ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03492216DIPTUpdated Jan 13, 2025Results posted

Drinkers' Intervention to Prevent Tuberculosis (DIPT Study)

An interventional study of Incentives for negative EtG test and Incentives for positive IsoScreen test in HIV/AIDS and Tuberculosis, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 2 sites in Uganda. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-13.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
680
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 77 studies in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome by University of California, San Francisco — 7 open to participants now, 14 under way, none of them phase 3. Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome · University of California, San Francisco.

Enrollment
8th of 68
680 · median 143
Started
2018
with 4 others
No phase
53 of 77
6 open now
Registered
42nd of 77
by date

Among the 77 studies in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome by University of California, San Francisco, this one is the 8th largest by enrollment of the 68 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2018, is one of 53 with no phase, and was the 42nd registered.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

3,037 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 307 are open to participants now.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 77 studies in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome by University of California, San Francisco are open now, in 4 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 7 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 198 Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies recruiting now, 118 (60%) set no upper age limit and 67 (34%) stop at 75 or younger; 43 take children under 18; 68 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 77 studies in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome by University of California, San Francisco, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

There is an urgent global need to decrease the high mortality of tuberculosis (TB) in persons with HIV as TB is the leading cause of death among persons with HIV worldwide. The DIPT (Drinkers' Intervention to Prevent TB) study is a randomized, 2x2 factorial trial among HIV/TB co-infected adults in Uganda with heavy alcohol use (n=680 persons, 340 each U01). The goal of the study is to determine whether economic incentive interventions can promote both reduced alcohol use and isoniazid (INH) pill taking among HIV/TB co-infected adult heavy drinkers, during isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT: a six-month course of INH) at HIV clinics in southwestern Uganda. Participants will be randomized to one of four arms: Arm 1: no incentives (control); Arm 2: economic incentives for decreasing alcohol use only; Arm 3: economic incentives for IPT adherence only; Arm 4: economic incentives for decreasing alcohol use and for IPT adherence (rewarded independently).

Read the detailed description

TB is the leading cause of death among persons with HIV worldwide, and HIV-infected drinkers are at very high risk for TB disease and mortality. Globally, an estimated 25% of persons with HIV are heavy drinkers, and the risk of TB disease is 3-fold higher among heavy drinkers compared to non-drinkers. Six months of isoniazid (INH) preventive therapy (IPT) reduces TB morbidity and mortality by 30-50% above the benefit of antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, INH can be toxic to the liver, and as a result in many high TB/HIV prevalence settings, such as east Africa, heavy drinkers are not offered IPT. Thus interventions to reduce alcohol use are needed to decrease INH toxicity during IPT among HIV/TB infected drinkers. It is also well established that heavy drinkers have poorer ART adherence, and there is growing evidence of reduced IPT adherence in drinkers. However, interventions to reduce drinking have had limited impact on ART adherence, and further interventions to increase IPT adherence among HIV/TB infected drinkers are likely needed.

The use of incentives to promote healthy behavior is a highly effective approach for reducing substance use and for improving adherence to HIV and TB regimens in resource-rich settings. Economic incentives to reduce alcohol use may create a window for safe and effective IPT use over six months by decreasing hepatotoxicity. Decreases in alcohol use may also improve IPT adherence, or additional incentives for IPT adherence may be needed. Such strategies to reduce alcohol use have not been studied in low-income countries and the effectiveness of incentives to optimize IPT in HIV/TB co-infected drinkers is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

Aim 1: Alcohol Reduction Intervention: Determine the effectiveness of economic incentives contingent on point-of-care (POC) urine ethyl glucuronide (EtG) \<300 ng/mL (Arms 2 \& 4) versus no alcohol incentives (Arms 1 \& 3) to reduce heavy drinking over 6 months, among HIV/TB co-infected adult drinkers receiving IPT. The investigators will randomize participants to low-cost escalating prize incentives for EtG negative urine tests at IPT refill visits (Arms 2+4), versus no incentives (Arms 1+3).

Aim 2: INH Adherence Intervention: Determine the effectiveness of economic incentives contingent on POC (IsoScreen) INH urine positive tests (Arms 3 \& 4) versus no INH incentives (Arms 1 \& 2) on INH adherence among HIV/TB co-infected adult drinkers. The investigators will randomize participants to low-cost escalating prize incentives for INH positive urine tests at IPT refill visits (Arms 3+4), versus no incentives (Arms 1+2).

Aim 3: Impact Assessment of Intervention: Assess the impact of economic incentives on HIV virologic suppression and explore their mechanisms of action, six months after trial completion. The investigators will follow all study participants for six months after trial completion.

  1. Assess the impact of the 3 separate incentive interventions (Arms 2, 3, 4) vs. no incentives (Arm 1) on HIV virologic suppression.
  2. Explore the mechanisms that may drive the economic incentives to increase virologic suppression. Potential mediators will be reductions in alcohol use and level of IPT adherence.

This study will leverage new low-cost POC tests for alcohol use and INH pill-taking for the first study of incentive-based alcohol and adherence interventions in low-resource settings; these interventions may improve the safety and effectiveness of life-saving medications for heavy alcohol users in many settings.

03

Conditions studied

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • -infected adult (≥18 years) prescribed antiretroviral therapy (ART) for at least 6 months;
  • Current heavy alcohol use (AUDIT-C positive for prior 3 month drinking and positive EtG urine test);
  • Positive tuberculin skin test (TST) (≥5 mm induration);
  • and ALT \<2x the (ULN);
  • Fluent in Runyankole or English;
  • No history of active TB, TB treatment, or TB preventive therapy;
  • Lives within 2-hour travel time or 60 km of the study site.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prescribed nevirapine (NVP, an ART drug that is declining in usage due to high risk for hepatotoxicity);
  • Plans to move out of the catchment area within 6 months;
  • Prescribed anti-convulsion medications or history of recurring seizures;
  • or AST elevations (>2X );
  • Suspected or confirmed active TB as determined by symptom screening and followed by chest X-ray and sputum testing;
  • History of prior active TB treatment or prior IPT.
  • Pregnant at time of screening
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
680 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    All participants will receive brief alcohol and adherence counseling according to Uganda Ministry of Health guidelines.

  • Experimental
    Escalating incentives (EtG tests)

    Escalating incentives for EtG negative urine test (Intervention: Incentives for negative EtG test).

    Behavioral: Incentives for negative EtG test

  • Experimental
    Escalating incentives (IsoScreen tests)

    Escalating incentives for IsoScreen positive urine tests (Intervention: Incentives for positive IsoScreen test).

    Behavioral: Incentives for positive IsoScreen test

  • Experimental
    Escalating incentives (EtG + IsoScreen)

    Escalating incentives for EtG negative tests and for IsoScreen positive urine tests with the incentives rewarded separately (Interventions: Incentives for negative EtG test and Incentives for positive IsoScreen test).

    Behavioral: Incentives for negative EtG test · Behavioral: Incentives for positive IsoScreen test

Interventions

  • BehavioralIncentives for negative EtG test

    Economic incentives are given to the study participant contingent on point-of-care (POC) urine ethyl glucuronide (EtG) \<300 ng/mL with the amount of the incentive escalating with each subsequent negative EtG test.

  • BehavioralIncentives for positive IsoScreen test

    Economic incentives contingent on POC (IsoScreen) INH urine positive tests with the amount of the incentive escalating with each subsequent positive IsoScreen test.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With and Without Non-hazardous Drinking, as Determined by Self-report and the Biomarker Phosphatidylethanol, at 3- and 6-months.

    Non-hazardous drinking is a composite outcome, measured at both 3 and 6 months. An individual must meet criteria for non-hazardous drinking (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test - Consumption \[AUDIT-C\], prior 3 months, negative) and phosphatidylethanol (PEth) \<35 ng/mL) at both time-points (3- and 6-months) in order to achieve the outcome.

    Time frame: Both 3 months and 6 months (composite measure)

  2. Number of Participants With >90% Isoniazid (INH) Adherence During Prescribed Course of INH

    Isoniazid (INH) adherence percentage is defined as the number of days with \>0 pill bottle openings divided by the number of prescribed doses, times 100. Pill bottle openings are captured by the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) pill cap, with no more than 1 opening per day counted. The INH adherence outcome is INH adherence percentage, dichotomized as \>90% versus \<= 90%.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Hepatotoxicity Resulting in Isoniazid (INH) Discontinuation.

    Isoniazid (INH) treatment discontinuation due to a Grade 3+ hepatotoxicity at any time during the treatment period. Grade 3 hepatoxicity is defined by lab and/or clinical criteria as alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) elevation ≥5 (but \<10) times the upper limit of normal and/or symptoms consistent with hepatotoxicity; and Grade 4 as ALT or AST elevation ≥10 times the upper limit of normal or potentially life-threatening symptoms.

    Time frame: up to 9 months

  2. INH Concentration in Hair

    Secondary Outcome. INH concentration in hair captures INH adherence over a period of weeks to months. Hair samples collected at the 3- and 6-month study visits will be analyzed for INH concentration.

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months

  3. Number of Participants With and Without HIV Viral Suppression at 12 Months

    The percentage of study participants with HIV viral load suppression (defined as \<200 copies/ml) at 12 months post-enrollment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Number of Participants With Active Tuberculosis (TB).

    Secondary Outcome. Number of participants diagnosed with active TB, within the 12 months of study follow-up.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 13, 2025

Participant flow

Study recruitment occurred from April 2018 through July 2021. 5,508 persons were screened and 680 persons were enrolled and randomized.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)
Started169169170172
3 month visit158162166168
6 month visit154164162165
Completed149160153158
Not completed2091714
Withdrew: Death1040
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject5311
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up9278
Withdrew: Moved5335
Withdrew: Too ill0100
Withdrew: Incarcerated0020

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With and Without Non-hazardous Drinking, as Determined by Self-report and the Biomarker Phosphatidylethanol, at 3- and 6-months.

Non-hazardous drinking is a composite outcome, measured at both 3 and 6 months. An individual must meet criteria for non-hazardous drinking (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test - Consumption \[AUDIT-C\], prior 3 months, negative) and phosphatidylethanol (PEth) \<35 ng/mL) at both time-points (3- and 6-months) in order to achieve the outcome.

Time frame:
Both 3 months and 6 months (composite measure)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With and Without Non-hazardous Drinking, as Determined by Self-report and the Biomarker Phosphatidylethanol, at 3- and 6-months.
ParticipantsAlcohol IncentivesNo Alcohol Incentives
Non-hazardous alcohol use at 3 and 6 months = yes5731
Non-hazardous alcohol use at 3 and 6 months = no266282
Statistical analysis
  • Alcohol Incentives vs No Alcohol Incentives · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0025 · Risk difference (rd): 7.6 · 95% CI 2.7 to 12.5adjusted risk difference for non-hazardous alcohol use, alcohol incentive groups compared to no alcohol incentive groups. logistic regression model adjusted for INH incentive arm, participant sex, and study site.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With >90% Isoniazid (INH) Adherence During Prescribed Course of INH

Isoniazid (INH) adherence percentage is defined as the number of days with \>0 pill bottle openings divided by the number of prescribed doses, times 100. Pill bottle openings are captured by the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) pill cap, with no more than 1 opening per day counted. The INH adherence outcome is INH adherence percentage, dichotomized as \>90% versus \<= 90%.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With >90% Isoniazid (INH) Adherence During Prescribed Course of INH
ParticipantsIsoniazid (INH) Adherence IncentivesNo Incentives for Isoniazid (INH) Adherence
>90% INH adherence244234
<=90% INH adherence9187
Statistical analysis
  • Isoniazid (INH) Adherence Incentives vs No Incentives for Isoniazid (INH) Adherence · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.9435 · Risk difference (rd): -0.2 · 95% CI -7.0 to 6.5adjusted risk difference for \>90% INH adherence, INH incentive group compared to no INH incentives. logistic regression model adjusted for alcohol incentive arm, participant sex and study site.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Hepatotoxicity Resulting in Isoniazid (INH) Discontinuation.

Isoniazid (INH) treatment discontinuation due to a Grade 3+ hepatotoxicity at any time during the treatment period. Grade 3 hepatoxicity is defined by lab and/or clinical criteria as alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) elevation ≥5 (but \<10) times the upper limit of normal and/or symptoms consistent with hepatotoxicity; and Grade 4 as ALT or AST elevation ≥10 times the upper limit of normal or potentially life-threatening symptoms.

Time frame:
up to 9 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Hepatotoxicity Resulting in Isoniazid (INH) Discontinuation.
ParticipantsControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)
Number of Participants With Hepatotoxicity Resulting in Isoniazid (INH) Discontinuation.1310159
SecondaryINH Concentration in Hair

Secondary Outcome. INH concentration in hair captures INH adherence over a period of weeks to months. Hair samples collected at the 3- and 6-month study visits will be analyzed for INH concentration.

Time frame:
3 and 6 months
Reported as:
Median · pmol INH + AcINH / mg hair
INH Concentration in Hair
pmol INH + AcINH / mg hairControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)
at 3 months——49.4 (26.8 to 81.3)49.1 (28.0 to 81.1)
at 6 months——49.3 (27.4 to 78.8)57.1 (31.9 to 84.0)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With and Without HIV Viral Suppression at 12 Months

The percentage of study participants with HIV viral load suppression (defined as \<200 copies/ml) at 12 months post-enrollment.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With and Without HIV Viral Suppression at 12 Months
ParticipantsControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)
HIV viral suppression = yes144147146146
HIV viral suppression = no4832
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.26 · Risk difference (rd): -2.5 · 95% CI -6.8 to 1.9adjusted risk different for HIV viral suppression at 12 months, Arm 2 (escalating incentives; EtG tests) compared to Arm 1 (control); logistic regression model adjusted for randomization arm, participant sex, and study site.
  • Control vs Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.70 · Risk difference (rd): 0.7 · 95% CI -2.8 to 4.1adjusted risk different for HIV viral suppression at 12 months, Arm 3 (escalating incentives; IsoScreen tests) compared to Arm 1 (control); logistic regression model adjusted for randomization arm, participant sex, and study site.
  • Control vs Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.42 · Risk difference (rd): 1.3 · 95% CI -1.9 to 4.5adjusted risk different for HIV viral suppression at 12 months, Arm 4 (escalating incentives; EtG and IsoScreen tests) compared to Arm 1 (control); logistic regression model adjusted for randomization arm, participant sex, and study site.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Active Tuberculosis (TB).

Secondary Outcome. Number of participants diagnosed with active TB, within the 12 months of study follow-up.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Active Tuberculosis (TB).
ParticipantsControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)
Number of Participants With Active Tuberculosis (TB).0121

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected over the course of the study follow-up (1 year).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control1/169 (0.6%)5/169 (3%)64/169 (37.9%)
Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)0/169 (0%)5/169 (3%)50/169 (29.6%)
Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)4/170 (2.4%)8/170 (4.7%)55/170 (32.4%)
Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)0/172 (0%)4/172 (2.3%)39/172 (22.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)
Elevated ALT or ASTHepatobiliary disorders3/1692/1693/1703/172
Physical assault; hospitalizationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1692/1690/1700/172
Intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders1/1690/1690/1700/172
Alcohol withdrawalNervous system disorders0/1691/1690/1700/172
DeathNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1690/1690/1700/172
Road traffic accident; hospitalizationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1690/1691/1700/172
BronchopneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1690/1691/1700/172
DeathGeneral disorders0/1690/1691/1700/172
DeathInfections and infestations0/1690/1691/1700/172
DeathInfections and infestations0/1690/1691/1700/172
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)
Grade 2: elevated AST or ALTHepatobiliary disorders52/16942/16940/17031/172
Grade 3: elevated AST or ALTHepatobiliary disorders12/1697/16914/1709/172
Peripheral neuropathyNervous system disorders0/1690/1692/1700/172
Myalgia of thighsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1690/1690/1700/172
Epigastric painGastrointestinal disorders1/1690/1690/1700/172
Active TBInfections and infestations0/1691/1690/1700/172
HypertensionCardiac disorders0/1691/1691/1700/172
Blurry visionEye disorders0/1691/1690/1700/172
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1690/1690/1700/172
Elevated creatinineRenal and urinary disorders1/1690/1690/1700/172

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)Total
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years167164167169667
>=65 years253313
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)Total
Median40 (33 to 46)38 (32 to 46)40 (32 to 48)39 (31 to 46)39 (32 to 47)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)Total
Female51535353210
Male118116117119470
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)ControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)Total
Count of participants————0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ControlEscalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] Tests)Escalating Incentives (IsoScreen Tests)Escalating Incentives (Ethyl Glucuronide [EtG] + IsoScreen)Total
Uganda169169170172680
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Infectious Disease Research Collaboration (IDRC)
    Mbarara, Uganda
  • Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH): Immune Suppression Syndrome HIV
    Mbarara, Uganda
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lodi S, Emenyonu NI, Marson K, Kwarisiima D, Fatch R, McDonell MG, Cheng DM, Thirumurthy H, Gandhi M, Camlin CS, Muyindike WR, Hahn JA, Chamie G. The Drinkers' Intervention to Prevent Tuberculosis (DIPT) trial among heavy drinkers living with HIV in Uganda: study protocol of a 2x2 factorial trial. Trials. 2021 May 20;22(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05304-7. PubMed 34016158 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Feb 2022, 45 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2025, 2 years 11 months after primary completion.

Of 642 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 45. This study's 45 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 648 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 20, 2018
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
StartActual
Apr 16, 2018
Primary completionActual
Feb 1, 2022
CompletionActual
Aug 2, 2022
Results first posted
Jan 13, 2025
Last update
Jan 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03492216
Collaborators
Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Uganda, Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
Start date
Apr 16, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2022
Completion
Aug 2, 2022
Results posted
Jan 13, 2025
Last update
Jan 13, 2025

Study contacts

Judith A Hahn, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco
Gabriel Chamie, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion