CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03825224Updated Nov 19, 2019

Evaluation of MyoStrain™ in Clinical Practice

An observational study in Cardiac Failure, Coronary Artery Disease and Sarcoidosis, sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-19.

Sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
19
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluate MyoStrain cardiac MRI pulse sequence in Clinical practice

Read the detailed description

Evaluate MyoStrain cardiac MRI pulse sequence in Clinical practice to determine how the use may alter treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients who are undergoing cardiac MRI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Failure
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Sarcoidosis
  • Amyloidosis
  • Lupus
  • Myocarditis
  • Drug Toxicity

Keywords

  • MRI
  • SENC MyoStrain
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 336 across 1,947 observational studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Kansas Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 483 studies on the registry; 113 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Population will consist of patients scheduled for diagnostic testing with cardiac MRI

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients already scheduled for diagnostic testing with commercially available imaging modality (cardiac MRI)
  • The patient population will include (but not limited to), those being evaluated for heart disease and heart failure that may be related to vascular disease (coronary artery disease), drug related heart failure (chemotherapy, alcohol), inflammatory systemic conditions (sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, lupus), myocarditis, and/or infectious etiologies
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to Magnetic Resonance Imaging
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • ProcedureDiagnostic Test: Myostrain

    This test measures the contraction of the heart muscle in one to three heartbeats per plane. It's a pulse sequence that produces images that reveal the underlying contraction fo the muscle of a healthy heart and associated weaknesses in case of disease.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate workflow for MyoStrain testing

    Survey the CMR interpreter to see how Myostrain impacted their interpretation and survey the referring clinician after receiving the CMR report. Survey Questions using 5-point Likert and binary reporting scale. The lower numbers represent positive feedback. Example listed below: CARDIAC MRI INTERPRETATION QUESTIONS FOR READER (CARDIOLOGIST OR RADIOLOGIST) How easy was it to interpret the additional Myostrain sequence information? 1 2 3 4 5 (1=Very Helpful 2=Helpful 3=Indifferent 4=Unhelpful 5=Very Unhelpful)

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Korosoglou G, Youssef AA, Bilchick KC, Ibrahim el-S, Lardo AC, Lai S, Osman NF. Real-time fast strain-encoded magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate regional myocardial function at 3.0 Tesla: comparison to conventional tagging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 May;27(5):1012-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21315. PubMed 18407541 ↗
  • Sugimori H, Oyama-Manabe N, Ishizaka K, Hamaguchi H, Sakata M. Comparison of SPAMM and SENC methods for evaluating peak circumferential strain at 3T. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013 Mar 25;12(1):69-75. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0045. Epub 2013 Mar 11. PubMed 23474965 ↗
  • Ohyama Y, Ambale-Venkatesh B, Chamera E, Shehata ML, Corona-Villalobos CP, Zimmerman SL, Hassoun PM, Bluemke DA, Lima JAC. Comparison of strain measurement from multimodality tissue tracking with strain-encoding MRI and harmonic phase MRI in pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 1;182:342-348. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Jan 6. PubMed 25590963 ↗
  • Altiok E, Neizel M, Tiemann S, Krass V, Becker M, Zwicker C, Koos R, Kelm M, Kraemer N, Schoth F, Marx N, Hoffmann R. Layer-specific analysis of myocardial deformation for assessment of infarct transmurality: comparison of strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance with 2D speckle tracking echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun;14(6):570-8. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes229. Epub 2012 Nov 12. PubMed 23148082 ↗
  • Korosoglou G, Gitsioudis G, Voss A, Lehrke S, Riedle N, Buss SJ, Zugck C, Giannitsis E, Osman NF, Katus HA. Strain-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance during high-dose dobutamine stress testing for the estimation of cardiac outcomes: comparison to clinical parameters and conventional wall motion readings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 6;58(11):1140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.063. PubMed 21884952 ↗
  • Korosoglou G, Lehrke S, Wochele A, Hoerig B, Lossnitzer D, Steen H, Giannitsis E, Osman NF, Katus HA. Strain-encoded CMR for the detection of inducible ischemia during intermediate stress. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Apr;3(4):361-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.015. PubMed 20394897 ↗
  • Korosoglou G, Lossnitzer D, Schellberg D, Lewien A, Wochele A, Schaeufele T, Neizel M, Steen H, Giannitsis E, Katus HA, Osman NF. Strain-encoded cardiac MRI as an adjunct for dobutamine stress testing: incremental value to conventional wall motion analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Mar;2(2):132-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.790105. Epub 2009 Jan 26. PubMed 19808579 ↗
  • Korosoglou G, Futterer S, Humpert PM, Riedle N, Lossnitzer D, Hoerig B, Steen H, Giannitsis E, Osman NF, Katus HA. Strain-encoded cardiac MR during high-dose dobutamine stress testing: comparison to cine imaging and to myocardial tagging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 May;29(5):1053-61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21759. PubMed 19388131 ↗
  • Korosoglou G, Giusca S, Gitsioudis G, Erbel C, Katus HA. Cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiography for clinical imaging of stable coronary artery disease. Diagnostic classification and risk stratification. Front Physiol. 2014 Aug 6;5:291. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00291. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25147526 ↗
  • Neizel M, Korosoglou G, Lossnitzer D, Kuhl H, Hoffmann R, Ocklenburg C, Giannitsis E, Osman NF, Katus HA, Steen H. Impact of systolic and diastolic deformation indexes assessed by strain-encoded imaging to predict persistent severe myocardial dysfunction in patients after acute myocardial infarction at follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Sep 21;56(13):1056-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.070. PubMed 20846606 ↗
  • Neizel M, Lossnitzer D, Korosoglou G, Schaufele T, Peykarjou H, Steen H, Ocklenburg C, Giannitsis E, Katus HA, Osman NF. Strain-encoded MRI for evaluation of left ventricular function and transmurality in acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Mar;2(2):116-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.789032. Epub 2009 Jan 26. PubMed 19808577 ↗
  • Koos R, Altiok E, Doetsch J, Neizel M, Krombach G, Marx N, Hoffmann R. Layer-specific strain-encoded MRI for the evaluation of left ventricular function and infarct transmurality in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jun 5;166(1):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Nov 8. PubMed 22071039 ↗
  • Oyama-Manabe N, Ishimori N, Sugimori H, Van Cauteren M, Kudo K, Manabe O, Okuaki T, Kamishima T, Ito YM, Tsutsui H, Tha KK, Terae S, Shirato H. Identification and further differentiation of subendocardial and transmural myocardial infarction by fast strain-encoded (SENC) magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol. 2011 Nov;21(11):2362-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2177-4. Epub 2011 Jun 18. PubMed 21688005 ↗
  • Youssef A, Ibrahim el-SH, Korosoglou G, Abraham MR, Weiss RG, Osman NF. Strain-encoding cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessment of right-ventricular regional function. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008 Jul 4;10(1):33. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-33. PubMed 18601713 ↗
  • Shehata ML, Basha TA, Tantawy WH, Lima JA, Vogel-Claussen J, Bluemke DA, Hassoun PM, Osman NF. Real-time single-heartbeat fast strain-encoded imaging of right ventricular regional function: normal versus chronic pulmonary hypertension. Magn Reson Med. 2010 Jul;64(1):98-106. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22408. PubMed 20572146 ↗
  • Hamdan A, Thouet T, Kelle S, Paetsch I, Gebker R, Wellnhofer E, Schnackenburg B, Fahmy AS, Osman NF, Fleck E. Regional right ventricular function and timing of contraction in healthy volunteers evaluated by strain-encoded MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Dec;28(6):1379-85. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21526. Erratum In: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Apr;29(4):996. Sebastian, Kelle [corrected to Kelle, Sebastian]. PubMed 19025945 ↗
  • Hamdan A, Thouet T, Kelle S, Wellnhofer E, Paetsch I, Gebker R, Schnackenburg B, Fahmy AS, Osman NF, Bornstedt A, Fleck E. Strain-encoded MRI to evaluate normal left ventricular function and timing of contraction at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Apr;29(4):799-808. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21684. PubMed 19306402 ↗
  • Freed BH, Tsang W, Bhave NM, Patel AR, Weinert L, Yamat M, Vicedo BM, Dill K, Mor-Avi V, Gomberg-Maitland M, Lang RM. Right ventricular strain in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a 2D echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance study. Echocardiography. 2015 Feb;32(2):257-63. doi: 10.1111/echo.12662. Epub 2014 Jun 28. PubMed 24975738 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 4, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03825224
Lead sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2019
Start date
Apr 15, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2019
Completion
Nov 15, 2019
Last update
Nov 19, 2019

Study contacts

Brian M Everist, MD
principal investigator · The University of Kansas Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion