CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03799328LoMOUpdated May 21, 2025

Low Dose Multi-OIT for Food Allergy (LoMo)

A Phase 2 interventional study of multi-OIT in Food Allergy, sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 15 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-21.

Sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
6 Months to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a food allergy treatment where small amounts of the food a child is allergic to is eaten and gradually increased over time with the aim to be able to eat a certain amount of the allergen without experiencing an allergic reaction. While this process works in many children there are concerns about safety, feasibility and drop-outs and how to adapt protocols for multiple allergies.

Many OIT trials have targeted approximately 4000mg of single food/day. In these trials up to 40% drop-out. There is evidence much lower doses can have beneficial effects.

The investigators will evaluate if low doses of foods can allow for OIT to multiple foods. This approach may have efficacy against accidental exposure and be able to demonstrate immune changes. This approach may have a low burden of treatment and a low rate of allergic reactions and

Read the detailed description

This is a single-arm, open label, study of the intervention of low dose multiple-nut OIT in nut allergic children.

After meeting eligibility criteria, participants will have a food challenge to 2-5 nuts.

If the oral food challenge is positive, participants will be enrolled in the study to multiple nut OIT. A blood draw and quality of life (QOL) survey will occur at baseline.

Participants will have dose escalation visits of the multiple nut OIT every 2 months to a target dose of 30mg of each nut protein. A blood draw and QOL survey will occur at 6 months.

Participants will then continue with daily ingestion of the 30mg of each nut protein for 1 year with visits every 3 months.

After 18 months from the start of the study, another oral food challenge will be given to participants to assess the change in the maximum tolerated dose of nuts. A blood draw will assess changes in the immune parameters. A QOL survey will occur at 18 months to assess changes in QOL.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Hypersensitivity

1,916 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 265 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 57 across 1,384 interventional studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.

Browse Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

The Hospital for Sick Children is the lead sponsor of 568 studies on the registry; 81 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Relevant allergy to 2-5 nuts
  • Serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) >0.35 kilounits/L (kU/L) (determined by UniCAP within the past 12 months) and/or a SPT to nut >3 mm compared to control
  • Positive oral food challenge (OFC) to less than 300mg of a nut in the nut mix at baseline (cumulative 444mg).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of frequent or repeated, severe or life-threatening episodes of anaphylactic shock
  • use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunomodulatory therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy in the 12 months prior to study entry
  • history of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease, uncontrolled asthma as defined by Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)
  • use of beta-blockers(oral)
  • use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE)
  • fails to tolerate 4mg of peanut after the first desensitization day
  • Other significant medical conditions that in the opinion of the investigator prevent participation in the study,
  • Previous intubation due to allergies or asthma,
  • Symptomatic atopic dermatitis or chronic urticaria which may interfere with ability to evaluate oral immunotherapy and /or requiring daily medication including antihistamines,
  • Patients with problems related to compliance or following study instructions, Inability to come to hospital every for dose escalation
  • Pregnancy
  • Non-fluency in English because participants may need to communicate with us after hours and be able to describe symptoms and concerns and follow instructions to treat anaphylaxis
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    multi-OIT

    Low dose OIT with multiple allergens

    Other: multi-OIT

Interventions

  • Othermulti-OIT

    low dose OIT to multiple foods

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Desensitization to allergic food as assessed by change in maximum tolerated dose in a dichotomous manner

    Change in how much nuts the participant can eat without an allergic reaction after the low dose OIT assessed as dichotomous did the participant reach 5 times the baseline eliciting dose

    Time frame: month 0, month 18

  2. Immunological change in IgG4

    Change in allergen specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) from baseline to end

    Time frame: month 0, month 18

Secondary outcomes

  1. Desensitization to allergic food as assessed by change in maximum tolerated dose on a linear scale

    A continuous variable amount tolerated at baseline vs at end

    Time frame: month 0, month 18

  2. Immunological change in IgG4

    Change in IgG4 from measures from historical data to 18 month of study. Some patients will have historical IgG4 values to compare

    Time frame: pre-study, month 18

  3. Desensitization to allergic food as assessed by maximum tolerated dose

    Did they reach 300mg (cumulative) on the 18 month exit oral food challenge

    Time frame: month 18

  4. Desensitization to allergic food as assessed by maximum tolerated dose

    Did they reach 140mg (cumulative) on the 18 month exit oral food challenge

    Time frame: month 0, month 18

Other outcomes

  1. Feasibility analysis as assessed by can the patients achieve the maintenance dosing of the allergen mix for OIT

    Proportion who achieve maintenance doses of their allergen mix (descriptive)

    Time frame: month 18

  2. Feasibility analysis as assessed by drop-out rate

    Proportion who drop-out of the study (descriptive)

    Time frame: month 18

  3. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events: Safety analysis as assessed by use of epinephrine

    Administration of epinephrine; (descriptive);

    Time frame: month 18

  4. Quality of life scale

    Change in quality of life at 18m of children compared to baseline assessment (using validated questionnaire: Food allergy quality of life questionnaires (FAQLQ) FAQLQ Parental form (PF) for ages 0-12 OR the FAQLQ-teenager form (TF) using total score. The FAQLQ total and domain scores range from 1-7 with higher scores indicative of worse health related quality of life with the total score being the average of the domain scores. The domains include Emotional Impact, Social and Dietary Restrictions, Food Anxiety, Allergen Avoidance, and Risk of Accidental Exposure.

    Time frame: month 0, month 18

  5. Change in allergen specific IgE, and components

    Change in allergen specific IgE, and components via microarray

    Time frame: month 0, month 18

  6. Basophil activation test

    Basophil activation test

    Time frame: month 0, month 18

  7. Skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to the individual nut extracts

    The size of the skin prick test will be compared

    Time frame: month 0, month 18

  8. High content functional immune profiling via mass cytometry and single cell sorting

    Compare the change in the immune pattern

    Time frame: pre-study, month 18

  9. Number of participants with treatment related adverse effects

    Diaries will be analyzed for allergic symptoms and tabulated

    Time frame: month 0, month 18

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario M5G1X8, Canada
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 13, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03799328
Lead sponsor
The Hospital for Sick Children
Responsible party
Julia Upton (Principal Investigator, The Hospital for Sick Children) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 10, 2019
Start date
May 23, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2022
Completion
Apr 1, 2025
Last update
May 21, 2025

Study contacts

Julia Upton
principal investigator · The Hospital for Sick Children

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion