An interventional study of Gaze stabilization exercises and Optokinetic training in Nystagmus and Optokinetic Nystagmus, sponsored by Foundation University Islamabad. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.
Sponsored by Foundation University Islamabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study compares the effectiveness of Gaze Stabilization Exercises and Optokinetic Training in improving dizziness, balance, and confidence in individuals with peripheral vestibular disorders.
Peripheral vestibular disorders (PVD) commonly cause dizziness, postural instability, and decreased balance confidence, which increase the risk of falls and limit participation in daily activities. Vestibular rehabilitation is widely used to manage these symptoms. Among rehabilitation approaches, Gaze Stabilization Exercises (GSE) aim to improve vestibulo-ocular reflex function, while Optokinetic Training (OKT) promotes symptom habituation through visual motion stimulation. However, the comparative effectiveness of these two interventions remains unclear.
This study aims to compare the effects of GSE and OKT on dizziness severity, postural stability, and balance confidence in individuals with peripheral vestibular disorders. Participants will undergo intervention sessions three times per week for six weeks. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (week 3), and post-intervention (week 6).
Primary and secondary outcomes will include the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Data will be analyzed using SPSS statistical software. It is hypothesized that both interventions will improve dizziness, balance, and confidence, though differences in effectiveness may exist between the two approaches.
The findings of this study are expected to contribute to evidence-based vestibular rehabilitation by identifying effective intervention strategies. The results may help clinicians design personalized rehabilitation programs aimed at reducing fall risk, improving functional mobility, and enhancing quality of life in individuals with peripheral vestibular disorders.
27 studies on the registry are indexed under Nystagmus, Pathologic; 3 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 48 across 17 interventional studies indexed under Nystagmus, Pathologic.
Browse Nystagmus, Pathologic studies →Foundation University Islamabad is the lead sponsor of 255 studies on the registry; 142 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Purpose: Enhance gaze stability, postural control, and confidence in functional activities. Description: Week 1: Sitting, VOR x1 horizontal, fixate on near target - start gaze stability. Week 2: Sitting, VOR x1 vertical, near/far target - increase head speed. Week 3: Standing, VOR x1 horizontal, fixate on target - improve upright balance. Week 4: Standing, VOR x1 with busy background - challenge visual-vestibular interaction. Week 5: Standing, VOR x2 horizontal/vertical - advanced gaze stabilization. Week 6: Standing, VOR x2 with busy background - integrate dynamic visual input.
Procedure: Gaze stabilization exercises
Purpose: Reduce visually induced dizziness, enhance balance, and improve confidence in daily activities. Description: Week 1: Horizontal stripes Week 2: Vertical motion Week 3: Real-world videos Week 4: Crowded/busy scenes Week 5: Moving environment + light movement Week 6: Provocative videos (spirals/crowded)
Procedure: Optokinetic training
The control group received gaze stabilization exercises for 6 weeks, comprising 18 supervised sessions conducted three times weekly. Training included VOR x1 and VOR x2 exercises in horizontal and vertical planes using near and far visual targets. Exercises progressed from sitting to standing positions and from simple to visually busy backgrounds. Each session also included balance training activities such as weight shifts, tandem stance, pivot turns, and walking with head movements, with rest periods provided as needed.
The experimental group underwent optokinetic training for 6 weeks with 18 supervised sessions conducted three times weekly. Participants were exposed to progressively challenging moving visual stimuli, including distortion patterns, busy street scenes, motorway driving videos, and chequerboard jiggle/wrap patterns. Training advanced from sitting to standing with dynamic movements as visual complexity increased. Baseline and task-specific balance exercises were incorporated into every session, with adequate rest periods provided when necessary.
Dizziness
It will be measured by using Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Score Interpretation: 0-30: Slight or Mild Handicap 31-60: Moderate Handicap 61-100: Severe Handicap
Time frame: 6 weeks
Postural Stability
It will be measured by using Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). Interpretation: ≤19 = increased fall risk 20-24 = safe ambulation Higher scores = better gait performance and dynamic balance Lower scores = impaired gait and higher fall risk
Time frame: 6 weeks
Balance Confidence
It will be measured by using Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Interpretation: \<50% = low level of physical functioning and high fall risk 50-80% = moderate level of functioning80% = high level of functioning and confidence Higher scores = greater balance confidence Lower scores = fear of falling and reduced functional independence
Time frame: 6 weeks
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Foundation University Islamabad →