ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03714607Updated Sep 17, 2019

Laser Therapy in Managing Vaginal Prolapse

An interventional study of Erbium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) laser in Cystocele, Vaginal Vault Prolapse and Rectocele, sponsored by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Status unknown at 1 site in Greece. Open to female participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-17.

Sponsored by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2019), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Efficacy of laser therapy in postmenopausal women with symptomatic prolapse stage >1. Assessment tools will include prolapse stage quantification system (POP-Q) and validated condition related questionnaires.

Read the detailed description

Postmenopausal women with symptomatic cystocele and/or rectocele stage 2 or 3 will be 1:1 randomly allocated to Er:YAG laser or watchful waiting group. Participants in the Er:YAG laser group will receive laser therapies at monthly intervals, while participants in the watchful waiting group will receive no treatment. All outcomes in both groups will be evaluated at baseline, 4-months and 6-months from baseline.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cystocele
  • Vaginal Vault Prolapse
  • Rectocele
  • Enterocele
03

In context

Cystocele

71 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystocele; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 75 across 46 interventional studies indexed under Cystocele.

Browse Cystocele studies →

Lead sponsor

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens is the lead sponsor of 176 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic prolapse stage >1 (cystocele, vaginal vault prolapse, enterocele, rectocele) according to POP-Q System
  • Negative Pap-smear

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Asymptomatic prolapse
  • prolapse stage \<=1
  • prolapse of uterus
  • presence of any type of genital infections (i.e herpes, vaginitis etc)
  • vaginal bleeding
  • underlying pathologies that could interfere in patients compliance (i.e psychiatric)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Laser

    Erbium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) laser therapies

    Device: Erbium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) laser

  • No intervention
    Control

    No intervention

Interventions

  • DeviceErbium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) laser

    5 Er:YAG laser therapies vaginally administered at monthly intervals

    Also known as: Fotona

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q)

    Physical examination

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Short Form (PFDI)

    Total score is calculated by adding the scores of 3 scales (Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI)-6, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI)-6 and Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI)-8) with a possible range from 0 to 300. Each scale-item could receive values from 0 to 4 applying to a score ranging from 0 to 100 for each scale. The higher the score the more intense are the symptoms.

    Time frame: Change from baseline το 4-6 months

  2. International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire-Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS)

    It is a 12-items questionnaire evaluating nocturia, urgency, bladder pain, frequency, hesitancy, straining, intermittency, urinary incontinence (UI) (urge, stress and unexplained), frequency of urinary incontinence and nocturnal enuresis. Filling, voiding and incontinence symptoms subscales range from 0 to 15, 0 to 12 and 0 to 20, respectively. Additionally, it evaluates impact of individual symptoms with bothering scales that are not incorporated in the overall scores.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-6 months

  3. Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short Form

    Includes 3 domains (incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ) and Colorectal-anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ) with overall 21-items (7 items in each domain). The total score of PFIQ-7 ranges from 0 to 300 (each domain may receive scores from 0 to 100). The highest the score the greater is the impact

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-6 months

  4. Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire Short form

    It includes 12 items corresponding to behavioral-emotive, physical and partner related domains. Likert scale ranging from always (0 score) to never (4 score) is encompassed. Scores are obtained for all domains individually. The sum of all scores create a total PISQ score. PISQ total score range from 0-125. Higher values indicate better sexual functioning.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 4-6 months

  5. Patients Global Impression of Improvement

    It is a single-item questionnaire aiming to evaluate patients impression of improvement following therapeutic intervention.

    Time frame: 4-6 months

  6. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    Women will be asked to keep a diary reporting any adverse events occuring.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months post-treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Urogynecological Unit of Alexandra Hospital
    Athens, 11528, Greece
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Athanasiou S, Pitsouni E, Cardozo L, Zacharakis D, Petrakis E, Loutradis D, Grigoriadis T. Can pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women be treated with laser therapy? Climacteric. 2021 Feb;24(1):101-106. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1789092. Epub 2020 Jul 28. PubMed 32720552 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2019, 13 months after the start.

Of 19 interventional studies with no phase under Cystocele, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 76. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 13, 2018
First posted
Oct 22, 2018
StartActual
Nov 30, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2019
CompletionEst.
Jan 2020
Last update
Sep 17, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03714607
Responsible party
Themos Grigoriadis (Assistant Professor, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 22, 2018
Start date
Nov 30, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2019

Study contacts

Stavros Athanasiou, Associate Proffesor
study director · National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion