-intervention in the active group versus the placebo group

    Change from baseline to weeks 9-12 post-intervention in number of cluster headache attacks per week in the active group versus the placebo group. The number of cluster headache attacks is collected in a headache diary

    Time frame: week 9 through week 12 in the post-injection period

  3. Difference in change from baseline week 5-8 in mean number of cluster headache attacks per week at weeks 5-8 post-intervention in the active group versus the placebo group, in the prespecified subgroups

    Change from baseline to weeks 5 - 8 post-intervention in number of cluster headache attacks per week comparing high versus low attack frequency and low versus high attack frequency variation in the entire baseline period. Comparisons are done between the active and the placebo group. The number of cluster headache attacks is collected in a headache diary

    Time frame: week 5 through week 8 in the post-injection period

  4. Difference in change from baseline week 5-8 in mean number of cluster headache attacks per week during weeks 9-12 post-intervention in the active group versus the placebo group, in the prespecified subgroups

    Change from baseline to weeks 9-12 post-intervention in number of cluster headache attacks per week comparing high versus low attack frequency and high versus low attack frequency variation in the entire baseline period. Comparisons are done between the active and the placebo group. The number of cluster headache attacks is collected in a headache diary

    Time frame: week 9 through week 12 in the post-injection period

  5. Difference in the number of therapeutic responders in the active group versus the placebo group.

    Number of therapeutic responders as defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in attack frequency, intensity or both during weeks 5 - 8 post-intervention compared to baseline week 5-8. The number in the placebo and intervention group are compared

    Time frame: week 5 through week 8 in the post-injection period

  6. Difference in the number of attack frequency responders

    Number of attack frequency responders as defined as a ≥ 30% reduction in attack frequency during weeks 5-8 post-intervention compared to baseline. The number in the placebo and intervention group are compared

    Time frame: week 5 through week 8 in the post-injection period

  7. Difference in change from baseline week 5-8 in mean attack intensity week 5 - 8 post-intervention in the active group versus the placebo group.

    Mean attack intensity (10-point numerical response scale - NRS) week 5-8 post intervention compared to baseline in the intervention group versus the placebo group.

    Time frame: week 5 through week 8 in the post-injection period

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Praxisklinik Ulmenhof
    Hamburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Alexandre Thomas Assaf, dr · Contact
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (CBNI)
    Milano, Italy
    Recruiting
  • St Olavs Hospital
    Trondheim, Norway
    Recruiting
  • Department of Neurology, University Clinic Hospital. Catholic University of Valencia
    Valencia, Spain
    Recruiting
  • National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College of London
    London, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — all IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared within 6 months after study results publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: 6 months after study results publication

Access criteria: erling.tronvik@ntnu.no

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03944876
Collaborators
St. Olavs Hospital, University College, London, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Catholic University of Valencia, PRAXISKLINIK ULMENHOF
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 10, 2019
Start date
Nov 1, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 19, 2024

Study contacts

Tore Wergeland Meisingset, md phd
Contact
tore.w.meisingset@ntnu.no
+47 728 21 335
Erling Tronvik, md phd
Contact
erling.tronvik@ntnu.no
Geir Bråthen, md phd
study director · St. Olavs Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Botulinum toxin type A

Start the discussion