CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03687502Updated Sep 8, 2023Results posted

The Role of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in Appendicitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres in Acute Appendicitis, sponsored by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-08.

Sponsored by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
37
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
8 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study seeks to determine the efficacy of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in improving the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children, when compared to the standard grey-scale ultrasound.

Read the detailed description

This will be a single-center, non-randomized trial that will add to our institution's current diagnostic algorithm using Contrast Enhanced Ultra Sound (CEUS) in subjects who are clinically suspicious for acute appendicitis.

For those who consent to study participation, we propose obtaining a CEUS after the initial gray-scale ultrasound. Once the initial ultrasound is complete, the contrast Lumason® (sulfur hexafluoride lipid type-A microspheres) will be administered through an already existing IV catheter and an abdominal scan will be completed. The patient will then continue with standard of care treatment per his treating physician. The CEUS image will be read at a future time by a Children's Mercy Hospital radiologist blinded to the results of the gray scale ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scan if one was obtained; these will be used for comparison.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Appendicitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Appendicitis

412 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 62 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 37 is below the median of 111 across 246 interventional studies indexed under Appendicitis.

Browse Appendicitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City is the lead sponsor of 209 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Present to Children's Mercy Adele Hall campus with a clinical concern for acute appendicitis
  • Age 8 through 17 years
  • seen between Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval date and 12/31/2019
  • Seen Monday- Friday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 pm
  • Has had an IV catheter placed as part of their standard of care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known cardiac abnormality
  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Known sensitivity to sulfur hexafluoride, polyethylene glycol 4000, distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC), dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol sodium (DPPG-Na), or palmitic acid
  • Does not had an IV catheter placed
  • Unable to roll over
  • Unable to assent
  • Pregnant
  • Lactating
  • Received an ultrasound image from a referring facility
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    IV sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres, 0.03 mL/kg, up to 2 doses per examination, total dose not to exceed 4.8 mL. Single examination per patient.

    Drug: Sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres

Interventions

  • DrugSulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres

    Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound of the appendix

    Also known as: Lumason

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Children With an Accurate Diagnosis of Appendicitis.

    Number of children with an accurate diagnosis of appendicitis when compared to the standard grey scale ultrasound and/ or CT scan based on the following categories: Category 1: Normal appendix Category 2: Appendix not fully visualized without secondary signs Category 3: Appendix not fully visualized with secondary signs Category 4: Appendicitis

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Definitive Diagnosis

    Proportion of children with definitive diagnosis of appendicitis with use of CEUS.

    Time frame: 1 week

  2. Number of Participants Who Required Additional CT Scan

    "Number of Participants who Required Additional CT Scan"

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Percentage of Negative Appendectomies

    Percentage of negative appendectomies

    Time frame: 1 week

  4. Total Cost Difference Compared to Traditional Ultrasound

    Costs in comparison to traditional ultrasound

    Time frame: 60 days

  5. Total Cost Difference Between Traditional Ultrasound in Comparison to Costs in CT Scan.

    Comparing total costs difference between traditional ultrasound in comparison to costs in CT scan. Total CT Scan Costs - Total Ultrasound Costs = Cost Difference.

    Time frame: 60 days

07

Results

Posted Dec 1, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExperimental
Started37
Completed35
Not completed2
Withdrew: Iv was removed prior to radiology visit for ultrasound1
Withdrew: Lumason not available1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Children With an Accurate Diagnosis of Appendicitis.

Number of children with an accurate diagnosis of appendicitis when compared to the standard grey scale ultrasound and/ or CT scan based on the following categories: Category 1: Normal appendix Category 2: Appendix not fully visualized without secondary signs Category 3: Appendix not fully visualized with secondary signs Category 4: Appendicitis

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Children With an Accurate Diagnosis of Appendicitis.
ParticipantsContrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
Category 16
Category 215
Category 31
Category 413
SecondaryDefinitive Diagnosis

Proportion of children with definitive diagnosis of appendicitis with use of CEUS.

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Definitive Diagnosis
ParticipantsContrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
Definitive Diagnosis13
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Required Additional CT Scan

"Number of Participants who Required Additional CT Scan"

Time frame:
30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Required Additional CT Scan
ParticipantsExperimental
Number of Participants Who Required Additional CT Scan0
SecondaryPercentage of Negative Appendectomies

Percentage of negative appendectomies

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Negative Appendectomies
ParticipantsContrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
Percentage of Negative Appendectomies1
SecondaryTotal Cost Difference Compared to Traditional Ultrasound

Costs in comparison to traditional ultrasound

Time frame:
60 days
Reported as:
Number · Dollars
Total Cost Difference Compared to Traditional Ultrasound
DollarsContrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
Total Cost Difference Compared to Traditional Ultrasound16
SecondaryTotal Cost Difference Between Traditional Ultrasound in Comparison to Costs in CT Scan.

Comparing total costs difference between traditional ultrasound in comparison to costs in CT scan. Total CT Scan Costs - Total Ultrasound Costs = Cost Difference.

Time frame:
60 days
Reported as:
Number · Dollars
Total Cost Difference Between Traditional Ultrasound in Comparison to Costs in CT Scan.
DollarsContrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
Total Cost Difference Between Traditional Ultrasound in Comparison to Costs in CT Scan.6198

Adverse events

Collected over 60 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Experimental0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Subjects who completed both the greyscale and contrast enhanced ultrasound.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
<=18 years35
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
Median11.4 (10 to 14.8)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
Female20
Male15
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
White26
Black2
Hispanic3
Multiracial3
Other1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
United States35
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Mercy Kansas City
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 20, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03687502
Lead sponsor
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Responsible party
Tolulope Oyetunji (MD, Director, Health Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 27, 2018
Start date
Jan 4, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 26, 2021
Completion
Jul 5, 2022
Results posted
Dec 1, 2022
Last update
Sep 8, 2023

Study contacts

Tolulope Oyetunji, MD
principal investigator · Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion