ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07936799DISPATCHUpdated Nov 13, 2026

DISPATCH: Decreasing Intervention Using sFlt-1/PlGF Applied to Chronic Hypertension

An interventional study of sFlt/PlGF lab assay with change in clinical care and sFlt/PlGF without change in clinical care in Preeclampsia, Chronic Hypertension Complicating Pregnancy and Pregnancy, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-13.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Updated Nov 13, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 229 studies in Pre-Eclampsia with a site in United States — 61 open to participants now, 77 under way, 6 of them phase 3. Pre-Eclampsia · United States.

Planned enrollment
85th of 160
74 · median 88
Started
2027
with 2 others
No phase
72 of 229
18 open now
Primary completion
2027-07
later than 41 of 76 live
Registered
229th of 229
by date

Among the 229 studies in Pre-Eclampsia with a site in United States, this one is the 85th largest by planned enrollment of the 160 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2027, is one of 72 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 41 of the 76 other live ones, and was the 229th registered.

Pre-Eclampsia

916 studies on the registry are indexed under Pre-Eclampsia; 243 are open to participants now.

Browse Pre-Eclampsia studies →

Open to participants now

61 of the 229 studies in Pre-Eclampsia with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

56 more — sign in →

All 61 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 162 Pre-Eclampsia studies recruiting now, 81 (50%) set no upper age limit and 80 (49%) stop at 75 or younger; 18 take children under 18; 60 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 229 studies in Pre-Eclampsia with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This pilot study tests the feasibility of conducting an interventional study in pregnant people with chronic hypertension with interventional clinical management based on sFlt-1/PlGF. It will also collect data on time to delivery, the incidence of preterm delivery, and other maternal or neonatal complications, for a pivotal trial.

Read the detailed description

Participants with chronic hypertension between 23+0 and 34+6 weeks presenting to triage for rule out superimposed preeclampsia. They will be randomly assigned to two groups at a 1:1 ratio, conceal or reveal, and will be tested with the sFlt-1/PlGF assay. In the conceal group, participants will have their blood tested but the results will not be returned to the participants or their clinical providers, and thus the participants will continue to receive routine clinical care in pregnancy. In the reveal group, the clinical team will be notified of the assay results (PlGF and sFlt-1 concentrations and ratio) and result status (normal \<40 or abnormal using the cut-off ≥40) and will be encouraged to discharge patients with a normal result. The ultimate decision to admit or discharge will still be based on the decision making of the clinical team; if a patient with a normal result is admitted and/or delivered, the clinical team will be asked to record the reason(s) behind the decision(s). Repeat PlGF and sFlt-1 concentration and ratio testing will occur for participants who re-present to triage ≥7 days from the prior test, and on a weekly basis for participants who are admitted. For participants in the reveal group who have had an abnormal result, additional concentration and ratio testing will be performed but results will not be reported to the clinical team.

03

Conditions studied

  • Preeclampsia
  • Chronic Hypertension Complicating Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • sflt/plgf
  • preeclampsia
  • pregnancy
  • chronic hypertension
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 and older
  • Singleton living pregnancy
  • Gestational age between 23+0 and 34+6 weeks gestation, confirmed by a fetal crown-rump length measurement in a first trimester ultrasound or by in vitro fertilization dates
  • Chronic hypertension, defined as:

    • At least 2 blood pressure measurements 140 systolic or 90 diastolic 4 hours apart diagnosed at less than 20 weeks 0 days of gestation and within 12 months of conception.
    • History or current use of anti-hypertensive medications for the indication of lowering blood pressure within 12 months prior to conception or prior to 20 weeks 0 days in the current pregnancy. Use during a prior pregnancy and through 12 weeks postpartum, or use for stage 1 chronic hypertension are not exclusions.
  • Evaluated in triage for worsening chronic hypertension, rule out preeclampsia due to:

    • Worsening blood pressures from baseline and/or development of severe range blood pressures
    • Preeclampsia associated symptoms: headache, vision changes, abdominal pain
    • New onset proteinuria or worsening proteinuria
    • Lab abnormalities suspicious for preeclampsia including anemia, signs of hemolysis, thrombocytopenia, increasing serum creatinine, elevated liver function tests
    • Any other concerning features of preeclampsia according to the evaluating clinician

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low syndrome (HELLP syndrome), pulmonary edema, eclamptic seizure, stroke, myocardial infarction, placental abruption, or heart failure.
  • Absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery Doppler
  • Unable to consent
  • Major birth defect or chromosomal abnormality that may necessitate preterm birth for other reasons
  • Other pregnancy complication that may necessitate preterm birth (e.g., PPROM)
  • IV Heparin use within 24 hours of the lab draw
  • Exogenous PlGF-2 or PlGF-3 given for therapeutic use at a concentration higher than 100 pg/mL
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
74 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Conceal arm

    The clinical team will be blinded to assay results and will manage as per their usual clinical protocol.

    Diagnostic Test: sFlt/PlGF without change in clinical care

  • Experimental
    Reveal arm

    The clinical team will receive qualitative assay results normal (sFlt-1/PlGF \<40) or abnormal (sFlt-1/PlGF ³40)) and the ratio value and concentrations of PlGF and sFlt-1.

    Diagnostic Test: sFlt/PlGF lab assay with change in clinical care

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testsFlt/PlGF lab assay with change in clinical care

    Diagnostic testing with sFlt/PlGF assay at each obstetric emergency room or admission in which the participant is being evaluated for preeclampsia. Testing will occur at each evaluation or if the participant is admitted to the hospital, weekly. Reveal arm: the clinical team will receive qualitative assay results normal (sFlt-1/PlGF \<40) or abnormal (sFlt-1/PlGF \>=40). * If normal, the clinical team will be encouraged to manage the patient expectantly, with discharge home and routine outpatient surveillance or if the patient is admitted, to continue expectant management without delivery. If a patient with a normal result is admitted and/or delivered, the clinical team will be asked to record the reason(s) behind the decision(s). * If abnormal, the clinical team should consider superimposed preeclampsia and will manage per their usual clinical protocol. If a patient with an abnormal result is discharged, the clinical team will be asked to record the reason(s) behind the decision(s).

  • Diagnostic testsFlt/PlGF without change in clinical care

    Diagnostic testing with sFlt/PlGF assay at each obstetric emergency room or admission in which the participant is being evaluated for preeclampsia. Testing will occur at each evaluation or if the participant is admitted to the hospital, weekly. Conceal arm: The clinical team will be blinded to assay results and will manage chronic hypertension as per their usual clinical protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment rate

    Number of participants enrolled per week

    Time frame: At month 6

  2. Protocol adherence in the reveal arm

    What proportion of participants in the reveal arm adhered to the clinical algorithm of management based on the assay result.

    Time frame: At month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time until delivery using a time-to-event analysis

    Assessing weeks from the initial enrollment in the trial to delivery

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of delivery

  2. Delivery with superimposed preeclampsia with severe features.

    The endpoint will be analyzed for different follow-up times including \<35 weeks of gestation. Analysis will take into account the potentially diverging directions of the effect in the patient strata of ratio results (levels: "abnormal", "normal"; cut-off 40; assuming reduction of deliveries in the "normal" stratum and increase in the "abnormal" stratum due to improved risk stratification by the ratio), e.g. by using (a) regression modelling with interaction term study arm x ratio result, or (b) stratification of the analysis by ratio result.

    Time frame: At the date of delivery

  3. Rate of preterm birth at <35 weeks

    Time frame: At month 6

  4. Rate of preterm birth at <37 weeks

    Time frame: At month 6

  5. Maternal admission rate

    1\) defined as the number of participants admitted at least once in the antepartum period divided by the total number of participants in that arm of the trial and 2) defined as the number of participants admitted at least once in the postpartum period divided by the total number of participants in that arm of the trial

    Time frame: At month 6

  6. Maternal admission days

    Defined 1) randomization to delivery and 2) in the postpartum period up to 6 weeks

    Time frame: Date of randomization to 6 weeks postpartum

  7. Maternal admission to the ICU

    1\) in pregnancy or 2) within 6 weeks postpartum

    Time frame: Date of randomization to 6 weeks postpartum

  8. Severe maternal morbidity (with and without transfusion)

    Severe maternal morbidity (without transfusion) is defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following during pregnancy, delivery, or in the first 6 weeks postpartum: acute myocardial infarction, aneurysm, acute renal failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, amniotic fluid embolism, cardiac arrest or conversion of cardiac rhythm, disseminated intravascular coagulation, eclampsia, hemorrhagic or embolic stroke, pulmonary edema, severe anesthesia complication, sepsis, shock, sickle cell disease with crisis, air and thrombotic embolism, hysterectomy, temporary tracheostomy, mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: Date of randomization to 6 weeks postpartum

  9. Gestational age at delivery

    Time frame: Date of delivery

  10. Birthweight

    Time frame: Date of delivery

  11. Birthweight percentile

    Time frame: Date of delivery

  12. Mode of delivery

    Time frame: Date of delivery

  13. Neonatal admission to the NICU

    Time frame: Date of delivery

  14. Days of neonatal admission to the NICU

    Time frame: Date of delivery to 6 weeks postpartum

  15. Neonatal composite morbidity

    * Neonatal major morbidity as measured in pregnancy and up to 6 weeks postpartum is defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following: death (fetal or neonatal death through 28 days postpartum), hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, necrotizing enterocolitis, persistent pulmonary hypertension, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, mechanical ventilation, seizure, sepsis, birth trauma (fracture, brachial plexus injury, facial palsy) * Neonatal minor morbidity as measured in pregnancy and up to 6 weeks postpartum is defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following: respiratory distress syndrome, hypoglycemia, meconium aspiration syndrome, and neonatal jaundice requiring phototherapy

    Time frame: Date of delivery to 6 weeks postpartum

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Jul 2027, 6 months later.

Of 171 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pre-Eclampsia, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 176 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 4, 2026
First posted
Nov 13, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
Last update
Nov 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 13, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07936799
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 13, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 13, 2026

Study contacts

Ophelia Yin, MD
Contact
ophelia.yin@ucsf.edu
(415) 894-9416‬
Alison Wenz
Contact
Alison.Wenz@ucsf.edu
415-502-3344
Juan M Gonzalez Velez, MD PhD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion