ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07824908Updated Sep 17, 2026

Effect Of Specimen Extraction Site And Local Anesthesia On Postoperative Pain In Laparoscopic Appendectomy

An interventional study of Port-site local anesthesia infiltration and Port-Site Saline Infiltration (Placebo) in Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Appendicitis Acute and Pain Management, sponsored by YUNUS YÜKSEL. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by YUNUS YÜKSEL · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2026, registered Sep 2026).
  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized study is to evaluate the effects of two different specimen extraction sites (periumbilical versus left lower quadrant) and the routine application of port-site local anesthesia infiltration on postoperative pain and complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis."

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical trial is to investigate the clinical impact of two different specimen extraction sites (periumbilical versus left lower quadrant) on postoperative pain. Additionally, the study evaluates the efficacy of routine preemptive local anesthesia infiltration at all trocar sites. Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy are randomly allocated into four parallel groups based on the extraction site and the administration of local anesthesia. The primary objective is to compare local and regional pain scores at the extraction and non-extraction port sites, assessed via the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at the 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes include total postoperative analgesic consumption, operative duration, length of hospital stay."

02

Conditions studied

  • Appendectomy, Laparoscopic
  • Appendicitis Acute
  • Pain Management

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • appendicitis acute
  • appendectomy laparoscopic
  • pain management
  • extraction site
03

In context

Appendicitis

419 studies on the registry are indexed under Appendicitis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 111 across 252 interventional studies indexed under Appendicitis.

Browse Appendicitis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with YUNUS YÜKSEL as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • Diagnosed with acute appendicitis
  • Scheduled for emergency laparoscopic appendectomy
  • obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conversion to open surgery
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Cognitive impairment or inability to understand the NRS scoring system
  • Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Left Lower Quadrant Extraction - Local Anesthesia

    Specimen is extracted from the left lower quadrant port. Local anesthesia infiltration is applied to all port sites.

    Drug: Port-site local anesthesia infiltration

  • Experimental
    Periumbilical Extraction - Local Anesthesia

    Specimen is extracted from the periumblical port. Local anesthesia infiltration is applied to all port sites.

    Drug: Port-site local anesthesia infiltration

  • Active comparator
    Left Lower Quadrant Extraction - No Local Anesthesia

    Specimen is extracted from the left lower quadrant port. No local anesthesia is infiltrated to the port sites

    Other: Port-Site Saline Infiltration (Placebo)

  • Active comparator
    Periumbilical Extraction - No Local Anesthesia

    Specimen is extracted from the periumblical port. No local anesthesia is infiltrated to the port sites

    Other: Port-Site Saline Infiltration (Placebo)

Interventions

  • DrugPort-site local anesthesia infiltration

    Infiltration of local anesthetic solution (bupivacaine) into the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and fascial layers of all trocar sites prior to closure

  • OtherPort-Site Saline Infiltration (Placebo)

    Prior to wound closure, a total of 10 cc of %0.9 normal saline solution is infiltrated into the skin, subcutaneous tissues, and fascial layers of all trocar sites as a placebo control

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Score at the Specimen Extraction Site

    Evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

    Time frame: Postoperative 8th hour.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Scores at Subsequent Time Points

    Postoperative regional pain assessed at the specimen extraction site and non-extraction port sites using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain)

    Time frame: Postoperative 2th, 4th, 12th, and 24th hours.

  2. Total Postoperative Analgesic Consumption

    The total amount of rescue analgesic medication (specifically the cumulative dose of tramadol/contramal required by the patient) administered during the first 24 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours

  3. Length of Hospital Stay

    The total duration of the patient's hospitalization, measured from the time of admission to the general surgery ward post-surgery until the time of official hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From postoperative admission to the general surgery ward until hospital discharge.

  4. Operative Duration

    The total surgical duration, measured in minutes from the initial skin incision to final wound closure.

    Time frame: From initial skin incision to final wound closure (intraoperatively).

  5. Total Intraoperative Insufflation Gas Volume

    The total volume of carbon dioxide gas used for pneumoperitoneum throughout the surgical procedure, recorded in liters from the insufflator device.

    Time frame: From initiation of pneumoperitoneum until completion of the surgical procedure.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 7 months after the start.

Of 89 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Appendicitis, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 91 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 6, 2026
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
StartActual
Apr 24, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2026
Last update
Sep 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07824908
Lead sponsor
YUNUS YÜKSEL
Responsible party
YUNUS YÜKSEL (General Surgery Resident, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
Start date
Apr 24, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion