ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03885596Updated Oct 27, 2021Results posted

Open-Label CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) in Bunionectomy

A Phase 2 interventional study of CA-008 and Ketorolac in Pain, sponsored by Concentric Analgesics. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-27.

Sponsored by Concentric Analgesics · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Phase 2, open-label study of CA-008 to evaluate post-surgical pain control with CA-008.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2, single-center, open-label study evaluating a single dose of CA-008 4.2 mg administered with different standard-of-care anesthetic regimens during an elective unilateral transpositional first metatarsal osteotomy for the correction of hallux valgus deformity (bunionectomy).

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Concentric Analgesics is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Healthy adult aged 18 - 65 years old
  2. American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical Class 1, 2 or 3
  3. Planning elective Bunionectomy repair
  4. For both males and females: using an acceptable method of
  5. If a female: not pregnant or breastfeeding
  6. Have a ≤ 36 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have another painful condition, other than bunion-related pain, that may require pain treatment during the study period
  2. Have active skin disease or another abnormality at the anticipated site of surgery that could interfere with the planned surgery.
  3. Have a known allergy to study medications.
  4. Have a history of significant medical, neuropsychiatric or other condition, including a abnormal clinical laboratory test values
  5. Have positive results on the alcohol test (breath or saliva) or urine drug screen.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CA-008 Cohort 1

    CA-008 4.2 mg reconstituted in saline All subjects received monitored anesthesia care (MAC) and a Mayo block followed by a sciatic (popliteal) nerve block.

    Drug: CA-008 · Drug: Ketorolac · Drug: Acetaminophen IV · Drug: Fentanyl · Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride · Drug: Lidocaine HCl · Drug: Celecoxib · Drug: Acetaminophen Oral

  • Experimental
    CA-008 Cohort 2

    CA-008 4.2 mg reconstituted in saline All subjects received monitored anesthesia care (MAC) and a Mayo block.

    Drug: CA-008 · Drug: Ketorolac · Drug: Acetaminophen IV · Drug: Fentanyl · Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride · Drug: Celecoxib · Drug: Acetaminophen Oral · Drug: Lidocaine Hydrochloride

  • Experimental
    CA-008 Cohort 3

    CA-008 4.2 mg reconstituted in saline All subjects received monitored anesthesia care (MAC) and a Mayo block.

    Drug: CA-008 · Drug: Ketorolac · Drug: Acetaminophen IV · Drug: Fentanyl · Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride · Drug: Lidocaine Hydrochloride

  • Active comparator
    Exparel

    106 mg \[8 mL of the 133 mg/10 mL suspension\] only All subjects received monitored anesthesia care (MAC) and a Mayo block.

    Drug: Ketorolac · Drug: Acetaminophen IV · Drug: Fentanyl · Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride · Drug: Lidocaine Hydrochloride · Drug: Exparel

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores (at Rest) Over 72h

    Area Under the Curve of pain intensity scores (using a Numeric Rating Scale of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable) over 72 hours

    Time frame: 0-72 hours

  2. Pain Intensity Scores at 24 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 24 hours

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Pain Intensity Scores at 48 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 48 hours

    Time frame: 48 hours

  4. Pain Intensity Scores at 72 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 72 hours

    Time frame: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Opioid Consumption

    Summary of opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents

    Time frame: 0-72 hours

07

Results

Posted Oct 27, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCA-008 Cohort 1CA-008 Cohort 2CA-008 Cohort 3Exparel
Started9999
Completed7899
Not completed2100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2100

Outcome measures

PrimaryArea Under the Curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores (at Rest) Over 72h

Area Under the Curve of pain intensity scores (using a Numeric Rating Scale of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable) over 72 hours

Time frame:
0-72 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale*hour
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores (at Rest) Over 72h
score on a scale*hourCA-008 Cohort 1CA-008 Cohort 2CA-008 Cohort 3Exparel
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores (at Rest) Over 72h72.30 ± 95.47666.24 ± 54.365203.76 ± 103.718306.58 ± 92.883
SecondaryOpioid Consumption

Summary of opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents

Time frame:
0-72 hours
Reported as:
Mean · mg morphine equivalents
Opioid Consumption
mg morphine equivalentsCA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 1CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 2CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 3Exparel
Opioid Consumption10.83 ± 27.333.33 ± 6.6138.33 ± 26.9080.83 ± 66.95
PrimaryPain Intensity Scores at 24 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 24 hours

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Intensity Scores at 24 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
units on a scaleCA-008 Cohort 1CA-008 Cohort 2CA-008 Cohort 3Exparel
Pain Intensity Scores at 24 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)0.6 ± 0.881.7 ± 1.665.1 ± 1.456.0 ± 1.00
PrimaryPain Intensity Scores at 48 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 48 hours

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Intensity Scores at 48 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
score on a scaleCA-008 Cohort 1CA-008 Cohort 2CA-008 Cohort 3Exparel
Pain Intensity Scores at 48 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)1.3 ± 2.120.6 ± 0.732.7 ± 2.454.8 ± 2.11
PrimaryPain Intensity Scores at 72 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 72 hours

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Intensity Scores at 72 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
score on a scaleCA-008 Cohort 1CA-008 Cohort 2CA-008 Cohort 3Exparel
Pain Intensity Scores at 72 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)1.2 ± 2.280.3 ± 0.712.0 ± 2.124.6 ± 2.88

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 76 days: Screening period from 45 days prior to surgery (D-45) to D29±2 Study Completion Visit. Unscheduled visits or visits after D29 might be necessary to assess ongoing safety issues or to follow an event to resolution or to establishment of a new baseline.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CA-008 Cohort 10/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)1/9 (11.1%)
CA-008 Cohort 20/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)4/9 (44.4%)
CA-008 Cohort 30/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)5/9 (55.6%)
Exparel0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)5/9 (55.6%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventCA-008 Cohort 1CA-008 Cohort 2CA-008 Cohort 3Exparel
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/90/90/93/9
Procedural painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/90/93/90/9
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/90/90/91/9
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/91/91/91/9
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/90/91/90/9
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/91/90/90/9
Incision site painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/90/90/90/9
DizzinessNervous system disorders0/90/91/91/9
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/91/91/91/9
Sensory disturbanceNervous system disorders1/91/90/90/9

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 1CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 2CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 3ExparelTotal
Mean49.1 ± 9.9643.1 ± 9.2035.2 ± 12.7152.8 ± 6.7245.05 ± 9.65
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 1CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 2CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 3ExparelTotal
Female778527
Male22149
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 1CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 2CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 3ExparelTotal
Hispanic or Latino426416
Not Hispanic or Latino573520
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 1CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 2CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 3ExparelTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native10001
Asian00000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00101
Black or African American242210
White646723
More than one race01001
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 1CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 2CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 3ExparelTotal
United States999936
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Lotus Clinical Research, LLC
    Pasadena, California 91105, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2019 to primary completion in Jul 2019, 3 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2021, 2 years 3 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Sep 2020.

Of 62 industry-sponsored phase 2 interventional studies under Pain, half reached primary completion within 8 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 19. This study's 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 186 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 20, 2019
First posted
Mar 21, 2019
StartActual
Mar 25, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jul 2, 2019
CompletionActual
Oct 22, 2019
Results delay requested
Sep 12, 2020
Results first posted
Oct 27, 2021
Last update
Oct 27, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03885596
Lead sponsor
Concentric Analgesics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 21, 2019
Start date
Mar 25, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2019
Completion
Oct 22, 2019
Results posted
Oct 27, 2021
Last update
Oct 27, 2021

Study contacts

Nancy Wu
study director · Concentric Analgesics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Vocacapsaicin · Lidocaine

Start the discussion