ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03929913Updated Apr 29, 2026Results posted

NHLBI DIR Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty Early Feasibility Study

An interventional study of Transmural Systems Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty (TMCA) in Functional Mitral Regurgitation, sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-29.

Sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research protocol tests a new technique and devices that we have developed to treat functional mitral valve regurgitation, called transcatheter mitral valve cerclage annuloplasty, otherwise known as "cerclage". Functional mitral valve regurgitation is a condition caused by damaged heart muscle involving the left ventricle which results in mitral valve leakage. This leakage causes heart failure (breathlessness and lack of energy especially when walking or exercising, and hospital admissions for fluid buildup).

This is an early feasibility study (EFS) evaluation of special devices, permanently implanted in the heart, to perform mitral cerclage annuloplasty. Mitral cerclage annuloplasty is a catheter procedure performed under X-ray and ultrasound guidance without surgery. The cerclage devices compress the mitral valve like a purse-string. The cerclage device has a special feature that prevents a coronary artery from getting squeezed as part of this purse-string.

The protocol has been changed to allow patients who have mitral valve regurgitation despite prior Mitra-Clip treatment, and to allow patients who have symptomatic heart failure with mild mitral regurgitation.

Read the detailed description

Functional mitral regurgitation (also known as secondary mitral regurgitation) is a common complication of left ventricular dysfunction. Ventricular dysfunction leads to dilation, which in turn leads to mitral annular dilation and leaflet traction. This causes a failure of coaptation of the otherwise intact leaflets of the mitral valve, leading to regurgitation through a central orifice between the mal-coapting leaflet tips. Functional mitral regurgitation contributes to heart failure symptoms. Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty (TMCA) is a new catheter technique that reduces the septal-lateral dimension of the dilated annulus through circumferential compression, prevents extrinsic compression and entrapment of coronary arteries by incorporating a protection element, and exhibits planar discordance that achieves annular reduction even when the coronary sinus is anatomically located along the posterior left atrial wall. This is an entirely right-sided procedure and device.

02

Conditions studied

  • Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Keywords

  • Ventricular Dysfunction
  • Functional Mitral Regurgitation
  • Heart Failure
  • Mitral Implant
  • Secondary Mitral Regurgitation
03

In context

Ventricular Dysfunction

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Ventricular Dysfunction; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 60 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Ventricular Dysfunction.

Browse Ventricular Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) is the lead sponsor of 1,143 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 58 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 51 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults age >=21 years

    1. Symptomatic functional mitral valve regurgitation

      1. Mild or greater mitral valve regurgitation, \<= 0.50, and class III - IV heart failure
      2. Moderate or greater mitral valve regurgitation and NYHA II - IV heart failure, irrespective of LV systolic function
    2. On optimal medical therapy for at least one month
    3. Left ventricular ejection fraction >=0.20 assessed by echocardiography, CT, or CMR
    4. Suitable coronary venous anatomy for Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty based on pre-procedural cardiac CT or coronary venogram
    5. Concordance of the Study Eligibility Committee
    6. If present, a MitraClip was implanted at least 30 days previously

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Subjects unable to consent to participate
  2. Subjects unwilling to participate or unwilling to return for study follow-up activities.
  3. Prior cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) likely to be entrapped by cerclage.

    -- Candidates with coronary sinus or left ventricular pacing or defibrillation leads that are not likely to be entrapped by cerclage, evident on baseline CT or angiogram, are eligible to participate.

  4. TAVR within 6 weeks
  5. Intended concurrent structural heart procedure, such as aortic or tricuspid valve intervention
  6. Aortic stenosis more than mild in severity
  7. Single-leaflet MitraClip detachment, if present
  8. Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant prior to completion of all protocol follow-up procedures
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transcatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty

    To evaluate the feasibility and safety of Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty (TMCA) to treat symptomatic heart failure accompanied by mitral valve regurgitation despite optimal medical therapy. The TMCA implant is attached to a guidewire and pulled through the internal jugular sheath, along the coronary sinus, through the basal septum, through the tricuspid valve, and back out of the internal jugular sheath. The position of the TMCA implant is adjusted so that the coronary protection element lies directly over any underlying branch of the left coronary artery.

    Device: Transmural Systems Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty (TMCA)

Interventions

  • DeviceTransmural Systems Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty (TMCA)

    The Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty implant has two components, with or without a coronary artery protection element, and the wishbone lock with coronary sinus and right ventricular outflow track limbs. Procedure is performed from a trans-jugular venous approach. Coronary guidewires and microcatheters are used to navigate into a coronary vein to the target capture catheter. The implant is then attached to the back end of the guidewire and pulled out of the internal jugular sheath. The position of the implant is adjusted so the coronary protection element lies directly over any underlying branch of the left coronary artery. The wishbone lock is advanced over the two limbs of the implant and the desired tension is titrated to the degree of mitral regurgitation. Coronary angiography is performed to confirm there is no coronary compression. After desired tension has been achieved, the wishbone lock is locked and the two limbs of the implant are cut with a cutter catheter.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Primary Endpoint is Technical Success

    The primary endpoint is Technical success. This endpoint is measured at exit from the catheterization laboratory. All of the following must be present: 1. Alive 2. Successful deployment and correct positioning of a single intended Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty (TMCA). Repositioning and recapture of the device, if needed, is not classified as failure. 3. Retrieval of the TMCA delivery system 4. Absence of TMCA-related coronary artery compression and absence of additional procedure such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to relieve coronary artery compression. 5. No additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the TMCA or delivery system.

    Time frame: 1 minute following procedure discharge (Exit from the catheterization laboratory)

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Secondary Endpoint is Procedural Success

    The secondary endpoint is Procedural success This endpoint is measured at 30 days. All of the following must be present: 1. Technical success 2. No Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty (TMCA) device-related Serious Adverse Events, defined as VARC-2 life-threatening bleeding, major vascular or cardiac complications related to the TMCA requiring unplanned reintervention or surgery.

    Time frame: Day 30 post procedure

07

Results

Posted Mar 8, 2023

Participant flow

Nineteen subjects consented and underwent cerclage procedures between May 2019 and February 2021, despite COVID-19-related delays.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTranscatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
Started19
Completed12
Not completed7
Withdrew: Death4
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1
Withdrew: Failed procedure2

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Primary Endpoint is Technical Success

The primary endpoint is Technical success. This endpoint is measured at exit from the catheterization laboratory. All of the following must be present: 1. Alive 2. Successful deployment and correct positioning of a single intended Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty (TMCA). Repositioning and recapture of the device, if needed, is not classified as failure. 3. Retrieval of the TMCA delivery system 4. Absence of TMCA-related coronary artery compression and absence of additional procedure such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to relieve coronary artery compression. 5. No additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the TMCA or delivery system.

Time frame:
1 minute following procedure discharge (Exit from the catheterization laboratory)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Primary Endpoint is Technical Success
ParticipantsTranscatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
The Primary Endpoint is Technical Success17
SecondaryThe Secondary Endpoint is Procedural Success

The secondary endpoint is Procedural success This endpoint is measured at 30 days. All of the following must be present: 1. Technical success 2. No Transcatheter Mitral Cerclage Annuloplasty (TMCA) device-related Serious Adverse Events, defined as VARC-2 life-threatening bleeding, major vascular or cardiac complications related to the TMCA requiring unplanned reintervention or surgery.

Time frame:
Day 30 post procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Secondary Endpoint is Procedural Success
ParticipantsTranscatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
The Secondary Endpoint is Procedural Success16

Adverse events

Collected over 5 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty5/19 (26.3%)12/19 (63.2%)19/19 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 33
Most frequent serious events
EventTranscatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
Heart failureCardiac disorders7/19
Atrioventricular block completeCardiac disorders4/19
HypotensionVascular disorders3/19
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders2/19
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders2/19
EncephalopathyNervous system disorders2/19
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/19
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/19
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders1/19
Cardiogenic Shock-post cardiac arrestCardiac disorders1/19
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 46
Most frequent other events
EventTranscatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
Cardiac troponin I increasedCardiac disorders19/19
Cardiac troponin I increasedInvestigations19/19
LeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disorders13/19
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders9/19
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations8/19
Heart failureCardiac disorders6/19
Conduction disorderCardiac disorders5/19
Creatinine increasedInvestigations5/19
BNP elevated post procedureInvestigations5/19
NT-BNP elevated post procedureInvestigations4/19

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Transcatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years5
>=65 years14
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Transcatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
Female12
Male7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Transcatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
Hispanic or Latino1
Not Hispanic or Latino17
Unknown or Not Reported1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Transcatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American7
White12
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Transcatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
United States19
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)(Participants)Transcatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
Count of participants12
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)(Participants)Transcatheter Mitral Valve Cerclage Annuloplasty
Count of participants7
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Emory University
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322-1102, United States
  • Carilion Medical Center
    Roanoke, Virginia 24014, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The authors are willing to share de-identified subject data upon reasonable request.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2019 to primary completion in Feb 2021, 21 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2023, 2 years after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Jan 2023.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 26, 2019
First posted
Apr 29, 2019
StartActual
May 7, 2019
Primary completionActual
Feb 23, 2021
CompletionActual
Feb 27, 2026
Results delay requested
Jan 18, 2023
Results first posted
Mar 8, 2023
Last update
Apr 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03929913
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 29, 2019
Start date
May 7, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 23, 2021
Completion
Feb 27, 2026
Results posted
Mar 8, 2023
Last update
Apr 29, 2026

Study contacts

Robert J Lederman, M.D.
principal investigator · National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion