An interventional study of natural orifice in Surgical Incision, sponsored by Inonu University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-14.
Sponsored by Inonu University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Among 15 studies in Surgical Wound with a site in Turkey — 4 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Surgical Wound · Turkey.
Among the 15 studies in Surgical Wound with a site in Turkey, this one is the 9th largest by enrollment of the 13 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2013, is one of 13 with no phase, and was the 3rd registered.
315 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound; 57 are open to participants now.
Browse Surgical Wound studies →4 of the 15 studies in Surgical Wound with a site in Turkey are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital · Sites in Turkey
Ages 17–60 · Women only
Ardahan University · Sites in Turkey
Ages 18–65 · Healthy volunteers
Erzurum Technical University · Sites in Turkey
Ages 18–75 · Healthy volunteers
Acibadem University · Sites in Turkey
Ages 18+ · Healthy volunteers
A study can be open while its sites in Turkey have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Turkey →
Of the 33 Surgical Wound studies recruiting now, 19 (58%) set no upper age limit and 10 (30%) stop at 75 or younger; 6 take children under 18; 7 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
15 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2007; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2013.
This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 66 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound.
Median enrollment 80 across the 13 interventional studies, 71 across the 2 observational. Of the 10 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
None of the 15 has an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Inonu University is the lead sponsor of 396 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.
Inonu University has 2 studies filed under Surgical Wound — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
1 of the studies in Surgical Wound with a site in Turkey that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07725068Acibadem UniversityEffect of a Risk-Based Perioperative Pressure Injury Prevention Bundle in Elective Surgery Patients | 2026-12-12 |
Add it to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 15 studies in Surgical Wound with a site in Turkey, from their registry updates:
Nothing recorded among them since 2026-09-25.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) is an accepted surgical procedure for several right sided colonic pathologies. Recently the advantages of the intracorporeal ileotransversostomy over the extracorporeal anastomosis is appearing in the literature. Additionally, specimen extraction through the natural orifices is an emerging method when combined with the totally laparoscopic procedures. Our observations on natural orifice surgery was promising . In our daily surgical practice, investigators prefer the intracorporeal anastomosis and this study was conducted to compare the specimen extraction sites after LRH. Here investigators aimed to compare the results of conventional and natural orifice specimen extractions (NOSE) after totally LRHs.
compare the patient-selected NOSE method and conventional method in laparoscopic right colon cancer surgery
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and removed the specimen from the natural orifice will be gathered. demographic data and perioperative results will be compiled
Procedure: natural orifice
patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and removed specimen with conventional will be gathered. demographic data and perioperative results will be compiled. (conventional extraction is suprapubic or median incision)
laparoscopic right colon surgery and patients who are removed from the natural orifice and conventional will gather
Also known as: conventional
VAS control
Visual Analog Score for pain (1-10 score)
Time frame: 6 years
Ran from Jan 2013 to primary completion in Mar 2019, 74 months.
Of 99 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Surgical Wound, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 53. This study's 74 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 126 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 42.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.