CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03764995Updated Oct 12, 2021

The Effects of Abdominal Massage on Functional (Primary) Chronic Constipation

An interventional study of Standard bowel management and Abdominal massage in Constipation, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-12.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the present study is to investigate the efficacy of abdominal massage in patients with functional (primary) chronic constipation. The present study is designed as a randomized placebo controlled. Since the placebo group is included in the research design, if there is a greater improvement of symptoms of constipation and quality of life in the massage group when compared to the control group, it will be determined that this effect is not related to a placebo effect. If the efficacy of Abdominal Massage is revealed with a placebo controlled design, the therapist effect will be eliminated and further evidence on a well-known massage technique in functional (primary) chronic constipation, a common gastrointestinal problem, will be provided. The results of the present placebo controlled randomized trial will indicate that the need for pharmacological agents and the side effects associated with these agents will be reduced. According to the literature, there are studies that investigate the effects of abdominal massage on symptoms of constipation and quality of life. However, it has generally been used for secondary constipation or two applications have been compared. In addition, there is no randomized placebo-controlled study investigating the effect of abdominal massage on severity of chronic constipation and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Constipation is a subjective symptom that defines as inadequate defecation including several symptoms as follows: the sensation of incomplete bowel evacuation, hard stool, straining, and difficulty in defecation. The general prevalence of constipation in adults is 16%. The pre-defined risk factors are women gender, advanced age, non-white ethnicity, low socio-economic level, decreased physical activity underlying diseases, and medications. Chronic constipation affects quality of life and causes problems such as anxiety, depression, somatization, sleep disorders, sexual dysfunctions, school/work absenteeism. In the following periods, it causes serious comorbidities including dyspnea, gastro-esophageal reflux, hypertension, thyroid diseases, vaginitis, dyspareunia, diabetes, and fibromyalgia.

In the treatment of chronic constipation, conservative approaches (lifestyle change and physiotherapy applications) are used at the first phase. If conservative approaches are not helpful for patients pharmacological and surgical treatment can be performed based on the characteristics of patients, respectively. Pharmacological treatments aim to increase the frequency of spontaneous bowel movements, to reduce abdominal pain and swelling, and to improve stool consistency. However, side effects such as abdominal bloating, abdominal cramping, abdominal pain, stomach gas, nausea, diarrhea, headache and dyspnea are reported by patients in the following period. Furthermore, medications for constipation management are not cost-effective. Therefore, the level of evidence on conservative approaches with low cost, non-invasive and no-side effects in constipation treatment should be increased.

Physiotherapy approaches to alleviate chronic constipation symptoms include such as defecation training, abdominal massage, connective tissue massage, electrical stimulation, Kinesio-taping, anorectal biofeedback, and exercise training. Abdominal massage application in constipation is used in constipation management since the early 1870s and it is popular in recent years. The benefits of abdominal massage are known as follows: reduction in the abdominal muscle tension, improvement of local circulation, and stimulation of peristaltic movements. The technique of abdominal massage consists of 5 stages as follows: abdominal muscle stroking, colon stroking, colon kneading, colon stroking, and abdominal muscle stroking.

02

Conditions studied

  • Constipation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • massage
  • abdominal massage
  • chronic constipation
  • primary constipation
  • functional constipation
  • defecation
03

In context

Constipation

1,018 studies on the registry are indexed under Constipation; 140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 74 is close to the median of 80 across 850 interventional studies indexed under Constipation.

Browse Constipation studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 983 studies on the registry; 212 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 65 years.
  • Diagnosed with chronic constipation according to Rome IV criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A recent history of abdominal surgery
  • Intestinal obstruction, ileus, colon cancer
  • Enteric neuropathic patients: Diabetic intestinal neuropathy, Hirschsprung's disease, Megacolon, Megarectum
  • Umbilical hernia
  • Metabolic diseases: Cancer, Chronic renal failure, Severe cardiovascular disease, Hepatic failure, Hepatosplenomegaly, Abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Neurological diseases: Parkinson, Spinal cord injury, Multiple sclerosis, Cerebro-vascular event,
  • Paraplegia Mental problem to prevent co-operative treatment
  • Pregnancy and lactation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Abdominal Massage

    Other: Standard bowel management · Other: Abdominal massage

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Ultrasound

    Other: Standard bowel management · Other: Placebo Ultrasound

Interventions

  • OtherStandard bowel management

    Lifestyle advices such as increasing fluid and fibre intake, improving physical activity level, and taking the ideal posture for defecation (squatting position) with a two-pages document.

  • OtherAbdominal massage

    Abdominal massage will be performed three days a week for four weeks. Each session will last around 15-20 minutes.

  • OtherPlacebo Ultrasound

    Placebo ultrasound (US) will be applied to the abdominal region for four weeks, 2 days of the week and 15 minutes per day.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severity of constipation

    Constipation Severity Instrument (CSI) will be used to evaluate the severity of the constipation. CSI was designed to evaluate defecation frequency and consistency as well as the level of straining experienced by individuals during bowel movement. There are three subscales of CSI, obstructive defecation (OT), colonic inertia (CI), and pain. Higher scores of CSI indicate more severe constipation.

    Time frame: Change in severity of constipation from baseline at 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of life

    Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QOL) will be used to evaluate quality of life. This questionnaire includes a total of 28 items in 4 subscales: worries and concerns (11 items), physical discomfort (4 items), psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and satisfaction (5 items). Higher scores of PAC-QOL indicate more negative effects of constipation on the quality of life.

    Time frame: Change in quality of life from baseline at 4 weeks

  2. Stool consistency

    The stool consistency will be evaluated using the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS), quick and useful indicator of the colonic transit time , a seven-point scale (from 1 to 7), type 1=separate hard lumps, like nuts; 2=sausage shaped but lumpy; 3=like a sausage or snake, but with cracks on its surface; 4=like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; 5=soft blobs with clear cut edges; 6=pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; 7=water, no solid pieces. While type 1 and 2 indicate hard stool, type 3,4 and 5 show looser (ideal) stool.

    Time frame: Change from baseline stool consistency at 4 weeks

  3. Symptoms of constipation

    In order to gather information regarding the participants' symptoms of constipation, they will be asked to complete a 7-day bowel diary during the treatment period. This diary includes items regarding the frequency of bowel movement, stool consistency, defecation time, feeling of incomplete evacuation, and changes in food and liquid consumption.

    Time frame: Change from baseline symptoms of constipation at 4 weeks

  4. Abdominal pain, abdominal bloating severity and the effect of life

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): This scale is a 10 cm horizontal line. 0 = no pain / bloating / meaning no effect, 10 = unbearable pain / bloating / experiencing

    Time frame: Change from baseline symptoms of constipation at 4 weeks

  5. Physical activity levels

    The physical activity levels of the individuals in the last seven days are evaluated under 4 headings (severe activities, moderate activity, walking and sitting). While calculating the total score, the MET-min scores of the patients are obtained by multiplying the duration of activity and frequency of activities (number of days) by the BAT values given to activities (severe activity = 8 MET, moderate activity = 4 MET, walking = 3.3 MET)

    Time frame: Change from baseline symptoms of constipation at 4 weeks

  6. Patient global change scale

    It is a 7-item scale that evaluates the perception of the change in the effect of constipation and related complaints on the life of the patient compared to the study. The options on this scale are ''much much better'', ''much better'', 'a little better'', ''no change", ''a little worse'', ''much worse'', ''much much worse''

    Time frame: Change from baseline patient global change at 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ceren Gursen
    Ankara, 06100, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lamas K, Lindholm L, Stenlund H, Engstrom B, Jacobsson C. Effects of abdominal massage in management of constipation--a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jun;46(6):759-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Feb 12. PubMed 19217105 ↗
  • Sinclair M. The use of abdominal massage to treat chronic constipation. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Oct;15(4):436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 25. PubMed 21943617 ↗
  • Lamas K, Graneheim UH, Jacobsson C. Experiences of abdominal massage for constipation. J Clin Nurs. 2012 Mar;21(5-6):757-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03946.x. Epub 2011 Nov 21. PubMed 22098585 ↗
  • Dogan IG, Gursen C, Akbayrak T, Balaban YH, Vahabov C, Uzelpasaci E, Ozgul S. Abdominal Massage in Functional Chronic Constipation: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Phys Ther. 2022 Jul 4;102(7):pzac058. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac058. PubMed 35554601 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 12, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03764995
Lead sponsor
Hacettepe University
Responsible party
SERAP ÖZGÜL (Doc. Dr., Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 5, 2018
Start date
Dec 10, 2018
Primary completion
May 16, 2019
Completion
May 16, 2019
Last update
Oct 12, 2021

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion