ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07779915MICCAPREMUpdated Aug 21, 2026

MICropsampling for CAffeine in PREMature Newborns

An interventional study of collection of an extra drop of capillary blood in Apnea of Prematurity, sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 24 Weeks to 34 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
24 Weeks to 34 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Caffeine is one of the top five most prescribed drugs in neonatology. Caffeine has many beneficial impacts on preterm infants (cardiac, neurologic and pulmonary). One of these beneficial impacts is to prevent apnea. However, despite its use in routine neonatal practice, there is currently no consensus on standardized protocols for caffeine administration concerning timing and dose and there is a lack of knowledge in the most immature preterm. High caffeine concentrations may lead to serious adverse events such tachycardia while low caffeine concentrations may lead to an upsurge apnea, and as a consequence to the necessity of mechanical ventilation.

A study demonstrated that highly variable caffeine concentrations where observed when a standardized dose was administered to preterm infants. However, while no correlation between caffeine concentration and the number of apneas has been reported, there is a correlation between caffeine concentration and heart rate in preterm infants. In addition, a retrospective study demonstrated that in infants born before 29 gestational weeks with a caffeine concentration > 15 micrograms/ml was associated with a lower incidence of chronic lung disease, persistent ductus arteriosus, lesser number of days of ventilation and shorter length of stay in hospital. Based on these observations, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of caffeine could be particularly relevant in preterm infants, in order to manage the risk of overexposure to caffeine in patients who need higher doses to prevent apnea. However, we are limited by the risk of anemia associated with repeated sampling in preterm infants. In our hospital, Caffeine is measured when children make apnea despite a dosage of 5 mg/kg and when children have potentials adverse events such tachycardia.

To avoid anemia due to repeated blood test for TDM, microsampling devices allowing analyses in very small volumes of blood could be used. Recently, microsampling devices have been developed for home-based capillary blood sampling and their use has been validated in different contexts, in particular the TDM of immunosuppressive drugs. These devices allow the collection of dried blood spots and present the advantages of being less invasive than venipuncture and collecting low volumes of blood for analysis. The analysis of caffeine in dried blood spot (DBS) has been developed with a good agreement between DBS and plasma concentrations in neonates. However, changes in hematocrit levels may impact concentrations measured in DBS. To avoid this, volumetric micro sampling (VAMS) devices such as the Mitra ® (Neoteryx®) have been developed with good results. With caffeine, VAMS effectively assisted in eliminating the effect of hematocrit and have good correlation with blood standard dosage.

In this context, the investigator propose a pilot study in preterm infants, in whom the microsampling device Mitra ® will be used for capillary blood sampling to collect caffeine for TDM. The (i) feasibility (ii) nurse satisfaction iii) analytical performances will be evaluated.

The hypothesis is that the use of a microsampling device such as Mitra ® will render possible caffeine TDM thanks to a good feasibility and to good pre-analytical and analytical performances of a method developed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Apnea of Prematurity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Target drug monitoring
  • caffein
  • micro sampling
03

In context

Apnea

282 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 195 interventional studies indexed under Apnea.

Browse Apnea studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Limoges is the lead sponsor of 264 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
24 Weeks to 34 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Preterm infants born before 34 amenorrhea weeks
  • Receiving oral or intravenous Caffeine
  • Requiring capillary blood sample
  • Having parental signed of participation in the study
  • Affiliated to, or beneficiary of, a social security program

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Birth Weight under 500 grams
  • Age under 24 weeks of amenorrhea.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    tested

    collection of an extra drop of capillary blood during the blood sampling for routine

    Diagnostic Test: collection of an extra drop of capillary blood

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testcollection of an extra drop of capillary blood

    an extra drop of capillary blood will be collected with the Mitra® at the time of capillary blood sampling performed by the nurses for their care. Caffein is dosed with this capillary blood sampling of 50 microliters but the pediatrician will only have the result of the routine test to adapt caffein treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of the integration of use of Mitra® in the therapeutic drug monitoring of caffeine in premature newborns

    The feasibility of using the Mitra® device will be assessed based on the compliance rate. Two types of noncompliance will be considered: * pre-analytical noncompliance: insufficient or excessive saturation * analytical noncompliance: noncompliant quality controls that prevent the generation of a reliable test result in accordance with the laboratory's standard operating procedures.

    Time frame: at the enrollement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nurses' satisfaction rating based on a questionnaire

    Time frame: at the enrollment

  2. Caffeine concentration in samples collected using Mitra ® vs. standard blood test for TDM in preterm infants

    Time frame: at the enrollment

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07779915
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 24, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Study contacts

Laure PONTHIER, MD
Contact
laure.ponthier@chu-limoges.fr
0555058666

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion