ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05404581Updated Oct 5, 2026

Insula Neuromodulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain

An interventional study of neuromodulation in Neuropathic Pain and Chronic Pain, sponsored by University of Virginia. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2022; still recruiting 4 years later.
Updated Sep 25, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will comprehensively investigate the insula as a brain target for neuromodulation to treat chronic neuropathic pain.

Read the detailed description

In the first stage, 12 subjects with refractory neuropathic pain will be enrolled to an inpatient clinical trial for insular brain mapping with acute stimulation and neurophysiological brain monitoring. Electrodes for stimulation and recording will be implanted stereotactically to the insular cortex. 'Responders' to trial stimulation and the optimal region of the insula for pain relief will be identified during this inpatient stage.

'Responder' subjects who have positive analgesic effects from acute insular stimulation during the first stage will continue to the second stage. The second stage, clinical trial is conducted outpatient and will test chronic deep brain stimulation of the insula. The study design is randomized, sham-stimulation-controlled, double-blinded, and cross-over where subjects receive both active and sham stimulation. Furthermore, neurophysiological biomarkers of pain will be investigated by studying changes in neural activity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuropathic Pain
  • Chronic Pain

Keywords

  • stereoencephalography
  • deep brain stimulation
  • insula
  • neuromodulation
03

In context

Neuralgia

1,100 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 241 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 52 across 831 interventional studies indexed under Neuralgia.

Browse Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 675 studies on the registry; 138 are open to participants now.

Of its 61 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 42 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men and women, between 18 and 80 years, inclusive
  2. Subjects who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits
  3. The pain is:

    • chronic with ≥6 month duration
    • severe is defined as: 'average' NPRS score of ≥ 5 out of 10 at current visit and the subject reports having a similar level of pain for at least the past two months
    • disabling and has resulted in an inability to work or perform ADLs in the home
    • medication- to adequate trials of at least 3 prescription medications (including at least one current or past opioid) commonly used for symptomatic relief of pain. An adequate medication trial is defined as a therapeutic dose of each medication without sufficient effect.
    • treatment-resistant and cannot be treated or has failed procedures including interventional therapies with injections, spinal neuromodulation with medication infusion or stimulation, and neurosurgical ablation surgery.
  4. The pain is neuropathic or predominantly neuropathic if mixed components.

    • Subject suffering from a pure neuropathic pain syndrome will be included if the pain has resulted from a specific injury including trauma, ischemia, hemorrhage, infection, tumor or iatrogenic to either the peripheral (nerve, spinal root, plexus, cranial nerve) or to the central nervous system (spinal cord or brain) Etiologies include:
    • Poststroke pain
    • Thalamic pain
    • Spinal cord injury
    • Brachial plexus injury or limb avulsion
    • Peripheral nerve injury or painful neuropathy
    • Postherpetic neuralgia, Tolosa Hunt syndrome, or cavernous sinus syndromes
    • Trigeminal neuropathic pain (not trigeminal neuralgia)
  5. Insula region must be apparent on MRI so that direct targeting can be performed for SEEG and DBS electrode placement.
  6. Able to communicate and report sensations during all stimulation testing
  7. Stable prescribed doses of all symptomatic pain medications for 30 days prior to study entry and for the duration of the study.
  8. Inclusion and exclusion criteria have been agreed upon by the principal investigator and the pain psychologist, both of whom have interviewed, examined and if appropriate provided psychotherapeutic intervention to the subject.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Idiopathic pain syndromes will be excluded. Examples include:

    1. Fibromyalgia syndrome
    2. temporomandibular joint disorders
    3. irritable bowel syndrome
    4. chronic headaches
    5. interstitial cystitis
    6. chronic pelvic pain
    7. whiplash-associated disorders
  2. Subjects deemed poor candidates by a multidisciplinary team of pain clinicians including specialists in neurosurgery, pain management, and pain psychology:

    1. Significant clinician concern(s) about reliability of subject-reported information, such as subject in active process of seeking disability for neuropathic pain
    2. Subjects exhibiting any behavior(s) consistent with ethanol or substance abuse as defined by the criteria outlined in the as manifested by one (or more) of the following occurring within a 12 month period: Recurrent substance use resulting in a failure to fulfill major role obligations at work, school, or home (such as repeated absences or poor work performance related to substance use; substance-related absences, suspensions, or expulsions from school; or neglect of children or household). Recurrent substance use in situations in which it is physically hazardous (such as driving an automobile or operating a machine when impaired by substance use)
    3. Recurrent substance-related legal problems (such as arrests for substance related disorderly conduct)
    4. Continued substance use despite having persistent or recurrent social or interpersonal problems caused or exacerbated by the effects of the substance (for example, arguments with spouse about consequences of intoxication and physical fights).
    5. Suspected dementia based on neuropsychological screening or (MMSE) Score \< 25
  3. Subjects with active psychiatric illness will be excluded. For the purpose of this study, active psychiatric illness includes:

    1. History of significant psychiatric disorder (e.g., comorbid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, suicidal ideation/attempts) that could interfere with interpretation of study endpoints.
    2. Exhibiting current suicide ideation and/or a history of suicide attempt within past 2 years
    3. been hospitalized for the treatment of a psychiatric illness within the past 2 years
    4. received transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression treatment
    5. received electroconvulsive therapy for depression
    6. any presence or history of psychosis
  4. Subjects with unstable cardiac status including:

    1. Unstable angina pectoris on medication
    2. Subjects with documented myocardial infarction within six months of protocol entry
    3. Significant congestive heart failure defined with \< 40
    4. Subjects with unstable ventricular arrhythmias
    5. Subjects with atrial arrhythmias that are not rate-controlled
  5. Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication)
  6. Subjects with standard for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
  7. On medications that increases the bleeding risk, based on the published guidelines41 which are currently recognized by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American Academy of Pain Medicine and the North American Neuromodulation Society; specifically:

    1. Aspirin or another antiplatelet medication (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticlopidine, abiciximab) for the last 7 days prior to treatment.
    2. Oral, subcutaneous or intravenous anticoagulant medications, such as oral vitamin K inhibitors for the last 7 days, non-vitamin K inhibitor oral anticoagulant (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban) for the last 72 hours.
    3. Intravenous or subcutaneous heparin-derived compounds for the last 48 hours.
  8. Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate prolonged hospitalization with continuous video EEG monitoring
  9. Subjects participating or have participated in another clinical trial to investigate or treat chronic pain in the last 30 days
  10. Subjects with risk factors for intraoperative or postoperative bleeding from a documented coagulopathy or if their serum coagulation studies ( count, PT, , and INR) exceed the institutional laboratory limits.
  11. Subjects with brain tumors or any significant intracranial mass.
  12. Subjects with a history of seizure
  13. Any illness that in the investigator's opinion preclude participation in this study
  14. Pregnancy or lactation
  15. Subjects with a true allergy to opioid medications which would preclude PET imaging
  16. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
  17. Subjects with a deep brain stimulation implant
  18. History of hemorrhagic stroke or cerebrovascular event within the past year of treatment exhibiting incomplete resolution
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Control

    Subjects who respond favorably to test/trial stimulation of the insula will be implanted with DBS devices. In an outpatient clinical trial, each subject will receive 3 months of active stimulation and 3 months of sham stimulation. The assignment for stimulation will be randomized and blinded to the subject and to the outcome assessors.

    Device: neuromodulation

  • Active comparator
    DBS of the insula

    Subjects who respond favorably to test/trial stimulation of the insula will be implanted with DBS devices. In an outpatient clinical trial, each subject will receive 3 months of active stimulation and 3 months of sham stimulation. The assignment for stimulation will be randomized and blinded to the subject and to the outcome assessors.

    Device: neuromodulation

Interventions

  • Deviceneuromodulation

    During the inpatient phase of the study, insular mapping will be performed with electrical stimulation to implanted SEEG electrodes in order to optimize the region for trial stimulation. Subjects who respond favorably to trial stimulation in the hospital, will progress to the outpatient clinical trial phase where a DBS system will be implanted. All subjects will be blindly randomized to 3 months of stimulation and 3 months of sham stimulation.

    Also known as: deep brain stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Adverse event reporting will be collected throughout the study period. This will include neurological assessments by the study team postoperatively using the NIH Stroke Scale, MR imaging of implanted electrodes, comprehensive assessment of mood and cognition by a licensed psychologist, and vigilance for suicide with the asQ Screening Tool.

    Time frame: Entire study period from enrollment through 6 months post DBS implantation

  2. Pain intensity

    The primary efficacy outcome measure compares the change in pain intensity, as rated by the blinded subjects using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), between bilateral DBS of the insula and sham stimulation. The NPRS is an 11 point scale where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents the "worst possible pain." Clinical pain severity will be assessed daily in the home environment with a 7-day Ecological Momentary Assessment (NPRS rating) aggregated across days. The analysis will focus on DBS-ON Week 12 data relative to the DBS-OFF (Sham) Week 12 data, controlling for Baseline data.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months post DBS stimulation, 3 months post sham stimulation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Liu CC, Moosa S, Quigg M, Elias WJ. Anterior insula stimulation increases pain threshold in humans: a pilot study. J Neurosurg. 2021 Apr 2;135(5):1487-1492. doi: 10.3171/2020.10.JNS203323. Print 2021 Nov 1. PubMed 33799301 ↗
09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026→Jul 1, 2028
Sep 25, 2026
Study completion
Jun 29, 2027→Jul 1, 2028
Sep 25, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • University of Virginia · Charlottesville, United StatesContact person changed (no phone or email listed)
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description
  2. Sep 25, 2026
    Primary completion Jun 30, 2026→Jul 1, 2028
    Study completion Jun 29, 2027→Jul 1, 2028
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • University of Virginia · Charlottesville, United StatesContact person changed (no phone or email listed)
    + 4 other changes: verification date, oversight details, references and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05404581
Responsible party
Jeff Elias, MD (Professor of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 3, 2022
Start date
Nov 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

Judy Beenhakker
Contact
jgb3p@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
434-982-1856
Zak Sturgill
Contact
ffm7rc@virginia.edu
434-243-9986
Jeff Elias, MD
principal investigator · University of Virginia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion