CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03750279Updated Dec 8, 2021

Inflammatory Targeted Laser Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

An interventional study of Exercise therapy and LLLT in Knee Osteoarthritis, sponsored by University of Bergen. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-08.

Sponsored by University of Bergen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2018, registered Nov 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as an adjunct to exercise therapy in knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • Knee osteoarthritis
  • Inflammation
  • Photobiomodulation
  • Low-level laser therapy
  • Double-blind
  • Randomized clinical trial
  • RCT
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Bergen is the lead sponsor of 141 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Any gender
  • Age ≥ 50 years
  • Pain on movement ≥ 40 mm Visual Analog Scale
  • Knee pain for the last ≥ 3 months
  • KOA verified with the American College of Rheumatology criteria using a history and physical examination, i.e. knee pain and at least three of the following: ≥ 50 years old, ≤ 30 minutes of morning stiffness, crepitus on active range of motion, bony tenderness, bony enlargement, and no palpable warmth of synovia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Knee alloplastic
  • Total meniscectomy
  • Intra-articular steroid injection and/or oral steroid treatment within the last six months
  • Cancer
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Severe cognitive deficit
  • Neurological deficits affecting the knee
  • Inability to speak and understand English/Norwegian
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Exercise therapy + LLLT

    * Exercise therapy 3 times per week for 8 weeks from baseline. * LLLT applied to the knee 3 times per week for 3 weeks from baseline.

    Other: Exercise therapy · Other: LLLT

  • Placebo comparator
    Exercise therapy + sham LLLT

    * Exercise therapy 3 times per week for 8 weeks from baseline. * Sham LLLT applied to the knee 3 times per week for 3 weeks from baseline.

    Other: Exercise therapy · Other: Sham LLLT

Interventions

  • OtherExercise therapy

    * 5 min. warm up with light exercises for the lower limb prior to strength/endurance exercise therapy. * Strength/endurance exercise therapy including level 1 or 2 per session: Level 1: Pelvic lifts (2x15 rep.), one-legged knee bends (2x10 rep. per leg), hip abductions (2x10 rep. per leg). The participants may progress from level 1 to level 2. Level 2: Pelvic lifts (3x15 rep.), one-legged knee bends (3x10 rep. per leg), hip abductions (2x10 rep. per leg), sideways slide (2x10 rep. per leg), and backwards slide (2x10 rep. per leg). The participants may regress from level 2 to level 1.

  • OtherLLLT

    - LLLT (60 mW mean output per probe, 904 nm wavelength) applied to the knee in adherence with the recommendations by World Association for Laser Therapy, in terms of dosage per treatment spot.

  • OtherSham LLLT

    - Same procedure as in the LLLT group with the exception of laser irradiation (0 mW mean output power).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain on movement

    The participants are asked to rate their pain experienced on movement using an unidimensional visual analogue scale (VAS). "No pain" (0) is written in one end and "worst imaginable pain" (100) is written in the other end of the VAS tool.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  2. Pain at night

    The participants are asked to rate their pain experienced in bed at night using an unidimensional visual analogue scale (VAS). "No pain" (0) is written in one end and "worst imaginable pain" (100) is written in the other end of the VAS tool.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  3. Pain at rest

    The participants are asked to rate their pain experienced at rest in sitting position using an unidimensional visual analogue scale (VAS). "No pain" (0) is written in one end and "worst imaginable pain" (100) is written in the other end of the VAS tool.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  4. Pain in general

    Pain in general is reported with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire pain subscale. The subscale is based on Likert scales, each with five severity categories. The raw KOOS score is transformed to a 0-100 percentage score (higher is better).

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical function in daily living

    Physical function in daily living is reported with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire physical function in daily living subscale. The subscale is based on Likert scales, each with five severity categories. The raw KOOS score is transformed to a 0-100 percentage score (higher is better).

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  2. Physical function in sports and recreational activities

    Physical function in sports and recreational activities is reported with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire physical function in sports and recreational activities subscale. The subscale is based on Likert scales, each with five severity categories. The raw KOOS score is transformed to a 0-100 percentage score (higher is better).

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  3. Quality of life

    Quality of life is reported with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire quality of life subscale. The subscale is based on Likert scales, each with five severity categories. The raw KOOS score is transformed to a 0-100 percentage score (higher is better).

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  4. Global health status assessment

    The participants evaluate their change from baseline in terms of symptoms in general from 1 to 7 (1, no symptoms; 7, worse than ever).

    Time frame: 8 weeks after randomization

  5. Real time ultrasonography assessment of effusion

    Maximum height will be measured.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  6. Real time ultrasonography assessment of neovascularization

    Doppler area will be measured.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  7. Real time ultrasonography assessment of femur cartilage thickness

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  8. 30 seconds chair stand

    Last attempt counts if the participant is more than half way up.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  9. Knee extension active range of motion

    A 30 cm goniometer is used.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  10. Knee flexion active range of motion

    A 30 cm goniometer is used.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  11. Maximum pain free isometric quadriceps strength

    A dynamometer is used: The dynamometer display is not visible during the procedure in order to blind the assessor for the level of pressure.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  12. Joint line pain pressure threshold

    The most tender spot in the medial knee joint line is identified with palpation. Subsequently, a pain pressure threshold algometer is used at this spot. The display of the algometer is not visible during the procedure in order to blind the assessor for the level of pressure.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  13. Tibia bone pain pressure threshold

    The most tender spot in the medial knee joint line is identified with palpation. Subsequently, a pain pressure threshold algometer is used 1.5 cm distally from this spot. The display of the algometer is not visible during the procedure in order to blind the assessor for the level of pressure.

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

  14. Analgesic drug consumption due to knee pain

    Time frame: 0, 3, 8, 26 and 52 weeks after randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Bergen
    Bergen, 5018, Norway
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 8, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03750279
Lead sponsor
University of Bergen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 23, 2018
Start date
Apr 19, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 24, 2021
Completion
Aug 24, 2021
Last update
Dec 8, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion