CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03498937TIMBERUpdated Mar 7, 2019

Effects of tDCS on Impulsiveness Among People Suffering From Borderline Personality Disorder

An interventional study of Active tDCS and Sham tDCS in Borderline Personality Disorder and Impulsive Behavior, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon. Status unknown at 3 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-07.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2018), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to evaluate the impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on impulsiveness of adults suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder. Short- and long-term effects are assessed by electroencephalography (EEG) records, experimental tasks and self-rated scales.

Read the detailed description

Impulsivity, considered as the tendency to express spontaneous, excessive and/or unplanned behavior, is recognized as a major factor involved in suicidal behavior and self-harm behaviors. It consists in one of the diagnostic criteria of Borderline Personality Disorder, allowing as well assessment of its clinical severity. There is so far no specific treatment concerning impulsivity. From a neurobiological perspective, the prefrontal cortex is considered as a critical region in the cognitive control of behaviors. Previous studies have associated an hypoactivation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and the dorsal part of the anterior cingulate cortex to Borderline Personality Disorder.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique of noninvasive brain stimulation which delivers a subthreshold electrical current to the scalp, manipulating the resting membrane potential. It has shown cognitive function improvement, both in healthy individuals and psychiatric populations. Modulation of the dlPFC could therefore represent a mean of reducing impulsivity in those patients.

With a prospective, sham-controlled, crossover, double-blind design, this study aims to evaluate the impact of bilateral tDCS over the dlPFC on the impulsive dimension of adults suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder. Subjects will be submitted to 10 tDCS stimulation sessions (active or sham) for five consecutive days (2 sessions of 30 minutes/day). Current intensity will be of 2 mA, through 25 cm² surface electrodes, placed over the dlPFC (anode position over F4 and cathode over F3, according to the EEG 10-20 international system). Subjects who undergo active stimulation sessions will be then submitted to sham sessions and vice-versa. Baseline measures will be compared to those obtained immediately after the end of sessions (5 days: short-term effects), and to 12 and 30 days later (long-term effects). Active and sham stimulation sessions outcomes will as well be compared.

02

Conditions studied

  • Borderline Personality Disorder
  • Impulsive Behavior

Keywords

  • Borderline Personality Disorder
  • Impulsive behavior
  • Suicidal behavior
  • Cognitive control
  • tDCS
  • Noninvasive brain stimulation
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Man or woman older than 18 years old
  • Right-handed
  • Signed Informed Consent form
  • Subject affiliated to or beneficiary from a French social security regime
  • Inpatient or outpatient at the Adult Psychiatry Service
  • Diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder according to the 5th edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria and confirmation by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID-II)
  • Absence of addictive comorbidities (except: tobacco, tea, coffee)
  • Absence of severe progressive neurologic and/or somatic pathologies (specially tumors, degenerative diseases)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 18 years old
  • Left-handed
  • Subject under measure of protection or guardianship of justice
  • Presence of psychiatric comorbidities (chronic psychosis, Bipolar Disorder)
  • Subject beneficiary from a legal protection regime
  • Subject unlikely to cooperate or low cooperation stated by investigator
  • Subject not covered by social security
  • Pregnant woman
  • Subject being in the exclusion period of another study or provided for by the "National Volunteer File"
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1

    Subjects suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder randomly assigned to start the trial by 10 active tDCS sessions, followed by 10 sham tDCS sessions

    Device: Active tDCS · Device: Sham tDCS

  • Experimental
    Group 2

    Subjects suffering from Borderline Personality Disorder randomly assigned to start the trial by 10 sham tDCS sessions, followed by 10 active tDCS sessions

    Device: Active tDCS · Device: Sham tDCS

Interventions

  • DeviceActive tDCS

    10 active tDCS sessions (2 sessions/day for 5 days, 30 min each, 2 mA) applied to the dlPFC

    Also known as: Starstim® (Neuroelectrics, Spain)

  • DeviceSham tDCS

    10 sham tDCS sessions (2 sessions/day for 5 days, 30 min each, 0 mA) applied to the dlPFC

    Also known as: Starstim® (Neuroelectrics, Spain)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. EPs during BART

    Amplitude variation of evoked potentials (EPs) detected by electroencephalography (EEG) during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), assessing risk-taking behavior. Variation will be obtained by comparing records before beginning of stimulation sessions with 5, 12 and 30 days after active and/or sham tDCS.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS

Secondary outcomes

  1. BIS-10 scores

    Compared scores from the French version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-10). The French version of the BIS-10 is a self-rated 34 item questionnaire, composed by three subscales: motor-impulsivity, cognitive-impulsivity and non-planning-impulsivity. Each item is scored on a 0 to 4 points scale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of impulsivity.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS

  2. HDRS scores

    Compared scores from the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). The HDRS is a clinician-rated 17 item scale which allows depression severity assessment and follow-up. Each item is scored on a 3 or 5 point scale. Scores are represented as follows: 0-7 Normal, 8-13 Mild Depression, 14-18 Moderate Depression, 19-22 Severe Depression, ≥23 Very Severe Depression.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS

  3. UPPS-P scores

    Compared scores from the Urgency, Premeditation (lack of), Perseverance (lack of), Sensation Seeking, Positive Urgency Impulsive Behavior Scale (UPPS-P). The French version of the UPPS-P is a self-rated 45 item scale, evaluating the following components: urgency, lack of premeditation, lack of perseverance and sensation seeking. Each item is scored on a base of 4 points. Higher scores indicate higher levels of impulsivity.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS

  4. MADRS scores

    Compared scores from the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The MADRS is clinician-rated 10 item scale, scored in a base of 6 points per item. Cutoff points are: 0-6 Asymptomatic, 7-19 Mild Depression, 20-34 Moderate Depression and \>34 Severe Depression.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS

  5. C-SSRS scores

    Compared scores from the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). The C-SSRS is a clinician-rated tool that evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. It is composed by 6 "yes/no" questions. High suicide risk is indicated when "yes" is answered to questions 4, 5 or 6.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS

  6. Go/No-Go task

    Compared results from the experimental Go/No-Go task, assessing response inhibition.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS

  7. Stroop task

    Compared results from the experimental Stroop task, assessing response inhibition.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 5, Day 12 and Day 30 post-tDCS

06

Study locations

3 sites
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Storebo OJ, Stoffers-Winterling JM, Vollm BA, Kongerslev MT, Mattivi JT, Jorgensen MS, Faltinsen E, Todorovac A, Sales CP, Callesen HE, Lieb K, Simonsen E. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2. PubMed 32368793 ↗
  • Teti Mayer J, Nicolier M, Gabriel D, Masse C, Giustiniani J, Compagne C, Vandel P, Pazart L, Haffen E, Bennabi D. Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in reducing impulsivity in borderline personality disorder (TIMBER): study protocol of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials. 2019 Jun 10;20(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3427-z. PubMed 31182143 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03498937
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
Start date
May 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 7, 2019

Study contacts

Djamila BENNABI, MD PhD
Contact
dbennabi@chu-besancon.fr
+33381219007
Magali NICOLIER, PhD
Contact
mnicolier@chu-besancon.fr
+33381219007
Djamila BENNABI, MD PhD
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion