ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03642470Updated Jun 3, 2021

Risk Factors of Metabolic Control in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes

An observational study in Type 1 Diabetes, sponsored by University Children's Hospital, Zurich. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-03.

Sponsored by University Children's Hospital, Zurich · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
197
Ages
7 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Type 1 diabetes is one of the most common chronic illnesses among children and adolescents. Although, intensive medical care is provided for these patients, some of them have poor metabolic control. For example, only 21% of adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the USA achieve the recommended average blood sugar concentration (HbA1c\<7.5%). This is a major problem, since chronic hyperglycemia is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in type 1 diabetes and causes several serious complications, for example kidney failure, blindness, and stroke. Therefore, the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) declared psychosocial factors, to be the most important risk factors of poor type 1 diabetes Management.

Aim: The aim of this project is to determine the most important risk factors for poor metabolic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in a cross-sectional design.

Method: The sample consists of children and adolescents (school age: 7-18 years), who were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes over a year ago, and who are in care at the University Children's Hospital of Zurich. Structured interviews are conducted with the patients and the parents are asked to fill out some questionnaires. Additionally, hair samples are collected to investigate the cortisol levels of the past 3 months. The collected data is used to investigate the impact of different psychosocial risk factors including personality and self-efficacy of the patients, stress, social support, family environment, education, and parental factors on the metabolic control (HbA1c) in pediatric patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes

Keywords

  • type 1 diabetes
  • metabolic control
  • psychosocial risk factors
  • cortisol
  • children
  • adolescents
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,614 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 586 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 197 is above the median of 121 across 769 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

University Children's Hospital, Zurich is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

primary care clinic - University Children's Hospital Zurich

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosed with type 1 diabetes over a year ago
  • in care at the University Children's Hospital of Zurich
  • German speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other severe illness that affects the diabetes management
  • severe developmental disorder
  • pregnancy
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
197 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HbA1c

    Glycated hemoglobin

    Time frame: 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. health-related quality of life (Chronic generic measure)

    Assessed by questionnaire: DISABKIDS Chronic generic measure - short version (DCGM-12; the European DISABKIDS Group, 2012). Total score range: 12-60. The higher the score, the higher the health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  2. health-related quality of life (diabetes module)

    Assessed by questionnaire: DISABKIDS diabetes module (The European DISABKIDS Group, 2012). Total score range: 10-50. The higher the score, the higher the health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  3. psychological health (Depression)

    Assessed by questionnaire: German Version of the Children's Depression Inventory (Depressionsinventar für Kinder und Jugendliche \[DIKJ\]; Stiensmeier-Pelster, Braune-Krickau, Schürmann \& Duda, 2014). Total score range: 0-58. The higher the score, the more depressed the participants are.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  4. psychological health (Trait-Anxiety)

    Assessed by questionnaire: German Version of the Trait-Anxiety Inventory for Children (Trait Angstinventar für Kinder \[STAIK-T\]; Unnewehr, Joormann, Schneider \& Margraf, 1992). Total score range: 20-60. The higher the score, the higher the trait anxiety.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  5. psychological health (Child Behavior)

    Assessed by questionnaire: German Version of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL 6-18R; Döpfner, Plück \& Kinnen, 2014). Total score range: 0-224. The higher the score, the more behavioral problems.

    Time frame: 10 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Children's Hospital Zurich
    Zurich, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Datye KA, Moore DJ, Russell WE, Jaser SS. A review of adolescent adherence in type 1 diabetes and the untapped potential of diabetes providers to improve outcomes. Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Aug;15(8):51. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0621-6. PubMed 26084580 ↗
  • Delamater AM. Psychological care of children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Sep;10 Suppl 12:175-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00580.x. No abstract available. PubMed 19754628 ↗
  • Litmanovitch E, Geva R, Rachmiel M. Short and long term neuro-behavioral alterations in type 1 diabetes mellitus pediatric population. World J Diabetes. 2015 Mar 15;6(2):259-70. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i2.259. PubMed 25789107 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2020, 24 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 3, 2018
First posted
Aug 22, 2018
StartActual
Jun 5, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 22, 2020
CompletionActual
Jun 22, 2020
Last update
Jun 3, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03642470
Lead sponsor
University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 22, 2018
Start date
Jun 5, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 22, 2020
Completion
Jun 22, 2020
Last update
Jun 3, 2021

Study contacts

Markus A Landolt, Prof. dr.
principal investigator · University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Daniel Konrad, Prof. dr.
principal investigator · University Children's Hospital, Zurich

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion