CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03863470STANDUpdated Oct 21, 2022

Study of Therapeutic Exercise in Acute Respiratory Failure to Improve Neuromuscular Disability Trial

An interventional study of Early mobilization intervention in Critical Illness and Acute Respiratory Failure, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-21.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,917
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized, trial evaluating the effect of an early goal-directed mobilization intervention for ICU patients with acute respiratory failure within 12 medical and surgical ICUs across 4 hospitals in the University of Pennsylvania Health System. The investigators will conduct a 54-week trial to measure the effect of the intervention on multiple patient-centered outcomes of patient physical function and cognition, in addition to ICU and hospital length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation compared to usual care.

Read the detailed description

The STAND trial aims to measure the effect of an early goal-directed mobilization algorithm versus usual care for ICU patients with acute respiratory failure in the medical and surgical ICUs across University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS) with respect to patient-centered outcomes of patient physical function and cognition as well as multiple secondary clinical outcomes. To achieve this goal, the investigators will conduct a 54-week stepped-wedge, cluster randomized, trial to test the intervention during the course of providing usual care among a large and diverse population of patients admitted to 12 ICUs across 4 hospitals within UPHS. The intervention is an early mobilization protocol implemented during a patient's stay in the ICU. It involves three steps: 1) the clinical team will set a standardized mobility goal for each patient during morning rounds and display the goal on the patient's door; 2) a facilitator will be established in the ICU to communicate mobility goals and activities across clinical personnel shifts; 3) patient mobility scores will be displayed to clinical and administrative staff in the ICU via the ICU board. Approximately 1,500 adult patients with continuous mechanical ventilation for ≥48 hours (without interruption) and baseline independent ambulatory status will be enrolled. Participating ICUs will be randomized into 6 clusters of 2 ICUs each. Each ICU contributes a minimum of 12 weeks of data under the usual care control condition prior to implementing the early mobilization intervention. Then, using the stepped-wedge design, all ICUs will implement the intervention in 6-week intervals with the order and timing of implementation determined by random assignment. By the end of the trial, all ICUs will have utilized the intervention for at least 12 weeks. The primary outcome is peak patient activity level as measure by the ICU mobility score (IMS) at ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes include an array of clinical outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness
  • Acute Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • Early ICU mobility
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,917 is above the median of 55 across 1,043 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,635 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years old; AND
  • Admission to 1 of 12 participating ICUs; AND
  • Continuous mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 hours (without interruption); AND
  • Baseline independent ambulatory status

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admitting diagnosis of any of the following conditions:

    • Cardiopulmonary arrest
    • Raised intracranial pressure
    • Acute neurological admission diagnosis
    • Subarachnoid hemorrhage
    • Ischemic stroke
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,917 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Pre-Intervention (Control)

    There is no trial-driven approach to care. All hospitals contribute a minimum of 12 weeks of outcomes data prior to adopting the intervention. Pre-specified outcomes data will be electronically extracted for patients meeting eligibility criteria but there will be no attempt to influence delivery of usual care within the ICU. The length of the control phase will differ for each ICU cluster, depending on the sequence in which ICU-clusters are assigned to switch to the intervention phase.

  • Active comparator
    Early mobilization intervention

    The clinical team will set a standardized mobility goal for each patient during morning rounds and display the goal on the patient's door. A facilitator will be established in the ICU to communicate mobility goals and activities across clinical personnel shifts. Patient mobility scores will be displayed to clinical and administrative staff in the ICU via the ICU board.

    Behavioral: Early mobilization intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralEarly mobilization intervention

    The intervention consists of 3 components: 1) A simplified mobilization goal (using the Surgical Optimal Mobility Score) will be defined during daily morning ward rounds and displayed on the doors of patients' rooms; 2) a facilitator will communicate to the care team regarding mobility goals; 3) clinicians will receive feedback on patient's mobility as mobility scores will be made available electronically on the ICU board - a dashboard for monitoring patient care in the ICU

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peak hour patient activity level

    Peak hour patient activity level as measured by the ICU mobility score (IMS) at ICU discharge. IMS score ranges from 0 to 10.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours of ICU discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. ICU mortality

    ICU Mortality

    Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, approximately 3 days

  2. ICU length of stay

    ICU length of stay (days)

    Time frame: From ICU admission to ICU discharge, approximately 3 days

  3. Hospital length of stay

    Hospital length of stay (days)

    Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, approximately 5 days

  4. Duration of mechanical ventilation

    Duration of time spent on continuous mechanical ventilation (hours)

    Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, approximately 5 days

  5. Duration of time spent in deep sedation

    Duration of time spent in deep sedation (hours)

    Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, approximately 5 days

  6. Neurological function

    Composite measure of delirium and coma free days

    Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, approximately 5 days

  7. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)

    RASS score at time of first spontaneous breathing trial. RASS score ranges from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (combative); A score of 0 = alert and calm.

    Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, approximately 5 days

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Pennsylvania Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Chester County Hospital
    West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 21, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03863470
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Responsible party
Scott Halpern (Professor of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2019
Start date
Mar 4, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2020
Completion
Jul 30, 2020
Last update
Oct 21, 2022

Study contacts

William Schweickert, MD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine - Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care
Scott D Halpern, MD PhD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine - PAIR Center
Juliane Jablonski, DNP RN
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion