ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07327125BISGOUpdated Apr 14, 2026

Effect of Skin Closure Techniques on Body Image in Women Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery

An interventional study of Continuous Subcuticular Suture and Interrupted Skin Closure in Gynecologic Cancers, Surgical Wound Closure Techniques and Body Image, sponsored by Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 17 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.

Sponsored by Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
17 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical trial investigates the impact of two different skin closure techniques on body image and mood in women undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancers.

Patients undergoing elective surgery with a midline abdominal incision will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1. Interrupted Closure Group: The surgical incision is closed using either metal clips (staples) or separate mattress sutures (individual stitches). 2. Subcuticular Sutures Group: The surgical incision is closed using continuous stitches placed under the skin surface (aesthetic stitching).

The main goal of the study is to determine whether the method of wound closure affects a patient's perception of their body image, cosmetic satisfaction, and levels of anxiety or depression.

Additionally, the study aims to prove that the subcuticular suture technique is safe and does not increase the risk of wound complications (such as infection or wound separation) compared to the other method.

Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires before surgery, and again at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery to track changes in their feelings and satisfaction with the scar.

Read the detailed description

Midline abdominal incisions are common in gynecologic oncology, yet the optimal skin closure technique to minimize scar-related psychological distress remains unclear. While staples offer speed, subcuticular sutures may provide superior cosmetic results. This study aims to fill the gap in the literature regarding the specific impact of these closure methods on body image and patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic cancer patients, beyond standard wound complication rates.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gynecologic Cancers
  • Surgical Wound Closure Techniques
  • Body Image

Keywords

  • surgical staples
  • Subcuticular Sutures
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Skin Closure Techniques
  • Body Image
  • Surgical Wound
  • Laparotomy
  • Cicatrix
  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Midline Incision
  • Wound Dehiscence
  • Wound Complications
  • Surgical Site Infection
03

In context

Surgical Wound

315 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 66 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound.

Browse Surgical Wound studies →

Lead sponsor

Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital is the lead sponsor of 109 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants aged 18 years or older.
  • Patients scheduled for elective open gynecologic surgery for suspected or confirmed gynecologic .
  • Surgery planned to be performed via a vertical midline laparotomy incision.
  • Literate patients capable of reading, understanding, and completing the Body Image Scale (BIS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
  • Patients who provide written to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of prior radiotherapy to the abdominal or pelvic region.
  • Patients currently receiving chronic therapy.
  • (BMI) less than 18 kg/m\^2 or greater than 40 kg/m\^2.
  • Presence of cognitive impairment, dementia, or Alzheimer's disease.
  • Major psychiatric disorders that prevent the patient from understanding or completing the questionnaires.
  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Subcuticular Suture Group

    Patients in this group will undergo skin closure using a continuous subcuticular suture technique with absorbable suture material.

    Procedure: Continuous Subcuticular Suture

  • Active comparator
    Interrupted Closure Group

    Patients in this group will undergo skin closure using interrupted techniques. The incision will be closed with either surgical staples (metal clips) or interrupted mattress sutures, depending on the standard practice.

    Procedure: Interrupted Skin Closure

Interventions

  • ProcedureContinuous Subcuticular Suture

    Surgical skin closure performed using a continuous technique with absorbable suture material.

  • ProcedureInterrupted Skin Closure

    Surgical skin closure performed using interrupted techniques, specifically metal staples or interrupted mattress sutures.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Body Image Scale (BIS) Score

    The Body Image Scale (BIS) is a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess body image changes in cancer patients. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The total score ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate higher levels of body image distress and dissatisfaction.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-operative), Post-operative Month 1, Post-operative Month 3 and Post-operative Month 6.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Wound Complications

    Evaluation of surgical site complications including superficial or deep surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence (separation of wound edges), seroma, and hematoma. Diagnosis is based on clinical examination and standard CDC criteria.

    Time frame: Post-operative Month 1, Month 3 and Month 6

  2. Change from Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score

    The HADS is a 14-item self-report screening scale. It consists of two subscales: Anxiety (HADS-A, 7 items) and Depression (HADS-D, 7 items). Each item is scored from 0 to 3. The maximum score for each subscale is 21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety or depression (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-operative), Post-operative Month 1, Month 3 and Month 6.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the article (text, tables, and figures) will be shared. This includes the data on body image scores, anxiety/depression scores, and wound complications. Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 5 years following article publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to the Principal Investigator. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Beginning 6 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

Access criteria: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal approved by an independent review committee or the Principal Investigator. Data will be shared for the purpose of achieving the aims in the approved proposal.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07327125
Responsible party
Mahmut Yassa (Principal Investigator - Gynecologic Oncology Specialist, Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 8, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 14, 2026

Study contacts

mahmut yassa, MD
Contact
mahmut_yassa@hotmail.com
+90 539 663 54 84
Bora Taşpınar, MD
principal investigator · Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion