ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03607838Updated Jul 24, 2025Results posted

SI-6603 (Condoliase) Study for Lumbar Disc Herniation (Discovery 6603 Study)

A Phase 3 interventional study of SI-6603 and Sham injection in Lumbar Disc Herniation, sponsored by Seikagaku Corporation. Completed at 67 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-24.

Sponsored by Seikagaku Corporation · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
352
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a single-dose intervertebral disc injection of SI-6603 in subjects with lumbar disc herniation (LDH)

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Disc Herniation

Keywords

  • Lumbar disc herniation
  • Radiculopathy
  • Sciatica
  • Intradiscal injection
  • Chemonucleolysis
03

In context

Intervertebral Disc Displacement

474 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement; 100 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 352 is above the median of 63 across 344 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Displacement studies →

Lead sponsor

Seikagaku Corporation is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with single-level LDH (L4-L5 or L5-S1 (or L5-L6)) with clear, demonstrable nerve root impingement as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical symptoms corresponding to position of the impaired nerve root.
  • Subjects with radiculopathy/radicular leg pain in the unilateral leg for 6 weeks or more but 1 year or less.
  • Subjects with positive result of Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test (≤70°) only on the ipsilateral leg having chief complaint of radiculopathy
  • Subjects with inadequate improvement in pain caused by LDH despite 6 weeks or more of conservative treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have 2 or more lumbar disc herniations as assessed by MRI.
  • Subjects who have undergone a lumbar operation, lumbar percutaneous nucleotomy, or lumbar intradiscal therapies at the affected level of lumbar spine.
  • Subjects who have received block procedure (e.g., spinal injection, epidural injection or nerve block) for treatment of LDH, oral or injectable within 28 days prior to randomization.
  • Subjects who have received opioids or cannabis by any route of administration, local anesthesia to the back, buttock, or posterior/lateral aspects of the affected leg within 7 days prior to randomization.
  • Subjects with a (BMI) ≥40.
  • Subjects who are receiving compensation according to the Workers' Compensation Act or are involved in personal injury litigation due to a lumbar-related injury.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
352 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SI-6603

    Condoliase: 1.25U, intradiscal injection, one time For patients in the active treatment group, a volume of 1.0 mL was administered into the intervertebral disc in a single dose.

    Drug: SI-6603

  • Sham comparator
    Sham

    Sham injection For patients in the control group, a solution was not prepared and the needle was not placed in the intervertebral disc.

    Drug: Sham injection

Interventions

  • SI-6603 will be injected into an intervertebral disc.

  • DrugSham injection

    The injection will be performed without needle placement into an intervertebral disc.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Average Worst Leg Pain Score During the Past 24 Hours Over the Previous 7 Days

    The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to Week 13 in average worst leg pain score during the past 24 hours over the previous 7 days, as assessed by 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS is a pain assessment tool with 0 mm representing an absence of pain, and 100 mm representing the worst pain patients have ever experienced.

    Time frame: baseline and 13 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Average Worst Leg Pain Score During the Past 24 Hours Over the Previous 7 Days

    One of the key secondary endpoints was the change from baseline to Week 52 in average worst leg pain score during the past 24 hours over the previous 7 days, as assessed by 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS is a pain assessment tool with 0 mm representing an absence of pain, and 100 mm representing the worst pain patients have ever experienced.

    Time frame: baseline and 52 weeks

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Herniation Volume

    One of the key secondary endpoints was change from baseline to Week 13 in herniation volume. Herniation volumes were assessed with MRI by a central imaging facility.

    Time frame: baseline and 13 weeks

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score

    One of the key secondary endpioints was change from baseline to Week 13 in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. The ODI questionnaire is designed to provide information as to how the patient's back (or leg) pain affects their ability to manage in everyday life. A higher score on the ODI indicates a more severe disability. The final index score is calculated as a percentage, with 0% indicating no disability and 100% indicating highest disability.

    Time frame: baseline and 13 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 11, 2025

Participant flow

Sixty sites screened at least 1 subject, and 41 of these sites enrolled at least 1 subject. The first participant was enrolled in November 2018 and the last participant was enrolled in March 2022.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSI-6603Sham
Started176176
Injected169172
Evaluated week 13156155
Completed135130
Not completed4146
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1420
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject138
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up611
Withdrew: Adverse event22
Withdrew: Physician decision20
Withdrew: Failure to meet randomization criteria12
Withdrew: Pregnancy10
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Due to work10
Withdrew: Litigation01
Withdrew: Temperature excursion for study drug01
Withdrew: Change of mind01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 13 in Average Worst Leg Pain Score During the Past 24 Hours Over the Previous 7 Days

The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to Week 13 in average worst leg pain score during the past 24 hours over the previous 7 days, as assessed by 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS is a pain assessment tool with 0 mm representing an absence of pain, and 100 mm representing the worst pain patients have ever experienced.

Time frame:
baseline and 13 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Average Worst Leg Pain Score During the Past 24 Hours Over the Previous 7 Days
units on a scaleSI-6603Sham
Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Average Worst Leg Pain Score During the Past 24 Hours Over the Previous 7 Days-41.7 ± 2.38-34.2 ± 2.36
Statistical analysis
  • SI-6603 vs Sham · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0263 · Mean difference (final values): -7.5 · 95% CI -14.1 to -0.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Average Worst Leg Pain Score During the Past 24 Hours Over the Previous 7 Days

One of the key secondary endpoints was the change from baseline to Week 52 in average worst leg pain score during the past 24 hours over the previous 7 days, as assessed by 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS is a pain assessment tool with 0 mm representing an absence of pain, and 100 mm representing the worst pain patients have ever experienced.

Time frame:
baseline and 52 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Average Worst Leg Pain Score During the Past 24 Hours Over the Previous 7 Days
units on a scaleSI-6603Sham
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Average Worst Leg Pain Score During the Past 24 Hours Over the Previous 7 Days-51.2 ± 2.40-44.7 ± 2.41
Statistical analysis
  • SI-6603 vs Sham · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0558 (To control family-wise error rate for multiple tests of the primary and key secondary endpoints, serial gatekeeping testing algorithm was used.) · Mean difference (final values): -6.5 · 95% CI -13.2 to 0.2
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 13 in Herniation Volume

One of the key secondary endpoints was change from baseline to Week 13 in herniation volume. Herniation volumes were assessed with MRI by a central imaging facility.

Time frame:
baseline and 13 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mm^3
Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Herniation Volume
mm^3SI-6603Sham
Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Herniation Volume-103.8 ± 10.74-78.1 ± 10.79
Statistical analysis
  • SI-6603 vs Sham · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0920 (To control family-wise error rate for multiple tests of the primary and key secondary endpoints, serial gatekeeping testing algorithm was used.) · Mean difference (final values): -25.8 · 95% CI -55.7 to 4.2
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 13 in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score

One of the key secondary endpioints was change from baseline to Week 13 in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. The ODI questionnaire is designed to provide information as to how the patient's back (or leg) pain affects their ability to manage in everyday life. A higher score on the ODI indicates a more severe disability. The final index score is calculated as a percentage, with 0% indicating no disability and 100% indicating highest disability.

Time frame:
baseline and 13 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of disability
Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score
percentage of disabilitySI-6603Sham
Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score-29.6 ± 1.38-25.4 ± 1.38
Statistical analysis
  • SI-6603 vs Sham · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0336 (To control family-wise error rate for multiple tests of the primary and key secondary endpoints, serial gatekeeping testing algorithm was used.) · Mean difference (final values): -4.2 · 95% CI -8.0 to -0.3

Adverse events

Collected over 52 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
SI-66031/167 (0.6%)7/167 (4.2%)91/167 (54.5%)
Sham0/174 (0%)6/174 (3.4%)62/174 (35.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent serious events
EventSI-6603Sham
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/1672/174
SciaticaNervous system disorders0/1672/174
Abdominal abscessInfections and infestations1/1670/174
COVID-19Infections and infestations1/1670/174
UrosepsisInfections and infestations1/1670/174
Diffuse large B-cell lymphomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1670/174
Metastases to spineNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1670/174
Intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders1/1670/174
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1670/174
Bladder perforationRenal and urinary disorders1/1670/174
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSI-6603Sham
Magnetic resonance imaging spinal abnormalInvestigations47/16716/174
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders32/16722/174
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders18/16713/174
COVID-19Infections and infestations11/16717/174
Spinal X-ray abnormalInvestigations13/1673/174
C-reactive protein increasedInvestigations10/1676/174
SciaticaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders6/1679/174

Baseline characteristics

Modified intention-to-treat population

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SI-6603ShamTotal
Mean46.8 ± 9.3645.9 ± 9.8446.3 ± 9.60
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SI-6603ShamTotal
Female7483157
Male9589184
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SI-6603ShamTotal
Hispanic or Latino474390
Not Hispanic or Latino122129251
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SI-6603ShamTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian6915
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American181432
White137142279
More than one race123
Unknown or Not Reported6511
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kilograms per square meter)SI-6603ShamTotal
Mean29.0 ± 4.9228.4 ± 4.8628.7 ± 4.89
Smoking History
Smoking History(Participants)SI-6603ShamTotal
Never smoked106103209
Past smoker343670
Current smoker293362
Occupation
Occupation(Participants)SI-6603ShamTotal
Heavy labor394988
Light labor130123253
Days of Onset of Current Leg Pain
Days of Onset of Current Leg Pain(days)SI-6603ShamTotal
Mean161.9 ± 83.57172.2 ± 79.65167.1 ± 81.66

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

67 sites
  • Delta Clinical Research
    Mobile, Alabama 36609, United States
  • Pain Medicine Associates, Inc.
    Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
  • University of California San Diego - Center for Pain Medicine
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • The Helm Center for Pain Management
    Laguna Woods, California 92637, United States
  • The Anand Spine Group
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
    Los Angeles, California 90073, United States
  • Samaritan Center for Medical Research
    Los Gatos, California 95032, United States
  • UC Davis Spine Center
    Sacramento, California 95816, United States
  • Source Healthcare
    Santa Monica, California 90403, United States
  • Boulder Neurosurgical Associates
    Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States
  • DBPS Research, LLC
    Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111, United States
  • International Spine, Pain, and Performance Center
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20006, United States
  • Florida Spine Institute
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
  • Spine and Orthopedic Center
    Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441, United States
  • Deland Clinical research Unit
    DeLand, Florida 32720, United States
  • Science Connections, LLC
    Doral, Florida 33166, United States
  • Coastal Clinical Research
    Fernandina Beach, Florida 32034, United States
  • Holy Cross Medical Group
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33334, United States
  • Coastal Clinical Research
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Genoma Research Group, Inc.
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Science Connections, LLC (Kendall)
    Miami, Florida 33175, United States
  • AMPM Research Clinic
    Miami Gardens, Florida 33169, United States
  • Pain Relief Centers
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33709, United States
  • Pain Relief Centers
    Sun City Center, Florida 33573, United States
  • Tampa Pain Relief Center
    Tampa, Florida 33603, United States
  • Florida Pain Relief Group, PLLC
    Tampa, Florida 33614, United States
  • Premier Medical Associates
    The Villages, Florida 32159, United States
  • Conquest Research
    Winter Park, Florida 32789, United States
  • Augusta University - Medical College of Georgia
    Augusta, Georgia 30912, United States
  • Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Injury Care Research
    Boise, Idaho 83713, United States
  • Millennium Pain Center
    Bloomington, Illinois 61704, United States
  • Chicago Anesthesia Pain Specialists
    Chicago, Illinois 60657, United States
  • Indiana Spine Group
    Carmel, Indiana 46032, United States
  • Neuroscience Research Center LLC
    Overland Park, Kansas 66210, United States
  • OtriMed Clinical Research
    Edgewood, Kentucky 41017, United States
  • Clinical Trials of Southwest Louisiana, LLC
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601, United States
  • Tulane University School of Medicine
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • St. Louis Pain Consultants
    Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, United States
  • Comprehensive and Interventional Pain Management LLP
    Henderson, Nevada 89052, United States
  • Innovative Pain Care Center
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89106, United States
  • Interventional Spine Medicine
    Barrington, New Hampshire 03825, United States
  • New Jersey Regenerative Institute
    Cedar Knolls, New Jersey 07927, United States
  • New York - Presbyterian Queens
    Flushing, New York 11355, United States
  • Drug Trials America
    Hartsdale, New York 10530, United States
  • Ainsworth Institute Of Pain Management
    New York, New York 10022, United States
  • University of Rochester- Neuromedicine Pain Management Center
    Rochester, New York 14618, United States
  • The Center for Clinical Research
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Clinical Inquest Center Ltd
    Beavercreek, Ohio 45431, United States
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • META Medical Research Institute
    Dayton, Ohio 45432, United States
  • Medical Research International
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73109, United States
  • Oklahoma City Clinical Research Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73159, United States
  • Main Line Spine
    King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406, United States
  • Clinical Trials of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29406, United States
  • SC Pain & Spine Specialists
    Murrells Inlet, South Carolina 29576, United States
  • Ascension Spine and Scoliosis Center
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • HRMD Research
    Dallas, Texas 75240, United States
  • Advanced Medical Trials
    Georgetown, Texas 78628, United States
  • Interventional Pain Specialists
    Pasadena, Texas 77505, United States
  • ARH Research, LLC.
    The Woodlands, Texas 77382, United States
  • JBR Clinical Research
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84107, United States
  • University of Virginia Orthopaedic Spine Center
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States
  • Virginia iSpine Physicians, P.C.
    Richmond, Virginia 23235, United States
  • Gershon Pain Specialists
    Virginia Beach, Virginia 23454, United States
  • Swedish Pain Management
    Seattle, Washington 98122, United States
  • West Virginia University
    Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Macadaeg KE, Kim KD, Gupta PB, Rivera J, Patel A, Chauhan K, Watanabe J, Seo T, Zucker E, Candido K. Impact of Condoliase on Health-related Quality of Life in Participants With Radicular Leg Pain Associated With Lumbar Disk Herniation: Results From a United States Phase 3 Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jun 15;50(12):796-803. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005327. Epub 2025 Mar 11. PubMed 40066868 ↗
  • Kim KD, Ahadian F, Hassanzadeh H, Rivera J, Candido K, Gershon S, Patel A, Gupta PB, Miller AE, Formoso FJ, Fuerst T, Zucker E, Seo T, Watanabe J, Matsuyama Y, Chiba K, Macadaeg KE. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial of SI-6603 (condoliase) in patients with radicular leg pain associated with lumbar disc herniation. Spine J. 2024 Dec;24(12):2285-2296. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Aug 19. PubMed 39168360 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03607838
Lead sponsor
Seikagaku Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 31, 2018
Start date
Nov 7, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 3, 2022
Completion
Mar 21, 2023
Results posted
Jul 11, 2025
Last update
Jul 24, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Condoliase

Start the discussion