CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07415577SwisskeraUpdated May 26, 2026

The Use of Cultured (Dermal) Epithelial Autografts in Severely Burned Patients

An observational study in Burn Degree Second, Burn Degree Third and Skin Transplantation, sponsored by University Children's Hospital, Zurich. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in Switzerland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-26.

Sponsored by University Children's Hospital, Zurich · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
236
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Swisskera project is a multicenter follow-up study at the three Swiss burn centers evaluating long-term outcomes after burn wound coverage with lab-grown epithelial grafts, specifically cultured epithelial autograft (CEA) and, where applicable, cultured dermal-epidermal autograft (CDEA). Patients who received CEA/CDEA between 1985 and 2023 will be invited for a study visit , using available clinical records and standardized long-term scar and skin assessments.

Long-term skin quality will be evaluated by comparing the previously transplanted area with a matched healthy skin reference site using non-invasive measurements (e.g., thickness, transepidermal water loss, hydration, elasticity, and color). Optional small punch biopsies may be obtained from transplanted areas (under local anesthesia or during clinically indicated anesthesia) for histological and immunohistochemical characterization of scar tissue remodeling, including collagen and elastin architecture, vascularization, nerve fiber ingrowth, inflammatory cell patterns, and melanocyte distribution.

Read the detailed description

The Swisskera project is a multicenter, observational long-term outcomes study conducted at the three Swiss burn centers. It evaluates scar and skin quality after burn wound coverage with lab-grown keratinocyte-based grafts, specifically cultured epithelial autograft (CEA) and, where applicable, cultured dermal-epidermal autograft (CDEA). Eligible patients are those who sustained a burn injury and were treated with CEA and/or CDEA since the introduction of CEA in Switzerland (1985-2023). Participants are invited for a dedicated study visit. The study uses routinely collected clinical data (at minimum demographics and date/time of CEA/CDEA transplantation) together with standardized long-term clinical and instrument-based assessments. Participation requires written informed consent from the patient or an authorized legal representative; patients who decline participation or cannot attend a study visit (at a study site or at home) are excluded.

At the study visit, long-term scar and skin quality are quantified using within-subject comparisons between the previously transplanted CEA/CDEA area and a comparable healthy skin reference site. The Primary Endpoint is the long term skin and scar quality evaluated by the POSAS. Non-invasive measurements are performed with the DermaLab Combo® system and include skin thickness, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), hydration, elasticity, and colorimetry, each recorded in the transplanted area and compared to the matched healthy site to characterize residual functional and aesthetic differences many years after transplantation.

In addition, participants may opt into a minimally invasive tissue assessment. Optional 4-mm punch biopsies can be taken from previously CEA-transplanted skin for histological and immunohistochemical analyses of long-term tissue remodeling. Biopsies are performed under local anesthesia or during clinically indicated general anesthesia/analgosedation if the participant is undergoing such anesthesia for other reasons. Histological endpoints include collagen fiber density and deposition pattern, elastin fiber density, vascular development and pattern, nerve fiber ingrowth, inflammatory/immunological cell presence and distribution (e.g., granulocytes and macrophages), and melanocyte presence/distribution. Together, the clinical record review, standardized non-invasive skin measurements, and optional tissue-level analyses aim to provide a comprehensive characterization of long-term outcomes after CEA/CDEA treatment in Switzerland.

02

Conditions studied

  • Burn Degree Second
  • Burn Degree Third
  • Skin Transplantation
  • Full Thickness Skin Defects
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes patients treated at the three Swiss burn centers who sustained a burn injury and received grafting with cultured epithelial autograft (CEA) and/or cultured dermal-epidermal autograft (CDEA) between 1985 and 2023. Participants must have available clinical data (at minimum demographics and the date/time of CEA/CDEA transplantation) and provide written informed consent (patient or authorized legal representative). Patients are excluded if they decline participation or are unable to attend a study visit at a study site or at home.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have undergone treatment at the three Swiss burn centres and received grafts utilizing CEA since the introduction of the CEA technique in Switzerland (from 1985 to 2023) will be invited to participate in this study.
  • Availability of clinical data, including at minimum demographic information and the date and time of CEA/CDEA transplantation.
  • Signed informed consent from the patient or his/her legal representative/relatives.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of participation in the study by the patient or his/her legal representative/relatives.
  • Patients, who are, of any reason, unable to attend a study visit at one of the study sites or in their home
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
236 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Cultured Epithelial Autografts and Cultured Dermal Epithelial Autografts

    The study population comprises patients treated at the three Swiss burn centers who sustained a burn injury and underwent grafting with cultured epithelial autograft (CEA) and/or cultured dermal-epidermal autograft (CDEA) since the introduction of CEA in Switzerland (1985-2023), with available clinical data (at minimum demographics and the date/time of CEA/CDEA transplantation) and written informed consent from the patient or an authorized legal representative.

    Other: Standard of Care (SOC)

Interventions

  • OtherStandard of Care (SOC)

    Standard of Care

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Long-term outcome of scar and skin quality (POSAS)

    The primary endpoint of this study is to assess scar quality in patients who have received a CEA within the past 40 years, as measured by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Examining the incidence of skin tumours (melanoma passenger are known)

    With Dermatoscope evaluations. Additionally, suspicious skin lesions, will undergo optional dermatopathological assessment, utilizing shave or punch biopsies. If the patient chooses further dermatopathological evaluation, we will obtain the histological findings as well as the diagnostic report, and ensure they are followed up and documented.

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  2. Evaluation of the requirement of secondary reconstructive surgical procedures and/or additional coverage of the transplanted CEAs/CDEAs

    The need for secondary surgery due to instable scars, hypertrophic scaring or contractures and replacement.

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  3. Medical history

    Evaluation of relevant medical history that might influence the skin and scar quality today, such as accidents, chronic illness or substance abuse.

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  4. Sensibility (2-point discrimination)

    Sensibility testing by 2-point discrimination focusing on comparing the sensibility difference between the transplanted CEA/CDEA area and the adjacent healthy skin. Unit of Measure: mm

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  5. Sensibility (Vibration)

    Sensibility testing by vibration with a Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork focusing on comparing the sensibility difference between the transplanted CEA/CDEA area and the adjacent healthy skin. Unit of measure: Hz

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  6. Sensibility (Temperature perception)

    Participants will report perceived warm and cold sensibility in the transplanted CEA/CDEA area compared with adjacent healthy skin (e.g., reduced, unchanged, or increased). Unit of measure: Categorical (reduced / unchanged / increased)

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  7. Sensibility (Pain perception)

    Monofilament touch will be applied to the transplanted CEA/CDEA area and to adjacent healthy skin. Participants will rate how strongly they perceive the stimulus on a numeric rating scale from 1 (not perceived/very weak) to 10 (very strong). The outcome is the within-participant difference in ratings (transplanted minus healthy). Unit of measure: Numeric rating scale (1-10)

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  8. Skin Thickness (DermaScan)

    The Dermascan will be used to measure the thickness of the dermal skin layer. Unit of Measure: mm

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  9. Skin thickness (DermaLab Combo®)

    Skin thickness will be measured in the transplanted CEA/CDEA area and at a matched adjacent healthy skin reference site. The outcome is the within-participant difference (transplanted minus healthy). Unit of Measure: mm

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  10. Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

    Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be evaluated using the Short Form-12 (SF-12),a shorter version from the SF-36, which is a for burn cohorts validated score. The score will undergo comparison with a control group matched for gender and age, utilizing established norm values from the University of Lucerne. If a significant variance is identified, it will be further analyzed and compared with HRQoL data from analogous studies in the existing literature (to be defined).

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  11. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) difference (DermaLab Combo®)

    Description: TEWL will be measured in the transplanted area and at a matched healthy reference site. The outcome is the within-participant difference (transplanted minus healthy). Unit of Measure: g/m²/h

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  12. Skin hydration difference (DermaLab Combo®)

    Description: Hydration will be measured in the transplanted area and at a matched healthy reference site. The outcome is the within-participant difference (transplanted minus healthy). Unit of Measure: Arbitrary units (device output)

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  13. Skin elasticity difference (DermaLab Combo®)

    Description: Elasticity will be measured in the transplanted area and at a matched healthy reference site. The outcome is the within-participant difference (transplanted minus healthy). Unit of Measure: Arbitrary units (device output)

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  14. Erythema index difference (DermaLab Combo®)

    Erythema index will be measured in the transplanted area and at a matched healthy reference site. The outcome is the within-participant difference (transplanted minus healthy). Unit of Measure: Index units (device output)

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  15. Melanin index difference (DermaLab Combo®)

    Melanin index will be measured in the transplanted area and at a matched healthy reference site. The outcome is the within-participant difference (transplanted minus healthy). Unit of Measure: Index units (device output)

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Immunhistochemical analyses

    Exploratory histology/immunohistochemistry from optional 4-mm punch biopsies collected at the on-site study visit (0-2 per participant) from transplanted skin and, when available, matched healthy skin. Analyses will characterize tissue architecture and cellular features using standard staining panels. Results will be summarized descriptively; no formal hypothesis testing is planned.

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

  2. Composite skin quality score (DermaLab Combo®) - z-score

    A unitless composite score will be calculated by standardizing each DermaLab parameter (skin thickness, TEWL, hydration, elasticity, erythema index, melanin index) to z-scores and averaging them. The outcome is the within-participant difference in the composite score (transplanted minus matched healthy reference site). Unit of Measure: Unitless (z-score composite)

    Time frame: Baseline Day 0 (= First contact with patient) Visit 1 up to 12 month after Baseline

06

Study locations

3 sites
  • University Children's Hospital Zurich
    Zurich, Canton of Zurich 8008, Switzerland
  • University Hospital Zurich
    Zurich, Canton of Zurich 8091, Switzerland
    • Bong-Sung Kim, Prof Dr. med. · Contact · bong-sung.kim@usz.ch · +41432538932
    • Bong-Sung Kim, Prof. Dr. med. · Principal investigator
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
    Lausanne, Lausanne 1005, Switzerland
    • Philippe Abdel-Sayed, PhD · Contact · philippe.abdel-sayed@chuv.ch · +41213146928
    • Anthony de Buys-Roessingh, Prof. Dr. med. · Principal investigator
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07415577
Lead sponsor
University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Collaborators
University of Zurich, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Swiss National Science Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
May 26, 2026

Study contacts

Sophie Böttcher, PD Dr. med.
Contact
sophie.boettcher@kispi.uzh.ch
+41442497228
Sophie Böttcher, PD Dr. med.
Contact
studien.plastische@kispi.uzh.ch
+41442496115

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion