ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07489040SHAPEUpdated Oct 6, 2026

SHAPE Trial: Skin Health and Allergy Prevention Exposure

An interventional study of Multi-component environmental package and standard of care in Allergy and Immunology, sponsored by McMaster University. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 37 Weeks to 42 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-06.

Primary conditionFood HypersensitivityRegistry: HypersensitivityReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Hypersensitivity — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Food Hypersensitivity
Why
  1. The study's title name Food Hypersensitivity, a narrower term within Hypersensitivity.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by McMaster University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Updated Oct 6, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
37 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a multi-component environmental package (MEP) can prevent food allergies among infants at risk of developing food allergies in early life.

Researchers will compare the multi-component environmental package to regular care to see if the MEP works to prevent food allergies. Participants will:

  • Be assigned to the multi-component environmental package or regular care once their baby is born
  • Complete a weekly diary
  • Attend in-office visits at 4 and 12 months of age
  • Complete web-based questionnaires at 4, 6, 9 and 12 months of age
Read the detailed description

Strategies that promote a healthy and diverse microbiome from early life, including careful management of hygiene practices, may be effective in preventing allergies. Excessive bathing, in frequency or intensity, using soaps and similar chemicals, may disrupt the skin barrier and developing microbiome, promoting aberrant immune responses directly or via promoting colonization by pro-allergic microbes.

Strategies to reduce antimicrobial use, detergent/soap exposure, scheduled bathing frequency, skin allergen exposure, and promoting microbiome diversity may support immune tolerance and prevent the development of food allergy. Our systematic reviews show that no clinical trial currently addresses the effect of an environmental package for the prevention of food allergy. Thus, investigators propose SHAPE, the first trial evaluating the feasibility of a multicomponent environmental package (MEP) as an approach to prevent food allergy in early life.

This randomized, assessor blinded, parallel, single center pilot trial will assess the feasibility in implementing MEP in preventing food allergy among infants. Birthing parents will be consented as early as 32 weeks gestational age up until delivery. After delivery, study staff will confirm eligibility and randomization will occur within 24 hours of birth among eligible neonates receiving either MEP (intervention) or standard of care (control) group in a 1:1 ratio.

The Evidence in Allergy group at McMaster University will coordinate this pilot study. Clinicians at prenatal clinics or postpartum ward of McMaster University Medical Centre (MUMC) in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada will identify and invite pregnant women during third trimester to enroll their babies after birth in the study. Once the baby is born, study staff will screen and assess eligibility criteria for randomization. This trial will enroll healthy singleton, neonates born at term without complications. To be eligible, the newborn will have at least one of the following risk factors: is an only child (no live siblings); first-degree relatives (parents and/or siblings) with history of food allergy, allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis, asthma, or atopic dermatitis.

Once the signed consent form and eligibility are confirmed, study staff will randomize the participants to either the MEP (intervention group) or the standard of care (control group) within 24 hours of birth. Study staff will provide face-to-face instructions to the parents of the enrolled infant according to the assigned group. After enrollment, study staff will schedule follow-up calls and visits to collect data on adherence through web-based questionnaires at 4, 6, 9 and 12 months of age and in-office visits at 4 and 12 months.

At the end of study, investigators will review feedback from the parents about the intervention, mode and timing of delivery, follow-up phone call intervals and method (texting, phone calls, e-mails, or combinations), structure of the web-based questionnaires, tools for recording adverse events (e.g., electronic diary cards) for further tailoring of these methods before scaling up to larger trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Allergy and Immunology

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Allergy
  • Allergy prevention
  • Skin health
  • Food allergy
03

In context

Food Hypersensitivity Reclassified

376 studies on the registry are indexed under Food Hypersensitivity; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 64 is close to the median of 60 across 246 interventional studies indexed under Food Hypersensitivity.

Browse Food Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 741 studies on the registry; 127 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.

Compared within Food Hypersensitivity, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Hypersensitivity. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
37 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Healthy singleton, neonates born at term (gestational age ≥37 weeks) (e.g. newborn without complications such as severe respiratory conditions, major congenital abnormalities, severe inborn errors of immunity [e.g. severe combined immunodeficiency], severe neonatal infections, neurologic impairment, and major gastrointestinal disorders).
  2. The newborn has any or at least one of the following risk factors: is an only child (no live siblings); first-degree relatives (parents and/or siblings) with history of food allergy, allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis, asthma, or atopic dermatitis.
  3. Parent(s)/guardian provided for the child's study participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Newborns born to mothers with positive routine prenatal screening for any of the vertically transmitted diseases (e.g. , , active syphilis or genital herpes simplex, Chlamydia trachomatis, gonorrhea and [HIV]) that may prevent adherence to any of the recommendations of the environmental packages.
  2. Inability to adhere to the study procedures, e.g. severe maternal conditions (e.g. eclampsia, life-threatening conditions requiring intensive care admission) or neonatal skin conditions that require specific care practices.
  3. Ongoing participation in another interventional study (e.g. trials involving skin care with topical creams, medication or interventions related to allergy prevention) that may interfere with the current study.
  4. No access to phone, internet, or email (requirements to contact participant/guardian).
  5. Planning to move out of the province within 12 months of study enrollment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    Description of the recommendations included in the intervention package 1. Delay first bath until target of 7 days after birth and use only water for the first bath (i.e. no soap or cleanser). 2. Bathe a target of once per week. 3. Avoid bubble baths, harsh soaps and detergents (e.g. surfactants- or lye-containing agents detailed below). 4. Avoid using antimicrobial (disinfectant) wipes (e.g. "wet wipes" such as Dr. Brown's, Parent's choice, Aleva Naturals, Munchkin Arm \& Hammer, Chicco cleaning wipes) for cleaning skin outside of the perineum/anus. 5. Avoid using dishwasher with detergents or rinse-aids for washing baby feeding devices, soothers, and toys (e.g. breast pump, nursing bottles, nipples, pacifiers, teething devices, or toys). 6. Avoid exposing the skin to food, e.g. eating over top of baby, or handling baby with food residue on hands (e.g. peanut butter), or kissing baby with food residue on lips or in mouth.

    Other: Multi-component environmental package

  • Other
    Control Group

    If assigned to the control group, the parents will be advised to continue their preferred routine practices.

    Other: standard of care

Interventions

  • OtherMulti-component environmental package

    Participants randomized to the intervention group (MEP) will be advised to follow the following 6 recommendations: 1. Delay first bath until target of 7 days after birth and use only water for the first bath (i.e. no soap or cleanser). 2. Bathe a target of once per week. 3. Avoid bubble baths, harsh soaps and detergents (e.g. surfactants- or lye-containing agents detailed below). 4. Avoid using antimicrobial (disinfectant) wipes (e.g. "wet wipes" such as Dr. Brown's, Parent's choice, Aleva Naturals, Munchkin Arm \& Hammer, Chicco cleaning wipes) for cleaning skin outside of the perineum/anus. 5. Avoid using dishwasher with detergents or rinse-aids for washing baby feeding devices, soothers, and toys (e.g. breast pump, nursing bottles, nipples, pacifiers, teething devices, or toys). 6. Avoid exposing the skin to food, e.g. eating over top of baby, or handling baby with food residue on hands (e.g. peanut butter), or kissing baby with food residue on lips or in mouth.

  • Otherstandard of care

    If assigned to the control group, the parents will be advised to continue their preferred routine practices.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adherence

    Investigators will measure the proportion of participants adhering to the protocol (MEP or control). Parents will log weekly details about bathing frequency, use of soap or detergents for bathing or using detergents for cleaning baby essentials and environmental exposure of food allergen to skin in weekly electronic diary card using REDCap. Reasons for non-adherence will be recorded for both groups. Successful adherence is anticipated if at least 50% of the participants completes the adherence form at the four study (4, 6, 9 and 12 months of age) time points and completes weekly diary card (at least 38 out of 52 weeks of follow-up).

    Time frame: Web-based questionnaires at 4, 6, 9 and 12 months will track adherence.

  2. Recruitment

    Investigators will determine the number of participants randomized to study groups (Group 1 or 2) over one year from the date of first accrual. A screening log will track eligible newborns and be used to assess the recruitment rate every week.

    Time frame: 12- months from study initiation

  3. Retention

    Study staff will track the proportion of participants completing all scheduled follow-ups and providing complete data. Reasons for incomplete data will be recorded for both groups (e.g., admission to hospital due to any illness) from process-related reasons (i.e., insufficient reminders, too difficult to implement, other reasons specified by parents).

    Time frame: Web-based questionnaire at 4, 6, 9, and 12 month age follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Data collection on number of adverse events (AE) related to allergic reactions, skin and gastrointestinal conditions

    Parents will record symptoms related to food allergy reactions, skin and gastrointestinal conditions such as redness, itching, blistering, or crusting of skin, diarrhea, and vomiting on weekly diary and survey questionnaire during the scheduled follow-up. the study period until 12 months of age. Study staff will track the number and severity of these symptoms through parental reporting, clinical exam, and routine medical records until 12 months of age.

    Time frame: Until 12 months of age (end of study)

Other outcomes

  1. Diagnosed Food allergy

    The proportion of diagnosed food allergy confirmed by clinical evaluation, by 12 (up to 18) months of age. The study will have a wide window of up to 18 months of age to accommodate multiple oral food challenge (OFCs) for individual infants as per routine clinical care.

    Time frame: 12 (up to 18) months of age (end of study)

  2. Diagnosed Atopic dermatitis (AD)

    Diagnosed cases of AD based on UK Working Party Diagnostic Criteria (UKWP) anytime confirmed at two separate time points, at least 1 month apart, between birth and 12 months of age. Blinded clinicians will assess AD. Parents of the infant will report severity of AD using Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) while parents, clinicians and study staff will report severity using Scoring atopic dermatitis (SCORAD).

    Time frame: 4-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months age follow-up

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • McMaster University Medical Centre
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Tasnuva Ahmed, MPH · Contactahmedt57@mcmaster.ca · 905-525-9140
    • Mackenzie Haggstrom, BHSc · Contacthaggstrm@mcmaster.ca · 905-525-9140
    • Derek Chu, MD, PhD, FRCPC · Principal investigator
    • Rohan D'Souza, MD, PhD, FRCOG · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • De Marchi F, Piacentini GL, Piazza M, Sandri M, Boner AL, Peroni DG. Correlation of skin barrier impairment in atopic dermatitis with aeroallergen sensitization. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):e127-33. doi: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3872. PubMed 26534744 ↗
  • Ierodiakonou D, Garcia-Larsen V, Logan A, Groome A, Cunha S, Chivinge J, Robinson Z, Geoghegan N, Jarrold K, Reeves T, Tagiyeva-Milne N, Nurmatov U, Trivella M, Leonardi-Bee J, Boyle RJ. Timing of Allergenic Food Introduction to the Infant Diet and Risk of Allergic or Autoimmune Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1181-1192. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12623. PubMed 27654604 ↗
  • Tuballa A, Connell D, Smith M, Dowsett C, O'Neill H, Albarqouni L. Introduction of allergenic food to infants and allergic and autoimmune conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):104-113. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112445. PubMed 38123975 ↗
  • de Silva D, Halken S, Singh C, Muraro A, Angier E, Arasi S, Arshad H, Beyer K, Boyle R, du Toit G, Eigenmann P, Grimshaw K, Hoest A, Jones C, Khaleva E, Lack G, Szajewska H, Venter C, Verhasselt V, Roberts G; European Academy of Allergy, Clinical Immunology Food Allergy, Anaphylaxis Guidelines Group. Preventing food allergy in infancy and childhood: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 Oct;31(7):813-826. doi: 10.1111/pai.13273. Epub 2020 Jun 18. PubMed 32396244 ↗
  • Marrs T, Bruce KD, Logan K, Rivett DW, Perkin MR, Lack G, Flohr C. Is there an association between microbial exposure and food allergy? A systematic review. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013 Jun;24(4):311-320.e8. doi: 10.1111/pai.12064. Epub 2013 Apr 11. PubMed 23578298 ↗
  • Tsuge M, Ikeda M, Matsumoto N, Yorifuji T, Tsukahara H. Current Insights into Atopic March. Children (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;8(11):1067. doi: 10.3390/children8111067. PubMed 34828780 ↗
  • Drislane C, Irvine AD. The role of filaggrin in atopic dermatitis and allergic disease. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Jan;124(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 14. PubMed 31622670 ↗
  • Bjorksten B, Sepp E, Julge K, Voor T, Mikelsaar M. Allergy development and the intestinal microflora during the first year of life. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Oct;108(4):516-20. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.118130. PubMed 11590374 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Investigators currently have no established plans to share participant data and no consent to share data as per the consent form.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2028, 21 months after the start.

Of 81 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Food Hypersensitivity, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 84 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 50.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Apr 2026 → Jun 2026, on Oct 6, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 17, 2026
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
StartActual
Jun 15, 2026was Apr 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Oct 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 6, 2026
Sites
McMaster University Medical Centre is now Recruiting
Oct 6, 2026
Start date
Apr 1, 2026→Jun 15, 2026 (actual)
Oct 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 6, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    McMaster University Medical Centre is now Recruiting
    Start date Apr 1, 2026→Jun 15, 2026 (now actual)
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07489040
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
Start date
Jun 15, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2026

Study contacts

Tasnuva Ahmed, MPH
Contact
ahmedt57@mcmaster.ca
905-525-9140 ext. 21349
Mackenzie Haggstrom, BHSc
Contact
haggstrm@mcmaster.ca
905-525-9140 ext. 21334
Derek Chu, MD, PhD, FRCPC
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion