ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07325201SCOUT-CKDUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Mitigating DKA in Type 1 Diabetes for Safe Use of SGLT Inhibitors Using Dual Continuous Ketone and Glucose Monitoring.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Sotagliflozin initiation in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and Chronic Kidney Disease, sponsored by HealthPartners Institute. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by HealthPartners Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 23, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to develop and evaluate a novel diabetes ketoacidosis risk mitigation strategy to support the safe use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) therapy in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and mild to moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD). The main objectives of this study are to:

  1. Evaluate how ketone metrics differ between participants no chronic kidney disease (CKD), moderate risk CKD and high or very high-risk CKD in three time periods.
  2. Identify potentially modifiable ketosis risk factors.
  3. Use continuous dual ketone and glucose monitoring (DGK) data prior to and following treatment to determine ketosis risk factors and gain knowledge to further refine reporting of risk factors and determine which factors in the Ketone Action Plan (KAP) were most valuable.
  4. Gather information on how participants and clinicians like and use the DGK reports.

Participants will be asked to:

  • Meet with study investigators to determine if they are eligible
  • Sign written informed consent
  • Take a pregnancy test, if applicable
  • Have blood taken to assess kidney function and hemoglobin A1c
  • Take the study medication, following the study team instructions
  • Wear the study provided sensor throughout participation.
  • Complete 5 in person visits, and 11 phone check ins over a nine-month period
  • Provide feedback on their experience, usefulness of CGM/CKM reports, and the most valuable factors of the Ketone Action Plan (KAP).
Read the detailed description

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and similar medications can prevent progression of heart and kidney disease but strategies to safely use these medications in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have not yet been developed. We will conduct an open-label trial of sotagliflozin (an SGLT 1/2 inhibitor) in 80 people with T1D with no chronic kidney disease (CKD), moderate risk CKD and high or very high risk CKD. Through the use of continuous ketone monitoring, we will characterize ketone levels in both individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and T1D, compared to those with T1D without CKD, before and after starting sotagliflozin. We will improve our understanding of the risk factors for developing elevated ketone levels and optimize prevention of diabetes ketoacidosis through the development and refinement of an enhanced combined continuous glucose and ketone monitoring data visualization report.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) With Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
  • Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Diabetic Ketoacidosis
  • Ketones

Keywords

  • Type 1 Diabetes
  • Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring
  • Diabetic Ketoacidosis
  • Continuous Ketone Monitoring
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,754 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 600 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 40 across 2,820 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

HealthPartners Institute is the lead sponsor of 167 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (94%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Provision of signed and dated form.
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
  3. Males and females; Ages 18-75.
  4. Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, based on a clinical diagnosis with onset at least 3 months prior to screening.
  5. Using an automated insulin delivery system (AID) or multiple daily injections (MDI), (defined by use of rapid analogue with meals and approved long-acting analogue (e.g. detemir or glargine)).
  6. Most recent ≥25 (and within prior 12 months).
  7. 7-\<-9%.
  8. Have never used SGLT2i medications.
  9. Must be willing and able to wear a DGK device and willing to follow the study protocol.
  10. Must be able to read and speak English.
  11. Use of adequate for the duration of the study be the women of .
  12. Access to necessary resources for participating in a technology-based intervention (i.e., computer, smartphone, internet access).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant or unwillingness to be on during the trial.
  2. Any form of diabetes other than T1D.
  3. Any history of use of sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors and use of other non-insulin glucose lowering medication within the last 6 months.
  4. Chronic systemic (>4 consecutive weeks) within 6 months before screening or planned use during the study period.
  5. History of diabetic ketoacidosis within 3 months of screening or 2 or more episodes of DKA within the last year.
  6. History of multiple (≥ 3 infections) genital mycotic or bacterial infections within 6 months of screening or any history of necrotizing fasciitis.
  7. Hypotension at screening as defined as, systolic blood pressure \< 90 and diastolic blood pressure \< 60 with symptoms of low blood pressure (confusion, dizziness, lightheadedness, fainting, heart palpitations).
  8. History of a level 3 hypoglycemic event (as defined by ADA criteria) within 3 months of screening.
  9. Recent myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure within 3 months prior to screening.
  10. Class IV heart failure.
  11. estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<25 mL/min/1.73m2.
  12. Impairment of systems and organs that may increase their risk of participating in the intervention study or compromise the results (for example: end stage kidney disease, active liver dysfunction, gastroparesis, anemia, organ transplant).
  13. Active or C, or tuberculosis.
  14. Abnormal liver function at screening defined as any of the following: (AST) >2X reference range (ULN), ALT >2X ULN, serum total (TB) >1.5X ULN.
  15. History of severe acquired immune deficiency syndrome or (HIV) infection or severely status, in the opinion of the investigator, including, but not limited to patients who have undergone organ or bone marrow transplantation. HIV positive patients who are on stable immunosuppressive therapy and have undetectable viral load may be eligible for inclusion in the study, subject to the investigator's discretion.
  16. Current or past history of decompensated cirrhosis (defined as variceal bleeding, ascites or hepatic encephalopathy), and/or known diagnosis of cirrhosis.
  17. Cancer treatment (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer treated by excision, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or uterus, ductal breast cancer in situ, resected non- breast or prostate cancer) within one year of screening.
  18. History of kidney transplant.
  19. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) from a known cause other than T1D.
  20. Current or history of an eating disorder.
  21. \<22 at time of screening.
  22. Adherence to a very low carbohydrate or ketogenic diet (\<100g carbohydrate /day) and unwilling to change during study participation.
  23. History of foot amputation.
  24. Non-healing wounds of extremities.
  25. Documented medical adhesive allergy, as evaluated by investigator.
  26. Inability to perform the study follow up or unwilling to wear the DGK device.
  27. Heavy alcohol use (for men, ≥5 drinks on any day or ≥15 drinks per week; for women, ≥4 drinks on any day or ≥8 drinks per week) at screening, history of alcohol use disorder or binge drinking.
  28. Participation in another treatment or intervention study within the past six weeks.
  29. Any condition or factor that would compromise the participant's safety or conduct of the study (for example: cognitive impairment, bipolar disorder, or eating disorder) or any other reason the PI deems that the patient should not be included.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sotagliflozin

    In this single arm trial, all patients will be started on sotagliflozin at a dose of 200mg/d. After 3 months of sotagliflozin 200 mg/d, patients who do not achieve good glycemic control (TIR \>60%) and who have moderate or no CKD (eGFR \>60) will be offered the option to increase sotagliflozin to 400mg/d. All other participants will continue taking 200 mg sotagliflozin daily.

    Drug: Sotagliflozin initiation

Interventions

  • DrugSotagliflozin initiation

    All patients will be started on sotagliflozin at a dose of 200mg/d. After 3 months of sotagliflozin 200 mg/d, patients who do not achieve good glycemic control (TIR \>60%) and who have moderate or no CKD (eGFR \>60) will be offered the option to increase sotagliflozin to 400mg/d. The decision to increase sotagliflozin dose will be a shared decision between the study subject and the study investigators. All other participants will continue taking 200 mg sotagliflozin daily. After completing all study visits, all participants will stop taking sotagliflozin and continue care with their healthcare provider(s).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in time in ketone range >1.5/mmol/L

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  2. Number of episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in mean ketone level

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  2. Highest ketone level in time period

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  3. Number of severe hypoglycemia episodes

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

  4. Number of episodes (>=15 minutes) at >1.5 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  5. Number of prolonged episodes (>=2 hours) at >1.5 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  6. Change in time in ketone level >3.0/mmol/L

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  7. Number of episodes (>=15 minutes) at >3.0 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  8. Number of prolonged episodes (>=2 hours) at >3.0 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  9. Change in time in ketone level >2.5/mmol/L

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  10. Number of episodes (>=15 minutes) at >2.5 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  11. Number of prolonged episodes (>=2 hours) at >2.5 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  12. Change in time in ketone level >2.0/mmol/L

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  13. Number of episodes (>=15 minutes) at >2.0 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  14. Number of prolonged episodes (>=2 hours) at >2.0 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  15. Change in time in ketone level >1.0/mmol/L

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  16. Number of episodes (>=15 minutes) at >1.0 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  17. Number of prolonged episodes (>=2 hours) at >1.0 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  18. Change in time in ketone level >0.6/mmol/L

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  19. Number of episodes (>=15 minutes) at >0.6 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  20. Number of prolonged episodes (>=2 hours) at >0.6 mmol/L

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

Other outcomes

  1. Change in HbA1c

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  2. Change in CGM metrics

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  3. Change in insulin total daily dose (TDD)

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  4. Change in carbohydrate intake

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  5. Report of any symptoms related to elevated ketones

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  6. Report of any use of Ketone Action Plan

    Time frame: 6 months, 9 months

  7. Change in extent of renal disease

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

  8. Change in other renal disease indicators

    Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bergenstal RM. Continuous glucose monitoring: transforming diabetes management step by step. Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1334-1336. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30290-3. Epub 2018 Feb 16. No abstract available. PubMed 29459022 ↗
  • Maines E, Pertile R, Cauvin V, Soffiati M, Franceschi R. Glucose metrics improvement in youths with type 1 diabetes using the Ambulatory Glucose Profile report: A real-world study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Jun;212:111720. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111720. Epub 2024 May 24. PubMed 38797262 ↗
  • Huang J, Yeung AM, Bergenstal RM, Castorino K, Cengiz E, Dhatariya K, Niu I, Sherr JL, Umpierrez GE, Klonoff DC. Update on Measuring Ketones. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May;18(3):714-726. doi: 10.1177/19322968231152236. Epub 2023 Feb 16. PubMed 36794812 ↗
  • Goldenberg RM, Gilbert JD, Hramiak IM, Woo VC, Zinman B. Sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors, their role in type 1 diabetes treatment and a risk mitigation strategy for preventing diabetic ketoacidosis: The STOP DKA Protocol. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Oct;21(10):2192-2202. doi: 10.1111/dom.13811. Epub 2019 Jun 30. PubMed 31183975 ↗
  • Garg SK, Peters AL, Buse JB, Danne T. Strategy for Mitigating DKA Risk in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Adjunctive Treatment with SGLT Inhibitors: A STICH Protocol. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Sep;20(9):571-575. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0246. Epub 2018 Aug 21. No abstract available. PubMed 30129772 ↗
  • Chow E, Clement S, Garg R. Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis in the era of SGLT-2 inhibitors. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Oct;11(5):e003666. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003666. PubMed 37797963 ↗
  • Wolfsdorf JI, Ratner RE. SGLT Inhibitors for Type 1 Diabetes: Proceed With Extreme Caution. Diabetes Care. 2019 Jun;42(6):991-993. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0008. No abstract available. PubMed 31110116 ↗
  • Ramphul K, Joynauth J. An Update on the Incidence and Burden of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2020 Dec;43(12):e196-e197. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1258. Epub 2020 Oct 13. No abstract available. PubMed 33051332 ↗
  • Charleer S, Mathieu C, Nobels F, De Block C, Radermecker RP, Hermans MP, Taes Y, Vercammen C, T'Sjoen G, Crenier L, Fieuws S, Keymeulen B, Gillard P; RESCUE Trial Investigators. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control, Acute Admissions, and Quality of Life: A Real-World Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Mar 1;103(3):1224-1232. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02498. PubMed 29342264 ↗
  • Yau K, Dharia A, Alrowiyti I, Cherney DZI. Prescribing SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With CKD: Expanding Indications and Practical Considerations. Kidney Int Rep. 2022 May 5;7(7):1463-1476. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.04.094. eCollection 2022 Jul. PubMed 35812300 ↗
  • Simonson GD, Criego AB, Battelino T, Carlson AL, Choudhary P, Franc S, Gershenoff D, Grunberger G, Hirsch IB, Isaacs D, Johnson ML, Kerr D, Kruger DF, Mathieu C, Martens TW, Nimri R, Oser SM, Peters AL, Weinstock RS, Wright EE, Wysham CH, Bergenstal RM. Expert Panel Recommendations for a Standardized Ambulatory Glucose Profile Report for Connected Insulin Pens. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Nov;26(11):814-822. doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0107. Epub 2024 Jun 10. PubMed 38758213 ↗
  • Mullen DM, Bergenstal R, Criego A, Arnold KC, Goland R, Richter S. Time Savings Using a Standardized Glucose Reporting System and Ambulatory Glucose Profile. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 May;12(3):614-621. doi: 10.1177/1932296817740592. Epub 2017 Nov 24. PubMed 29169243 ↗
  • Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T, Beck RW, Bissen J, Buckingham B, Deeb L, Dolin RH, Garg SK, Goland R, Hirsch IB, Klonoff DC, Kruger DF, Matfin G, Mazze RS, Olson BA, Parkin C, Peters A, Powers MA, Rodriguez H, Southerland P, Strock ES, Tamborlane W, Wesley DM. Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the ambulatory glucose profile. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 1;7(2):562-78. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700234. PubMed 23567014 ↗
  • Bergenstal RM. Roadmap to the Effective Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Innovation, Investigation, and Implementation. Diabetes Spectr. 2023 Fall;36(4):327-336. doi: 10.2337/dsi23-0005. Epub 2023 Nov 15. PubMed 37982061 ↗
  • Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Cheng P, Kollman C, Carlson AL, Johnson ML, Rodbard D. The Relationships Between Time in Range, Hyperglycemia Metrics, and HbA1c. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jul;13(4):614-626. doi: 10.1177/1932296818822496. Epub 2019 Jan 13. PubMed 30636519 ↗
  • Bergenstal RM, Bode BW, Bhargava A, Wang Q, Knights AW, Chang AM. Assessing Time in Range with Postprandial Glucose-Focused Titration of Ultra Rapid Lispro (URLi) in People with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2023 Nov;14(11):1933-1945. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01476-4. Epub 2023 Sep 23. PubMed 37740871 ↗
  • Bergenstal RM, Mullen DM, Strock E, Johnson ML, Xi MX. Randomized comparison of self-monitored blood glucose (BGM) versus continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data to optimize glucose control in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2022 Mar;36(3):108106. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.108106. Epub 2021 Dec 31. PubMed 35131155 ↗
  • Zhang JY, Shang T, Koliwad SK, Klonoff DC. Continuous Ketone Monitoring: A New Paradigm for Physiologic Monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jul;15(4):775-780. doi: 10.1177/19322968211009860. Epub 2021 Apr 9. PubMed 33834884 ↗
  • Bergenstal RM, Simonson GD, Heinemann L. More Green, Less Red: How Color Standardization May Facilitate Effective Use of CGM Data. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jan;16(1):3-6. doi: 10.1177/19322968211053341. Epub 2021 Oct 28. No abstract available. PubMed 34711063 ↗
  • Tecce N, de Alteriis G, de Alteriis G, Verde L, Tecce MF, Colao A, Muscogiuri G. Harnessing the Synergy of SGLT2 Inhibitors and Continuous Ketone Monitoring (CKM) in Managing Heart Failure among Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;12(7):753. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070753. PubMed 38610175 ↗
  • Virdi N, Poon Y, Abaniel R, Bergenstal RM. Prevalence, Cost, and Burden of Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Jun;25(S3):S75-S84. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0149. PubMed 37306442 ↗
  • Danne T, Garg S, Peters AL, Buse JB, Mathieu C, Pettus JH, Alexander CM, Battelino T, Ampudia-Blasco FJ, Bode BW, Cariou B, Close KL, Dandona P, Dutta S, Ferrannini E, Fourlanos S, Grunberger G, Heller SR, Henry RR, Kurian MJ, Kushner JA, Oron T, Parkin CG, Pieber TR, Rodbard HW, Schatz D, Skyler JS, Tamborlane WV, Yokote K, Phillip M. International Consensus on Risk Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter (SGLT) Inhibitors. Diabetes Care. 2019 Jun;42(6):1147-1154. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2316. Epub 2019 Feb 6. PubMed 30728224 ↗
  • Garg SK, Henry RR, Banks P, Buse JB, Davies MJ, Fulcher GR, Pozzilli P, Gesty-Palmer D, Lapuerta P, Simo R, Danne T, McGuire DK, Kushner JA, Peters A, Strumph P. Effects of Sotagliflozin Added to Insulin in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14;377(24):2337-2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708337. Epub 2017 Sep 13. PubMed 28899222 ↗
  • Buse JB, Garg SK, Rosenstock J, Bailey TS, Banks P, Bode BW, Danne T, Kushner JA, Lane WS, Lapuerta P, McGuire DK, Peters AL, Reed J, Sawhney S, Strumph P. Sotagliflozin in Combination With Optimized Insulin Therapy in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The North American inTandem1 Study. Diabetes Care. 2018 Sep;41(9):1970-1980. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0343. Epub 2018 Jun 24. PubMed 29937430 ↗
  • Heerspink HJL, Stefansson BV, Correa-Rotter R, Chertow GM, Greene T, Hou FF, Mann JFE, McMurray JJV, Lindberg M, Rossing P, Sjostrom CD, Toto RD, Langkilde AM, Wheeler DC; DAPA-CKD Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1436-1446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816. Epub 2020 Sep 24. PubMed 32970396 ↗
  • Bailey CJ, Day C, Bellary S. Renal Protection with SGLT2 Inhibitors: Effects in Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease. Curr Diab Rep. 2022 Jan;22(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01442-z. Epub 2022 Feb 3. PubMed 35113333 ↗
  • Clegg LE, Heerspink HJL, Penland RC, Tang W, Boulton DW, Bachina S, Fox RD, Fenici P, Thuresson M, Mentz RJ, Hernandez AF, Holman RR. Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk and Improved Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate by SGLT2 Inhibitors, Including Dapagliflozin, Is Consistent Across the Class: An Analysis of the Placebo Arm of EXSCEL. Diabetes Care. 2019 Feb;42(2):318-326. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1871. Epub 2018 Dec 6. PubMed 30523029 ↗
  • Menne J, Dumann E, Haller H, Schmidt BMW. Acute kidney injury and adverse renal events in patients receiving SGLT2-inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 9;16(12):e1002983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002983. eCollection 2019 Dec. PubMed 31815931 ↗
  • Heerspink HJ, Perkins BA, Fitchett DH, Husain M, Cherney DZ. Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Cardiovascular and Kidney Effects, Potential Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications. Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):752-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021887. Epub 2016 Jul 28. PubMed 27470878 ↗
  • Neal B, Perkovic V, Matthews DR. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 23;377(21):2099. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1712572. No abstract available. PubMed 29166232 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Steering committee will agree upon a publication and NIH Public Access Policy

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Feb 2029, 25 months later.

Of 83 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, half reached primary completion within 51 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 76. This study's planned 25 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 133 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 63.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Jan 2027, on Oct 23, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 6, 2026
First posted
Jan 8, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 2027was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2029
CompletionEst.
Feb 2030
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Sep 2026→Jan 2027
Oct 23, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • International Diabetes Center · Minneapolis, United StatesContact •••3452→•••3452
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    Start date Sep 2026→Jan 2027
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • International Diabetes Center · Minneapolis, United StatesContact •••3452→•••3452
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07325201
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 8, 2026
Start date
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Kelsea Forrester, Dietitian
Contact
kelsea.r.forrester@healthpartners.com
1-952-993-2755
Rebecca Passi
Contact
rebecca.a.passi@healthpartners.com
1-952-993-3452
Richard Bergenstal, MD
principal investigator · HealthPartners/Park Nicollet International Diabetes Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion