CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03933215Updated Apr 29, 2025Results posted

A Study of Suboptimally Controlled Participants Previously Taking Injectable DMDs for RMS (CLICK-MS)

An observational study in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.. Completed at 18 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-29.

Sponsored by EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the effectiveness, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety of cladribine tablets in participants with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) including relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (aSPMS),who transition to cladribine tablets after suboptimal response to any injectable disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) approved in the United States (US) for RMS in a real-world setting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Cladribine Tablets
  • Observational
  • Mavenclad
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 100 across 1,016 observational studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 85 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Of its 46 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 38 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants with Multiple Sclerosis and experienced suboptimal response (lack of effectiveness, intolerability, poor adherence) to prior treatment with an injectable DMD.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female participants greater than or equal to (>=)18 years
  • Signed informed consent
  • Have diagnosis of RMS including RRMS and aSPMS and satisfy the approved indication for cladribine tablets as per United States Prescribing Information (USPI)
  • Have time since diagnosis of RMS of at least 12 months
  • Had received their last previous injectable disease-modifying drug (DMD) for at least 3 months
  • Have decided to initiate treatment with cladribine tablets during routine clinical care
  • Meet criteria as per the approved USPI
  • Have access to a valid e-mail address
  • In the opinion of the Investigator, experienced suboptimal response (lack of effectiveness, intolerability, poor adherence) to injectable DMD treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have been previously treated with cladribine in any dosing form
  • Transitioning from previous injectable DMD solely for administrative reasons such as relocation
  • Have comorbid conditions that preclude participation
  • Have any clinical condition or medical history noted as contraindication on USPI
  • Are currently participating in an interventional clinical trial
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, women who plan to become pregnant or men whose partner plans to become pregnant during the cladribine treatment period
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cladribine

    Drug: Cladribine

Interventions

  • DrugCladribine

    Participants received cladribine tablets as per investigator discretion and as per United States approved label: 3.5 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg) body weight over 2 years, administered as 1 treatment course of 1.75 mg/kg per year.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)

    The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days).

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

    The TSQM-14 was a participant-rated scale used to assess subjective satisfaction with medication. The TSQM has 14 questions that assesses participants' global satisfaction level with their treatment in 4 domains: side effects (There are 5 questions in the side effects domain, however one of them is a Yes/No question and there are 4 sub-components, hence a maximum score of 20), effectiveness (3 questions), global satisfaction (3 questions), and convenience (3 questions). All questions are scored from 1 (least satisfied) to 5 or 7 (most satisfied). The total score is summed for each domain to obtain: side effects (1-20), effectiveness (1-21), global satisfaction (1-17), and convenience (1-21), using transformed scores between 0 and 100. Lower total scores in each domain indicate dissatisfaction with the study medication and higher total scores indicate satisfaction.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24

  2. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

    SF-36 was a multipurpose, participant completed, short-form health survey with 36 questions that consists of an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. Physical component summary (PCS) is mostly contributed by physical function (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), and general health (GH). Mental component summary (MCS) is mostly contributed by mental health (MH), role emotional (RE), social function (SF), and vitality (VT). Each component on the SF-36 item health survey is scored from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Total score ranges from 0-100 for each component summary (i.e., PCS and MCS), where higher scores are associated with less disability and better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24

  3. Change From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale - 5-item Version (MFIS-5) Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

    MFIS-5 is a modified form of the Fatigue Impact Scale that consists of 5 questions that assess the impact of fatigue on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning, with 5 response levels ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 = (Never), 1 = (Rarely), 2 = (Sometimes), 3 = (Often), 4 = (Almost always). Total scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores representing a greater impact of fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24

  4. Change From Baseline in 7-Item Beck-Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS) Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

    The 7 items BDI-FS is a self-report inventory for measuring the severity of depression on a 7-item scale. The BDI-Fast Screen is scored by summing all of the highest ratings for each of the 7 items. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The maximum total score is 21. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24

  5. Change From Baseline in Percent Work Time Missed Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

    The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-items validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in percent work time missed (absenteeism) was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Percent Impairment While Working Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

    The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-items validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in percentage of impairment while working (presentisms) was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24

  7. Change From Baseline in Percent Overall Work Impairment Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

    The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-items validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in total percentage of work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms) were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24

  8. Change From Baseline in Percent Activity Impairment Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment- Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

    The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-items validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in percent activity impairment was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) Scale Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

    PDDS scale developed to assess the disability in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) participants and in assessing disease progression that focuses mainly on how participants walk. PDDS scale ranges from 0 to 8, where 0 = normal; 1 = mild disability; 2 = moderate disability; 3 = gait disability; 4 = early cane; 5 = late cane; 6 = bilateral support; 7 = wheelchair/scooter and 8 = bedridden. A higher score represented higher level of disability.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24

  10. Number of Participants With Adherence to Cladribine as Assessed by Modified Versions of the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MS-TAQ)

    7 Treatment adherence questions, based on MS-TAQ, were developed to determine level of adherence as well as identify barriers to adherence for MS participants taking DMDs. 1.What treatment week of cladribine (Clad.) tablets (tab.) did you most recently complete? 2.How many Clad. tab. were you supposed to take during this treatment week? 3.Did you miss/forget to take any Clad. tab. during this treatment week? 4. How many Clad. tab. did you miss/ forget to take? 5.How important were following factors in missing/forgetting to take a dose? (scale from 0-3, where, 0=Not important at all and 3=Extremely important). 6.Overall, how hard/easy do you feel it is to take Clad. tab. as recommended by your physician during your treatment week? (scale from 1- 5, where 1=Extremely easy and 5=Extremely hard). 7.How satisfied are you with how things have been with your Clad. tab. treatment during your treatment week? (scale from 1-5, where 1=Not satisfied at all and 5=Completely satisfied).

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) and Months 1, 2, 13 and 14

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Relapse at Months 12 and 24

    The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days). Percentage of participants who experienced relapse at Months 12 and 24 were reported.

    Time frame: Months 12 and 24

  12. Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Month 12

    The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days).

    Time frame: At Month 12

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Relapse Associated With Hospitalization

    The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days). Percentage of participants who experienced relapse associated with hospitalization at Months 12 and 24 were reported.

    Time frame: Months 12 and 24

  14. Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Associated With Hospitalization at Months 12 and 24

    The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days). ARR associated with hospitalization at Months 12 and 24 were reported.

    Time frame: Months 12 and 24

  15. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Relapse Associated With Glucocorticoid Use

    The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days).Percentage of participants who experienced relapse associated with glucocorticoid use at Months 12 and 24 were reported.

    Time frame: Months 12 and 24

  16. Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Associated With Glucocorticoid Use at Months 12 and 24

    The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days). ARR associated with glucocorticoid use at Months 12 and 24 were reported.

    Time frame: Months 12 and 24

  17. Number of Previous Disease-Modifying Drugs (DMD) Received for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) at Baseline

    Number of previous DMD received by participants with MS were reported.

    Time frame: At Baseline

  18. Number of Participants Who Received At Least One Concomitant Medication

    Number of participants who received at least one concomitant medication were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Month 24

  19. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Cladribine Tablets

    Percentage of participants who discontinued cladribine tablets were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 Months

  20. Elapsed Time to Discontinuation After First Dose of Cladribine Tablets

    Elapsed time to discontinuation after first dose of cladribine tablets was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 Months

  21. Number of Doses Received by Participants as Per United States Prescribing Information

    Number of doses received by participants as per United States prescribing information were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 Months

  22. Percentage of Participants With Treatment Compliance as Per United States Prescribing Information

    Treatment compliance was defined as total actual number of cladribine tablets / total planned number of cladribine tablets.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 Months

  23. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

    A serious adverse event (SAE) is an adverse event (AE) that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or is otherwise considered medically important. An ADR is a response to a medicinal product which is noxious and unintended. An AESI is an AE of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the investigator to the Sponsor can be appropriate.

    Time frame: Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 29, 2025
Limitations and caveats
There are methods to adjustment for missing-not-at-random, but these methods are varied and inconsistent, especially with high missingness. Knowing we have low counts for many outcomes, we reported the data that we have, accepting that there will be patients with missing data who are missing assessments due to sickness or other non-random reasons.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCladribine
Started100
Treated62
Completed34
Not completed66
Withdrew: Other6
Withdrew: Sponsor decision5
Withdrew: Protocol violation5
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject6
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up6
Withdrew: Enrolled but not treated38

Outcome measures

PrimaryAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR)

The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days).

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 Months
Reported as:
Mean · relapses per year
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
relapses per yearCladribine
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)0.02 (0.000 to 0.059)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

The TSQM-14 was a participant-rated scale used to assess subjective satisfaction with medication. The TSQM has 14 questions that assesses participants' global satisfaction level with their treatment in 4 domains: side effects (There are 5 questions in the side effects domain, however one of them is a Yes/No question and there are 4 sub-components, hence a maximum score of 20), effectiveness (3 questions), global satisfaction (3 questions), and convenience (3 questions). All questions are scored from 1 (least satisfied) to 5 or 7 (most satisfied). The total score is summed for each domain to obtain: side effects (1-20), effectiveness (1-21), global satisfaction (1-17), and convenience (1-21), using transformed scores between 0 and 100. Lower total scores in each domain indicate dissatisfaction with the study medication and higher total scores indicate satisfaction.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 14-Item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-14) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24
units on a scaleCladribine
Global Satisfaction: change at Month 632.9 ± 29.01
Global Satisfaction: change at Month 1226.2 ± 21.43
Global Satisfaction: change at Month 247.1 ± NA
Effectiveness: change at Month 624.4 ± 23.45
Effectiveness: change at Month 127.4 ± 35.13
Effectiveness: change at Month 24-5.6 ± NA
Side Effects: change at Month 6-8.8 ± 41.37
Side Effects: change at Month 12-18.1 ± 24.69
Side Effects: change at Month 240.0 ± NA
Convenience: change at Month 635.0 ± 21.44
Convenience: change at Month 1224.7 ± 19.66
Convenience: change at Month 2433.3 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

SF-36 was a multipurpose, participant completed, short-form health survey with 36 questions that consists of an 8-scale profile of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically-based physical and mental health summary measures. Physical component summary (PCS) is mostly contributed by physical function (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), and general health (GH). Mental component summary (MCS) is mostly contributed by mental health (MH), role emotional (RE), social function (SF), and vitality (VT). Each component on the SF-36 item health survey is scored from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Total score ranges from 0-100 for each component summary (i.e., PCS and MCS), where higher scores are associated with less disability and better quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24
units on a scaleCladribine
PCS: Change at Month 64.1 ± 6.90
PCS: Change at Month 12-0.4 ± 5.68
PCS: Change at Month 241.9 ± NA
MCS: Change at Month 60.9 ± 7.66
MCS: Change at Month 120.3 ± 8.05
MCS: Change at Month 24-2.5 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale - 5-item Version (MFIS-5) Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

MFIS-5 is a modified form of the Fatigue Impact Scale that consists of 5 questions that assess the impact of fatigue on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning, with 5 response levels ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 = (Never), 1 = (Rarely), 2 = (Sometimes), 3 = (Often), 4 = (Almost always). Total scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores representing a greater impact of fatigue.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale - 5-item Version (MFIS-5) Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24
units on a scaleCladribine
Change at Month 6-2.1 ± 3.42
Change at Month 120.4 ± 4.73
Change at Month 240.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 7-Item Beck-Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS) Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

The 7 items BDI-FS is a self-report inventory for measuring the severity of depression on a 7-item scale. The BDI-Fast Screen is scored by summing all of the highest ratings for each of the 7 items. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The maximum total score is 21. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in 7-Item Beck-Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS) Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24
units on a scaleCladribine
Change at Month 6-1.3 ± 3.09
Change at Month 12-0.1 ± 3.04
Change at Month 24-1.0 ± 2.83
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percent Work Time Missed Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-items validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in percent work time missed (absenteeism) was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of work time missed
Change From Baseline in Percent Work Time Missed Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24
percentage of work time missedCladribine
Change at Month 63.1 ± 16.37
Change at Month 12-6.3 ± 28.64
Change at Month 240.0 ± 0.00
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percent Impairment While Working Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-items validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in percentage of impairment while working (presentisms) was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of impairment while working
Change From Baseline in Percent Impairment While Working Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24
percentage of impairment while workingCladribine
Change at Month 6-11.4 ± 6.90
Change at Month 12-5.0 ± 22.24
Change at Month 240.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percent Overall Work Impairment Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-items validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in total percentage of work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms) were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of overall work impairment
Change From Baseline in Percent Overall Work Impairment Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24
percentage of overall work impairmentCladribine
Change at Month 6-5.1 ± 18.73
Change at Month 12-6.1 ± 19.99
Change at Month 240.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percent Activity Impairment Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment- Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

The WPAI-MS questionnaire is a 6-items validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI-MS included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI-MS generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Change from baseline in percent activity impairment was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of activity impairment
Change From Baseline in Percent Activity Impairment Assessed by 6-Item Work Productivity Activity Impairment- Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI-MS) Score at Month 6, 12 and 24
percentage of activity impairmentCladribine
Change at Month 6-10.0 ± 10.00
Change at Month 12-7.7 ± 21.27
Change at Month 24-5.0 ± 7.07
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) Scale Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24

PDDS scale developed to assess the disability in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) participants and in assessing disease progression that focuses mainly on how participants walk. PDDS scale ranges from 0 to 8, where 0 = normal; 1 = mild disability; 2 = moderate disability; 3 = gait disability; 4 = early cane; 5 = late cane; 6 = bilateral support; 7 = wheelchair/scooter and 8 = bedridden. A higher score represented higher level of disability.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0), Month 6, 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) Scale Total Score at Month 6, 12 and 24
units on a scaleCladribine
Change at Month 6-0.2 ± 0.69
Change at Month 12-0.3 ± 0.72
Change at Month 24-0.1 ± 1.17
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adherence to Cladribine as Assessed by Modified Versions of the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MS-TAQ)

7 Treatment adherence questions, based on MS-TAQ, were developed to determine level of adherence as well as identify barriers to adherence for MS participants taking DMDs. 1.What treatment week of cladribine (Clad.) tablets (tab.) did you most recently complete? 2.How many Clad. tab. were you supposed to take during this treatment week? 3.Did you miss/forget to take any Clad. tab. during this treatment week? 4. How many Clad. tab. did you miss/ forget to take? 5.How important were following factors in missing/forgetting to take a dose? (scale from 0-3, where, 0=Not important at all and 3=Extremely important). 6.Overall, how hard/easy do you feel it is to take Clad. tab. as recommended by your physician during your treatment week? (scale from 1- 5, where 1=Extremely easy and 5=Extremely hard). 7.How satisfied are you with how things have been with your Clad. tab. treatment during your treatment week? (scale from 1-5, where 1=Not satisfied at all and 5=Completely satisfied).

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0) and Months 1, 2, 13 and 14
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adherence to Cladribine as Assessed by Modified Versions of the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MS-TAQ)
ParticipantsCladribine
At Baseline28
Month 138
Month 238
Month 1321
Month 1418
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Relapse at Months 12 and 24

The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days). Percentage of participants who experienced relapse at Months 12 and 24 were reported.

Time frame:
Months 12 and 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Relapse at Months 12 and 24
percentage of participantsCladribine
Month 121.6
Month 241.6
SecondaryAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Month 12

The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days).

Time frame:
At Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · relapses per year
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Month 12
relapses per yearCladribine
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Month 120.01955 (0.0 to 0.1)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Relapse Associated With Hospitalization

The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days). Percentage of participants who experienced relapse associated with hospitalization at Months 12 and 24 were reported.

Time frame:
Months 12 and 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Relapse Associated With Hospitalization
percentage of participantsCladribine
Month 120.0
Month 240.0
SecondaryAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Associated With Hospitalization at Months 12 and 24

The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days). ARR associated with hospitalization at Months 12 and 24 were reported.

Time frame:
Months 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · relapses per year
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Associated With Hospitalization at Months 12 and 24
relapses per yearCladribine
Month 120.0 (0.0 to NA)
Month 240.0 (0.0 to NA)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Relapse Associated With Glucocorticoid Use

The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days).Percentage of participants who experienced relapse associated with glucocorticoid use at Months 12 and 24 were reported.

Time frame:
Months 12 and 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Relapse Associated With Glucocorticoid Use
percentage of participantsCladribine
Month 120.0
Month 240.0
SecondaryAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Associated With Glucocorticoid Use at Months 12 and 24

The qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (for more than \[\>\] 24 hours, no fever, infection, injury, adverse events (AEs), and preceded by a stable or improving neurological state for more than or equal to \[\>=\] 30 days). ARR associated with glucocorticoid use at Months 12 and 24 were reported.

Time frame:
Months 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · relapses per year
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) Associated With Glucocorticoid Use at Months 12 and 24
relapses per yearCladribine
Month 120.0 (0.0 to NA)
Month 240.0 (0.0 to NA)
SecondaryNumber of Previous Disease-Modifying Drugs (DMD) Received for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) at Baseline

Number of previous DMD received by participants with MS were reported.

Time frame:
At Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · number of DMDs received
Number of Previous Disease-Modifying Drugs (DMD) Received for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) at Baseline
number of DMDs receivedCladribine
Number of Previous Disease-Modifying Drugs (DMD) Received for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) at Baseline1.9 ± 1.14
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Received At Least One Concomitant Medication

Number of participants who received at least one concomitant medication were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Month 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Received At Least One Concomitant Medication
ParticipantsCladribine
Number of Participants Who Received At Least One Concomitant Medication60
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Cladribine Tablets

Percentage of participants who discontinued cladribine tablets were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 Months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Cladribine Tablets
percentage of participantsCladribine
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Cladribine Tablets32.3
SecondaryElapsed Time to Discontinuation After First Dose of Cladribine Tablets

Elapsed time to discontinuation after first dose of cladribine tablets was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 Months
Reported as:
Median · months
Elapsed Time to Discontinuation After First Dose of Cladribine Tablets
monthsCladribine
Elapsed Time to Discontinuation After First Dose of Cladribine Tablets13.2 (12.2 to 14.1)
SecondaryNumber of Doses Received by Participants as Per United States Prescribing Information

Number of doses received by participants as per United States prescribing information were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 Months
Reported as:
Median · number of doses received
Number of Doses Received by Participants as Per United States Prescribing Information
number of doses receivedCladribine
Number of Doses Received by Participants as Per United States Prescribing Information28.00 (18.00 to 34.00)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment Compliance as Per United States Prescribing Information

Treatment compliance was defined as total actual number of cladribine tablets / total planned number of cladribine tablets.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 Months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Compliance as Per United States Prescribing Information
percentage of participantsCladribine
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Compliance as Per United States Prescribing Information82.3
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

A serious adverse event (SAE) is an adverse event (AE) that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or is otherwise considered medically important. An ADR is a response to a medicinal product which is noxious and unintended. An AESI is an AE of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the investigator to the Sponsor can be appropriate.

Time frame:
Baseline (Month 0) up to 24 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
ParticipantsCladribine
SAE3
ADR18
AESI9

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline up to 24 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cladribine0/62 (0%)3/62 (4.8%)34/62 (54.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCladribine
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders1/62
Anal squamous cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/62
Low absolute lymphocyte countInvestigations1/62
Suspected infection of the kidneyInfections and infestations1/62
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 65
Most frequent other events
EventCladribine
LymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders9/62
COVID-19Infections and infestations5/62
Herpes zosterInfections and infestations4/62
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations3/62
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders2/62
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/62
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/62
HypersensitivityImmune system disorders2/62
BronchitisInfections and infestations2/62
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/62

Baseline characteristics

The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of cladribine tablets.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cladribine
Mean49 ± 12.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cladribine
Female49
Male13
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cladribine
Hispanic or Latino2
Not Hispanic or Latino51
Unknown or Not Reported9
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cladribine
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American7
White52
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported3
08

Study locations

18 sites
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • HCA Research Institute
    Englewood, Colorado 80113, United States
  • Advanced Neurosciences Research
    Fort Collins, Colorado 80528, United States
  • Prairie Education & Research
    Springfield, Illinois 62702, United States
  • Fort Wayne Neurological Center
    Fort Wayne, Indiana 46804, United States
  • College Park Family Care Center
    Overland Park, Kansas 66212, United States
  • The Elliot Lewis Center for Multiple Sclerosis Care, LLC
    Wellesley, Massachusetts 02481, United States
  • UMASS - Neurology
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States
  • Henry Ford Health System
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Memorial Healthcare
    Owosso, Michigan 48867, United States
  • Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology - Neurology
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422, United States
  • Guilford Neurologic Associates
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27405, United States
  • Neurology Center of San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78258, United States
  • Blacksburg Neurology, PC
    Christiansburg, Virginia 24073, United States
  • Neurological Associates
    Richmond, Virginia 23229, United States
  • VCU Medical Center - Pediatric Neurology
    Richmond, Virginia 23298-0211, United States
  • Sentara Ambulatory Care Center
    Virginia Beach, Virginia 23456, United States
  • MS Center of Evergreen
    Kirkland, Washington 98034, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Miravalle AA, Katz J, Robertson D, Hayward B, Harlow DE, Lebson LA, Sloane JA, Bass AD, Fox EJ. CLICK-MS and MASTER-2 Phase IV trial design: cladribine tablets in suboptimally controlled relapsing multiple sclerosis. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2021 Apr;11(2):99-111. doi: 10.2217/nmt-2020-0059. Epub 2021 Feb 1. PubMed 33517769 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 14, 2024
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 30, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03933215
Lead sponsor
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
Collaborators
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2019
Start date
May 21, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2024
Completion
Mar 30, 2024
Results posted
Apr 29, 2025
Last update
Apr 29, 2025

Study contacts

Medical Responsible
study director · EMD Serono Inc., the biopharmaceutical division of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion