CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03781804Updated May 29, 2024Results posted

Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of OPN-375 in Subjects With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With or Without the Presence of Nasal Polyps

A Phase 3 interventional study of OPN-375 in Chronic Rhinosinusitis, sponsored by Optinose US Inc.. Completed at 92 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-29.

Sponsored by Optinose US Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
332
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal administration of 186 and 372 μg twice daily (BID) of OPN-375 in subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis (CS) with or without nasal polyps.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of intranasal administration of twice-daily doses of 186 and 372 µg of OPN-375 (fluticasone propionate) with placebo in subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis using the following co-primary endpoints:

  1. A change from baseline in symptoms as measured by a composite score of nasal congestion, facial pain or pressure sensation, and nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior) at the end of Week 4.
  2. A change from baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the average percent of the volume opacified in the ethmoid and maxillary sinuses.
02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Rhinosinusitis
03

In context

Rhinosinusitis

330 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinosinusitis; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 332 is above the median of 60 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Rhinosinusitis.

Browse Rhinosinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Optinose US Inc. is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Potential subjects must meet the following criteria to enter this study:

  1. men or women aged 18 years and older at baseline visit
  2. women of childbearing potential must be abstinent, or if sexually active,

    1. be practicing an effective method of birth control (eg, prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, contraceptive patch, intrauterine device, double-barrier method [eg, condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, cream, or gel], or male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the study, or
    2. be surgically sterile (have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation, or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy), or
    3. be postmenopausal (amenorrhea for at least 1 year)
  3. women of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 (Screening)
  4. must have a history of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and be currently experiencing 2 or more of the following symptoms, 1 of which has to be either nasal congestion or nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior nasal discharge) for equal to or greater than 12 weeks:

    • nasal congestion
    • nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior nasal discharge)
    • facial pain or pressure
    • reduction or loss of smell
  5. endoscopic evidence of nasal mucosal disease, with edema, purulent discharge, or polyps in middle meatus, bilaterally, or presence of bilateral disease on a prior computed tomography (CT) scan performed within 14 days of Visit 1
  6. must have confirmatory evidence via a CT scan of bilateral sinus disease (have at least 1 sinus on each side of nose with a Lund-Mackay score of ≥1)
  7. baseline CT scan must show a combined ≥25% opacification of the ethmoid sinuses and ≥25% opacification of at least 1 maxillary sinus
  8. must have at least moderate symptoms (as defined in protocol) of nasal congestion as reported by the subject, on average, for the 7-day period preceding Visit 1 (Screening) run-in
  9. must have an average morning score of at least 1.5 for congestion on the Nasal Symptom Scale (as defined in protocol) recorded on the subject diary over a 7-day period during the first 14 days of the single-blind run-in period
  10. must demonstrate an ability to correctly complete the daily diary during the run-in period to be eligible for randomization
  11. Subjects with comorbid asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) must be stable with no exacerbations (eg, no emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or oral or parenteral steroid use) within the 3 months before Visit 1 (Screening). Inhaled corticosteroid use must be limited to stable doses of no more than 1,000 μg/day of beclomethasone (or equivalent) for at least 3 months before Visit 1 (Screening) with plans to continue use throughout the study.
  12. Subjects with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, who have undergone aspirin desensitization and are receiving daily aspirin therapy, must be receiving therapy for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1.
  13. must be able to cease treatment with intranasal steroids, inhaled corticosteroids (except permitted doses listed above for asthma and COPD) at the screening visit
  14. must be able to cease treatment with oral and nasal decongestants and antihistamines at Visit 1 (Screening)
  15. must be able to use the exhalation delivery system (EDS) correctly; all subjects will be required to demonstrate correct use with the practice EDS at Visit 1 (Screening).
  16. must be capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of providing informed consent to participate in the study. Subjects must sign an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.

Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from entering this study:

  1. women who are pregnant or lactating
  2. inability to have each nasal cavity examined for any reason, including nasal septum deviation
  3. inability to achieve bilateral nasal airflow
  4. is currently taking XHANCE®
  5. have previously used XHANCE for more than 1 month and did not achieve an adequate symptomatic response
  6. the nasal/sinus anatomy prevents the accurate assessment of sinus volume via CT scan
  7. history of sinus or nasal surgery within 6 months before Visit 1 or has not healed from a prior sinus or nasal surgery
  8. have current evidence of odontogenic sinusitis, sinus mucocele (the affected sinus is completely opacified and either the margins are expanded and/or thinned OR there are areas of complete bone resorption resulting in bony defect and extension of the "mass" into adjacent tissues), evidence of allergic fungal sinusitis, or evidence of complicated sinus disease (including, but not limited to, extension of inflammation outside of the sinuses and nasal cavity)
  9. have a paranasal sinus or nasal tumor
  10. have a polyp extending outside the ostiomeatal complex/middle turbinate (anterior or inferior) that is below the inferior turbinate attachment as determined by the nasoendoscopy at screening
  11. have a nasal septum perforation
  12. have had more than 1 episode of epistaxis with frank bleeding in the month before Visit 1 (Screening)
  13. have evidence of significant mucosal injury, ulceration (eg, exposed cartilage) on Visit 1 (Screening) nasal examination/nasoendoscopy
  14. have current, ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound rhinitis)
  15. have significant oral structural abnormalities (eg, a cleft palate)
  16. have a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
  17. history of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome) or dyskinetic ciliary syndromes
  18. Symptom resolution or last dose of antibiotics for purulent nasal infection, acute sinusitis, or upper respiratory tract infection, influenza, or SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has not occurred before Visit 1 or was less than 4 weeks before the CT scan. Potential subjects presenting with any of these infections may be rescreened 4 weeks after symptom resolution.
  19. planned sinonasal surgery during the period of the study
  20. allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to corticosteroids or steroids
  21. has used oral steroids in the past for treatment of CRS and did not experience any relief of symptoms
  22. has a steroid eluting sinus stent still in place within 30 days of Visit 1
  23. allergy or hypersensitivity to any excipients in study drug
  24. exposure to any glucocorticoid treatment with potential for systemic effects (eg, oral, parenteral, intra-articular, or epidural steroids, high dose topical steroids) within 1 month before Visit 1 (Screening); except as noted in inclusion criteria for subjects with comorbid asthma or COPD
  25. have nasal candidiasis
  26. history or current diagnosis of any form of glaucoma or ocular hypertension
  27. history of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation on any form of steroid therapy
  28. history or current diagnosis of the presence (in either eye) of a cataract unless both natural intraocular lenses have been removed
  29. history of immunodeficiency
  30. any serious or unstable concurrent disease, psychiatric disorder, or any significant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator could confound the results of the study or could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study
  31. have a positive drug screen or a recent (within 1 year of Visit 1 [Screening]) history of drug or alcohol abuse, or dependence that, in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study
  32. have participated in an investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of Visit 1 (Screening)
  33. have received mepolizumab (Nucala®), reslizumab (Cinquair®), dupilumab (Dupixent®), omalizumab (Xolair®), or benralizumab (Fasenra™) within 6 months of Visit 1 (Screening)
  34. is using strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor (eg, ritonavir, atazanavir, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, nefazodone, nelfinavir, saquinavir, ketoconazole, telithromycin, conivaptan, lopinavir, voriconazole, cobicistat)
  35. is an employee of the investigator or study center, with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that investigator or study center, or is a family member of the employee or the investigator
  36. Patients who report unexplained worsening of vision within the past 3 months (e.g. difficulty reading or seeing traffic signs from a distance.). A diagnosis of presbyopia established by an eye doctor is not exclusionary
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
332 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    OPN-375 186 μg BID

    OPN-375 186 μg BID x 24 Weeks

    Drug: OPN-375

  • Active comparator
    OPN-375 372 μg BID

    OPN-375 372 μg BID x 24 Weeks

    Drug: OPN-375

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Matching Placebo BID x 24 Weeks

    Drug: OPN-375

Interventions

  • DrugOPN-375

    OPN-375, BID

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 4

    Change from baseline to the end of Week 4 in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.

    Time frame: 4 Weeks

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses

    Change from baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT. Percent volume opacified can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoint - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains

    The SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 symptoms and social/emotional consequences of their nasal disorder across several domains including: rhinologic, ear/facial pain, psychological dysfunction, and sleep dysfunction. Total scores range from 0-110. Each item is rated as follows: 0=no problem, 1=very mild problem, 2=mild or slight problem,3=moderate problem, 4=severe problem, 5=problem as bad as it can be.

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior)

    Change from baseline in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.

    Time frame: Week 12

  3. Change From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

    Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours), The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  4. Change in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

    Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours) The sense of smell scored as 0= normal, 1=slightly impaired, 2=moderately impaired, 3=absent. The change reported in the results is calculated by subtracting the score reported at Baseline from the score reported at Visit 4 (Week 12).

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  5. Change From Baseline in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

    Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours). The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  6. Change in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

    Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours). The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living. The value reported in the results is calculated by subtracting the score reported by the patient at Baseline from the score reported by the patient at Visit 4 (Week 12).

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses Among Patient Populations

    Change from baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT for CRS with Nasal Polyps (NP) and without NP sub-groups and in patients with and without previous sinus surgery. Percent volume opacified can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefor, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score

    Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The total LM score for a CT scan ranges from 0-24.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  9. Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Scores for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined

    Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for the ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The values reported for this outcome are the change in total opacification of the left and right maxillary and ethmoid sinuses (Visit 6 \[Wk 24\] score minus Baseline score). Each visit score can range from a total of 0-12 (sum of 0-2 score assigned for each of left and right maxillary, left and right anterior ethmoid, and left and right posterior ethmoid).

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  10. Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Scores for Sinus Pairs

    Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for the ostiomeatal complex (OMC). Each sinus pair (left and right side) listed below can achieve a total score of 0-4 (sum of 0-2 for each side). The values reported below are calculated by subtracting the total score at Baseline from the total score at Visit 6 (Wk 24).

    Time frame: Week 24

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus as Measured by CT Scan Assessment

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus as Measured by CT Scan Assessment

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  13. Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Sinus Between the Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses as Measured by CT Scan Assessment Among Patient Populations

    Percent of sinus volume occupied by disease in the worst sinus between maxillary and ethmoid sinuses for the total population, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) subgroup, chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) subgroup, patients with previous sinus surgery subgroup, and without previous surgery subgroup.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  14. Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score

    Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% for each sinus. Total score ranges from 0 to 50.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  15. Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined

    Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% The total score for the combined ethmoids and maxillary sinuses can range from 0-30 (0-5 for each left and right of the anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, and maxillary sinuses). The outcome values presented in the results are determined by subtracting the total score at Baseline from the total score at Week 24.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  16. Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs

    Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% Each sinus pair (left and right side) listed below can achieve a total score of 0-10 (sum of score on each side). The values reported for this outcome calculated by subtracting the score at Baseline from the score at Visit 6 (Wk 24).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  17. Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient Populations

    Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100%

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  18. Time Comparison to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis

    Comparing the distribution of time to first acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis, defined as a worsening of symptoms that requires escalation of treatment

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  19. Percentage of Subjects Requiring Rescue Medication After Week 4

    Recording of each dose of approved rescue medication after the Week 4 visit through Week 12

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  20. Change in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    The PSQI is a validated, self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate 7 "component" scores (each ranging between 0 and 3): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these 7 components yields 1 global score ranging between 0 and 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks, 24 Weeks

  21. Change in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Global impression of change will be assessed using a subject-completed PGIC scale range: 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, 3 - Minimally improved, 4 - No change, 5 - Minimally worse, 6 - Much worse, 7 - Very much worse

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 24

  22. Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)

    The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Week 24

  23. Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Composite Score (MCS)

    Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the MCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  24. Change in the SF-36v2 Physical Composite Score (PCS)

    Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the PCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  25. Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)

    The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, 36-item subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The SF-36v2 survey with a 4-week recall will be used. It yields scale scores for each of these 8 health domains , each of which is scored from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate with a better health status, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  26. Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)

    The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  27. Change in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™

    The SIT is a test comprised of 4 booklets each containing 10 microencapsulated (scratch and sniff) odors. Forced choice response alternatives to identify the odor accompany each test item. Each correct response is assigned a score of 1 and incorrect responses are assigned a score of 0. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of each individual odor for a total possible score ranging from 0-40. The higher the score, the better the individual's sense of smell. The test provides an absolute indication of smell loss (anosmia; mild, moderate or severe hyposmia) as well as an index to detect malingering.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  28. Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The EQ-5D consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The outcome measured for this study was the EQ VAS, which records the subject's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the subject's own judgement. VAS scores range from 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine).

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  29. Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument

    The SF-6D is a single health state index derived from the 11 items from the SF-36v2. SF-6D scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (best health state).

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  30. Comparison of Health Economic Measures- Percentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery

    Percentage of subjects indicating that they are willing to consider Sinus Surgery

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  31. Comparison of Health Economic Measures- Percentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention

    Percentage of Subjects who meet the minimal objective criteria for surgical intervention

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  32. Comparison of Health Economic Measures- Percentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a Surgery

    Outcome value presented here is the percent of subjects who are approved for surgery but no longer elect to undergo a surgery. The number of participants analyzed indicates the total number of participants for whom this analysis was completed.

    Time frame: Week 24

  33. Change in Work Productivity From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ).

    The Health and Work Performance Questionnaire measures work productivity (absenteeism and presenteeism). - Absenteeism is measured in missed work days over the past four weeks (range 0-20); absenteeism is measured in % productivity at work (0-100%), with higher values indicating improved productivity. Values for this outcome are reported as the change in relative absenteeism (the percentage of productivity at work) from baseline to Week 24.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Evaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)

    Assessment of safety by measuring severity of AEs using scale with 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  2. Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination

    Assessed in nasal examination worksheet which includes recording the presence of any epistaxis, septal erosion/perforation, ulceration/erosion of area other than septum.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  3. Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood Pressure

    Includes systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements in millimeter of mercury (mmHg)

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  4. Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Pulse

    Measure pulse in beats per minute (bpm)

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  5. Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Weight

    Assessment of safety from physical examination-weight measured in kg or lb

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  6. Evaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication Usage

    Assessment for safety from the collection of information for concomitant medications usage

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Sep 18, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Started111109112
Completed10210196
Not completed9816
Withdrew: Adverse event223
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up112
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy429
Withdrew: Protocol violation001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject011
Withdrew: Reason not provided220

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 4

Change from baseline to the end of Week 4 in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.

Time frame:
4 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 4
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) at the End of Week 4-1.58 ± 0.161-1.60 ± 0.163-0.62 ± 0.161
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT. Percent volume opacified can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percentage of volume opacified
Change From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses
Percentage of volume opacifiedOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses-5.58 ± 1.436-6.20 ± 1.412-1.60 ± 1.421
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Defined Timepoint - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains

The SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 symptoms and social/emotional consequences of their nasal disorder across several domains including: rhinologic, ear/facial pain, psychological dysfunction, and sleep dysfunction. Total scores range from 0-110. Each item is rated as follows: 0=no problem, 1=very mild problem, 2=mild or slight problem,3=moderate problem, 4=severe problem, 5=problem as bad as it can be.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoint - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Defined Timepoint - Subject Symptoms and Functioning as Measured by the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22-item (SNOT-22) Total Score and Sub Domains-18.05 ± 1.687-22.77 ± 1.709-10.16 ± 1.723
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior)

Change from baseline in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior)
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Symptoms as Measured by a Composite Score for Each Symptom of Nasal Congestion, Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation, and Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior)-1.89 ± 0.204-2.18 ± 0.208-1.35 ± 0.208
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours), The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
AM Diary Score-0.71 ± 0.074-0.84 ± 0.076-0.45 ± 0.076
PM Diary Score-0.68 ± 0.075-0.82 ± 0.076-0.41 ± 0.076
SecondaryChange in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours) The sense of smell scored as 0= normal, 1=slightly impaired, 2=moderately impaired, 3=absent. The change reported in the results is calculated by subtracting the score reported at Baseline from the score reported at Visit 4 (Week 12).

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Sense of Smell Scores Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
AM Diary Score-0.60 ± 0.078-0.54 ± 0.079-0.31 ± 0.079
PM Diary Score-0.54 ± 0.078-0.56 ± 0.080-0.32 ± 0.079
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours). The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Nasal Discharge (Anterior and/or Posterior) Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
AM Diary Score-0.65 ± 0.075-0.74 ± 0.076-0.43 ± 0.077
PM Diary Score-0.58 ± 0.077-0.72 ± 0.078-0.37 ± 0.078
SecondaryChange in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores

Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours). The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living. The value reported in the results is calculated by subtracting the score reported by the patient at Baseline from the score reported by the patient at Visit 4 (Week 12).

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Facial Pain or Pressure Sensation Measured by AM and PM Diary Symptom Scores
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
AM Diary Score-0.53 ± 0.078-0.61 ± 0.079-0.48 ± 0.079
PM Diary Score-0.52 ± 0.077-0.57 ± 0.079-0.43 ± 0.078
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses Among Patient Populations

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT for CRS with Nasal Polyps (NP) and without NP sub-groups and in patients with and without previous sinus surgery. Percent volume opacified can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefor, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of volume opacified
Change From Baseline to Week 24/Early Termination (ET) in the Average Percent of the Volume Opacified in the Ethmoid and Maxillary Sinuses Among Patient Populations
percentage of volume opacifiedOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Nasal Polyps Present-6.01 ± 1.741-4.64 ± 1.7441.29 ± 1.727
Nasal Polyps Absent-3.52 ± 2.389-7.90 ± 2.287-5.50 ± 2.309
Prior Sinus Surgery-7.58 ± 2.156-8.91 ± 2.235-1.65 ± 2.185
No Prior Sinus Surgery-3.30 ± 1.913-3.82 ± 1.787-0.95 ± 1.810
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score

Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The total LM score for a CT scan ranges from 0-24.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score-0.40 ± 0.269-0.46 ± 0.2670.10 ± 0.266
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Scores for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined

Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for the ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The values reported for this outcome are the change in total opacification of the left and right maxillary and ethmoid sinuses (Visit 6 \[Wk 24\] score minus Baseline score). Each visit score can range from a total of 0-12 (sum of 0-2 score assigned for each of left and right maxillary, left and right anterior ethmoid, and left and right posterior ethmoid).

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Scores for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Scores for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined0.12 ± 0.1480.04 ± 0.1490.37 ± 0.148
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Scores for Sinus Pairs

Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for the ostiomeatal complex (OMC). Each sinus pair (left and right side) listed below can achieve a total score of 0-4 (sum of 0-2 for each side). The values reported below are calculated by subtracting the total score at Baseline from the total score at Visit 6 (Wk 24).

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week24/ET in the Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Scores for Sinus Pairs
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Ethmoid Sinus Anterior0.06 ± 0.064-0.01 ± 0.0630.07 ± 0.064
Ethmoid Sinus Posterior0.00 ± 0.066-0.04 ± 0.0670.15 ± 0.068
Maxillary Sinus0.04 ± 0.0490.09 ± 0.0510.12 ± 0.052
Frontal Sinus0.08 ± 0.0720.01 ± 0.0710.01 ± 0.070
Sphenoid Sinus0.04 ± 0.067-0.03 ± 0.0680.08 ± 0.069
Ostiomeatal Complex-0.66 ± 0.129-0.47 ± 0.129-0.31 ± 0.129
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus as Measured by CT Scan Assessment
Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent opacified volume
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus as Measured by CT Scan Assessment
Percent opacified volumeOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Maxillary Sinus as Measured by CT Scan Assessment-14.70 ± 2.23-12.62 ± 2.3-7.61 ± 2.29
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus as Measured by CT Scan Assessment
Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent opacified volume
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus as Measured by CT Scan Assessment
Percent opacified volumeOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Ethmoid Sinus as Measured by CT Scan Assessment-7.31 ± 1.43-7.43 ± 1.44-3.76 ± 1.44
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Sinus Between the Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses as Measured by CT Scan Assessment Among Patient Populations

Percent of sinus volume occupied by disease in the worst sinus between maxillary and ethmoid sinuses for the total population, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) subgroup, chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) subgroup, patients with previous sinus surgery subgroup, and without previous surgery subgroup.

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percent opacified volume
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in Average Percent of Sinus Volume Occupied by Disease in the Worst Sinus Between the Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses as Measured by CT Scan Assessment Among Patient Populations
Percent opacified volumeOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Full Population-11.27 ± 1.81-10.39 ± 1.83-6.51 ± 1.82
CRSwNP SubGroup-6.54 ± 1.77-6.72 ± 1.81-3.23 ± 1.79
CRSsNP SubGroup-7.88 ± 2.37-7.89 ± 2.37-3.88 ± 2.34
Subjects with Prior Sinus Surgery-11.29 ± 2.67-12.44 ± 2.89-3.24 ± 2.85
Subjects without Prior Sinus Surgery-11.00 ± 2.46-8.83 ± 2.30-8.39 ± 2.33
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score

Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% for each sinus. Total score ranges from 0 to 50.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System Total Score-0.98 ± 0.65-1.95 ± 0.64-0.03 ± 0.65
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined

Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% The total score for the combined ethmoids and maxillary sinuses can range from 0-30 (0-5 for each left and right of the anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, and maxillary sinuses). The outcome values presented in the results are determined by subtracting the total score at Baseline from the total score at Week 24.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for Ethmoids and Maxillary Sinuses Combined-1.21 ± 0.43-1.44 ± 0.43-0.19 ± 0.42
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs

Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% Each sinus pair (left and right side) listed below can achieve a total score of 0-10 (sum of score on each side). The values reported for this outcome calculated by subtracting the score at Baseline from the score at Visit 6 (Wk 24).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Sinus Pairs
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Anterior Ethmoid Sinus Pair-0.39 ± 0.17-0.53 ± 0.17-0.19 ± 0.17
Posterior Ethmoid Sinus Pair-0.33 ± 0.18-0.55 ± 0.180.03 ± 0.18
Maxillary Sinus Pair-0.53 ± 0.18-0.39 ± 0.17-0.08 ± 0.17
Frontal Sinus Pair0.12 ± 0.20-0.16 ± 0.200.05 ± 0.20
Sphenoid Sinus Pair0.15 ± 0.20-0.16 ± 0.190.20 ± 0.19
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient Populations

Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System: Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100%

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24/ET in the Zeinrich Modification of Lund-Mackay Staging System for the Worst Sinus Between Maxillary and Ethmoid Sinuses Among Patient Populations
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Total Population-0.59 ± 0.11-0.60 ± 0.11-0.45 ± 0.11
CRSwNP-0.49 ± 0.13-0.57 ± 0.14-0.30 ± 0.14
CRSsNP-0.70 ± 0.18-0.61 ± 0.18-0.64 ± 0.18
Subjects with Prior Sinus Surgery-0.48 ± 0.16-0.78 ± 0.17-0.33 ± 0.17
Subjects without Prior Sinus Surgery-0.70 ± 0.15-0.51 ± 0.14-0.54 ± 0.14
SecondaryTime Comparison to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis

Comparing the distribution of time to first acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis, defined as a worsening of symptoms that requires escalation of treatment

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Weeks
Time Comparison to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis
WeeksOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Time Comparison to First Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Sinusitis23.44 ± 0.5517.19 ± 0.2519.73 ± 0.69
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects Requiring Rescue Medication After Week 4

Recording of each dose of approved rescue medication after the Week 4 visit through Week 12

Time frame:
8 Weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

The PSQI is a validated, self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate 7 "component" scores (each ranging between 0 and 3): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these 7 components yields 1 global score ranging between 0 and 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame:
12 Weeks, 24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Week 12-0.66 ± 0.291-1.48 ± 0.291-0.91 ± 0.294
Week 24-1.12 ± 0.292-1.77 ± 0.294-1.09 ± 0.301
SecondaryChange in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Global impression of change will be assessed using a subject-completed PGIC scale range: 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, 3 - Minimally improved, 4 - No change, 5 - Minimally worse, 6 - Much worse, 7 - Very much worse

Time frame:
Week 4, Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Overall Health From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 24/ET as Measured by the Percent of Subjects Improved as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
ParticipantsOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Week 4847757
Week 24788056
SecondarySeverity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)

The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Severity of Depression at Week 24 as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)-0.24 ± 0.31-0.80 ± 0.31-0.62 ± 0.31
SecondaryChange in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Composite Score (MCS)

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the MCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Composite Score (MCS)
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Mental Composite Score (MCS)-0.1 ± 0.8101.65 ± 0.8201.41 ± 0.834
SecondaryChange in the SF-36v2 Physical Composite Score (PCS)

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the PCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in the SF-36v2 Physical Composite Score (PCS)
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change in the SF-36v2 Physical Composite Score (PCS)2.37 ± 0.6473.64 ± 0.6521.58 ± 0.663
SecondaryChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)

The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, 36-item subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The SF-36v2 survey with a 4-week recall will be used. It yields scale scores for each of these 8 health domains , each of which is scored from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate with a better health status, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible.

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2)
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Physical Functioning Score1.07 ± 1.0391.43 ± 1.0550.04 ± 1.067
Role Physical Score0.92 ± 1.0572.64 ± 1.0740.16 ± 1.082
Bodily Pain Score0.94 ± 1.1724.10 ± 1.1851.8 ± 1.201
General Health Score0.55 ± 1.0912.38 ± 1.119-1.18 ± 1.21
Vitality Score1.13 ± 1.1423.35 ± 1.1561.81 ± 1.168
Social Functioning Score0.22 ± 1.1532.05 ± 1.1731.89 ± 1.181
Role Emotional Score-1.11 ± 1.1471.2 ± 1.169-0.32 ± 1.178
Mental Health Score-0.92 ± 1.1690.75 ± 1.188-0.69 ± 1.194
SecondaryChange in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)

The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change in Depressive Symptoms From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by Change in the Severity of Depression as Measured by the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS)-0.24 ± 0.308-0.80 ± 0.312-0.62 ± 0.314
SecondaryChange in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™

The SIT is a test comprised of 4 booklets each containing 10 microencapsulated (scratch and sniff) odors. Forced choice response alternatives to identify the odor accompany each test item. Each correct response is assigned a score of 1 and incorrect responses are assigned a score of 0. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of each individual odor for a total possible score ranging from 0-40. The higher the score, the better the individual's sense of smell. The test provides an absolute indication of smell loss (anosmia; mild, moderate or severe hyposmia) as well as an index to detect malingering.

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change in Olfactory Impairment From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Smell Identification Test (SIT)™2.47 ± 0.7652.33 ± 0.768-1.30 ± 0.793
SecondaryChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

The EQ-5D consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The outcome measured for this study was the EQ VAS, which records the subject's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the subject's own judgement. VAS scores range from 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine).

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) Instrument Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)2.59 ± 1.7833.97 ± 1.791-0.35 ± 1.810
SecondaryChange in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument

The SF-6D is a single health state index derived from the 11 items from the SF-36v2. SF-6D scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (best health state).

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument
score on a scaleOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change in Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Short-Form 6-Dimension (SF-6D) Instrument0 ± 0.0160.04 ± 0.0170.01 ± 0.016
SecondaryComparison of Health Economic Measures- Percentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery

Percentage of subjects indicating that they are willing to consider Sinus Surgery

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Comparison of Health Economic Measures- Percentage of Subjects Indicating That They Are Willing to Consider Sinus Surgery
ParticipantsOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Baseline635954
Week 24524854
SecondaryComparison of Health Economic Measures- Percentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention

Percentage of Subjects who meet the minimal objective criteria for surgical intervention

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Comparison of Health Economic Measures- Percentage of Subjects Who Meet the Minimal Objective Criteria for Surgical Intervention
ParticipantsOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Baseline424845
Week 24303638
SecondaryComparison of Health Economic Measures- Percentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a Surgery

Outcome value presented here is the percent of subjects who are approved for surgery but no longer elect to undergo a surgery. The number of participants analyzed indicates the total number of participants for whom this analysis was completed.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Comparison of Health Economic Measures- Percentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a Surgery
ParticipantsOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Comparison of Health Economic Measures- Percentage of Subjects Approved for Surgery Who no Longer Elect to Undergo a Surgery525648
SecondaryChange in Work Productivity From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ).

The Health and Work Performance Questionnaire measures work productivity (absenteeism and presenteeism). - Absenteeism is measured in missed work days over the past four weeks (range 0-20); absenteeism is measured in % productivity at work (0-100%), with higher values indicating improved productivity. Values for this outcome are reported as the change in relative absenteeism (the percentage of productivity at work) from baseline to Week 24.

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of productivity
Change in Work Productivity From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ).
percentage of productivityOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Change in Work Productivity From Baseline to Week 24/ET as Measured by the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ).0.98 ± 2.384-4.13 ± 2.479-6.28 ± 2.505
Other pre-specifiedEvaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)

Assessment of safety by measuring severity of AEs using scale with 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Evaluation of Safety by Recording the Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)
ParticipantsOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Mild252320
Moderate292633
Severe335
Other pre-specifiedEvaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination

Assessed in nasal examination worksheet which includes recording the presence of any epistaxis, septal erosion/perforation, ulceration/erosion of area other than septum.

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Evaluation of Safety-Nasal Examination
ParticipantsOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Epistaxis — Present391
Epistaxis — Absent10596102
Septal Erosion/Perforation — Present330
Septal Erosion/Perforation — Absent105102103
Ulceration/Erosion (non-septum) — Present021
Ulceration/Erosion (non-septum) — Absent108103102
Mucosal Candidiasis — Present000
Mucosal Candidiasis — Absent108105103
Other pre-specifiedEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood Pressure

Includes systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements in millimeter of mercury (mmHg)

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Blood Pressure
mmHgOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)127.3 ± 14.15126.7 ± 14.11127.3 ± 14.69
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)78.0 ± 8.2278.2 ± 9.7079.3 ± 8.62
Other pre-specifiedEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Pulse

Measure pulse in beats per minute (bpm)

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Beats per minute
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Pulse
Beats per minuteOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Pulse73.7 ± 11.9672.7 ± 9.573.1 ± 9.45
Other pre-specifiedEvaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Weight

Assessment of safety from physical examination-weight measured in kg or lb

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · kg
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Weight
kgOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Evaluation of Safety Measuring Vital Signs- Weight82.81 ± 20.87384.23 ± 19.23283.84 ± 21.531
Other pre-specifiedEvaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication Usage

Assessment for safety from the collection of information for concomitant medications usage

Time frame:
24 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Evaluation of Safety - Monitoring Concomitant Medication Usage
ParticipantsOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
Amides333830
Adrenergics in Combination with Corticosteroids or other drugs353027
Ace Inhibitors, Plain5712
Allergen Extracts662
Alpha-Adrenoreceptor Antagonists162

Adverse events

Collected over Pretreatment (Screening/Run-in) period to end of treatment (Week 24). Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
OPN-375 186 μg BID0/111 (0%)1/111 (0.9%)37/111 (33.3%)
OPN-375 372 μg BID0/109 (0%)2/109 (1.8%)37/109 (33.9%)
Placebo0/112 (0%)3/112 (2.7%)14/112 (12.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
COVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestations0/1110/1092/112
Alcoholic pancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders0/1111/1090/112
Ankle fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1111/1090/112
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/1110/1090/112
Pneumonia staphylococcalInfections and infestations0/1110/1091/112
Uterine leiomyomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1110/1091/112
AdenomyosisReproductive system and breast disorders0/1110/1091/112
Ovarian cystReproductive system and breast disorders0/1110/1091/112
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventOPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlacebo
EpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/11113/1091/112
Cataract corticalEye disorders6/1112/1091/112
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations6/1113/1093/112
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/1114/1091/112
Cataract nuclearEye disorders5/1114/1090/112
Acute sinusitisInfections and infestations5/1112/1094/112
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/1113/1091/112
DizzinessNervous system disorders0/1113/1090/112
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1113/1090/112
InfluenzaInfections and infestations3/1110/1093/112

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)OPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlaceboTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years959389277
>=65 years16162355
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)OPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlaceboTotal
Mean48.4 ± 13.8549.6 ± 13.4949.2 ± 15.2649.1 ± 14.19
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)OPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlaceboTotal
Female474351141
Male646661191
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)OPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino19818
Not Hispanic or Latino110100104314
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)OPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native1001
Asian15410
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American104620
White9999101299
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)OPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlaceboTotal
Canada27716
Sweden2428
United States626457183
Poland33253290
United Kingdom0112
Georgia2002
Bulgaria2327
Russia851124
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within the last 10 years
Intranasal corticosteroid treatment for chronic sinusitis within the last 10 years(participants)OPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlaceboTotal
Mometason Furoate445148143
Fluticasone proprionate626667195
Fluticasone Furoate12142046
Budesonide18221858
Ciclesonide1124
Beclomethasone27918
Triamcinolone14111641
Flunisolide0011
Fluticasone and azelastine15141746
Other63413
Any Treatment100100104304
Prior Sinusitis Surgery
Prior Sinusitis Surgery(participants)OPN-375 186 μg BIDOPN-375 372 μg BIDPlaceboTotal
Any surgery585358169
Endoscopic sinus surgery524748147
Balloon sinuplasty54514
Polypectomy alone14122147
Other surgery52310
Sinus stent22812
Propel mometasone furoate implant22812
Sinuva mometasone furoate sinus implant : Yes1001

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

92 sites
  • AZ Allergy & Immunology Research
    Gilbert, Arizona 85234, United States
  • Kern Research
    Bakersfield, California 93301, United States
  • Sacramento Ear, Nose & Throat Surgical and Medical Group Inc
    Folsom, California 95630, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Specialists Medical Group
    Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
  • Jonathan Corren, MD, Clinical Research Division
    Los Angeles, California 90025, United States
  • Sacramento Ear, Nose & Throat
    Roseville, California 95661, United States
  • UC Davis Medical Center
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Allergy and Asthma Associates of Santa Clara Valley
    San Jose, California 95117, United States
  • Breathe Clear Institute
    Torrance, California 90503, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Clinical Research
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • Colorado ENT & Allergy
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80909, United States
  • Yale School of Medicine Section of Otolaryngology
    New Haven, Connecticut 06519, United States
  • Emory University MOT
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • The University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Midwest Allergy Sinus Asthma
    Normal, Illinois 61761, United States
  • Advanced ENT and Allergy
    New Albany, Indiana 47150, United States
  • Iowa Head & Neck
    Des Moines, Iowa 50312-3505, United States
  • Kentuckiana Ear Nose & Throat
    Louisville, Kentucky 40205, United States
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • John Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Ear, Nose and Throat Associates at Greater Baltimore Medical Center
    Towson, Maryland 21204, United States
  • St. Cloud Ear, Nose & Throat
    Saint Cloud, Minnesota 56303, United States
  • University of Missouri, Dept of Otorlaryngology
    Columbia, Missouri 65212, United States
  • Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology Associates, PC
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68505, United States
  • Atlantic Research Center
    Ocean City, New Jersey 07712, United States
  • ENT and Allergy Associates
    New Hyde Park, New York 11042, United States
  • Mount Sinai Downtown Union Square
    New York, New York 10003, United States
  • Madison ENT and Facial Plastic Surgery
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Allergy Asthma & Immunology Relief of Charlotte
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Allergy Asthma & Clinical Research Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
  • Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute, P.C.
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136, United States
  • Northwest Research Center
    Portland, Oregon 97202, United States
  • Specialty Physician Associates
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18017, United States
  • Hospital at the University of PA
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • National Allergy and Asthma Research
    North Charleston, South Carolina 29420, United States
  • Holston Medical Group
    Kingsport, Tennessee 37660, United States
  • University of TX Health Science Ctr at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • STAAMP Research, LLC
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Chrysallis Clinical Research
    Saint George, Utah 84790, United States
  • Intermountain Ear, Nose & Throat
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84102, United States
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • Bellingham Asthma, Allergy & Immunology Clinic
    Bellingham, Washington 98225, United States
  • Spokane ENT
    Spokane Valley, Washington 99201, United States
  • UMHAT - Kaspela EOOD
    Plovdiv, 4002, Bulgaria
  • MC Iskar
    Sofia, 1000, Bulgaria
  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Serdika
    Sofia, 1303, Bulgaria
  • MC Pirogov
    Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria
  • The Military Medical Academy (MHAT)
    Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria
  • Мinistry of Interior - Medical Institute
    Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria
  • University of British Columbia and Providence Health Care
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1Y6, Canada
  • St. Joseph's Healthcare London
    London, Ontario N6A 4V2, Canada
  • CHU de Quebec, pavillon Hopital Saint- Sacrement
    Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada
  • Ltd Acad. Fridon Todua Medical Center
    Tbilisi, 0112, Georgia
  • Ltd Israel-Georgian Medical Research Clinic - Helsicore
    Tbilisi, 0112, Georgia
  • JSC Curatio
    Tbilisi, 0114, Georgia
  • Ltd Aversi Clinic
    Tbilisi, 0160, Georgia
  • Ltd Simon Khechinashvili University Hospital
    Tbilisi, 0179, Georgia
  • Medicus Sp z o.o.
    Wrocław, Dolnoslaskie 50-224, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Biotamed
    Wieliczka, Malopolskie 32-020, Poland
  • Jarosław Ślifirski Indywidualna Praktyka Lekarska
    Kęty, MA 32-650, Poland
  • Mini Clinic Paweł Białogłowski
    Łańcut, PK 37-100, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita
    Katowice, SL 40-611, Poland
  • NZOZ Centrum Medyczne LiMED
    Tarnowskie Góry, SL 42-600, Poland
  • NZOZ Imedica
    Poznań, Wielkopolska 60-537, Poland
  • ReumaClinic
    Białystok, 15-181, Poland
  • Przychodnia "Narutowicza"
    Inowrocław, 88-100, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne All Med - Krakow
    Kraków, 30-033, Poland
  • Medical Center Woś i Piwowarczyk
    Kraków, 31-572, Poland
  • Centrum Alergologii
    Lublin, 20-552, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Lucyna Andrazej Dymek - Strzelce Opolskie
    Strzelce Opolskie, 47-100, Poland
  • NZOZ "Ignis" dr med. Alicja Łobińska
    Świdnik, 21-040, Poland
  • NZOZ Przychodnia Medycyny Rodzinnej
    Świętochłowice, 41-600, Poland
  • I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University-University Hospital No.1 - Ear, Nose, and Throat Clinic
    Moscow, Moskovskaya Obl. 119435, Russian Federation
  • Moscow Regional Scientific Research Clinical Institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirsky (MONIKI)
    Moscow, Moskovskaya Obl. 129110, Russian Federation
  • Saint-Petersburg State Medical University n.a. I.P. Pavlov
    Saint Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg 197022, Russian Federation
  • Smolensk, "Uromed"
    Smolensk, Smolenskaya Obl 214031, Russian Federation
  • Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital
    Yaroslavl, Yaroslavskaya Obl. 150062, Russian Federation
  • Central Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic" Office of Affairs of the President of the Russian Federation
    Moscow, 121359, Russian Federation
  • Saint-Petersburg Institute of Ear, Nose, Throat, and Speech (The RSFSR Ministry of Health)
    Saint Petersburg, 190013, Russian Federation
  • ONH Klinikun Skane Universitetssjukhuset (Lund - Oron- Nas- Och Halskliniken)
    Lund, Skane Lan 222 41, Sweden
  • Karolinska University Hospital
    Stockholm, Stockholms Lan 171 76, Sweden
  • Helsingborg Hospital
    Helsingborg, Sverige 25187, Sweden
  • ONH Kliniken Sahlgrenska Universitetsynkhiset
    Gothenburg, Vastra Gotaland Lan 413 45, Sweden
  • Sofiahemmet Hospital
    Stockholm, 114 28, Sweden
  • University Hospital of Wales
    Cardiff, Cf14 4xw, United Kingdom
  • Darlington Memorial Hospital
    Darlington, DL3 6HX, United Kingdom
  • Lister Hospital
    Stevenage, SG1 4AB, United Kingdom
  • Stockport NHS Foundation Trust (Stepping Hill Hospital Base)
    Stockport, SK2 7JE, United Kingdom
  • Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust
    Wigan, WN1 2NN, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 7, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 14, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03781804
Lead sponsor
Optinose US Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 20, 2018
Start date
Nov 27, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 19, 2022
Completion
Jan 19, 2022
Results posted
Sep 18, 2023
Last update
May 29, 2024

Study contacts

Jennifer Carothers
study director · Optinose US Inc.
John Messina
study chair · Optinose US Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion