ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03717298Updated Mar 28, 2023

Evaluation of Ocoxin-Viusid® in Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ocoxin-Viusid® in Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas, Pancreatic Cancer and Advanced Cancer, sponsored by Catalysis SL. Completed at 1 site in Cuba. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-28.

Sponsored by Catalysis SL · Phase 2, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators hypothesized that with the administration of the nutritional supplement Ocoxin-Viusid® is expected to improve the quality of life and enhance tolerance to chemotherapy in at least 70% of patients diagnosed with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, treated at the "Hermanos Ameijeiras" Surgical Clinical Hospital. Phase II clinical trial, open, multicenter, nonrandomized.

Read the detailed description

To assess the effect of Ocoxin-Viusid® on the quality of life of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

To evaluate the effect of Ocoxin-Viusid® on the quality of life of patients. To evaluate the influence of Ocoxin-Viusid® on tolerance to onco-specific therapy.

Identify the changes that occur in the nutritional status of patients receiving the supplement.

To evaluate the toxicity of Ocoxin-Viusid® in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Advanced Cancer
  • Digestive System Neoplasms
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms
  • Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
  • Digestive System Diseases
  • Endocrine System Diseases
  • Pancreatic Diseases

Keywords

  • Nutritional supplement
  • Advanced Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • Ocoxin-Viusid
  • Oxidative stress
  • Antioxidant
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,896 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 1,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 47 across 2,932 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Catalysis SL is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients of any sex, resident in Cuba, with an age greater than or equal to 18 years.
  • Patients that meet the diagnostic criteria.
  • Patients with general health according to ≥70 %.
  • greater than or equal to 3 months.
  • Patients eligible to receive chemotherapy.
  • Patients who have signed the .
  • Patients who have laboratory values in parameters that do not contraindicate the administration of chemotherapy:
  • ≥ 90 g / l.
  • Total Leukocyte Count ≥ 3.0 x 109 / L.
  • ≥1.5 x 109 / L.
  • count ≥100 x 109 / L.
  • Total values ≤ 1.5 times the established in the institution.
  • TGO and TGP values ≤2.5 times the upper limit of the normal interval established in the institution.
  • Creatinine values within the normal limits of the institution.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating patients.
  • Patients with known to any of the active ingredients of the chemotherapy used
  • Patients who are receiving another product under investigation.
  • Patients with decompensated intercurrent diseases, including: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, active infections, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, liver damage or any other special condition that at the discretion of the doctor puts their health at risk and his life during the study or his participation in the trial.
  • Patients with .
  • Patients with mental disorders that may limit adherence to the requirements of the clinical trial and may hinder the collection of information, treatment or follow-up.

It is planned to include a total of 30 patients in the study, taking into account 10% of losses.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ocoxin-Viusid

    It will be used at a rate of 60 ml daily (1 vial every 12 hours).

    Dietary Supplement: Ocoxin-Viusid®

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementOcoxin-Viusid®

    An oral solution of Ocoxin-Viusid® (30 ml vials) will be used at a rate of 60 ml daily (1 vial every 12 hours), preferably administered after breakfast and lunch. It will be prescribed for a period of 2 weeks before starting the QT. The treatment with Ocoxin-Viusid® will continue in the possible periods of time of suspension of the chemotherapy treatment due to toxicities attributable to the oncospecific treatment. The treatment will be administered continuously from the inclusion of the patient in the study, up to one year.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life: EORTC QLQ-C30

    Life quality measurement through the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (ORTC QLQ-C30): an integrated system for assessing the healthrelated quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials. It's composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nutritional Status of the patient during Chemotherapy

    Variations in the patient's nutritional status will be considered, measured by body mass Index (a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women)

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Adverse Events-AE during Chemotherapy Test

    A test with the following questions: Occurrence of an AE in the subject \[Yes, No\]; Description of the AE \[Name of the event\]; Duration of the AE \[Difference between the start and end date of the event\]; Intensity of the AE \[According to CTCAE version 4 it will classify in Light, Moderate, Severe, Life-threatening consequences, Death related to AE\]; Seriousness of the AE \[serious or not serious\], Attitude with respect to the treatment under study \[No changes, dose modification, temporary or definitive interruption of the study treatment\], Result of the AE \[recovered, improved, persisted or sequelae\], Causal relationship \[According to WHO algorithm it will classify in very probable, probable, possible, improbable, unrelated, not evaluable\]

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Hematology test

    Levels of Hemoglobin, Platelets, Hemogram with differential in blood extractions.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Blood Chemistry test

    Measure levels of GPT, GOT, Creatinine, Glycemia, Bilirrubin, Alkaline Phosphatase, LDH in blood.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Compliance with the treatment with chemotherapy (CT) and Immunotherapy (IT) test

    Test with the next parameters: if the administration of chemotherapy (CT) and Immunotherapy (IT) treatments will be considered at planned time, number of the cycle administered out of date, days elapsed since the previous cycle and, cause that caused the administration of the CT/IT outside the planned date. In the case of the dose, the medication in which it was modified will be taken into account, as well as the modified dose.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • "Hermanos Ameijeiras" Surgical Clinical Hospital
    La Habana, 10300, Cuba
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff P, Nelson R, Dorr FA, Stephens CD, Von Hoff DD. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2403-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2403. PubMed 9196156 ↗
  • Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Pere-Verge D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M; Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923. PubMed 21561347 ↗
  • Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, Seay T, Tjulandin SA, Ma WW, Saleh MN, Harris M, Reni M, Dowden S, Laheru D, Bahary N, Ramanathan RK, Tabernero J, Hidalgo M, Goldstein D, Van Cutsem E, Wei X, Iglesias J, Renschler MF. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369. Epub 2013 Oct 16. PubMed 24131140 ↗
  • Tobita K, Kijima H, Dowaki S, Kashiwagi H, Ohtani Y, Oida Y, Yamazaki H, Nakamura M, Ueyama Y, Tanaka M, Inokuchi S, Makuuchi H. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in human pancreatic cancer: Significance for liver metastasis. Int J Mol Med. 2003 Mar;11(3):305-9. PubMed 12579331 ↗
  • Burris H 3rd, Rocha-Lima C. New therapeutic directions for advanced pancreatic cancer: targeting the epidermal growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways. Oncologist. 2008 Mar;13(3):289-98. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0134. PubMed 18378539 ↗
  • Ueda S, Ogata S, Tsuda H, Kawarabayashi N, Kimura M, Sugiura Y, Tamai S, Matsubara O, Hatsuse K, Mochizuki H. The correlation between cytoplasmic overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and tumor aggressiveness: poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2004 Jul;29(1):e1-8. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200407000-00061. PubMed 15211117 ↗
  • Korc M, Meltzer P, Trent J. Enhanced expression of epidermal growth factor receptor correlates with alterations of chromosome 7 in human pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jul;83(14):5141-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.14.5141. PubMed 3014534 ↗
  • Immervoll H, Hoem D, Kugarajh K, Steine SJ, Molven A. Molecular analysis of the EGFR-RAS-RAF pathway in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: lack of mutations in the BRAF and EGFR genes. Virchows Arch. 2006 Jun;448(6):788-96. doi: 10.1007/s00428-006-0191-8. Epub 2006 Apr 6. PubMed 16598499 ↗
  • Lee J, Jang KT, Ki CS, Lim T, Park YS, Lim HY, Choi DW, Kang WK, Park K, Park JO. Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase mutations, EGFR gene amplifications, and KRAS mutations on survival of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2007 Apr 15;109(8):1561-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22559. PubMed 17354229 ↗
  • Russo A, Rizzo S, Bronte G, Silvestris N, Colucci G, Gebbia N, Bazan V, Fulfaro F. The long and winding road to useful predictive factors for anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: the KRAS/BRAF pathway. Oncology. 2009;77 Suppl 1:57-68. doi: 10.1159/000258497. Epub 2010 Feb 2. PubMed 20130433 ↗
  • da Cunha Santos G, Dhani N, Tu D, Chin K, Ludkovski O, Kamel-Reid S, Squire J, Parulekar W, Moore MJ, Tsao MS. Molecular predictors of outcome in a phase 3 study of gemcitabine and erlotinib therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study PA.3. Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;116(24):5599-607. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25393. Epub 2010 Sep 7. PubMed 20824720 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03717298
Lead sponsor
Catalysis SL
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 24, 2018
Start date
Oct 30, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2022
Completion
Jan 20, 2023
Last update
Mar 28, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ocoxin

Start the discussion