ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07735260UHTUpdated Jul 29, 2026

Taping for Umbilical Hernia

An interventional study of Taping of the umbilical hernia in Umbilical Hernia, sponsored by University Children's Hospital, Zurich. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 1 Month to 3 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by University Children's Hospital, Zurich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Month to 3 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Umbilical hernias in infants are very common and in most cases disappear on their own by school age. If this does not happen, surgery may be necessary. Until then, the umbilical hernia is usually only observed and not treated. This approach is currently considered the medical standard. With this study, the investigators want to find out whether taping the umbilical hernia causes it to disappear more quickly. The investigators also want to know whether taping leads to less frequent protruding belly buttons (fewer "outies") and whether taping can cause a change in the quality of life of the parents. The investigatorsare therefore planning a study in which they will randomly divide patients into groups (observation versus taping) and examine the infants at 6 and 12 months of age. In addition to our physical examinations, the parents will each fill out a questionnaire about any stress they may be experiencing due to the umbilical hernia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Umbilical Hernia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Umbilical hernia
  • Taping
  • Observation
  • Medical tape
  • Strapping
  • Hernia strapping
  • Hernia taping
  • Hernia bracing
03

In context

Hernia, Umbilical

67 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Umbilical; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 82 is above the median of 66 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Umbilical.

Browse Hernia, Umbilical studies →

Lead sponsor

University Children's Hospital, Zurich is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Month to 3 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants with protruding umbilical hernias with a visible protrusion above the level of the abdominal wall
  • Infants over 1 month of age and under 3 months of age

    • If the patient is born prematurely (\<37 0/7 weeks) it has to also be at least 4 weeks old AND over 32 weeks postmenstrual age (see below) and younger than 52 weeks postmenstrual age (i.e. 3 months of corrected age)
  • Legal custodian gives consent to participation in study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Umbilical abnormalities, such as stump still in place, continuing wet umbilicus or umbilical granuloma
  • Premature infants younger than 32 weeks of postmenstrual age
  • Patients with known underlying skin diseases in whom taping may cause extensive skin damage, such as Epidermolysis bullosa
  • Patients after suture-less closure of gastroschisis
  • Patients in whom the umbilical tapes cannot be positioned as per study protocol, e.g. in patients with intestinal ostomies.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
82 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Patients in this group will be observed and monitored twice after randomization during the study period. This is the current medical standard for infants with an umbilical hernia.

  • Experimental
    Intervention / Taping Group

    Patients in this group receive taping of their umbilical hernia by their parents/caretakers at home and be seen twice after randomization during the study period.

    Procedure: Taping of the umbilical hernia

Interventions

  • ProcedureTaping of the umbilical hernia

    The study intervention is taping of the umbilical hernia. Patients parents of the treatment group shall be instructed by our physiotherapist on how to perform umbilical hernia taping. A parent information sheet on the standardized application of taping will be provided. Umbilical hernia taping involves reducing the prolapse beneath the level of the abdominal wall and applying multiple medical tapes to apply long-lasting and light pressure on the umbilicus as to prevent the hernia from protruding.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Umbilical hernia closure rates at 6 months

    The primary objective is to show that umbilical hernia closure rates at 6 months of age in infants with umbilical hernias undergoing umbilical taping are increased compared to the control group without taping.

    Time frame: at 6 months of age

Secondary outcomes

  1. Umbilical hernia closure rates at 12 months of age

    Time frame: At 12 months of age

  2. Occurrence of complications of umbilical hernias within the first 12 months

    Time frame: Until 12 months of age

  3. Diameter of umbilical fascial defect at all visits

    Time frame: Measured at each visit (first visit, at 6 months and at 12 months of age)

  4. Parental health-related quality of life assessed by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) Family Impact Module

    The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) Family Impact Module is scored from 0 to 100: * Highest score: 100 = better family functioning and less negative impact on the family. * Lowest score: 0 = worse family functioning and greater negative impact on the family.

    Time frame: Measured at each visit (first visit, at 6 months and at 12 months of age)

  5. Parental satisfaction of the appearance of the umbilicus after closure of the fascial ring assessed by the Infant Umbilical score

    The Infant Umbilical Score is currently under validation and assesses six aspects, each scored from 1 to 5, giving a total score ranging from 6 to 30. Higher scores indicate greater reviewer satisfaction with the appearance of the infant umbilicus.

    Time frame: Measured only if and after umbilical fascial closure occurs at either 6 or 12 months

  6. Blinded surgeons assessment of the appearance of the umbilicus after closure of the fascial ring assessed by the Infant Umbilical score

    The Infant Umbilical Score is currently under validation and assesses six aspects, each scored from 1 to 5, giving a total score ranging from 6 to 30. Higher scores indicate greater reviewer satisfaction with the appearance of the infant umbilicus.

    Time frame: at 12 months of age

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Jun 2030, 41 months later.

Of 19 interventional studies with no phase under Hernia, Umbilical, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 41 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 18, 2026
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2030
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2030
Last update
Jul 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07735260
Lead sponsor
University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 29, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Hannah R Neeser, MD
Contact
hannah.neeser@kispi.uzh.ch
+41442494949
Ueli Möhrlen
study chair · University Children's Hospital of Zurich

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion