ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03510455Updated Nov 10, 2026Results posted

BGJ398 for the Treatment of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia

A Phase 2 interventional study of BGJ398 in Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia and Oncogenic Osteomalacia, sponsored by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR). Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study was stopped early due to a greater than expected incidence of ocular AEs and analysis of the data from the first 4 subjects indicating that the likelihood of permanent remission with this therapy was low.
Updated Nov 10, 2026Study documents postedPosted results revised+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

People with tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) have small tumors that may cause low blood phosphorus, weak muscles, bone pain, and broken bones. The tumors may be so small they are hard to find or impossible to remove. Researchers want to test a drug that may help treat TIO.

Objective:

To see how the drug BGJ398 affects people with tumor-induced osteomalacia.

Eligibility:

People ages 18-85 who are in NIH protocol 01-D-0184 and have TIO that cannot be found or easily removed

Design:

At every study visit, participants will have:

  • Medical history
  • Physical exam
  • Blood and urine tests
  • Questions about their health and fatigue

At the screening visit, participants will also have a heart and eye tests. They may have other tests to find their tumor.

The baseline visit will be a 1-week stay in the clinic. Participants will have the regular study tests, plus:

  • Their first dose of the study drug capsules
  • Blood and urine collected every 2-4 hours for 24 hours. A thin plastic tube will be inserted in a vein to collect blood.
  • Heart and kidney ultrasounds
  • Activities that test strength
  • 6-minute walk test

Participants will take the study drug for six 1-month cycles. In each cycle, participants will:

  • Take the study drug every day for 4 weeks.
  • Have 1 visit. Participants will collect their urine for 24 hours and have their blood drawn. Participants will have the regular study tests and repeat some baseline tests.
  • Have blood and urine tests at their local lab.

Participants will have 1 visit at the end of the last cycle and another 3 months later....

Read the detailed description

Background:

  • Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare disorder in which fibroblast growth factor (FGF23)-producing neoplasms cause renal phosphate wasting and skeletal disease.
  • Recent studies have shown that chromosomal translocations causing a fibronectin-FGFR1 (FN1/FGFR1) fusion gene have been identified in 40-60% of these tumors.
  • BGJ398 is an orally bio-available, selective and ATP competitive pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) kinase inhibitor which has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in preclinical, in vitro and in-vivo tumor models harboring FGFR genetic alterations.

Objectives:

To induce complete metabolic response in subjects with tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) with BGJ-398 as demonstrated by normalization of FGF23 and phosphate homeostasis.

Eligibility:

Patients may be eligible if they:

  • Are adults 18-85 years with documented evidence of TIO due to a non-localized or unresectable tumor, or metastatic disease, or resectable tumor that cannot be easily removed.
  • Are not taking any exclusionary medications or foods that may interfere with BGJ398.
  • Are not pregnant or nursing and are willing to use contraception (at least two forms of contraception), if able to become pregnant.
  • Have no significant ophthalmologic, gastrointestinal, renal, or hematologic disease.

Design:

  • Phase 2, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm, drug treatment trial.
  • 10 subjects to be studied.
  • Treatment duration 6 months with 3 months off drug follow-up and optional extension phase.
  • Monthly NIH visits with additional labs obtained in between visits.
  • Imaging performed in those with identifiable tumors.
  • Analyses to include repeated measures ANOVA assessing changes in biochemical indices over time in response to BGJ398.
02

Conditions studied

  • Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia
  • Oncogenic Osteomalacia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • FGF-23
  • Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF23)
  • Hypophosphatemia
03

In context

Hypophosphatemia

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypophosphatemia; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 4 is below the median of 46 across 26 interventional studies indexed under Hypophosphatemia.

Browse Hypophosphatemia studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

The criteria were revised on the registry on Nov 10, 2026. See what changed

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients eligible for inclusion in this study have to meet all of the following criteria:

  • Aged 18-85 years
  • Diagnosis of TIO due to a non-localized or unresectable tumor, or disease or resectable tumor that cannot be removed by minor surgical procedure. This diagnosis will be confirmed prior to enrollment on protocol 01-D-0184. Where clinically indicated, genetic testing to rule-out heritable causes of FGF23 excess will also be performed on 01-D-0184.
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan and laboratory tests.
  • Able to swallow and retain oral medication.
  • Able to provide

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Patients eligible for this study must not meet any of the following criteria:

  • Have another genetic or secondary cause of hypophosphatemia.
  • History of any other that has not been cured/in remission for 5 years.
  • Patients who previously received treatment with an FGFR inhibitor other than BGJ398.
  • Current evidence of corneal or retinal disorder/keratopathy including, but not limited to: bullous/band keratopathy, corneal abrasion, inflammation/ulceration, keratoconjunctivitis, confirmed by ophthalmologic examination
  • Impairment of gastrointestinal (GI) function or GI disease that may significantly alter the absorption of oral BGJ398 (e.g., ulcerative diseases, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome, small bowel resection)
  • Patients who are currently receiving treatment with agents that are known strong inducers or inhibitors of are prohibited. This includes treatment with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs including carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone.
  • Consumption of grapefruit, grapefruit juice, pomegranates, star fruits, Seville oranges or products within 7 days prior to first dose
  • Use of amiodarone within 90 days prior to first dose
  • Current use of therapeutic doses of warfarin sodium or any other coumadin-derivative anticoagulants. Heparin and/or low molecular weight heparins are allowed.
  • Insufficient bone marrow function defined as all of the following:

    • ANC \<1,500/mm\^3 [1.0 x 10\^9/L] AND
    • \< 75,000/mm\^3 [75 x 10\^9/L] AND
    • \< 10.0 g/dL
  • Insufficient hepatic and renal function defined as one of the following:

    • Total > 1.5x OR
    • /SGOT and ALT/SGPT > 2x ULN OR
    • Blood creatinine > 1.5xULN and/or calculated \< 45 ml/min/1.73 m\^2 (calculated by CKD-Epi)
  • cardiac disease including any of the following:

    • Congestive heart failure requiring treatment (NY Heart Association grade >= 2),
    • History or presence of clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, resting bradycardia, or conduction abnormality
    • Unstable angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction less than or equal to 3 months prior to starting study drug
    • > 450 msec (males); > 470 msec (females)
    • History of congenital long QT syndrome
  • Recent (less than or equal to 3 months) or stroke
  • Patients under age 21 will have a bone age assessed as part of their clinically indicated skeletal survey under 01-D-0184 and will not be offered enrollment if their growth plates are open.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test
  • Women of , defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of during dosing and for 3 months following the discontinuation of study treatment. Highly effective contraception methods include:

    • Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception
    • Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment
    • Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female subjects on the study the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that subject.
    • Combination of the following (a+b or a+c, or b+c):

      • Use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate \<1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception
      • Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS)
      • Barrier methods of contraception: Condom or Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/vaginal suppository

        • women are allowed to participate in this study. Women are considered post- menopausal and not of child-bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea or 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum FSH >40 mIU/ml or 6 weeks postsurgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy.
        • Sexually active males unless they use a condom during intercourse while taking drug and for 3 months after the last dose of the study drug and should not father a child in this period. A condom is required to be used also by vasectomized men in order to prevent delivery of the drug via seminal fluid.
        • Patients with TIO who are currently taking BGJ398 or have been treated with BGJ398 in the past are eligible to participate in this study, provided that they discontinue BGJ398 for 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
4 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single Arm (TIO Subjects)

    Phase 2, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm, drug treatment trial. 10 subjects will be studied. Treatment duration of 6 months with 3 months off drug follow-up and optional extension phase.

    Drug: BGJ398

Interventions

  • DrugBGJ398

    BGJ398, a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) kinase inhibitor will be orally administered over six 4-week cycles (4 weeks on drug continuously). After the initial dose, escalation/de- escalation of BGJ398 will be based on FGF- 23 blood levels and adjusted according to protocol procedures. The six cycles of BGJ398 will be followed by 3 months off the drug and an optional extension phase.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Complete Metabolic Remission After Stopping BGJ398

    Participants were monitored for up to 12 weeks after stopping BGJ398. A participant was considered to have a complete metabolic remission by achieving both normal blood FGF23 and phosphorus levels in the blood for 12 weeks after stopping BGJ398.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks after stopping BGJ398

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Complete and Partial Metabolic Response Rate

    Participants were monitored for metabolic response to BGJ398 every other week. A participant was considered to have a complete metabolic response by achieving both normal c-terminal FGF23 and phosphorus levels at each time point. A participant was considered to have a partial metabolic response by achieving both a decrease of at least 50% in c-terminal FGF23 levels and an increase of at least 50% in phosphorous at each time point

    Time frame: Every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks

  2. Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events or Serious Adverse Events

    Percentage of patients who incurred grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse events (SAE) or AEs causing dose interruption/reduction

    Time frame: 24 week treatment phase followed by 3 month follow up or extension phase

  3. Six-Minute Walk Test

    The Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), is a self-paced practical test that measures the distance the patient can quickly cover on a flat, hard surface. Each subject was instructed to complete the maximum distance possible in six minutes. Feedback was given in two minute intervals and during the last 30 seconds. Patients were instructed to notify test administrator of leg cramping, pain, nausea, dizziness and shortness of breath. Test administrators counted each lap and upon test completion, the partial distance is measured and added to where the subject stopped.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 24 weeks after starting BGJ398

  4. Hand Grip Strength Test

    The person is seated, lower extremities flexed at 90 degrees. The individual uses the dominant hand for this activity. The individual sit with shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated elbow flexed at 90 degrees, forearm in neutral position, resting on the arm of a chair. The JAMAR Hand Dynamometer set to the third level position from the inside is used. The examiner lightly supports the readout dial to prevent it from dropping. The patient is asked to "Squeeze as hard as you can….squeeze…..squeeze….relax." Three successive trials is recorded in kilograms. A 10-15 second break occurs to prevent muscle fatigue. Scores are recorded and averaged for the final result. Scores within two standard deviations of the mean are considered within normal limits.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  5. Pinch Test

    A lateral pinch is required of the patient, using the dominant hand. The individual is seated, lower extremities flexed at 90 degrees. The examiner stabilizes the patient's wrist as the patient holds the pinch gauge to perform the test. The examiner requests the person to pinch with maximum strength. The peak-hold needle will automatically record the highest force exerted. After the patient uses the Pinch gauge, the examiner records the reading and resets the peak-hold needle to zero before testing again. Three lateral pinch trials are recorded and averaged for the final result.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks for the 24 treatment period, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  6. Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test

    The Five Times Sit to Stand Test measures an aspect of transfer skill. The test provides a method to quantify functional lower extremity strength and/or identify movement strategies a patient uses to complete transitional movements. The chair is free standing. Patient sits with arms folded across chest and with their back against the chair. A standard chair height 44 cm was used for each patient. Patient stands fully between repetitions of the test, careful to not touch the back of the chair during each repetition. Patient instructions: "I want you to stand up and sit down 5 times as quickly as you can when I say Go." Timing begins at "Go" and ends when the buttocks touches the chair after the 5th repetition. The results are recorded in seconds.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks during the 24 week treatment period

  7. The Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measurement (DASH)

    The Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measurement (DASH) The minimum score value is 0, maximum is 100, where a higher school represents a worse outcome (significant symptoms/disability)

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  8. RAND SF-36 Survey Results

    Evaluation using the RAND 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Results were separated into 8 domains - Physical Functioning, Role limitations due to physical health problems, Role limitations due to emotional problems, Emotional well-being, Energy/fatigue, Social functioning, Bodily Pain, and General health perceptions. The minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 100, which the higher the score, the better the outcome.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  9. PROMIS Fatigue

    Assessed using the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Fatigue 8A short form. Scores are given as T values when compared to a population where the mean is 50 and 1SD is 10. A higher score represents increased feelings of fatigue.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  10. PROMIS Pain Interference Score

    Assessed using the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Interference 8A short form. Scores are given as T values when compared to a population where the mean is 50 and 1SD is 10. A higher score represents increased pain interference

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  11. PROMIS Mobility Score

    Assessed using the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Mobility bank. Scores are given as T values when compared to a population where the mean is 50 and 1SD is 10. A higher score represents a better outcome (unencumbered mobility)

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  12. Blood Intact FGF23 Levels

    Measured Blood Intact FGF23 Levels.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  13. Blood C-terminal FGF23 Level

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  14. Blood Phosphate Levels

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  15. Blood 1,25-(OH)2-Vitamin D Level

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  16. Blood Alkaline Phosphatase

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  17. Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate

    Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate was calculated using blood phosphate and creatinine, as well as either 24 hour urine or spot urine samples.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  18. Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)

    Tubular maximum reabsorption rate of phosphate to glomerular filtration rate (TmP/GFR) was calculated using blood phosphate and creatinine, as well as either 24 hour urine or spot urine samples.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks

  19. Radiographic Evidence of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia

    In patients with radiographic evidence of TIO, 18FDG PET scans were performed

    Time frame: Baseline and at 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2021
Limitations and caveats
This study was terminated early due to a lack of efficacy in the first 4 patients and an unexpectedly high rate of ocular adverse events. As a result, only 4 patients were enrolled in this study. Because of the small sample size, we were unable to perform the planned statistical analysis, and instead the results are primarily descriptive.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Started4
Treated4
Extension phase1
Screening failures0
Completed3
Not completed1
Withdrew: Physician decision1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Complete Metabolic Remission After Stopping BGJ398

Participants were monitored for up to 12 weeks after stopping BGJ398. A participant was considered to have a complete metabolic remission by achieving both normal blood FGF23 and phosphorus levels in the blood for 12 weeks after stopping BGJ398.

Time frame:
Up to 12 weeks after stopping BGJ398
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Complete Metabolic Remission After Stopping BGJ398
ParticipantsTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Complete Metabolic Remission0
No Complete Metabolic Remission4
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Complete and Partial Metabolic Response Rate

Participants were monitored for metabolic response to BGJ398 every other week. A participant was considered to have a complete metabolic response by achieving both normal c-terminal FGF23 and phosphorus levels at each time point. A participant was considered to have a partial metabolic response by achieving both a decrease of at least 50% in c-terminal FGF23 levels and an increase of at least 50% in phosphorous at each time point

Time frame:
Every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Complete and Partial Metabolic Response Rate
ParticipantsSingle Arm (TIO Subjects)
Baseline — Complete Metabolic Response0
Baseline — Partial Metabolic Response0
Baseline — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response4
Week 2 — Complete Metabolic Response2
Week 2 — Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 2 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 4 — Complete Metabolic Response0
Week 4 — Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 4 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response3
Week 6 — Complete Metabolic Response2
Week 6 — Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 6 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 8 — Complete Metabolic Response1
Week 8 — Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 8 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response2
Week 10 — Complete Metabolic Response0
Week 10 — Partial Metabolic Response0
Week 10 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response4
Week 12 — Complete Metabolic Response1
Week 12 — Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 12 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response2
Week 14 — Complete Metabolic Response1
Week 14 — Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 14 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response2
Week 16 — Complete Metabolic Response0
Week 16 — Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 16 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response3
Week 18 — Complete Metabolic Response1
Week 18 — Partial Metabolic Response2
Week 18 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 20 — Complete Metabolic Response1
Week 20 — Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 20 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response2
Week 22 — Complete Metabolic Response1
Week 22 — Partial Metabolic Response1
Week 22 — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response2
Week 24 - prior to drug discontinuation — Complete Metabolic Response0
Week 24 - prior to drug discontinuation — Partial Metabolic Response0
Week 24 - prior to drug discontinuation — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response4
Week 24 - after drug discontinuation — Complete Metabolic Response0
Week 24 - after drug discontinuation — Partial Metabolic Response0
Week 24 - after drug discontinuation — Neither Complete or Partial Metabolic Response4
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events or Serious Adverse Events

Percentage of patients who incurred grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse events (SAE) or AEs causing dose interruption/reduction

Time frame:
24 week treatment phase followed by 3 month follow up or extension phase
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events or Serious Adverse Events
ParticipantsTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
SAE0
Grade 4 AE0
Grade 3 AE1
AE leading to dose interruption/reduction4
SecondarySix-Minute Walk Test

The Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), is a self-paced practical test that measures the distance the patient can quickly cover on a flat, hard surface. Each subject was instructed to complete the maximum distance possible in six minutes. Feedback was given in two minute intervals and during the last 30 seconds. Patients were instructed to notify test administrator of leg cramping, pain, nausea, dizziness and shortness of breath. Test administrators counted each lap and upon test completion, the partial distance is measured and added to where the subject stopped.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and 24 weeks after starting BGJ398
Reported as:
Mean · Meters
Six-Minute Walk Test
MetersTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline320.4 ± 221.8
24 Weeks496 ± 173.4
SecondaryHand Grip Strength Test

The person is seated, lower extremities flexed at 90 degrees. The individual uses the dominant hand for this activity. The individual sit with shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated elbow flexed at 90 degrees, forearm in neutral position, resting on the arm of a chair. The JAMAR Hand Dynamometer set to the third level position from the inside is used. The examiner lightly supports the readout dial to prevent it from dropping. The patient is asked to "Squeeze as hard as you can….squeeze…..squeeze….relax." Three successive trials is recorded in kilograms. A 10-15 second break occurs to prevent muscle fatigue. Scores are recorded and averaged for the final result. Scores within two standard deviations of the mean are considered within normal limits.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · kg
Hand Grip Strength Test
kgTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline14.7 ± 11.8
Week 416.4 ± 11.2
Week 818.5 ± 9.4
Week 1217.0 ± 7.9
Week 1622.6 ± 18.5
Week 2017.3 ± 6.6
Week 2415.5 ± 1.4
Week 2830.1 ± 6.7
SecondaryPinch Test

A lateral pinch is required of the patient, using the dominant hand. The individual is seated, lower extremities flexed at 90 degrees. The examiner stabilizes the patient's wrist as the patient holds the pinch gauge to perform the test. The examiner requests the person to pinch with maximum strength. The peak-hold needle will automatically record the highest force exerted. After the patient uses the Pinch gauge, the examiner records the reading and resets the peak-hold needle to zero before testing again. Three lateral pinch trials are recorded and averaged for the final result.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks for the 24 treatment period, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · kg
Pinch Test
kgTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline6.8 ± 4.0
Week 46.7 ± 1.2
Week 86.8 ± 1.3
Week 127.5 ± 2.0
Week 167.5 ± 1.0
Week 207.7 ± 1.5
Week 247.0 ± 1.3
Week 288.1 ± 1.9
SecondaryFive Times Sit-to-Stand Test

The Five Times Sit to Stand Test measures an aspect of transfer skill. The test provides a method to quantify functional lower extremity strength and/or identify movement strategies a patient uses to complete transitional movements. The chair is free standing. Patient sits with arms folded across chest and with their back against the chair. A standard chair height 44 cm was used for each patient. Patient stands fully between repetitions of the test, careful to not touch the back of the chair during each repetition. Patient instructions: "I want you to stand up and sit down 5 times as quickly as you can when I say Go." Timing begins at "Go" and ends when the buttocks touches the chair after the 5th repetition. The results are recorded in seconds.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks during the 24 week treatment period
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test
secondsTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline14.7 ± 6.5
Week 413.2 ± 4.0
Week 813.5 ± 1.1
Week 1211.2 ± 0.7
Week 1610.5 ± 1.5
Week 2010.8 ± 0.8
Week 2411.1 ± 0.8
Week 2811.1 ± 1.0
SecondaryThe Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measurement (DASH)

The Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measurement (DASH) The minimum score value is 0, maximum is 100, where a higher school represents a worse outcome (significant symptoms/disability)

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · DASH Disability/Symptom Score
The Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measurement (DASH)
DASH Disability/Symptom ScoreTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline16.5 ± 4.8
Week 413.3 ± 6.8
Week 814.2 ± 4.6
Week 1213.3 ± 7.3
Week 1612.7 ± 6.7
Week 2021.0 ± 23.1
Week 2412.1 ± 8.1
Week 2810.0 ± 2.3
SecondaryRAND SF-36 Survey Results

Evaluation using the RAND 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Results were separated into 8 domains - Physical Functioning, Role limitations due to physical health problems, Role limitations due to emotional problems, Emotional well-being, Energy/fatigue, Social functioning, Bodily Pain, and General health perceptions. The minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 100, which the higher the score, the better the outcome.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
RAND SF-36 Survey Results
score on a scaleTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Physical Functioning - Baseline46.3 ± 18.9
Physical Functioning - 4 weeks47.5 ± 21.0
Physical Functioning - 8 weeks51.3 ± 16.5
Physical Functioning - 12 weeks47.5 ± 12.6
Physical Functioning - 16 weeks56.0 ± 16.2
Physical Functioning - 20 weeks52.5 ± 26.0
Physical Functioning - 24 weeks41.0 ± 6.4
Physical Functioning - 28 weeks65.0 ± 7.1
Role limitations due to physical health problems - Baseline43.8 ± 12.5
Role limitations due to physical health problems - 4 weeks93.8 ± 12.5
Role limitations due to physical health problems - 8 weeks68.8 ± 31.5
Role limitations due to physical health problems - 12 weeks50 ± 35.4
Role limitations due to physical health problems - 16 weeks50 ± 57.7
Role limitations due to physical health problems - 20 weeks75 ± 50
Role limitations due to physical health problems - 24 weeks25 ± 50
Role limitations due to physical health problems - 28 weeks12.5 ± 17.7
Role limitations due to emotional problems - Baseline66.7 ± 27.2
Role limitations due to emotional problems - 4 weeks83.3 ± 33.3
Role limitations due to emotional problems - 8 weeks75 ± 31.9
Role limitations due to emotional problems - 12 weeks66.7 ± 47.1
Role limitations due to emotional problems - 16 weeks50 ± 43
Role limitations due to emotional problems - 20 weeks91.7 ± 16.7
Role limitations due to emotional problems - 24 weeks41.7 ± 50
Role limitations due to emotional problems - 28 weeks33.3 ± 47.1
Emotional well-being - Baseline67 ± 15.1
Emotional well-being - 4 weeks72 ± 15.7
Emotional well-being - 8 weeks72 ± 12.6
Emotional well-being - 12 weeks72 ± 17.6
Emotional well-being - 16 weeks69.8 ± 21.5
Emotional well-being - 20 weeks73 ± 8.2
Emotional well-being - 24 weeks62 ± 10.1
Emotional well-being - 28 weeks72 ± 5.7
Energy/fatigue - Baseline50 ± 29.4
Energy/fatigue - Week 458.8 ± 8.5
Energy/fatigue - week 852.5 ± 22.2
Energy/fatigue - week 1246.3 ± 28.4
Energy/fatigue - week 1661.3 ± 31.5
Energy/fatigue - week 2057.5 ± 18.5
Energy/fatigue - week 2448.8 ± 33.3
Energy/fatigue - week 2847.5 ± 53.0
Social functioning - Baseline59.4 ± 37.3
Social functioning - 4 weeks87.5 ± 14.4
Social functioning - 8 weeks78.1 ± 21.3
Social functioning - 12 weeks81.3 ± 16.1
Social functioning - 16 weeks75 ± 27
Social functioning - 20 weeks78.1 ± 25.8
Social functioning - 24 weeks71.9 ± 32.9
Social functioning - 28 weeks75 ± 17.7
Bodily Pain - Baseline51.9 ± 29.2
Bodily Pain - week 466.3 ± 28
Bodily Pain - week 863.1 ± 37.4
Bodily Pain - week 1243.1 ± 26.8
Bodily Pain - week 1672.5 ± 34.6
Bodily Pain - week 2075 ± 20.7
Bodily Pain - week 2436.2 ± 2.5
Bodily Pain - week 2890 ± 0
General health perceptions - Baseline60 ± 10.8
General health perceptions - week 468.8 ± 13.1
General health perceptions - week 872.5 ± 16.6
General health perceptions - week 1273.8 ± 25.9
General health perceptions - week 1671.3 ± 14.9
General health perceptions - week 2067.5 ± 23.3
General health perceptions - week 2471.3 ± 18.0
General health perceptions - week 2867.5 ± 31.8
SecondaryPROMIS Fatigue

Assessed using the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Fatigue 8A short form. Scores are given as T values when compared to a population where the mean is 50 and 1SD is 10. A higher score represents increased feelings of fatigue.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · T score
PROMIS Fatigue
T scoreTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline55.1 ± 8.1
Week 447.4 ± 1.6
Week 852.6 ± 7.9
Week 1252.3 ± 9.1
Week 1652.3 ± 9.1
Week 2046.6 ± 9.1
Week 2452 ± 4.9
Week 2846.7 ± 8.1
SecondaryPROMIS Pain Interference Score

Assessed using the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Interference 8A short form. Scores are given as T values when compared to a population where the mean is 50 and 1SD is 10. A higher score represents increased pain interference

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · T score
PROMIS Pain Interference Score
T scoreTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline56.4 ± 4.5
Week 452.6 ± 9.4
Week 852.5 ± 6.0
Week 1255.7 ± 4.2
Week 1649.0 ± 10.6
Week 2048.2 ± 15
Week 2452.6 ± 9.1
Week 2840.7 ± 0
SecondaryPROMIS Mobility Score

Assessed using the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Mobility bank. Scores are given as T values when compared to a population where the mean is 50 and 1SD is 10. A higher score represents a better outcome (unencumbered mobility)

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · T score
PROMIS Mobility Score
T scoreTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline38.2 ± 6.7
Week 440.0 ± 6.4
Week 839.3 ± 5.3
Week 1238.8 ± 3.2
Week 1640.2 ± 4.5
Week 2040.7 ± 7.3
Week 2439.5 ± 2.6
Week 2843.6 ± 1.6
SecondaryBlood Intact FGF23 Levels

Measured Blood Intact FGF23 Levels.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Blood Intact FGF23 Levels
pg/mLTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline1384 ± 1467
4 Weeks282 ± 254
8 Weeks286 ± 236
12 Weeks596 ± 924
16 Weeks310 ± 202
20 Weeks135 ± 67
24 Weeks439 ± 230
Follow up2534.8 ± 2824.6
SecondaryBlood C-terminal FGF23 Level
Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · RU/mL
Blood C-terminal FGF23 Level
RU/mLTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline814 ± 911
2 Weeks213 ± 158
4 Weeks330 ± 87
6 Weeks229 ± 123
8 Weeks304 ± 154
10 Weeks2225 ± 2015
12 Weeks430 ± 409
14 Weeks270 ± 65
16 Weeks360 ± 75
18 Weeks185 ± 151
20 Weeks274 ± 118
22 Weeks368 ± 272
24 Weeks463 ± 102
Follow up1568 ± 1863
SecondaryBlood Phosphate Levels
Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Blood Phosphate Levels
mg/dLTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline1.6 ± 0.3
Week 22.7 ± 0.9
Week 42.9 ± 1
Week 63.2 ± 1.3
Week 83.6 ± 1.5
Week 103.1 ± 0.7
Week 122.9 ± 1.2
Week 142.8 ± 1.2
Week 163.4 ± 1.6
Week 182.5 ± 0.2
Week 203.0 ± 1.3
Week 223.3 ± 2.8
Week 243.0 ± 1.2
Follow up2.3 ± 0.4
SecondaryBlood 1,25-(OH)2-Vitamin D Level
Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Blood 1,25-(OH)2-Vitamin D Level
pg/mLTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline22.5 ± 16.1
Week 2112.3 ± 94.5
Week 479 ± 68.4
Week 6202.8 ± 246.5
Week 864.7 ± 30.7
Week 1085.7 ± 63.8
Week 1296.5 ± 61.4
Week 1459.8 ± 28.9
Week 1636 ± 6.1
Week 1886.5 ± 56.3
Week 2033 ± 12.1
Week 2222.5 ± 19.1
Week 2480.3 ± 35.7
Follow up51 ± 32.2
SecondaryBlood Alkaline Phosphatase
Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · IU/L
Blood Alkaline Phosphatase
IU/LTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline132 ± 52.3
Week 2178.8 ± 50.7
Week 4186.5 ± 42.1
Week 6198 ± 36.6
Week 8171.8 ± 26.6
Week 10181.3 ± 22
Week 12170 ± 18.4
Week 14188.3 ± 29.4
Week 16175.5 ± 14.3
Week 18183 ± 40.4
Week 20190.3 ± 33.6
Week 22200.7 ± 48
Week 24192.3 ± 67.4
Follow up185.7 ± 17
SecondaryTubular Reabsorption of Phosphate

Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate was calculated using blood phosphate and creatinine, as well as either 24 hour urine or spot urine samples.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · % Filtered Phosphate
Tubular Reabsorption of Phosphate
% Filtered PhosphateTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline67 ± 20
Week 282 ± 13
Week 479 ± 14
Week 684 ± 14
Week 878 ± 19
Week 1050 ± 36
Week 1245 ± 36
Week 1482 ± 15
Week 1681 ± 15
Week 1877 ± 13
Week 2075 ± 12
Week 2281 ± 11
Week 2474 ± 19
SecondaryTubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)

Tubular maximum reabsorption rate of phosphate to glomerular filtration rate (TmP/GFR) was calculated using blood phosphate and creatinine, as well as either 24 hour urine or spot urine samples.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks up to 24 weeks during the treatment phase, and every 4 weeks in the follow up phase, up to 37 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Tubular Maximum Reabsorption Rate of Phosphate to Glomerular Filtration Rate (TmP/GFR)
mg/dLTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline1.1 ± 0.5
Week 22.5 ± 1.2
Week 42.3 ± 1.3
Week 63.5 ± 2.2
Week 83.4 ± 2.3
Week 101.32 ± 0.9
Week 121.52 ± 1.86
Week 142.76 ± 1.61
Week 163.44 ± 2.47
Week 181.98 ± 0.34
Week 202.31 ± 1.25
Week 223.86 ± 2.99
Week 242.61 ± 1.87
SecondaryRadiographic Evidence of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia

In patients with radiographic evidence of TIO, 18FDG PET scans were performed

Time frame:
Baseline and at 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units
Radiographic Evidence of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia
UnitsTIO Subjects With Radiographic Evidence of TIO Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Baseline SUVmax Tumor7.9 ± 1.3
24 Week SUVmax tumor3.9 ± 1.3

Adverse events

Collected over Patients were monitored for adverse events during 24 weeks of treatment followed by 3 month follow-up period, with optional extension phase up to 37 weeks. If a patient was withdrawn from the study, adverse event data was no longer collected. Subjects who required permanent discontinuation of BGJ398 therapy due to an adverse event continued to be followed in the study until the toxicity had resolved or up to 30 days after study drug discontinuation.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
TIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)4/4 (100%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 40
Most frequent other events
EventTIO Subjects Who Received BGJ398 (Single Arm)
Blurred visionEye disorders4/4
Corneal inflamation/keratitisEye disorders4/4
Pain, nailsSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/4
Nail change/separationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/4
Dry eyeEye disorders3/4
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations3/4
Parathyroid hormone increasedInvestigations3/4
HyperphosphatemiaInvestigations3/4
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders3/4
Pain, musculoskeletalMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/4

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Single Arm (TIO Subjects)
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years4
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Single Arm (TIO Subjects)
Mean33.75 ± 7.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Single Arm (TIO Subjects)
Female2
Male2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Single Arm (TIO Subjects)
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino4
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Single Arm (TIO Subjects)
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White2
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Type of TIO Disease
Type of TIO Disease(Participants)Single Arm (TIO Subjects)
Localized2
Non-localized2
Metastatic0
Blood Intact FGF23 on Initiation of Study
Blood Intact FGF23 on Initiation of Study(pg/mL)Single Arm (TIO Subjects)
Mean1384 ± 1467
Blood C-Terminal FGF23 on Initiation of Study
Blood C-Terminal FGF23 on Initiation of Study(RU/mL)Single Arm (TIO Subjects)
Mean814 ± 911

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Results
Posted results revised
revised Nov 10, 2026
Eligibility
1 exclusion criterion edited
What changed in the criteria
Exclusion criteria
  • EditedCurrent evidence of corneal or retinal disorder/keratopathy including, but not limited to: bullous/band keratopathy, corneal abrasion, inflammation/ulceration, keratoconjuctivitiskeratoconjunctivitis, confirmed by ophthalmologic examination
Nov 10, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionHand Grip Strength Test: how it is measured was reworded
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Posted results revised
    Eligibility 1 exclusion criterion edited
    What changed in the criteria
    Exclusion criteria
    • EditedCurrent evidence of corneal or retinal disorder/keratopathy including, but not limited to: bullous/band keratopathy, corneal abrasion, inflammation/ulceration, keratoconjuctivitiskeratoconjunctivitis, confirmed by ophthalmologic examination
    Secondary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionHand Grip Strength Test: how it is measured was reworded
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03510455
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 27, 2018
Start date
Feb 27, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2020
Completion
May 4, 2020
Results posted
Apr 8, 2021
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Rachel I Gafni, M.D.
principal investigator · National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Infigratinib

Start the discussion