ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03523182Updated Feb 11, 2019

Spirulina Supplementation and Infant Growth, Morbidity and Motor Development

An interventional study of Spirulina and Control in Stunting, Underweight and Pneumonia, Pneumocystis, sponsored by Programme Against Malnutrition. Completed at 1 site in Zambia. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 18 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-11.

Sponsored by Programme Against Malnutrition · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2015, registered Apr 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
501
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 18 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: In developing countries, micronutrient deficiency in infants is associated with growth faltering, morbidity, and delayed motor development. One of the potentially low-cost and sustainable solutions is to use locally producible food for the home fortification of complementary foods.

Objective: The objectives are to test the hypothesis that locally producible spirulina platensis supplementation would achieve the following: 1) increase infant physical growth; 2) reduce morbidity; and 3) improve motor development.

Design: 501 Zambian infants are randomly assigned into a control (CON) group or a spirulina (SP) group. Children in the CON group (n=250) receive a soya-maize-based porridge for 12 months, whereas those in the SP group (n=251) receive the same food but with the addition of spirulina. The change in infants' anthropometric status, morbidity, and motor development over 12 months are assessed.

Read the detailed description

Micronutrient deficiency in the infancy is associated with growth faltering, morbidity, and delayed motor development, and is common in developing countries where the food available for infants has low micronutrient density.

A low-cost and sustainable way to address this problem is to utilize locally producible foods rich in multi-micronutrients as home supplements to complementary food. Arthrospira platensis, also known as spirulina, is a blue-green micro-algae indigenous to Africa.

It contains a high percentage of protein, and is rich in multiple micronutrients know to support infant growth such as beta carotene, B vitamins, and minerals such as calcium, iron, magnesium, manganese, potassium, and zinc. The cost of producing spirulina is much lower than that of producing other comparably protein-rich foods, such as soya beans and beef, and therefore may potentially sustainably meet the nutritional demands of African infants.

Our objective is to assess the acceptability and effects of spirulina supplementation on growth, incidence of morbidity, and level of motor development in infants in Zambia. The testable hypothesis is that spirulina supplementation for 12 months would increase infant height, reduce the incidence of morbidity, and reduce time taken to achieve motor development milestones (ability to walk unassisted).

This study is conducted from April 2015 to April 2016 in the form of an open-labeled randomized control trial, and involves in a spirulina-fed treatment (SP) group and a control (CON) group.

501 Zambian infants are randomly assigned into a control (CON) group or a spirulina (SP) group. Children in the CON group (n=250) receive a soya-maize-based porridge for 12 months, whereas those in the SP group (n=251) receive the same food but with the addition of spirulina.

The change in infants' anthropometric status, morbidity, and motor development over 12 months are assessed.

Amendment: the study period has been extended by 4 months. Without no-intervention period, monthly supplementation was restarted in study are.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stunting
  • Underweight
  • Pneumonia, Pneumocystis
  • Cough
  • Malaria
  • Fever
  • Motor Delay

Keywords

  • Micronutrient supplementation
  • Home fortification
  • Spirulina
  • Zambia
03

In context

Growth Disorders

227 studies on the registry are indexed under Growth Disorders; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 501 is above the median of 413 across 143 interventional studies indexed under Growth Disorders.

Browse Growth Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Programme Against Malnutrition as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 18 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All infants were eligible for the study if they are between 6 and 18 month of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-singleton birth infants were excluded
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
501 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Spirulina (SP)

    Children in the SP group (n=251) received a soya-maize-based porridge for 12 months with the addition of spirulina.

    Dietary Supplement: Spirulina · Dietary Supplement: Control

  • Active comparator
    Control (CON)

    Children in the CON group (n=250) received a soya-maize-based porridge for 12 months.

    Dietary Supplement: Control

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementSpirulina

    Arthrospira platensis, also known as spirulina, is a blue-green micro-algae indigenous to Africa. Spirulina group (n=251) receive a soya-maize-based porridge with the addition of spirulina. We used 10 g per day of spirulina powder with a mealie meal and soya flour porridge blend.

  • Dietary supplementControl

    Children receive a soya-maize-based porridge for 12 months. We use a mealie meal and soya flour porridge blend.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) at 32 month follow up

    Primary outcome is changes in HAZ. Height of the infants is transformed to standardized scores using the World Health Organization (WHO) Multicentre Growth Standards

    Time frame: Height of the infants are measured by experienced field workers at at 0, 6, and 12 month. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018) survey.

  2. Child development

    Study children will be assessed at 32 month follow up (January 2018) using the Malawi Development Assessment Tool (MDAT) instrument. Scores will be standardized within the study sample for analysis. Scores of children in treatment group will be compared with children in comparison group to determine differences.

    Time frame: At 32 month follow up (January 2018) survey

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ) at 32 month follow up

    Secondary outcome is changes in WAZ. Weight of the infants is transformed to standardized scores using the WHO Multicentre Growth Standards

    Time frame: Weight of the infants are measured at 0, 6, and 12 month by experienced field workers. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018)

  2. Change from baseline in pneumonia incidence at 32 month follow up

    Secondary outcome is changes in pneumonia incidence. Pneumonia was defined as cough accompanied by short and rapid breathing and difficulty in breathing

    Time frame: Data on pneumonia indicators were collected up to 12 months by trained local health workers. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018)

  3. Change from baseline in cough incidence at 32 month follow up

    Secondary outcome is changes in cough incidence in the 4 weeks preceding the interview.

    Time frame: Data on cough morbidity indicators are collected up to 12 months by trained local health workers. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018)

  4. Change from baseline in severe high fever incidence at 32 month follow up

    Secondary outcome is changes in severe high fever incidence. Severe high fever was defined based on the following clinical signs: fever with rash on child's body, fever with chills, shaking, nausea, or alternating high and low body temperature

    Time frame: Data are collected up to 12 months by trained local health workers. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018)

  5. Change from baseline in fever incidence at 32 month follow up

    Secondary outcome is changes in fever incidence in the 4 weeks preceding the interview

    Time frame: Data are collected up to 12 months by trained local health workers. Amendment: also measured at extension endline (October 2016), at 24 month follow up (April 2017) and at 32 month follow up (January 2018)

  6. Ability of the infant to walk independently.

    The ability of children to walk without assistance measured by the questionnaire.

    Time frame: This indicator was evaluated at 0, 6 and 12 months by research assistants who visited the participants' homes

  7. Child development at 24 month follow up

    Study children will be assessed at 24 month follow up (April 2017) using the Malawi Development Assessment Tool (MDAT) instrument. Scores will be standardized within the study sample for analysis. Scores of children in treatment group will be compared with children in comparison group to determine differences.

    Time frame: At 24 month follow up survey (April 2017)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Programme Against Malnutrition
    Mansa, Luapura, Zambia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2015 to primary completion in Apr 2016, 13 months.

Of 77 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Growth Disorders, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 30. This study's 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 78 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 30.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 19, 2018
First posted
May 14, 2018
StartActual
Mar 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2016
CompletionActual
Jan 30, 2018
Last update
Feb 11, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03523182
Lead sponsor
Programme Against Malnutrition
Collaborators
Hitotsubashi University, Alliance Forum Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2018
Start date
Mar 1, 2015
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2016
Completion
Jan 30, 2018
Last update
Feb 11, 2019

Study contacts

Kazuya Masuda, PhD
principal investigator · Hitotsubashi University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Spirulina maxima

Start the discussion