CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03518749Updated Feb 19, 2019

Effects of tDCS-enhanced Cognitive Control Training on Depression

An interventional study of 1mA tDCS and 2mA tDCS in Depression Unipolar, sponsored by University Hospital Tuebingen. Status unknown at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-19.

Sponsored by University Hospital Tuebingen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Deficient cognitive control (CC) is one of the central characteristics of major depression (MD). Hypoactivation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) has been linked with this deficit. Antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapies modify CC most-likely as a common mechanism of treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, simple and effective non-invasive method to modulate the cortical excitability. It has been shown, that the activity of the dlPFC can be modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with polarity-dependent learning-phase specific effects on performance that, when combined with training, can outlast the stimulation.

The goal of this randomized, sham-controlled, rater blind clinical trial is to investigate the effect of a tDCS-enhanced CC Training (CCT) on depressive symptom severity and compare the stimulation intensities 1mA, 2mA and sham tDCS. Overall, the study will include 57 participants (n = 19 per group). Each participant will complete 12 training sessions with online sham/ anodal tDCS.

As a training task we will use an adaptive version of the paced auditory serial addition task (PASAT). In the PASAT, digits are presented auditive and participants have to add the current digit to the digit they heard before. In the adaptive version the interstimulus-intervals decrease (increase) when four consecutive trials are correct (incorrect). The PASAT is known to elicit frustration. Participants have to exert cognitive control over these emotions to complete the task successfully.

Before, during and after the training symptom severity will be assessed. Baseline and post-training performance in the PASAT and in a transfer task (delayed working memory task, DWM) will be measured.

To further explore variables that influence the effect of tDCS on depressive symptom severity we will measure brain activity (EEG, NIRS), heart rate, global functioning (GAF), emotion regulation strategies, self-esteem, mood ratings and subjective performance ratings before and after the training and collect genetic factors.

Sustainability of the training effects will be measured at a follow-up visit (3 months later).

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression Unipolar

Keywords

  • Depression
  • transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 57 is below the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Tuebingen is the lead sponsor of 476 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • current Major Depressive Episode
  • right handedness

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of seizures
  • Intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, that cannot be safely removed
  • pregnancy
  • use of mood stabilizers
  • diagnosed bipolar disorder
  • current substance abuse (nicotine excluded)
  • current substance addiction (nicotine excluded)
  • diagnosed psychotic diseases
  • diagnosed anorexia nervosa
  • diagnosed personality disorders: cluster A, antisocial personality disorder,
  • borderline personality disorder
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
57 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1mA anodal tDCS + cognitive control training

    1 mA anodal tDCS will be administered to the left dlPFC (F3) for 23 mins during the performance of a cognitive control training.

    Other: 1mA tDCS · Behavioral: Cognitive control training

  • Active comparator
    2mA tDCS + cognitive control training

    2 mA anodal tDCS will be administered to the left dlPFC (F3) for 23 mins during the performance of a cognitive control training.

    Other: 2mA tDCS · Behavioral: Cognitive control training

  • Placebo comparator
    sham tDCS + cognitive control training

    Sham tDCS (30 secs of tDCS) will be administered to the left dlPFC (F3) with 2mA at the beginning of a cognitive control training.

    Behavioral: Cognitive control training

Interventions

  • Other1mA tDCS

    transcranial direct current stimulation with the intensity of 1mA

  • Other2mA tDCS

    transcranial direct current stimulation with the intensity of 2mA

  • BehavioralCognitive control training

    cognitive control training with the PASAT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of MADRS scores

    Change in Depressive Symptom severity will be measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from Baseline session to the last stimulation session, scale range from 0 to 60 points, higher scores indicate a more severe depression

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the last training session (week 4, day 26)

Secondary outcomes

  1. BDI scores

    Beck Depression Inventory

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)

  2. Number of correct trials in the PASAT

    Performance in the PASAT. Number of correct trials.

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)

  3. RT in the DWM

    Reaction time in the transfer task, a delayed working memory task (DWM)

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)

  4. Number of correct trials in the DWM

    Number of correct trials in the transfer task, a delayed working memory task (DWM)

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)

  5. GAF score

    Global Assessment of Functioning

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average)

  6. Delta Mood ratings

    Mood changes (PANAS delta) through the PASAT performance: the positive and negative affective schedule (PANAS) will be conducted immediately before and after the PASAT performance. The change in mood ratings (PANAS delta = PANAS pre PASAT - PANAS post PASAT) will be the outcome measure.

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)

  7. Subjective performance ratings

    Participants will be asked to rate their performance and overall cognitive abilities on a likert scale.

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)

  8. Electroencephalography (EEG) measures

    EEG will be conducted to measure resting state oscillations and event related potentials stimulus locked to the presented feedback in the PASAT

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average)

  9. Prefrontal Brain activity (NIRS)

    Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy will be used to measure frontal brain activity: resting state and during task performance.

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average)

  10. Course of MADRS scores

    Depressive Symptom severity will be measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale

    Time frame: Assessment once a week during training (week 1, 2 and 3 at day 5, 12 and 19 respectively on average) and at the follow up visits (week 5 and 17, day 31 and 110 on average)

  11. Prefrontal Brain activity (NIRS) as a predictor

    The investigators will analyze if frontal brain activity measured with NIRS during resting state and task performance can contribute to the prediction of the effectiveness of the tDCS training.

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average)

  12. Electroencephalography (EEG) measures as a predictor

    The investigators will analyze if resting state oscillations and event related potentials stimulus locked to the presented feedback in the PASAT can contribute to the prediction of the effectiveness of the tDCS training.

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average)

  13. Genetic factors as predictors

    The investigators will analyze if genetic factors involved in neuroplasticity (5-HTTLPR, BDNF, COMT) can contribute to the prediction of the effectiveness of the tDCS training.

    Time frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sommer A, Fallgatter AJ, Plewnia C. Investigating mechanisms of cognitive control training: neural signatures of PASAT performance in depressed patients. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2022 Jun;129(5-6):649-659. doi: 10.1007/s00702-021-02444-7. Epub 2021 Nov 23. PubMed 34812928 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03518749
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Tuebingen
Collaborators
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Universität Tübingen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 8, 2018
Start date
Mar 19, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 19, 2019

Study contacts

Christian Plewnia, MD
Contact
christian.plewnia@uni-tuebingen.de
+49 (0)7071-2986121

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion