CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03928093Updated Jan 22, 2025

Pregabalin Treatment for RDEB Pain and Itch

A Phase 3 interventional study of Pregabalin in Pain, Neuropathic, Itch and Epidermolysis Bullosa, sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-22.

Sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) patients' quality of life is severely affected by neuropathic pain and itch, which have recently been demonstrated to be secondary to skin small fiber neuropathy. To date, there is no evidence on what the best agent is to control these symptoms. Based on the anecdotal data and safety profile, the investigators believe that pregabalin is a therapeutic agent that will be effective and safe in this population. The investigators propose to conduct a blinded study, using pregabalin versus placebo in which each patient serves as its own control (cross-over design). This is a feasibility study that will provide preliminary data on efficacy and safety of pregabalin in RDEB patients with neuropathic pain and itch and gather much needed data (dosage, titration schedule, outcome measures, etc) to inform the design of a larger cohort, controlled, multicenter trial.

Read the detailed description

Neuropathic pain and itch are significant symptoms that affect RDEB patients' quality of life. To date, there is no evidence on what the best agent is to control these symptoms.

Based on the anecdotal data and the safety profile, the investigator believes that pregabalin is a therapeutic agent that will be effective and safe in this population.

This is a pilot, randomized, double-blinded, cross-over trial of pregabalin vs placebo for the treatment of RDEB associated neuropathic pain and itch. The study will run for 24 weeks and will have 4 separate phases with 6 overall visits: 1. Observation/wash out period (2 weeks); 2. ARM-1, ½ of the patients will receive pregabalin(A) and ½ the placebo (B) (10 weeks); 3. Wash out period (2 weeks) and 4. ARM-2 (patients who received placebo will receive pregabalin and pregabalin will receive placebo (10 weeks).

Patients will be recruited during the regular clinic visits or invited to participate via a letter followed by 2 phone calls.

  1. Screening/Wash out period #1 (Visit 0)to assess eligibility criteria and the background pain and itch level (2 weeks), as well as the effectiveness of patients' "standard pain/itch interventions". Throughout this phase and the rest of the study, patients will receive pain and itch medications, except those that interfere with the pregabalin (see exclusion criteria).

    • Investigators will assess the eligibility criteria, including having moderate to severe pain (>4/10), the evidence of neuropathy using a thermal roller device ROLLTEMP2, Sometic, and a screening tool for neuropathic pain, the DN4 questionnaire 15 (Appendix 2).
    • Investigators will collect basic demographic data, medication information and disease severity using iscorEB clinician portion, a valid outcome measure that evaluates the disease severity 16 and EBDASI 17 ( Data collection form: Baseline/Screening Form)
    • Patients will be asked to report on their disease severity using iscorEB patient portion (all ages) that includes pain and itch domains and QOLEB 18 for those over 18 years of age (validated only for the adult population).
    • Patients will be instructed how to collect daily assessments of pain and itching for 14 days before the next visit. For the overall pain intensity assessment, the investigators will use a 100mm VAS, where 0 is no pain and 10- the worst pain ever experienced. For itch assessments, the investigators will ask patients to score each day, before going to bed, the degree of itching experienced that day using a 100 mm horizontal VAS where 0 is no itch and 10 is the worst itch.19 The investigators chose the single item for its reliability, validity and responsiveness to change. These values will represent patient's baseline pain (AvePain-00) and itch (AveItch-00).
  2. ARM1 intervention study period (Visits 1 \& 2): ½ of the patients will receive the active intervention (Pregabalin) and ½ the placebo. This phase will be of 10 weeks duration and will consist of 4 weeks of escalating dose until the desired maximum, 4 weeks of active treatment and 2 weeks of titration down (see titration schedule in the Appendix 1)Patients will receive either active intervention (pregabalin) or placebo including instruction of how to administer them.

    Visit 1: (Week 2)

    • Investigator will collect the data on pain and itching from the 2 weeks wash-out and will determine the average pain and itching of approximately 14 days prior to the study visit 1(AvePain-00, AveItch-00)
    • Patients will be asked to report on their disease severity using iscorEB patient portion and QOLEB for those over 18 years of age.
    • A team member will call patient twice a week during the escalation phase to inquire about adverse events
    • Patients will be instructed to collect daily assessments of pain, and itch for 7 days before next visit (\~from weeks 9-10).

    Visit 2: (Week 10)

    • Patients will be instructed to contact investigator if experiencing any adverse events.
    • Investigator will collect the data on pain and itching from approximately 7 days prior to visit 2 (\~weeks 9-10) and will determine the average pain and itching (AvePain-02, AveItch-02)
    • Patients will be asked to report on their disease severity using iscorEB patient portion and QOLEB for those over 18 years of age.
    • Adverse events (see potential risks, DCF follow up, patient's diary)
    • Patients will be instructed to collect daily assessments of pain, and itch for 7 days before next visit (\~from weeks 13-14)
  3. Wash out period #2 (2 weeks) Visit 3 (Week 14)

    • Investigator will collect the data on pain and itching and will determine the average pain and itching of approximately 7 days prior to the study visit 3 (AvePain-03, AveItch-03)
    • Patients will be asked to report on their disease severity using iscorEB patient portion and QOLEB for those over 18 years of age.
    • Investigator will collect adverse events (see potential risks, DCF follow up, patient's diary)
    • Patients will be instructed to collect daily assessments of pain, and itch for 7 days before next visit (\~from weeks 21-22)
    • All study procedures at visit 3 will be similar to visit 1.
  4. ARM2 intervention study period (Visits 4 \& 5 (Week 22 and 24): patients randomized to placebo will receive pregabalin and those on placebo will get the pregabalin conducted similarly as in ARM1

    • All study procedures at visit 4 will be similar to visit 2
    • The outcome measures will be similar, but will be recorded as (AvePain-04, AveItch-04)
    • Weaning will be similar to ARM1
    • End of the Study visit: Visit 5 (Week 24) The outcome measures will be similar, but will be recorded as AvePain-05, AveItch-05)
02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Neuropathic
  • Itch
  • Epidermolysis Bullosa
03

In context

Neuralgia

1,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 256 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 52 across 973 interventional studies indexed under Neuralgia.

Browse Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

The Hospital for Sick Children is the lead sponsor of 568 studies on the registry; 81 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: > 8 - 40 years (we selected this range due to lack of data in younger population and the difficulty in getting patient reported outcomes in younger patients)
  • Diagnosis of RDEB (by a dermatologist and/or EB specialist and/or genetic confirmation)
  • Evidence of neuropathy defined by: thermal sensory loss (determined by a thermal roller, ROLLTEMP2, Sometic, Sweden) 14 and > 4/10 score using a screening tool for neuropathic pain, the DN4 questionnaire 15
  • Pain intensity of > 4/10 on a 0-10 VAS scale measured daily (reduced frequency is also acceptable) at night over 2 weeks
  • Itch intensity of > 4/10 on a 0-10 VAS scale measures daily (reduced frequency is also acceptable) at night over 2 weeks
  • Consent to follow with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intolerance and/or allergy to Pregabalin or gabapentin
  • Lactose intolerance (placebo capsules contain lactose)
  • Pregabalin use within 2 weeks before study enrolment
  • Ongoing treatment with gabapentin, amitriptyline, duloxetine, nortriptyline, other tricyclics or SNRIs
  • Medical conditions that would be considered as contraindications for pregabalin treatment (ischemic heart disease, cardiac dysrhythmia, glaucoma, history of urinary retention)
  • Pregnancy
  • History of use of restrictive substances or alcohol abuse
  • Allergy to gelatin
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pregabalin followed by placebo

    The study has a crossover design. Participants in this arm will receive pregabalin during the first study treatment period for ten weeks and placebo during their second ten-week treatment period . The dose will depend on the participant's weight and phase of treatment period. Each treatment period consists of 4 weeks of escalating dose until the desired maximum , 4 weeks of active treatment and 2 weeks of titrating down.

    Drug: Pregabalin

  • Experimental
    Placebo followed by Pregabalin

    Participants will receive placebo during the first treatment period of the study(10 weeks) followed by 10 weeks of pregabalin treatment . The dose will depend on the participant's weight and phase of the treatment period . Each treatment period consists of 3 phases: 4 weeks of escalating dose until the desired maximum, 4 weeks of active treatment and 2 weeks of titrating down.

    Drug: Pregabalin

Interventions

  • DrugPregabalin

    Pregabalin /placebo capsules will be taken by mouth and will be prescribed for the study participants in the doses, depending on their weight and treatment phase: Participant \< 25 kg at baseline will start with 50 mg per day, increasing the dose by 50 mg each week until their maximum dose 200 mg per day; Participants who are greater than or equal to 25 kg at baseline will start with 100 mg per day, increasing their dose by 50 mg each week until their target dose 300 mg per day is achieved. The study medication will be taken twice per day.The dose will be weaned down every 1-2 days by 25 mg in the last two weeks of each treatment period.

    Also known as: Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in the mean pain scores between pregabalin and placebo group: VAS

    It will be measured as difference in the mean pain values pre- and post-intervention for each group using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).It is a 10 cm line with anchor statements on the left (no pain) and on the right (worst pain ever). The patient is asked to mark their pain level on the line.The pain is scored using the VAS by measuring the distance in centimeters (0-10) from the "no pain" anchoring point.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients on pregabalin achieving a ≥75% reduction in their mean pain intensity score across last 7 days of treatment compared to baseline/wash-out

    Proportion of patients on pregabalin achieving a ≥75% reduction in their mean pain intensity score across last 7 days of treatment compared to baseline/wash-out

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Proportion of patients on pregabalin achieving a ≥50% reduction in their mean pain intensity score across last 7 days of treatment compared to baseline/wash-out

    Proportion of patients on pregabalin achieving a ≥50% reduction in their mean pain intensity score across last 7 days of treatment compared to baseline/wash-out

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Difference in the average pain score assessed using VAS between first and second treatment periods (period effect)

    Difference in the average pain score assessed using VAS, reported by the patient between first and second treatment periods. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line with anchor statements on the left (0 -no pain) and on the right (10- worst pain ever). The patient is asked to mark their pain level on the line. The pain is scored using the VAS by measuring the distance in centimeters (0-10) from the "no pain" anchoring point.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  4. Proportion of patients on pregabalin achieving a ≥75% reduction in their mean itch intensity score across last 7 days of treatment compared to baseline/wash-out

    Proportion of patients on pregabalin achieving a ≥75% reduction in their mean itch intensity score across last 7 days of treatment compared to baseline/wash-out.The intensity of itch is measured using the Visual Analog Scale for itch(VAS).It is a 10 cm line with anchor statements on the left (no itching) and on the right (worst possible itching). The patient is asked to mark the intensity of itch on the line. The itch is scored using the VAS by measuring the distance in centimeters (0-10)from the "no itch" anchoring point.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  5. Proportion of patients on pregabalin achieving a ≥50% reduction in their mean itch intensity score across last 7 days of treatment compared to baseline/wash-out

    Proportion of patients on pregabalin achieving a ≥50% reduction in their mean itch intensity score across last 7 days of treatment compared to baseline/wash-out

    Time frame: 12 weerks

  6. Difference in the average itch score as assessed using VAS between the first and the second treatment periods (period effect).

    Difference in the average itch score as assessed using VAS( reported by the patient) between the first and the second treatment periods (period effect). The intensity of itch is measured using the Visual Analog Scale for itch (VAS).It is a 10 cm line with anchor statements on the left (0- no itching) and on the right (10 -worst possible itching). The patient is asked to mark the intensity of itch on the line. The itch is scored using the VAS by measuring the distance in centimeters (0-10) from the "no itch" anchoring point.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  7. Changes in the Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa Questionnaire score(QOLEB) for patients >18yrs in the intervention versus placebo

    Changes in the QOLEB for patients \>18yrs in the intervention versus placebo. QOLEB is a measurement tool containing 17questions.Each question has a score range from 0-3.Total score range is between 0 and 51. iscorEB is a measurement tool for evaluating the disease severity in EB patient.It evaluates the cutaneous,mucosal and other organ impact of EB and includes clinician and patient reported outcomes in a single instrument. Score ranges between 0-120 for both reported outcomes.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  8. Changes in iscorEB (instrument for scoring clinical outcomes for research of EB), patient portion score in the intervention versus placebo

    iscorEB is a measurement tool for evaluating the disease severity in EB patient. It evaluates the cutaneous, mucosal and other organ impact of EB and includes clinician and patient reported outcomes in a single instrument. Score ranges between 0-120 for both reported outcomes. Patient portion of this instrument contains 15 questions. Each question has a score range from 0-8.Total score range for iscorEB patient portion is between 0 and 120. Reduction in iscorEB scores indicates improvement. An increase in score indicates deterioration.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Correlation between pain score (as measured by VAS), iscorEB patient portion score and QOLEB (for patients over 18 yrs) total scores.

    Correlation between pain score, as measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), iscorEB (instrument for scoring clinical outcomes for research of EB)- patient portion score, and Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa Questionnaire (QOLEB) score (for patients over 18 years). Please see full description of the mentioned instruments above.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  2. Correlation between pain score( as measured by VAS) and iscorEB clinician portion score and Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index(EBDASI) score.

    Correlation between pain score(as measured by Visual Analog Scale), iscorEB (instrument for scoring clinical outcomes for research of EB)- clinician portion score and EBDASI total score.Total EBDASI score ranges of 0-42, 43-106 and 107-506 corresponded to mild, moderate and severe disease respectively. Reduction in EBDASI activity scores of greater than 9 indicated clinically significant improvement. An increase of 3 in the activity score indicated deterioration. iscorEB is a measurement tool for evaluating the disease severity in EB patient. It evaluates the cutaneous, mucosal and other organ impact of EB and includes clinician and patient reported outcomes in a single instrument. Clinician score ranges between 0-120 between. Reduction in iscorEB scores indicates improvement. An increase in score indicates deterioration.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  3. Proportion of patients experiencing adverse events, minor, severe and serious (life-threatening)

    Proportion of patients experiencing adverse events

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  4. Proportion of patients that dropped out of the study as a result of an adverse event

    Proportion of patients that dropped out of the study as a result of an adverse event

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  5. Correlation between itch score (as measured by VAS),iscorEB patient portion and QOLEB (for patients over 18 yrs) total scores.

    Correlation between itch score( as measured by VAS),iscorEB patient portion, and QOLEB (for patients over 18 yrs.) total scores.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  6. Correlation between itch score( as measured by VAS) and iscorEB clinician and Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index(EBDASI)

    Correlation between itch score(as measured by VAS) and iscorEB clinician and EBDASI total scores. Total EBDASI score ranges of 0-42, 43-106 and 107-506 corresponded to mild, moderate and severe disease respectively. Reduction in EBDASI activity scores of greater than 9 indicated clinically significant improvement. An increase of 3 in the activity score indicated deterioration.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario M5G1X8, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03928093
Lead sponsor
The Hospital for Sick Children
Collaborators
Epidemolysis Bullosa Research Partnership
Responsible party
Elena Pope (Dermatology section head, The Hospital for Sick Children) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 25, 2019
Start date
Aug 7, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2023
Completion
Feb 1, 2024
Last update
Jan 22, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion