CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03715751ARDSUpdated Mar 8, 2022

Adaptive Support Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

An interventional study of ASV and Lung Protective Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-08.

Sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2018, registered Aug 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this protocol is to compare standard of care lung protective ventilation settings with an automated ventilator setting, called Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV), in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study will compare measurements (i.e. tidal volumes, driving pressure, respiratory rate (RR), compliance, peak airway pressures, plateau pressures, PEEP) with each ventilator technique, and will measure esophageal pressures to compare transpulmonary and respiratory system mechanics.

Read the detailed description

This study will compare two different modes of mechanical ventilation: standard lung protective controlled mandatory ventilation and Adaptive Support Ventilation. The investigators will enroll adult patients with ARDS who are mechanically ventilated and admitted to intensive care units, capturing a population with respiratory failure and significant critical illness. Patient mechanics during each ventilation strategy will be compared before and after crossover.

After obtaining informed consent, the investigators will place an esophageal balloon which will be used for simultaneous measurements of airway pressures (Pao) and esophageal pressures (Pes), to estimate transpulmonary pressures (PL = Pao - Pes), while also measuring Flow and Volume. Use of esophageal balloon catheters is common practice in the ICUs, and standard of care at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is to use these balloons in patients with ARDS. Both the respiratory therapy and physician staff are very comfortable with placement and use. The esophageal balloon will be left in place until extubation. If the balloon is dislodged or removed for clinical purposes, it will not be replaced solely for research purposes unless it occurs on the first day of study measurements.

Patients will then be randomized to be switched to ASV immediately or to be maintained on their current lung protective ventilation settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

  • Adaptive Support Ventilation
  • ARDS
  • Esophageal Pressure
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Transpulmonary Pressure
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 560 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 75 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 61 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients ≥ 18 years of age
  2. Receiving mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit
  3. ARDS, as defined by the Berlin definition:

    1. Hypoxemic respiratory failure with PaO2 / FiO2 ratio \< 300 mmHg
    2. Bilateral alveolar/interstitial infiltrates on chest x-ray, with opacities not present for more than 7 days
    3. Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload
    4. Intubation on mechanical ventilation and receiving PEEP ≥ 5 cm H2O
  4. Receiving mechanical ventilation from a Hamilton ventilator, on a controlled mode of ventilation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical team refusal
  2. Esophageal injury or contraindication precluding placement of the esophageal balloon
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ASV

    Patients in this arm will have the ventilator adjusted per results of recent arterial blood gas. Esophageal balloon placement will be confirmed. Study team will measure several tidal breaths, end-expiratory and end-inspiratory ventilator holds. Then PEEP will be adjusted to achieve desired end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures, Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2) adjusted as needed to achieve SpO2\>95%, and Tidal Volume (Vt) adjusted to 6cc/kg (IBW). Respiratory Rate (RR) will be adjusted to target the same minute ventilation achieved prior to any change in Vt. Patients will then be switched to ASV mode. The percentage minute volume (%minVol) will be adjusted to target the same minute ventilation as was achieved before the change. Settings will be maintained for approximately 1-2 hours, after which breath hold measurements will be repeated and another blood gas drawn.

    Other: ASV

  • Active comparator
    Lung Protective Ventilation

    Patients in this arm will have the ventilator adjusted per results of recent arterial blood gas. Esophageal balloon placement will be confirmed. Study team will measure several tidal breaths, end-expiratory and end-inspiratory ventilator holds. Then PEEP will be adjusted to achieve desired end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures, Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2) adjusted as needed to achieve SpO2\>95%, and Tidal Volume (Vt) adjusted to 6cc/kg (IBW). Respiratory Rate (RR) will be adjusted (while leaving the Vt at 6cc/kg) to achieve the same minute ventilation. Patients will then be maintained on their current lung protective ventilation settings for approximately 1-2 hours, after which breath hold measurements will be repeated and another blood gas drawn.

    Other: Lung Protective Ventilation

Interventions

  • OtherASV

    Adaptive Support Ventilation

    Also known as: Adaptive Support Ventilation

  • OtherLung Protective Ventilation

    Targeted tidal volume of 6cc/Kg, Positive Inspiratory Pressure titrated per ARDS guidelines.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tidal Volume

    Lung tidal volume in both ventilation modes (mL)

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Driving Pressure (cmH20)

    Driving pressure in both ventilation modes

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Respiratory rate (BPM)

    Respiratory Rate in both ventilation modes

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Oxygenation (SpO2%)

    Oxygenation (SpO2%) in both ventilation modes

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. CO2 clearance

    CO2 clearance in both ventilation modes

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. Blood Gas pH

    Blood Gas pH (units) in both ventilation modes

    Time frame: Day 1

  6. Blood Gas Partial Pressure of Oxygen

    Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) (mm Hg) in both ventilation modes

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. Blood Gas Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2) (mm Hg)

    Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2) (mm Hg) in both ventilation modes

    Time frame: Day 1

  8. Composite measure (lung protectiveness) - Asynchrony index

    Asynchrony index

    Time frame: Day 1

  9. Composite measure (lung protectiveness) - Number of Adjustments

    Number of Adjustments

    Time frame: Day 1

  10. Composite measure (lung protectiveness) - Time with tidal volumes under 6cc/kg

    Time spent with tidal volumes less than or equal to 6cc/kg

    Time frame: Day 1

  11. Composite measure (lung protectiveness) - Driving pressures less than 15

    Time spent at or under Driving pressures less than 15

    Time frame: Day 1

  12. Composite measure (lung protectiveness) - Plateau Pressure <30

    Time spent at or under Plateau Pressure \<30

    Time frame: Day 1

  13. Composite measure (lung protectiveness) - Oxygen saturation by pulse Oximetry (SpO2) >88%

    Time spent at or under Oxygen saturation by pulse Oximetry (SpO2) \>88%

    Time frame: Day 1

  14. Time to extubation

    Time to liberation from mechanical ventilation (days)

    Time frame: 30 Days

  15. ICU length of stay

    Time to ICU discharge (days)

    Time frame: 90 Days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 8, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03715751
Lead sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Responsible party
Daniel Talmor (Edward Lowenstein Professor of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2018
Start date
Feb 14, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 2, 2020
Completion
Jan 31, 2021
Last update
Mar 8, 2022

Study contacts

Daniel Talmor, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion