CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03872492REDRESSUpdated Mar 3, 2023

Major Depressive Disorder: Early Prediction of Non-response to Antidepressant Therapy Via a Mobile Digital Scale

An interventional study of Digital Assessment on mobile in Depressive Disorder, Major, sponsored by Ad scientiam. Terminated at 10 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-03.

Sponsored by Ad scientiam · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was terminated
The study was stopped prematurely because the total number of analyzable patients for the primary objective to be included was reached.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a debilitating disease characterized by a depressed mood, diminished interests, impaired cognitive function and vegetative symptoms, such as disturbed sleep or appetite. MDD occurs about twice as often in women than it does in men and affects about 6% of the adult population worldwide each year.

Standard symptoms scales like the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or the Montgomery-asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Self-Report 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology were initially developed for the evaluation of a therapeutic intervention or a pharmacological treatment and are routinely used by clinicians in the assessment of Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) occurrence. In parallel, patient-reported outcomes have gained increasing importance and are widely recommended by health authorities in the assessment of depression. The same institutions insist on the collection of real-world data to provide clinicians with ecological measurements. It has been demonstrated that an early response to an AntiDepressant (AD) treatment can be seen as early as week 2 and is not related to a placebo-effect. While there is no consensus on the exact cut-off values, several factors emerge as early predictors of a later treatment response, such as:

  • Improvement in emotional processing of happy facial expressions after 1 week of treatment,
  • Circa 20% improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 item (HDRS-17) at week 2. The hypothesis is therefore that repeated, systematic and real-time, contextualized and multimodal collection of depressive symptoms from patients at home will establish a threshold score that can predict a subsequent response to their treatment.

REDRESS was inspired by several standard depression scales used and recommended by the French Health Authority, augmented with digital active and passive activity monitoring, speech analysis and emotional processing assessment. Another important assumption is that honesty and willingness to disclose personal or embarrassing things will be best achievable via a digital solution.

To test this assumption, the overall scores and each subscores on the REDRESS numerical scale will be compared in people with MDD showing adequate response to those showing insufficient response.

The response to treatment at week 6 will be studied (end of Phase 1). Non-responders and responders to the first treatment round will be enrolled in a 6-week extension phase (Phase 2). Non-responders will receive another treatment course (Other AD, combination, etc.). Responders will just be followed up and will keep the same treatment. The REDRESS scores will be analysed in this population and will allow us to test the investigator's assumption in people with treatment resistant depression. This study will also allow to assess patients' quality of life at the end of each phase of treatment and to compare results with REDRESS scores.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depressive Disorder, Major

Keywords

  • REDRESS
  • Depression
  • Application
  • Mobile
03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 92 is above the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Ad scientiam is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 to 70 Years
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 criteria for MDD
  • Score > 21 on HDRS-17
  • Initiation of an antidepressant treatment for the current episode (first line or second line treatment, ...)
  • Ability to use a mobile application
  • Agreement to use the study mobile if he/she does not own an iPhone 5 or newer
  • Enrolled in or benefiting of a Social Security program
  • Having read the information sheet and signed the informed consent form

Non inclusion Criteria:

  • Serious suicidal risk, identified by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
  • Perinatal depression
  • Seasonal affective disorder
  • Psychiatric comorbidities: bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress, psychotic disorder, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, personality disorder identified by the MINI questionnaire
  • Alcohol addiction or abuse, identified by the MINI questionnaire
  • Substance related disorders non-alcoholic addiction or abuse (opioids, cocaine, cannabis, sedatives, stimulants, hallucinogens, inhalants, solvents), identified by the MINI questionnaire
  • Under neurostimulation (\< 6 months before inclusion day)
  • Patient under Temporary Use Authorisation (TUA)
  • Patients with Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor (MAOIs), tricyclic antidepressant
  • Patient with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) history for current episode
  • Patient with a somatic pathology
  • Scheduled hospitalization for more than 7 days
  • Antecedent of major head trauma
  • Seizures
  • Systemic medical diseases that are likely to affect cognitive functioning
  • Pregnant and nursing women
  • Wearers of pacemakers, implantable defibrillators
  • Subjects not proficient in French
  • Person under guardianship or curators
  • Illiterate subjects
  • Participation to another interventional clinical trial (category 1)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Serious suicidal risk, according to clinician's judgement
  • Discontinuation or change of AD treatment before 4 weeks after the dose initiation in the phase 1 and 2
  • Initiation of a structured psychotherapy or neurostimulation
  • Initiation of treatment with MAOIS
  • Introduction of benzodiazepines at regular doses. Limited use (≤7 consecutive days or several periods of ≤3 consecutive days) is authorized
  • Alcohol and substances abuse related disorders (opioids, cocaine, cannabis, sedatives, stimulants, hallucinogens, inhalants, solvents), according to clinician's judgement.
  • Patient under Temporary Use Authorisation (TUA)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
92 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

    Patients will be followed for 12 weeks. Hospital visits will be made at week 2 and week 6 (Phase1) as well as week 8 and week 12 (Phase 2). At the end of phase 1 if the patient is considered as an responder he will make one more visit at week 12. If the patient is considered as non-responder, he will make 2 other visits: at week 8 and week 12. Between each visit, the patient will perform REDRESS application assessments every day for "My daily survey" and every 3 days for the other assessments.

    Other: Digital Assessment on mobile

Interventions

  • OtherDigital Assessment on mobile

    The digital assessment is composed on 5 tests: * "My daily survey" * "My evaluation" * "My cognition" * "My emotions" * "My voice" Data will also be collected passively.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Show that responders and non-responders in phase 1, have a different early profile on some of the items assessed by REDRESS at week 2 (or before) and identify the predictor item(s).

    Identification of items will be based on the diagnostic performance (AUC).

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Week 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Show that responders and non-responders in phase 1 have a different profile on some of the items assessed by REDRESS at week 6 and identify the discriminating item(s).

    Identification of items will be based on the diagnostic performance (AUC).

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Week 6

  2. Reproducibility: show that responders and non-responders in phase 2 have a different profile on some of the items assessed by REDRESS at week 8 and identify the same predictor item(s) found in phase 1.

    Identification of items will be based on the diagnostic performance (AUC).

    Time frame: From Week 6 to Week 8

  3. Reproducibility: show that responders and non-responders in phase 2 have a different profile on some of the items assessed by REDRESS at week 12 and identify the same discriminating item(s) found in phase 1.

    Identification of items will be based on the diagnostic performance (AUC).

    Time frame: From Week 6 to Week 12

  4. Intra-patient comparison phase 1 / phase 2: show that patients non-responding in phase 1 and responding in phase 2 have a different profile on some of the items assessed by REDRESS

    Intra patient comparison will be based on a paired comparison test.

    Time frame: Between Week 6 and Week 12

  5. Intra-patient comparison phase 1 / phase 2: show that patients non-responding in phase 1 and responding in phase 2 have a different profile on some of the items assessed by REDRESS

    Intra patient comparison will be based on a paired comparison test.

    Time frame: Between Week 2 and Week 8

  6. Build up a composite score (the REDRESS digital score), from the item(s) identified in the previous objectives.

    Ability of the REDRESS digital score to identify responders and non-responders will be based on the diagnostic performance. The REDRESS digital score will be built using the 5 assessments: "My Daily Survey", My Evaluation", "My Cognition", "My Emotion", My Voice" and passive data collection. This score will be constructed during the study.

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 6, Week 8 and Week 12

  7. Evaluate patients' adherence to the mobile application

    Patients' adherence to the REDRESS mobile application will be based on the number of questionnaires administered and completed and the number of variables collected via the mobile application as a function of time of follow-up.

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Week 12

  8. Evaluate the adverse events of the mobile application use.

    Mobile application safety will be assessed by a descriptive analysis.

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Week 12

  9. Collect patients and investigators feedback (usability, satisfaction) on the REDRESS mobile application

    Descriptive analysis of patients and investigators satisfaction relating to the mobile application collected with satisfaction questionnaires

    Time frame: Week 12

  10. Evaluate patient's social relationship

    The quality of life will be measure with the form "Work and Social Adjustment Scale" (WSAS). This scale measures : ability to work, home management, social leisure activities, private leisure activities and close relationships. A WSAS score above 20 appears to suggest moderately severe or worse psychopathology. Scores between 10 and 20 are associated with significant functional impairment but less severe clinical symptomatology. Scores below 10 appears to be associated with subclinical populations. The maximum score of the WSAS is 40.

    Time frame: Day 0, Week 6 and Week 12

  11. Evaluate patient's quality of life

    The quality of life will be measure with the form "Quality of Life Enjoyment". This questionnaire is designed to help assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week. This scale mesures : physical health, mood, work, household activities, social relationship, family relationship, leisure time activities, ability to function in daily life, sexual drive, living situation, ability to do work or hobbies, medication.

    Time frame: Day 0, Week 6 and Week 12

  12. Evaluate the patient's quality of life evolution

    The quality of life will be measure with the form "Work and Social Adjustment Scale" (WSAS). This scale measures : ability to work, home management, social leisure activities, private leisure activities and close relationships. A WSAS score above 20 appears to suggest moderately severe or worse psychopathology. Scores between 10 and 20 are associated with significant functional impairment but less severe clinical symptomatology. Scores below 10 appear to be associated with subclinical populations. The maximum score of the WSAS is 40.

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Week 12

  13. Evaluate patient's social relationship evolution

    The quality of life will be measure with the form "Quality of Life Enjoyment". This questionnaire is designed to help assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced during the past week. This scale mesures : physical health, mood, work, household activities, social relationship, family relationship, leisure time activities, ability to function in daily life, sexual drive, living situation, ability to do work or hobbies, medication.

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Week 12

  14. Explore correlation between patient's quality of life and REDRESS score

    The correlation will be evaluated with the pearson correlation

    Time frame: Day 0, Week 6 and Week 12

  15. Evaluate patient's quality of life

    The quality of life will be measure with the form "Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale". This scale measure anhedonia in the context of Major Depressive Disorder. The DARS assesses anhedonia across 4 domains: Hobbies, Food/Drink, Social Activities and Sensory Experiences. The total score of the DARS ranges from 0-68.

    Time frame: Day 0, Week 6 and Week 12

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand
    Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • CHU Grenoble
    Grenoble, France
  • CHU Nantes - CAPPA Jacques Prévet
    Nantes, France
  • CHU de Nice
    Nice, France
  • Centre hospitalier Saint-Antoine
    Paris, France
  • Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière
    Paris, France
  • Centre hospitalier Henri Laborit
    Poitiers, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Guillaume Régnier
    Rennes, France
  • CHU Toulouse
    Toulouse, France
  • CHRU Tours
    Tours, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03872492
Lead sponsor
Ad scientiam
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 13, 2019
Start date
Oct 17, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 29, 2022
Completion
Dec 29, 2022
Last update
Mar 3, 2023

Study contacts

Bruno MILLET, Prof
principal investigator · Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion